Cover Image: Rise of Knight and Sword

Rise of Knight and Sword

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

I am sorry but because the book did not grab me as other books usually do, I did not finish it.
What a shame. The cover was great!

Was this review helpful?

I absolutely loved this unique spin on King Arthur. Based on the characters’ names I kind of knew what would happen but the author changed up the scenes enough that I was still fully entrenched in the story.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to the publishers, author and NetGalley for the free copy of this book!

This seemed like it would be the perfect book for me but honestly I was rather disappointed. I couldn't connect with the characters and it was at times confusing. I feel like this might be better for a younger audience, and I'm sure it could be a hit for many- just not me.

Was this review helpful?

This books should be perfect for me according to the blurb. Unfortunately I found it a bit too confusing and it didn't keep my attention.
Not my cup of tea.
Many thanks to the publisher and Netgalley for this ARC, all opinions are mine

Was this review helpful?

I am a fan of all things Arthur/Merlin/Lady of the Lake generally. This book had a different take which included both dinosaurs and inter-planetary travel. Some of the story was a little disjointed, some characters who seemed interesting never got developed. The reason for Mordred's betrayal was never made clear. The love story between Arthur and Guinevere was juvenile at times. Could have been a great read but needs some changes.

Was this review helpful?

Rise of Knight and Sword (One Sword Saga) by Miriam Wade is a retelling the mythos of the Arthurian legend in a new, steampunk setting. The thing that attracted me the most was dinosaurs. But that was not the main part of this story. The blurb is very promising but that does not reflect in the story. It was beating around the bush but nothing was moving ahead. The characters were not fully developed and felt very felt. The relationships between the characters wasn't even clear and not sure in which direction was it moving ahead.
________

Thank you to NetGalley for giving me an arc in exchange for an honest review!

Was this review helpful?

#riseofknightandsword #netgalley

I had a hard time getting into this book and had to stop reading. I can't give a fair review, because I simply couldn't keep reading it.

Was this review helpful?

I lost interest in reading this story. Sorry. I'm sure it's a great book but I currently won't be reading it. Sorry sorry sorry.

Was this review helpful?

I received this and as an eARC to read for free in exchange for my honest review. Thank you to GenZ Publishing and NetGalley for giving me access.

Let me open up with saying that this just wasn't for me.

Dinosaurs? Yes Please!
Steampunk? Check!
Guinevere and anything based off Excalibur? GIVE ME!

Put it all together and it just becomes a hot mess.

I had high hopes for this one because it checked several boxes for me. Alas, no. I was confused and left wanting more world/character building. For being a debut novel, the premise was great, the execution was just a bit lacking for me.

Was this review helpful?

I have a problem and the problem is totally me and me alone. I did not like the third person omniscient POV, with practically every sentence starting with Guinevere it was just to much and I can't take it. I will not be sharing this review anywhere else as I fell it is me having the problem and others may really like the story.

Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for an ARC of this book in return for an honest review. All spelling and grammar errors are totally my own.

Was this review helpful?

My ratings: 2.5/5 stars (rounded to three)

NOTE: This is a review written against an uncorrected ARC provided. All thoughts are my own.

'Rise of Knight and Sword" is the debut novel of Miriam Wade touted as 'a steampunk re-imagination of the legend of King Arthur'. The blurb promised a good adventure and the book only lived up to it somewhat. Too much time was spent in the first few pages detailing on the mundane aspects of the lead's life. The initial meet of the bounty hunters and Guinivere spiced things and the book seemed to spark an interest in me. Sadly, as the story progressed, the pace seemed too slow. The pace of the book was extremely skewed, with too much happening in the last few pages. The ending and all the events immediately leading to it seemed way too rushed. The novel left a few issues unanswered and there were some inconsistencies as well. I spotted quite a few typos; I hope this was resolved before publication. I'm not someone too familiar with the actual myth but this did make me want to learn more about it.
Despite all this, this did offer an okay read, with the leads slowly growing on me. The author did a fair job of fleshing out the leads too an extent and I liked that. I really hope these issues are made note of and implemented when writing the next book in this saga.

Many thanks to NetGalley, GenZ Publishing and the author Miriam Wade for providing an ARC in exchange for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?

"Avalon, city of kings. Sky towers and airships dominate its skyline, dinosaurs roam freely throughout its parklands, and bounty hunters lurk in its shadows.

Guinevere has always lived on the outskirts of Avalon, working as an archivist in the central library. While corruption runs rampant throughout the city, her life is fairly mundane and predictable. That is, until she discovers the map to Excalibur and uncovers a plot to usurp the throne.

Finding herself on the run from these would-be king-slayers, Guinevere sets out to find the mythical sword. But with no one to trust and no where to hide, she must form an uneasy alliance with a pair of notorious bounty hunters.

"My future, and the future of Avalon are forward."

Rise of Knight and Sword is the first installment of the One Sword Saga. It reimagines Arthurian legend in a steampunk fantasy world at the height of the 1920's. Follow Guinevere and crew as they face off against smugglers, wild dinosaurs, hidden motives, and mistrust."

This ticks all my boxes, 1920s, Camelot, Steampunk!

Was this review helpful?

I held off reviewing this novel due to the fact that I absolutely hate giving negative reviews. I really tried to like this book but it just wasn’t for me. My biggest issue was that I didn’t understand where the characters story was going up until the half way point and even then I was still lost. The pacing was off for me and that made it hard for me to connect with the characters.

Was this review helpful?

I was granted complimentary access to an eARC of Ride of Knight and Sword by the publisher via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.

I was so excited to be approved for this book because it sounded so promising. A librarian in Camelot who answers the call to adventure? Sign me up! Alas, I've been trying to finish this book for over a month, and I've decided to throw in the towel. The opening chapter is painfully slow as Guinevere goes about her morning routine in far too detailed mundanity. Then we get past that and start to see the world we're in. Camelot has been made into a modern world full of technology and real-world 21st-century luxuries and worries but we're going to go on a King Arthur rehash adventure and there just so happens to be inconsequential dinosaurs wandering around? Arthurian legend usually has dragons, I'll give you that, but dinosaurs with no purpose? They just exist in this modern fantasy world and nobody cares? Make Arthurian dragons based in prehistoric life, sure. Tell me a story about what Camelot has become in the many centuries since Arthur, sure. Rehash King Arthur but in modern times with modern tech, sure. All of the above at once? There's too much going on and we've somehow focused on the more boring details of it all.

I try to include positives in my reviews even with I chose not to finish, or slogged through but didn't like what I read, but I'm struggling with this one. I see from the current Goodreads average of 2.16 stars after 33 reviews that I'm not alone in this. I will say the cover design is spectacular and the reason I looked at this listing in the first place. I do think some of the concepts in this book are strong, and with a serious tear-down by a developmental editor, it could become something great. This author has good ideas but needs someone in the pre-publication process (the earlier the better) to be brutally honest about what isn't working.

Was this review helpful?

🍁This is a honest review. I received the book from NetGalley

🍁All my opinions are my own.

—————————————————————

🍁Synopsis: Avalon, city of kings. Sky towers and airships dominate its skyline, dinosaurs roam freely throughout its parklands, and bounty hunters lurk in its shadows.

Guinevere has always lived on the outskirts of Avalon, working as an archivist in the central library. While corruption runs rampant throughout the city, her life is fairly mundane and predictable. That is, until she discovers the map to Excalibur and uncovers a plot to usurp the throne.

Finding herself on the run from these would-be king-slayers, Guinevere sets out to find the mythical sword. But with no one to trust and no where to hide, she must form an uneasy alliance with a pair of notorious bounty hunters.

"My future, and the future of Avalon are forward."
—————————————————————

🍁Review: I give this book 1,5 stars.

🍁It sounded so good. A Arthurian retelling, set in a world where dinosaurs roamed the earth. But is a retelling, but that’s just it. The characters aren’t interesting. The dinosaurs are well not really in the story. And omg why is there so much drinking in this book. Every event that happens there’s alcohol poring through the pages. And if it makes sense for the story that’s oké, but it doesn’t. You will meet gwen, arthur, mordred, merlin and lancelot in the story. See some fighting and a some puppy love. But if your bored in a chapter and skipped a couple off pages you’re not really missing anything.

Was this review helpful?

This book I did not know going in that it was a debut novel but it was easy to tell once I started. And it was easy to tell because the book had a great premise but everything was so vague and there were certain things that were overly detailed. This book also did a lot more telling than showing. The world building was not great, we were told the few places that Guinevere goes to like the library but it didn’t get a great description, I couldn’t visualize myself there. And the period that this book is set in I have no idea when because people are using guns and then there are dinosaurs. Yes, dinosaurs, I wish more was done with them because I didn’t feel like they added anything. One of the big problems in the story was how it dealt with Guinevere’s assault, after it happens both Arthur and Mordred acted like she wanted it and then a little while later they have no memory of it. And not only that but there was a moment where Arthur had to be pulled away from Guinevere because she and others thought that he was going to physically assault her. And the messed up thing is that Guinevere takes the blame and apologizes, and then they continue on together and moments earlier they were all lovey dovey. The characters felt very one dimensional and needed character development to make it so readers can connect with them. Because they follow the formula of all the cliches and stereotypes. And their dialogues did not sound right to me. Overall, I feel this book had a lot of potential but it needed a lot of editing.

Was this review helpful?

I really wanted to love this because the idea seems brilliant. A retelling of the classic King Arthur tale set in a medieval/steampunk/modern mixed era and focusing on Guinevere. So many elements there that I was so ready to love. So many ways it went wrong.
Wade has a tendency to get excited over her ingenuity in worldbuilding and taking forever to describe little details or elements that have no bearing on the story. They're cool details, but you get taken completely out of the story for an entire paragraph on a random world detail.
I might have gotten over that eventually as a tick of the writer, but the thing that made me give up on anything beyond just finishing it was how flat and uninspired a character Arthur is. He's the male version of the much-hated caricature female love interest: unexplored background, emotions only appear when related to the heroine, seemingly only there to give the heroine emotional actions. I get that we're focused on Guinevere, but a flat Arthur in an Excalibur tale is just wrong.
Overall, an excellent concept and some fun details but (I'm sorry, Wade) uninspired writing.

Thank you NetGalley and Zenith Publishing for the read.

Was this review helpful?

Guinevere, a librarian working at the Camelot city library, accidentally comes across an encoded map rumoured to lead to Excalibur and decides to take it upon herself to find this mythical sword and fix the corrupted land she calls home. Thus, she is forced to form new alliances, like a duo of wise-cracking bounty hunters, and learn to use her book-smarts for good.

Rise of Knight and Sword presented many cool concepts, like dinosaurs living alongside humans in this version of Camelot, and had the potential to create a page-turning adventurous story. Sadly, it was anything BUT page-turning. In fact, at times it was hard to even pick it up let alone read another chapter. The world-building was overwhelming and felt flat, I was genuinely confused over the plotline, some things felt next-level ridiculous. Characters, especially Guinevere, felt too... Random in their presentation? One second Guinevere is your average middle-class worker, next - every man Guinevere comes across drools over her and she is suddenly a badass bow-wielding schemer, not five minutes passes and she turns into a damsel in distress. I feel bad going hard on a debut novel, but it feels more like a Wattpad-esque story rather than published work. I believe Rise of Knight and Sword should have gone through a few more rounds of heavy edits. That truly makes me sad as this was the first book I requested from NetGalley and was approved for…

Was this review helpful?

Before I jump into the review, I'd like to thank NetGalley and GenZ publishing for giving me an EArc of this book in exchange for an honest review.

Rise of Knight and Sword came out to me as this fantasy/adventure that gave too many elements that didn't balance out well at the start of the novel. There were dinosaurs, a retelling of the Arthurian legend of Excalibur, and modernism-ish in a fantasy setting.

It would have a ton more potential for me if things were paced properly and given a tighter glance at all the things happening in this book. Some parts of the book were choppy, and the character development needed a ton more work. I found some of Guinevere's decisions between brash and impulsive. She sets on this journey to retrieve Excalibur, and later swears loyalty to a dude, she met along the whole adventure.

I honestly do think the story would've been amazing, if the writing was more engaging, and the characters are well-written out. There were so many blurred lines, that I just couldn't get hooked into it than I initially thought.

Was this review helpful?

I am a huge fan of the Arthurian legend so I was very excited to get an eARC of this book. Unfortunately this book did not live up to expectations. The author definitely has a great imagination and I did enjoy the plot with all its twists and non-stop action. However, the writing is just not good. Sentences are choppy. Descriptions are awkward and over the board. The characters are boring and barely sketched out. And what is up with all the whisky guzzling? I felt like I landed in the middle of a bad CW show. Anyway, 2 stars for the plot and the cover (I truly am in love with the cover - it is by far the best thing about this book). I do hope the novel goes through thorough editing before it is released.

Was this review helpful?