Fans of military history rejoice!  This is not another biography of Alexander the Great but a thorough analysis of the field campaigns of one of the greatest military commanders of all times through an examination of the tactics, strategies, topography, and ancient sources of these battles.  This is only about the set-piece military encounters, not the sieges or the make-up of the army which are covered in other volumes.  One does not need specialized knowledge to understand this work for it is readable but it will most appeal to those interested in detailed military history, probably not the casual reader.  Illustrations and maps supplement the text to help understanding as well.  I did occasionally forget what Greek term referred to what type and size of grouping of military men and there was no appendix of such terms to clarify the meaning, though to be fair some of the original sources seemed to be loose in the use of such terminology and English points these out when they are particularly problematic.  

 Of particular interest are English’s suggestions in the reconstructions of some battles where the ancient sources are unclear or conflicting.  Here English is able to distinguish himself from the usual interpretations.  He makes clear where he differs from many other historians and what he believes supports his conjectures and even at times he is able to reconcile the contradictory sources but there is not always proof or even suggestions of his ideas in the ancient sources.  His speculations seem to make sense but someone with a thorough knowledge of the sources may have good reason to dispute them.  

Also, English gives Alexander’s opponents more credit than many historians.  For example, Darius is often presented as being a coward and a poor military leader.  English argues Darius used sound battle plans, even using tactics that had not been used against Alexander before, and “adapting..to the tactical situation of the battlefield.” However, Alexander had a better strategy, more adaptability and a trap.  Alexander was simply more brilliant.  

English does not have a formal conclusion to the book.  He does not put in one place all the things he thought that made Alexander a genius military leader.  He does not reinforce his own conclusions.  The work seems to end abruptly.  

You do not need to be a scholar to read this book but it is clear that this was written by a scholar and geared for those with a military history interest.  Also, this is only one of three volumes and has a very specific focus.  All three would be needed to be read to get the whole picture of Alexander’s military leadership and the army.

Thanks to Netgalley and the publisher for a copy of the ARC in exchange for an honest review.

A fascinating and incredibly readable account of the incredible sweeping field campaigns of one of history's greatest generals and leaders, while I'm sure you know a lot about the man himself, this book goes into detail about his military campaigns and numerous triumphs which usually don't get as much attention.

While some information you will have definitely heard of before, there are some new insights and information found here that makes it a worthy read for any fan of military history, or anyone looking to dip their toes in the water. While the book does give great detail into tactics and strategies it does so in a way that is readable and understandable for even the newest fans of military history.