Me being stupid, I thought that this was a different book to what it was. However, I did still end up giving it a quick read because I study film at university, and it turned out to be quite interesting and I did end up using a couple of chapters as a reference in an essay!

Essays on the Essay Film, edited by Nora M. Alter and Timothy Corrigan, collects essays and other writings that cover the history and development, as well as the elusive definition, of essay films.

I found this collection to be an excellent overview of what an essay film is and is not without making any definition too boxed in. In much the same way a literary essay can vary greatly so too the filmic equivalent. I won't try to summarize every point but rather I will give you an idea of what, for me, this volume did for my understanding.

I knew there were a variety of styles for documentaries to take and I lumped almost every nonfiction film into that catchall category. Yet I knew when viewing that some were quite different in the effect as well as the style. Some, probably most, present evidence of some type and make connections so that the viewer will, hopefully, come away having gained insight and come to the same conclusions the filmmaker has. In other words, they make explicit some idea(s) and work similarly to a persuasive paper. Yet some seem to make only their general topic explicit while opening up a space where ideas are shared but not driven to a stated conclusion. They make the viewer think about the general topic and, if successful, whatever narrower part of that topic the filmmaker wants considered, yet serves as more of an awareness-raiser than a definitive argument. That isn't to say they aren't still made to guide the viewer to some extent, often a large extent, but they want to generate thought and discussion rather than simply agreement or disagreement. Documentaries of the first type may well create agreement or disagreement, perhaps even changing a viewer's mind, but at that point it is finished, it has done what it set out to do. The essay film may well lead to some sort of agreement or disagreement but it will be harder to pin down because the essay film does not usually argue an either/or case but rather opens a space which should continue after the film ends. In other words, the purpose is to generate thought and discussion rather than agreement or disagreement.

The previous paragraph is one of my takeaways from the book and should not be considered a restatement of any or all of the essays in the volume. I have taken what I read and taken my first steps toward understanding and digesting the information and the paragraph shows, I hope, the types of questions the book both answers and asks.

I would highly recommend this to students of film and for any people considering any visual media as an avenue for making any kind of statement. For the future filmmaker it will help you decide how you want to present your ideas and information. For the film viewer this book will help you to better understand why some documentaries are more definitive and some are more openly thought-provoking.

Reviewed from a copy made available by the publisher via NetGalley.