Skip to main content

Member Reviews

I didn’t realize this was part of a series but it was a good read as a stand alone. I may have enjoyed the characters more if I had read the first two or three books. I enjoy true crime books sometimes and voraciously read In Cold Blood many many years ago. The premise of the book was great but it seemed somewhat disjointed in the way it developed. The only characters I found myself liking were Carlo and Achilles. It kept my interest until the end but left me wishing for more depth. Many thanks to Becky Masterman, Minotaur Books, and NetGalley for providing me with an arc of this soon to be published book.

Was this review helpful?

I was a bit worried I wouldn't be able to follow since I hadn't read the previous ones; it didn't seem to matter at all actually. Quick and easy read, definitely entertaining and I really enjoyed it. Enough so I'll look for the previous ones!!

Was this review helpful?

I like the idea of a spin-off of another book and honestly, that was the only reason I picked this book this far in the series. The book is based on the true crime of a family of four killed in 1959 in Kansas, The Clutter family murder. The investigation and solution of that crime was the subject of Truman Capote's In Cold Blood. Although I have not read In Cold Blood, I was curious about Masterman's new theory that perhaps there was a third killer that got away.
Brigid Quinn is the retired FBI agent married to a former priest, Carlo. Now, Jerry Beaufort has just been released from jail. Could he have been the third killer?
I enjoyed this book. This is not the type of story full of twists and turns, but I liked Brigid and Carlo--their relationship and tribulation.
I would like to thank Minotaur Books and NetGalley for providing me with a copy of this book in exchange for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?

This was slow for me in the beginning but picked up speed later on. I’ve never read capote’s original book so I was a bit confused in certain areas. I was intrigued by the description but was a bit letdown. I still think people might enjoy it.

Was this review helpful?

Rage against the Dying was my first introduction to Becky Masterman and immediately I became one of her fans. This new novel, which is a variation of Truman Capote's stars in the novel In Cold Blood, involves a third individual, a young boy who aided and abetted Hickok and Smith, and also committed murders of his own. Enter our heroine, Brigid Quinn, who comes into contact with this young boy, now an old man, after he is discharged from prison. It appears that there is a document describing his involvement in the latter unsolved murder. As he tries to find this document he has to go toe to toe with the likes of Brigid. Admittedly, I enjoyed the novel but did not find it had the tension needed to create a page turner where the pages fly. Instead, it was like slipping on an old moth eaten sweater, pondering how this had come to be.

Was this review helpful?

I liked this book. I like true crime stories and have read Capote’s In Cold Blood so I really enjoyed how the writer incorporated that crime into this story. She, of course, added her own version of how the crime was committed and it is completely plausible. The story begins with Brigid Quinn as a child sitting around her father and his cop friends while they discuss the Cutter and Walker murders. This discussion spurred her lifelong obsession with those murders. When the real Walker killer is released from prison after doing time for an unrelated crime, he is concerned that new developments in forensic science may lead police to his doorstep. Even after almost 60 years since the crime was committed, he tries to tie off loose ends. I like the way the author tells the story alternating between each POV. I enjoyed her insights into the psychopathic mind of the killer. For a retired FBI agent Brigid is good at investigating but I found her insecurity in her relationship with her husband, Carlo, a little annoying. Also, his philosophical mumbo - jumbo was annoying, too, but I guess it fits for a professor who is also a former priest. All in all, I liked this book and the way the details of fact and fiction regarding this still unsolved crime are woven together to create a thrilling rendition of the story. Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for giving me an arc in exchange for a fair and honest review. All opinions expressed are my own.

Was this review helpful?

This is a real “what if” kind of story. Ex-FBI agent Brigid Quinn has always been obsessed with "In Cold Blood" and the detective in her can’t let go of some of the more unsolved details. Jerry Beaufort is an old man who has just gotten out of prison and is trying to understand DNA and how he could have left evidence at a very old crime scene. I found this story full of suspense and interesting to see a character trying to fit into society like he never left it. I loved the Humoresque *Pop*. Very creepy. You’ll have to read it to find out!

Was this review helpful?

With the fourth Brigid Quinn book, the locale has moved back to Tucson, although the story goes back to a cold case murder in 1959 Florida. I found this plot to be a stretch for me. Drawing on the Clutter family murders that Truman Capote detailed in In Cold Blood, Masterman posits that there was a boy along with Hickok and Smith, one that was never identified. And that this trio also killed a family in Florida.

This third man is now released from jail for other crimes and is worried a dying confession given by Hickok might implicate him.

The book starts off slow. It gives us two narratives - Beaufort’s, the killer looking for the confession, and Brigid’s, which seems to focus more on the jealousy she is experiencing for Carlo’s deceased first wife. It does pick up speed as the book progresses. In one instance, very literally. Later in the book, a third viewpoint enters the picture.

My problem is that the plot relied on way too many coincidences, especially for a crime committed in Florida that ties into Carlo’s time as a priest in Kansas. And it’s also a crime that Brigid has been fascinated by for years.

It’s not a bad read. It kept my interest and I appreciated how both Carlo and Brigid had to navigate through some hard issues within their new marriage. It’s just that I have been less than impressed with the last two books in the series compared to how much I enjoyed the first two.

My thanks to netgalley and St. Martin’s Press for an advance copy of this book.

Was this review helpful?

This mystery was so intriguing, with great depth to the characters, that slowly built to a satisfying ending that sticks with you for days.

Was this review helpful?

Brigid Quinn has finally reached a point in her life where she is retired from the FBI and is married to a wonderful caring man, Carlos DiFranzo. Carlos is a retired Professor, and is enjoying his life with Brigid. There seems to be a connection with Carlos and a Priest, Father Santangelo, to Truman Capote’s book, In Cold Blood. There were two men, Richard Hickock, and Perry Smith, who were are death row for the murder of the Clutter Family in 1979. The father, son and daughter, were murdered, and the wife was raped and murdered. Truman Capote interviewed both inmates and promised them, he would not publish the book, until after their death. Not too long after the death of the Clutters, the Walkers family, was murdered in the same manner as the Clutters. Both Hickock and Smith, were adamant that they did not commit the murder of the Walkers. So why is a paroled inmate, Jeremiah Randolph Beaufort, looking into the individuals who were involved with both Hickock and Smith’s confession? Why is he hunting down each person who had contact with both of these inmates? What does he have to hide? Is it possible he was involved with the murder of the Walkers? Since Carlos was a priest at the prison, at the time of the arrests of both of the inmates and had access to both Hickock and Smith, is it possible that he is a target? What could he possibly know about both of these inmates? Did one or both of the inmates confess to him? Will Brigid be able to find out why individuals who had some involvement are being murdered? Will she be able to protect her husband against Beaufort? Will they find an additional confession from Hickock? This book kept me reading until the very end. The mystery kept the reader guessing all the way through. The plot was very well researched and was very believable. The character development was very well built and the reader could relate to all the emotions both good and bad. This book really kept me captivated until the very end. I enjoyed this book!

Was this review helpful?

I appreciate having received an advanced copy of this read. I however didn’t get much thrill out of this one. While it was well written, it really didn’t contain much punch for me. Not much action, more of a tale being told, and a stroll down memory lane.

It was not a bad read, it flowed well and you could definitely jump into it as a standalone, despite it being book number four in the series. I just wanted more meat, more action.

If you do read this crime thriller, again you won’t leave feeling unfulfilled. The writer has a fantastic knack for making the reader be able to visualize the scene as you read, something that I do enjoy. I can see the room, in the first scene, men sitting around talking, a mist of smoke in the air. I was still worth my while.

Was this review helpful?

This is Book #4 in the Brigid Quinn series. I have not read books 1-3 and it did not distract from the story one bit. I did, however, read Truman Capote's In Cold Blood while I was in high school. Could there have been a third killer involved? Well, this is the story that wraps itself around this question.

Many thanks to Netgalley and Minotaur Books for this advanced readers copy. This book is due to release in June 2019.

Was this review helpful?

Like other reviewers, I did not realize this was the 4th in a series that follow a former FBI agent and her former Catholic priest. The storyline definitely holds its own and the reader does not need to read the previous books in order to read this.

We Were Killers Once is fiction that follows the story of the murders outlined in Truman Capote's In Cold Blood. Was there actually a third killer involved in those gruesome murders? Where they involved in another family murder in Florida. There are a lot of twists and turns as the reader follows the released convict.

My rating is actually 3.5 but I rounded it up as it was a quick read and held my attention. At the end of the day, would I go back to read the other books, maybe yes or maybe no.

I received an ARC in exchange for an honest review. Thank you NetGalley.

Was this review helpful?

This was a good book, but not a memorable one. Just kind of a "run-of-the-mill" mystery - nothing that stood out about it.

Was this review helpful?

An interesting take on the Kansas murder in 1959 that inspired Truman Capotes in Cold Blood. The premise is what it there was another murderer?

Intriguing storyline, great dialogue and good characters. This is #4 in a series but can be read as stand alone.

Thank you Netgalley for the ARC.

Was this review helpful?

I didn't realize it was the 4th in a series! You definitely don't need to read the previous books to understand We Were Killers Once (I didn't), but it probably helps.

I assume the previous books also feature Carlos (Brigid's husband who was a priest once) and that's why he figures so heavily in this book?! Honestly, his character annoyed me and I rushed through his parts to get back to Brigid! Brigid is a former FBI agent who is retired but cannot help involving herself in mysterious people or nosing about when something might involve an infamous crime.
Everything came together very nicely and conveniently which made me a little bored and peeved because I feel like that's rather unusual in the real world, but hey, what do I know?!

Having read In Cold Blood I appreciated all the "what-ifs" and talk about Truman Capote fictionalizing his famous book and I did find myself thinking back to In Cold Blood after reading chapters in We Were Killers Once and going, "OH, that's plausible actually! Hmmm" so it did its job. It just did the job sporadically and bounced all around different viewpoints while telling it and never fully explained Jerry's connections.

Overall, I enjoyed the plot and I loved Brigid's parts, but the rest draggggged and it wasn't until I was 30% into the story that I actually became engaged!

Was this review helpful?

** I received an ARC in exchange for an honest review.**
I really wanted to love this book. A case that was presumably solved years ago has a wrinkle. However, this book seemed to be so caught up in the marriage of the retired FBI agent and the former Jesuit Priest that the actual murders were an aside. This killer was not particularly smart and his clumsy attempts only brought attention to the old case instead of letting it go.
It was just not my favorite.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to NetGalley and St Martin's Press for an advanced read in exchange for this review.

This book revisits the case in Truman Capote's In Cold Blood. I was expecting some excitement as a third killer is introduced. However, the writing style makes the book hard to follow. It started out very slowly and struggled with the pace after that. I appreciated another look at this famous crime, but the book fell flat to me.

Was this review helpful?

First, a big thank you to the author, Becky Masterman, the publisher, Minotaur Books, and NetGalley for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.

I couldn't put this one down. This is a brilliantly thought-out story, a "what if" in regards to the Clutter and Walker family murders in the late 1950s, memorialized by Truman Capote's In Cold Blood. But with so many unsolved pieces to those crimes, Masterman has brilliantly brought in a fictional 3rd character to sew it all up. The research and creativity involved in this is very impressive and I was loathe to put it down. In addition, the thriller-suspenseful movement is appropriately dotted with little, thought-provoking gems like:  "...marriage is about repeatedly forgiving the other person for not being us." These little philosophical musings, not only made one stop and think, but added to the reader's understanding of these characters. 

I did, however, find the writing somewhat inconsistent, with unnecessary repetitions and too much explaining that felt a bit condescending to the reader and broke up the pace. The author at times violated the 'show don't tell' rule and I would find myself disappointed because otherwise the plot is fabulous and I highly recommend this for anyone, but especially those who are fascinated with one of the biggest crime stories of the 20th century.

Was this review helpful?

Jerry Beaufort has been released from prison after spending decades behind bars. He could quietly go on to lead his life but he is afraid there is a confession out there that could put him back in prison. In 1959 murders were committed and a book, In Cold Blood was written about them. The perpetrators were found guilty, but were there other people involved. Were there more crimes connected to the convicted killers? Jerry is afraid someone out there knows about his time spent with the 2 killers.

This is an interesting premise for a book. The story started out slow. We see the story from the point of view of retired FBI agent Brigid and Jerry. Some parts were in the first person which is not my favorite style of writing. I also had a problem connecting with the characters. This is a quick, fast paced read. If you are looking fo a beach read and you don’t mind first person this might be for you. Thank you to net galley for an advanced readers copy.

Was this review helpful?