Cover Image: The End of the CBC?

The End of the CBC?

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

I found this book difficult to read. Although I found the information interesting I am just not a fan of the thesis style of writing. The authors present a history of the Candain State Run Television Station CBC and explain how its future is in jeopardy. They also offer suggestions on how to save it and why it is still important. Even though this book is about the CBC much of the information applies to other Public Broadcasting Stations. The authors spend a lot of time repeating their points and over explaining which is why I found this a slow read.

Was this review helpful?

I really enjoyed reading this book. I thought the CBC was just the Canadian version of PBS but found it it's so much more

Was this review helpful?

The End of the CBC? by David Taras and Christopher Waddell was a very informative read that educated me about the history of the CBC as well as its current plight.

I'll preface my comments with the statement that I am not Canadian so my opinions are based largely on this book and the questions I asked my housemate (who is Canadian). I have no doubt that someone with memories of the CBC as well as being from the country will have more nuanced views than I do.

I was a little surprised at just how much I enjoyed learning about both the CBC and broadcast programming in general in Canada. I won't go into detail on the plight but the current state of affairs for the CBC is not good as far as future prospects. I saw one reviewer who thought the book was overly critical of the CBC. My perception isn't that the writers were overly critical of the CBC so much as they present statistics and research that illustrate the precarious position the broadcaster finds itself in. But that, to me, is different from simply being overly critical.

Like many broadcasters globally there are a lot of challenges facing the CBC. Couple those with the additional mandates under which the CBC has to operate, it is no wonder that it is near a make or break decision about its future.

I like the suggestion they come up with, which is to take the limited funding they have and focus it more narrowly on an area where they have both a foothold and a reasonable chance to thrive. That area is news and journalism. Not clickbait, not sensationalism, but thoughtful and comprehensive journalism. Where a lot of the news that people get have no or very little Canadian perspective, doing this would offer the citizens a reliable source for Canadian perspective on global stories while also serving as a rational location for political, cultural, and societal debate and investigative journalism. With the tendency for private news sources to lean too far in a direction, the CBC could offer voices from across the spectrum.

I recommend this to any Canadians who have an interest in the future of the CBC. I also think some of the issues facing the CBC are the same ones affecting broadcasting and news everywhere, so readers who want to get additional perspective on both what is happening and the types of things that can be done in response should get something from the book as well.

Reviewed from a copy made available by the publisher via NetGalley.

Was this review helpful?

Taras has given us a book that is long on important stats and information but short on an actual plan to fix the situation. This is an important book and well worth the read. The argument appears to be simply that the CBC should be given scope and funding to reorganize. This is pretty straightforward. The book is well written, and although I didn't agree in many places it is a book I would heartily recommend to anyone who loves the CBC.

Was this review helpful?

I found this book to be very informing. It was a great read! I may be American and this book involves Canada, but I believe that it can relate to everybody around the world.

Was this review helpful?

I felt as though this was an overly critical look at the CBC.
With broad comments like the network not having a hit comedy for "at least a decade", completely ignoring the success of the Emmy nominated comedy "Shitt's Creek". Briefly mentioning the show only to say that Canadians couldn't identify the lead actors.
This book read like a long biased wikipedia article

Was this review helpful?