This book acts as a deep dive into various aspects of politics, how it can impact us, and what we can learn.

Political Sign is a brief look at the history and impact of, well, political signage. Exploring the simple to more complex forms of political expression, it touches on how elements such as colours, names and symbols came to evoke particular parties or political dynasties. Primarily focusing on the US, but with a brief look at the UK, the book is a quick and easy read which manages to educate the reader whilst also providing some ideas to chew upon. An enjoyable little book for sure, and worth the read - especially for the politicos out there!

The book took on much more than the typical political signs you may think about, such as yard signs, billboards, and those placards people carry when marching in the streets. I was surprised at the breadth that political signs may appear. Yes, tattoos make sense when you think about it. One of the bigger surprises for me was sporting events, particularly in soccer, or football as the rest of the world calls it.

All in all, this was a thorough book on the topic and short enough that the material doesn’t get bogged down with too much. The coverage is mainly focused on the United States, but veers away from time to time, into the UK and other countries where football (soccer) is the main sporting event. There was some discussion about the history of political signs as well, but not in depth.

This book is part of the Object Lessons series, and they are all fairly short, and focused topic reads.

NOTE: Please disregard star rating. NetGalley insists there be one, but I consider the that unreasonable and will give everything a 3 star rating until the demand is. brought to an end.

The Object Lessons series, published in cooperation with The Atlantic magazine, includes volumes on the stuff of ordinary life that is for the most part taken for granted (eggs, socks, dust) -- or would be, except that forgetfulness sometimes makes them a problem (remote controls, passwords). Like other volumes in the series, Political Sign tries to defamiliarize a part of the world that tends to escape notice, or that holds our attention only on occasion, and then briefly.....

Another great entry into the Bloomsbury Academic Object Lessons series. It was interesting and thought-provoking, but even with the detour into punk vs politics, it was missing some of the whimsy I have grown to expect from the series.

Unfortunately for Carroll, he asks the exact question I have been asking continually, for years: "what happens when a politician lies.". It is a question that bookends a chapter, so there is no answer given ... probably because the answer is nothing &*^%$# happens to them. And this makes me angry.

Recommended for: good commuting read.

Thank you to Netgalley and Bloomsbury Academic for the ARC.

A very in depth book about political signs, history, and fun facts.

5/5 for the research and antedotes.

Political Sign by Tobias Carroll is an extremely informative read about understanding political signs in the current election year.

Thank you NetGalley for providing me with an Advanced Readers Copy in exchange for an honest review.

This series of books – the list of which will soon breach a second page in every edition, so long it's getting, no matter the font shrinking – is designed to discuss semi-academically something we routinely find around us, or don't realise is culturally significant enough to have a non-fiction book dedicated to it. They're not for the specialists regarding each and every topic, for they're designed to be for the lay browser, in a collect-the-set fashion. This book, on the political sign, is one of the better ones, taking us from the hand-held placard at protests, to torching yourself at said protests, through tifos and tattoos, and up to the Three Billboards-sized one name, one party indicator, maximum-sized minimalism.

The book has quite a few elephants in the room, and that's not a pun on one of those US parties. It's definitely very much concentrated on the United States, however, and when it does venture into the UK it does so with much less sureness of foot. Our author declares the Leave side in the Brexit debate had signs that proclaimed lies. Er, and the losing side didn't? I hoped (in vain, I later saw) this is not the author's bias in evidence. You'll possibly remember how the Remainers were shouting the victors down for 'lies' printed on the side of a bus in large letters. Only the Remainers ever thought those letters had actually been believed. One more elephant – the book cried out for illustration; I didn't recognise the Obama emblem mentioned and had to look it up with the new knowledge it was a pro-Obama sticker, and not a Soviet Union postage stamp with precognition.

What we think of in the UK as political signs are only one of two things, generally – either a sorry scrap of paper with red ink in a council house window, or a large blue wooden thing dumped at the end of a rich land-owner's farm drive. Funny that. People in England can seek green and yellow ones in vain these days. But this book is actually really wide-ranging, covering the legitimacy of the political message from sportswomen and -men, efforts to ban the roadside statement of intent (which might influence nobody, just decide for you which of your neighbours you'll feel friendly towards in future), and so much more.

And the spread of political signs is only going to grow. In the last British General Election copious f*c*book images pretended to show actual signs and adverts from the Tories. Nobody seemed to bat an eyelid about their funereal black, and nobody seemed to notice they were stuck over the insurmountable underground train air vents. The numbers of people falling so gullibly for fake signs, at a sophistication of almost "ban beards" or "kill NHS staff" level, was only one reason why political signs need to be learnt about. There are small flaws to this book, but it's a welcome, intelligent and thorough survey, actually for both academe and said tube commuter.

This book is very factually relevant to understanding how political signs and endorsements influence elections and the functioning of campaigns. I really enjoyed this book.

This is the first of Bloomsbury Object Lesson series I have read, a short monograph style on a particular piece of ephemera, trying to knit together a brief history, with thoughts and discussions on the importance of that item. As such this is probably an odd one compared to say the one on Trains or Bulletproof Vests - as what consists a Political Sign is a very broad church. And this is also an openly personal take on the subject, Carroll talks about his own history with political signs as someone in his early forties growing up in New Jersey his first interactions with them would be electoral lawn signs, and placards at a Equal Rights Amendment rally. But also he is open about his politics, what the major influences are (US 80's punk primarily - though Ann Nocienti's Daredevil run gets name checked a surprising amount) and how that feeds into the book. So this is oddly 80% about political signs, 20% memoir.

What the book therefore lacks in rigour it gains in bouncey narrative flow as we jump from placards, to Dead Kennedy album covers, to Labour's Not Working to right wing tattoos. It is both to large a subject - the history of political signage is basically a history of politics, and too narrow a focus - it is mainly his lifetime and mainly US (with a small sop of Britishness for the publisher). But then the point of this kind of monograph is not to be exhaustive, or even particularly authoritative, it is instead to start or help along a conversation, and to spur and make connections where none previously exist. So perhaps any caveat I have is just that Carroll's is representative of a voice I hear to much and have heard on this and similar subjects because he is - a little younger, and a little more American - me. Open-minded, left wing, semiotically savvy, dubious of the actual point of political signage but at the same time infuriated by it. I didn't walk away with many new ideas, and whilst I enjoyed the short study, it already feels dated despite its most recent textual reference being in late 2019.. That's not its fault, and would always be the case when writing about mass media (though the pandemic has chipped away at it), but there you go.