Member Review
Review by
RoXXie S, Reviewer
A Promising Premise That Never Quite Takes Flight
L.N. Costley’s A Parliament of Crows arrives with the promise of a dark, gripping mystery thriller: ritualistic murders, FBI involvement, small-town panic, and a killer with a theatrical flair. On paper, it sounds like the kind of story that should deliver tension and momentum. Unfortunately, despite a strong premise and an attention-grabbing blurb, the novel settles somewhere in the middling range for me—thus the three-star rating.
A Parliament of Crows ♦ C.N. Costley—A Review
Opinion
From the outset, the book positions itself as a fast-paced, multi-state investigation, but in practice, the pacing is one of its biggest weaknesses. The narrative moves slowly, and not in a deliberate, suspense-building way. Instead, it often feels weighed down by scenes that neither deepen the mystery nor heighten tension. On top of that, the characters never quite evolve into the complex, engaging figures they need to be. Even with the author’s real-world law enforcement experience, the cast comes across as unusually flat and lacking depth.
One major issue that repeatedly pulled me out of the story is the jurisdiction oversight. Detective Todd continues investigating a missing woman’s case even after it crosses state lines—something we all know, even from shows like Criminal Minds, would instantly place it outside her authority. It’s odd that this isn’t acknowledged until the final chapters, and such a fundamental lapse is hard to ignore.
The similarities to Criminal Minds don’t stop there. The religious symbolism, the ritualistic staging, the stereotypical targeting of women from strip clubs—these elements feel heavily lifted from the show’s familiar formula. There’s nothing wrong with drawing inspiration, but here, the result feels derivative rather than fresh. The book doesn’t deliver much that hasn’t already been done elsewhere, and often more effectively.
And predictability is an ongoing problem. In fact, I figured out who the killer was within the first third of the book. For a mystery thriller that leans on psychological and ritualistic elements, that’s far too early. Once the reveal became obvious, the remaining chapters lost much of their intended suspense.
Still, the experience isn’t all negative. The cover design perfectly reflects the story’s eerie and rural atmosphere. The writing style is smooth and easy to follow, which made the roughly 200 pages quick to get through despite the shortcomings. Costley certainly has a readable voice.
What didn’t work for me at all was the attempted romantic or sexual tension between SSA Blackwood and Detective Todd. Not only did it feel unprofessional within the context of an active investigation, but the spark simply wasn’t there. Their connection felt forced, unnecessary, and ultimately out of place in a story that should have prioritized psychological depth and escalating tension.
Conclusion
Overall, A Parliament of Crows isn’t a bad book—it just doesn’t deliver on its promise of suspense or originality. With its predictable twists, slow pacing, and underdeveloped characters, it ends up as an okay but forgettable read. Fans of procedural crime stories might enjoy it, but those seeking something fresh or truly thrilling may walk away wanting more.
L.N. Costley’s A Parliament of Crows arrives with the promise of a dark, gripping mystery thriller: ritualistic murders, FBI involvement, small-town panic, and a killer with a theatrical flair. On paper, it sounds like the kind of story that should deliver tension and momentum. Unfortunately, despite a strong premise and an attention-grabbing blurb, the novel settles somewhere in the middling range for me—thus the three-star rating.
A Parliament of Crows ♦ C.N. Costley—A Review
Opinion
From the outset, the book positions itself as a fast-paced, multi-state investigation, but in practice, the pacing is one of its biggest weaknesses. The narrative moves slowly, and not in a deliberate, suspense-building way. Instead, it often feels weighed down by scenes that neither deepen the mystery nor heighten tension. On top of that, the characters never quite evolve into the complex, engaging figures they need to be. Even with the author’s real-world law enforcement experience, the cast comes across as unusually flat and lacking depth.
One major issue that repeatedly pulled me out of the story is the jurisdiction oversight. Detective Todd continues investigating a missing woman’s case even after it crosses state lines—something we all know, even from shows like Criminal Minds, would instantly place it outside her authority. It’s odd that this isn’t acknowledged until the final chapters, and such a fundamental lapse is hard to ignore.
The similarities to Criminal Minds don’t stop there. The religious symbolism, the ritualistic staging, the stereotypical targeting of women from strip clubs—these elements feel heavily lifted from the show’s familiar formula. There’s nothing wrong with drawing inspiration, but here, the result feels derivative rather than fresh. The book doesn’t deliver much that hasn’t already been done elsewhere, and often more effectively.
And predictability is an ongoing problem. In fact, I figured out who the killer was within the first third of the book. For a mystery thriller that leans on psychological and ritualistic elements, that’s far too early. Once the reveal became obvious, the remaining chapters lost much of their intended suspense.
Still, the experience isn’t all negative. The cover design perfectly reflects the story’s eerie and rural atmosphere. The writing style is smooth and easy to follow, which made the roughly 200 pages quick to get through despite the shortcomings. Costley certainly has a readable voice.
What didn’t work for me at all was the attempted romantic or sexual tension between SSA Blackwood and Detective Todd. Not only did it feel unprofessional within the context of an active investigation, but the spark simply wasn’t there. Their connection felt forced, unnecessary, and ultimately out of place in a story that should have prioritized psychological depth and escalating tension.
Conclusion
Overall, A Parliament of Crows isn’t a bad book—it just doesn’t deliver on its promise of suspense or originality. With its predictable twists, slow pacing, and underdeveloped characters, it ends up as an okay but forgettable read. Fans of procedural crime stories might enjoy it, but those seeking something fresh or truly thrilling may walk away wanting more.
*This page contains affiliate links, so we may earn a small commission when you make a purchase through links on our site at no additional cost to you.