HOLLOW HEROES

An Unvarnished Look at the Wartime Careers of Churchill, Montgomery and Mountbatten

This title was previously available on NetGalley and is now archived.
Buy on Amazon Buy on BN.com Buy on Bookshop.org
*This page contains affiliate links, so we may earn a small commission when you make a purchase through links on our site at no additional cost to you.
Send NetGalley books directly to your Kindle or Kindle app

1
To read on a Kindle or Kindle app, please add kindle@netgalley.com as an approved email address to receive files in your Amazon account. Click here for step-by-step instructions.
2
Also find your Kindle email address within your Amazon account, and enter it here.
Pub Date Dec 18 2014 | Archive Date Feb 20 2015
Casemate Publishing | Casemate Publishing

Description

The book reveals the truths behind the conventional images of three of Great Britain's primary military leaders during and immediately after the Second World War. In each case there was a totally different side to each man, which demonstrates that a great deal of their reputation was built on contrived results, deception and dishonesty.

It examines the influence and impediment of “class” on the performance of the British Army in World War II, and quotes the views of the Americans that far too often there was an unwillingness among the British to base officer promotion on effectiveness rather than on social background; conforming was more important than performing, as anyone who has served in the British Army’s ranks would agree. At the same time, Montgomery feared and was jealous of Patton, whose rate of advance was nearly always twice that of Monty’s.

The services of Field Marshals Wavell and Auchinleck, two of Britain’s finest commanders of the war, were largely lost to Britain because of Churchill’s consistent interfering in field matters and his need to contrive almost anything to remain in power after he had been responsible for the fall of Singapore.

This book includes the bizarre case of Major-General Dorman-Smith, one of Britain’s most brilliant original thinkers, who without reason was sacked by Churchill. Dorman-Smith was the tactician who had produced Britain’s victory over Rommel at the first battle of Alamein, but his crime seems have been overachievement; an unforgivable sin in some eyes. Mountbatten’s fumbling in India is also realistically portrayed in these pages, putting paid to the “man for the century’s” overly embellished reputation.

The book reveals the truths behind the conventional images of three of Great Britain's primary military leaders during and immediately after the Second World War. In each case there was a totally...


Advance Praise

No Advance Praise Available

No Advance Praise Available


Marketing Plan

• Trade, library and direct-audience review mailing to local, regional and national

publications


• Catalog and website advertising

• Direct-mail and internet promotion

• Simultaneous launches in the US and UK

• Sales presentations to all major chain stores, select local bookstores, national catalog

booksellers and book clubs

• Trade, library and direct-audience review mailing to local, regional and national

publications


• Catalog and website advertising

• Direct-mail and internet promotion

• Simultaneous...


Available Editions

EDITION Hardcover
ISBN 9781612002736
PRICE $34.95 (USD)

Average rating from 5 members


Featured Reviews

The book is a polemic on three of the major players on the British side during World War II; Winston Churchill (who was prime minister), Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery (military commander of the British Army), and Admiral Louis Mountbatten. Mostly Arnold discusses how the many kudos that these three men received, weren’t merited by what they did.

To begin with Churchill, he does give him credit with keeping-up the morale of the British nation during its’ most trying time (during the Blitz), but that his self- described ‘military genius’ was a myth. Just like in WWI, where he was behind the Gallipoli debacle, almost all of his ideas in WW2 turned out badly.

His demand for assistance to Greece/Crete so weakened the British North African Army, that they weren’t able to hold off the Afrika under Rommel until he was at the door to Cairo. Rommel was stopped at the first Battle of El-Alamain but Churchill then fired the generals in charge and replaced them with Montgomery.

Montgomery who was to fight Rommel at a time when the Afrika Corp was one-half the size of the reinforced British, was then given the laurels for stopping Rommel. But per Arnold, anyone with the knowledge of Rommel’s shortcomings and with twice the men and tanks as their adversary could have won that battle. But Montgomery failed to follow-up the victory and allowed the Afrika Corp to reassemble and make a defensive stand that prolonged the war. This is backed up from the war diary of Rommel and his second in command.

Much of Arnold’s discussion of Churchill and Montgomery has to do with their mutual admiration society. Unlike most generals, Churchill always backed Montgomery to the hilt no matter how inflammatory or insulting his comments about his Allies (and especially Eisenhower and Patton). When Monty pushed Eisenhower to allow him to attack across the Rhine in Operation Market Garden, his planning was so inept that at the end, he was back to his starting line after massive casualties to the Airborne troop he used.

Most of the American Generals could not deal with Monty’s need to always be in the forefront by calling his own press conferences and then taking credit for all that was done, even if he wasn’t involved. He bypassing of the northern shore of the Sheldt which protected Antwerp, led to a major battle (fought by the Canadians) later on and the loss of the use of the port for three more months.

There are many stories relating to the problems of the British ‘old boy’ network in the choosing of officers and staff members. It was more important as to who you went to school with than how good a tactician you were.

Lord Louis Montbatten was a cousin of the Royal Family (his nephew Phillip was to marry Princess later Queen Elizabeth II) and seemed to lead a charmed life no matter what he did. The invasion of Dieppe, had been put off by the naval high command, but Montbatten went ahead anyway. After this disaster, he was promoted by Churchill and sent to South East Asia to fight the Japanese on the Malayan peninsula. Having planned an invasion for September 1945, he landed his troops on beaches that couldn’t hold the weight of tanks or armored vehicles. Thankfully the Japanese had already surrendered or his troops would have been sitting ducks.

After the war, he was sent to India to help with the partition of the colony into Moslem and Hindu parts. In a hurry to get back to the Navy, he completed his job in fourteen weeks instead of the fourteen months that had been projected. Problems with the partition have led to four wars between India and Pakistan and seventy years of animosity between those two nations.

From the point of view of an American reader, all of these petty squabbles seem to be ridiculous. Why not have the best and the brightest at the head of your military forces? But considering the problems that we have had in Iraq and Afghanistan, by a military still fighting Vietnam, it’s understandable. Like the British in WW2, our military has become too politically savvy for its’ own good.

This is a well documented and well written monograph, and gives a totally different look at the major players for the British in WWII.

Zeb Kantrowitz zworstblog.blogspot.com

Was this review helpful?

Readers who liked this book also liked: