The Justification of the Sinless
On Supralapsarian Christology and the Goodness of the Incarnation
You must sign in to see if this title is available for request. Sign In or Register Now
Send NetGalley books directly to your Kindle or Kindle app
1
To read on a Kindle or Kindle app, please add kindle@netgalley.com as an approved email address to receive files in your Amazon account. Click here for step-by-step instructions.
2
Also find your Kindle email address within your Amazon account, and enter it here.
Pub Date Sep 22 2026 | Archive Date Sep 30 2026
Baker Academic & Brazos Press | Baker Academic
Talking about this book? Use #TheJustificationoftheSinless #NetGalley. More hashtag tips!
Description
In The Justification of the Sinless, Brendan Case argues that God the Son would have become incarnate even if humanity had never sinned. The incarnation benefits creation in many ways besides redemption. Indeed, it is the ultimate reason for the creation of the cosmos itself.
Case develops his argument primarily by drawing on the work of Robert Grosseteste (ca. 1168-1253). Though neglected today, this brilliant medieval theologian drove the thirteenth-century debates over the incarnation. Building on Grosseteste, Case provides a compelling set of exegetical and theological arguments for the supralapsarian thesis. If the incarnation is logically prior to the fall, then God always planned to endow creation with a glory beyond estimation.
Available Editions
| EDITION | Other Format |
| ISBN | 9781540971319 |
| PRICE | $29.99 (USD) |
| PAGES | 192 |
Available on NetGalley
Average rating from 1 member
Featured Reviews
This book is a look into the Supralapsarianism belief system of Robert Grosseteste.
Case uses Grosseteste to present his argument for the Supralapsarianism. His view has more to do with Christ's incarnation than predestination. He sees the plan of the incarnation to be in God's will even before man's fall.
The main argument is, "Would Christ have come in the flesh if there was no fall?"
He believes the fact that man is a physical being and because of that man needs God to take on flesh as a way of communicating with man as both flesh and spirit.
I don't totally agree with his conclusions but thought the book was very interesting. It asked questions that I had never considered.
I would recommend it to those who like to go deeper into theological history of the subject