Cover Image: Blurred Lines

Blurred Lines

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

If you think that the Columbia student who lugged her mattress around campus for year is a real hero (or, I guess I should say, "shero"), then you'll probably love Vanessa Grigoriadis's book Blurred Lines: Rethinking Sex, Power, and Consent on Campus. If you think Mattress Girl is a vindictive attention seeker who wrongfully made an ex-boyfriend's life a living hell by continually publicizing his name and the alleged act of rape, smearing his name all over campus and the national media, then reading Grigoriadis's book will be a frustrating and infuriating experience.



Grigoriadis spent a few years traveling to college campuses to interview Mattress Girl and her friends and like-minded survivors/victims and activists at Columbia and elsewhere. If her account is all you ever know about college life, you will get a picture of hyper-sexualized post adolescents who have sex all the time and frat boys who have no qualms about having sex with passed-out young ladies. You will be disturbed by the author's accounts of young ladies who knowingly attend parties where they know vast quantities of alcohol will be consumed and where the male hosts intend to have sex with someone--anyone--before the night is done, and then they're shocked--shocked!--when a girl wakes up hungover, her panties off, her clothes in disarray, and doesn't remember who or how many guys she had sex with.



In this world, it's perfectly OK to ruin a young man's reputation and educational experience over a misunderstanding about intercourse, or even kissing or groping. It's perfectly OK to willingly have sex with a bunch of fraternity brothers, then turn them all in to the school administration when they compare notes and make up a bawdy story about their shared experiences. And it's perfectly normal to go to an ABC (anything but clothes) party and not expect that the guys there won't see the presence of a bunch of mostly naked women as an invitation for a bit of whoopee.



Look, rape is horrible. No one should ever be forced to have sex. No one should take advantage of a passed out drunk person. I think everyone agrees on that. But Blurred Lines and other books and articles written from a similar perspective weaken the case of rape victims by placing them in the same category as a girl who gets mad because the guy she was grinding with on the dance floor grabs her boobs without asking, or the girl who is on the receiving end of an unwelcome kiss from a guy she's talking with at a party.



Grigoriadis does talk with and about guys who claim to have been wrongfully accused, but she seems to minimize their plight. The whole "believe the victim" mentality puts guys in a position of "guilty until proven innocent." In fact, Columbia found Mattress Girl's accused perpetrator innocent, which prompted her to begin her years-long smear campaign. After suffering her public shaming, which Columbia allowed and even encouraged, he won a lawsuit against the school, getting some measure of satisfaction, but his name is forever linked to this case.



Here's what I would have liked to have heard from Grigoriadis, but she and her ilk will not say. "Ladies, you think you are liberated by having lots of sex. But you're not weighing the costs." Even though she mocks calls for abstinence before marriage, there is no question that a lifestyle of chastity keeps young people away from much of the pain and hardship she discusses. The vast majority of cases of campus rape and sexual assault are in the context of sexually promiscuous lifestyles. Does that make it OK? Of course not. But if college kids embrace a culture of sexual promiscuity, the opportunities for misunderstanding and miscommunication, especially after a few drinks, increase exponentially.



If you read Blurred Lines and still get excited about sending your kids to college, you're crazy. The college life she portrays herein is predatory males, non-stop drunken parties, hookups and promiscuity, and very little studying and academic work. Weep for our culture and teach your sons and daughters to live right.





Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for the complimentary electronic review copy!

Was this review helpful?

Vanessa Grigoriadis writes as a journalist, investigating the many perspectives found in approaching the topic of sexual assault and rape on American college campuses, and their responses to reports. She divides the book into three parts, each dedicated to a side of the story: consensual sex, nonconsensual sex, and the role colleges play.

Vanessa has a clear, stated personal position on this topic and issue that is found throughout this book. But she does what a good journalist is supposed to do: investigate the claims, whether or not she agrees with them, and then see how they hold up. In the process she learns that not every claim and statement made by survivors advocacy groups is based on good research. And she finds that definitions of words and concepts differs from one person to another, making adjudication more subjective than what is frequently portrayed in the public media. She sees that there is quite a bit of confusion about this issue among students and the schools that are supposed to do something about it.

Advocacy has different goals and priorities than law enforcement, and they are different from campus disciplinary hearings, and journalism and reporting have yet another set of priorities, ethics, and guidelines. What I saw in reading this book is that each groups often believes they are “the right perspective” and that all others must be subordinate and/or wrong. I think that does disservice to the issue by creating conflict and confusion, by placing ideology above finding pragmatic ways to improve safety for all, and by propagating information and data that may not be based on good science and research.

I suspect this book will not make anyone happy because it does not fully validate the views and ideologies of any group. It raises questions and asks everyone to consider perspectives of sides you don’t agree with, and to question your own assumptions.

Was this review helpful?

I found this book so essential to my scholastic library that I purchased it four chapters into reading this ARC. So, yes, I would recommend it.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you for this book. Unfortunately, since it is not in kindle format, I am not able to read it at this time.

Was this review helpful?