A fascinating illumination and exploration of the notions of public spaces, private lives and how the parameters of these shape our expression and expectation of ourselves and others. The tone is academic but the author works to define and explain the concepts and origination of the public spheres and how their limitations necessitate the use of private spaces to truly explore, express and experience freedom because private spaces represent an avenue for our authentic selves to create dialogues with the authentic selves of others in ways that no public forum offers.

I have no idea why this book was written. It makes no sense whatsoever. It keeps giving and repeating 'definitions' of 'public sphere'! I did not know 'public sphere' was such a difficult concept to understand that it required a hundred-plus page book!

Although there are more than a few moments where Adut oversimplifies our contemporary political moment (essentially doing a lazy sketch of the 2016 election that is certainly a dominant media narrative but more than a bit erroneous), this is a rather brilliant work. Adut’s critique of what we mean by ‘the public sphere,’ what we would like it to be, what it actually is, and what it could be is not just an academic exercise but a vital bit of deep thinking.

The Reign of Appearances compares the public sphere to private communication, and finds it wanting. The public sphere is largely phony, according to Ari Adut. Everyone using it is aware of criticism, trolls, libel laws, personal risk and safety. So far from enabling genuine debate, the public sphere is about posing and politics. What people say there is measured, self-edited and restricted. Real meaning is hidden if not vanquished. Real debate is not possible. Scoring political points is entertainment, not progress.

Possibly the most interesting aspect is the double-edged sword of fame. From movie stars to politicians, if they’re around long enough, they learn that adulation can flip to contempt in a heartbeat. Living in the public sphere points out that there are no constants, no baselines, and no limits.

Freedom of speech mutates almost daily. A hundred years ago, Americans had no right to say the things they do today. In China it can be a capital crime to portray government without The Party, and judges are required to consider the welfare of The Party before considering the law. In Thailand, it is illegal to say anything the king might consider offensive. In North Carolina, it is illegal to publicly claim the sea level is rising. In Pennsylvania, it is illegal for doctors to publicly claim disease is connected to fracking. The differences between private and public spheres remain dramatic.

Over the centuries and within nations and also cultures, the standards constantly change. Some things that were sacred or profane we no longer give a second thought to. Other things have become points of extreme sensitivity, and banned. And nothing in the book gives any clue how to measure, analyze or make predictions about the process. So Reign of Appearances is not science; it is a top line survey of the obvious.

Adut hurtles onward, piling up results without trying to prove them. This is the very old correlation vs causation problem. Just one example: voter turnout has steadily decreased in western democracies ever since the secret ballot took hold. But he could just as validly claim that pizza production increased In that same time. There are many more such examples in the book, arguable at very least.

The book ends without coming to any useful conclusions. Perhaps this should not be surprising, as very early on (page 15), Adut quotes Charles Tilly: “The concept of public sphere is morally admirable but analytically useless.”

David Wineberg