Cover Image: What Is Populism?

What Is Populism?

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

I found this a really interesting and timely book. Populism is a term which seems to be in constant use in the media at present with an assumption that everyone is in agreement on its meaning. I must admit it was something I hadn't really considered until reading this book but I will now look at political statements in particular with more interest and even more cynicism.

Was this review helpful?

A short, easily digestible book that eloquently argues the opinion on what populism is and it’s connection to pluralism. Considering the times in which we now live and recent events that have given us Trump and Brexit, this is an important book. Muller argues that a Populist will claim to be of the people while being conveniently vague about who the people really are, and will then turn out to be anti-pluralist. (If I am mangling this I apologise – I am a political light weight). An important definition since we have recently had people like that proto-amphibian Nigel Farage arguing that ‘the people have spoken’ when they are clearly not referring to all the people. Muller also makes the point that while the politically ineffective will eventually self deselect through incompetence, we should be aware of the huge amounts of damage they can do before they are removed from power. Backed up with examples from world history, this was informative and interesting.

Was this review helpful?

In the current climate, this is an essential book, as Jan-Werner Müller defines populism's most salient characteristics - antielitism, antipluralism, exclusivity - explaining Donald Trump, Nigel Farage and other populists through this framework. He goes on to explain that populism is not just antiliberal, it is antidemocratic, and actually fails to be a real representational system for people once in power.

An interesting point made in this book is the fact that while certain grievances are completely credible, populists' assertion that they are the only legitimate voice to represent 'the will of the people', opposes democratic ideals in the first place - after all, that is what the electoral system is supposed to represent. He also makes a clear distinction between those claiming to be anti-establishment and populist - making the comparison between Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump, as Sanders never claimed to represent 100 per cent of the population, or pretended not to be part of elite institutions.

Müller is certainly right to challenge, or at least qualify, the popular talk of a populist wave by pointing out that “to this day, no right-wing populist has come to power in Western Europe or North American [sic] without the collaboration of established conservative elites.” It is a quick read, and worth every page.

Was this review helpful?

Brilliant book that tries to explain a very popolar concept: populism (pun intended). As a political concept that has behind itself no political theory, it's not easy to get to understand exactly what characterizes populism, but it's very sad for me, that Italy is one of the most referred to country to explain the topic....

Libro molto interessante che tenta di spiegare il popolare concetto di populismo (sí, il gioco di parole era voluto). La spiegazione non é semplice, perché il populismo é un concetto politico privo di una teoria politica che lo sorregga, quindi non é facile caratterizzarlo, né tanto meno spiegarlo, ma la cosa peggiore é quanto spesso l'Italia venga comunque portata come esempio.....

THANKS TO NETGALLEY FOR THE PREVIEW!

Was this review helpful?

It has been said that every ‘ism’ except ‘baptism’ resists precise definition and that is particularly true of ‘populism’: a word applied to politicians and parties of both the left (such as Bernie Sanders and Syriza) and right (Donald Trump and the Front National); which is more an attitude than a coherent political doctrine; which is mostly defined negatively (being variously described as anti-elitist, anti-technocratic, anti-pluralist and anti-democratic); and which possesses different connotations on either side of the Atlantic Ocean (sometimes being ‘progressive’ in the United States but ‘demagogic’ in Europe).

Jan-Werner Müller’s short but closely argued book ‘What is Populism?’ is superior to Mudde and Kaltwasser’s outwardly very similar ‘Populism: A Very Short Introduction’, as it does a better job of teasing out the meaning of populism, without resorting to technical jargon, although populists and their supporters will obviously still take issue with Müller’s characterising populism as a threat to democracy on the grounds that it falsely claims to represent the true voice of ‘the people’ against their (morally inferior) elected politicians.

Müller is certainly right to challenge, or at least qualify, the popular talk of a populist wave by pointing out that “to this day, no right-wing populist has come to power in Western Europe or North American [sic] without the collaboration of established conservative elites.” But then, to paraphrase Lincoln, populists can fool some of the people all the time by claiming that only some of the people are really the people, but in so doing they cannot hope to fool all the people all the time.

Was this review helpful?