Presented decently, but no new information. Same thing I've read in previous books on this subject matter.

This exposé about the food industry in our country and how the food industry, itself, has made food unhealthful for the consumer is a must-read for everyone interested in their health.

The bulk of the treatise exposes the dangers of food additives and packaging. Lawless was quite specific and documented her concerns with multiple studies. She fleshes this out nicely and presents her case well. Anyone reading this and wanting to make a change can see how to do it. She also explains how we got into the quagmire we’re in.

The last sections of the book, which are calls to action, are less easily put into action. She offers many opportunities for getting involved, but most are not feasible for regular people. And many are just plain unrealistic. In her summary, her loudest cry is for more and more government involvement and action. In the first 2/3 of the book I felt like she was wanting to educate everyone so that the consumers would exercise more personal responsibility for what they ate and/or fed to their families. By the end I felt like she was saying personal responsibility was no longer a possibility and the government should step in making all sorts of new rules, regulations and laws regulating everything from TV advertising to spokesmen for various food products.

There’s a lot that doesn’t apply to everyone, but there’s enough excellent universal information for each reader to glean something important. I highly recommend this book.

I received this ARC from NetGalley and St. Martin’s Press. This review will be published on GoodReads immediately and at Amazon and on my library’s website
https://publiclibrary.cc following the publication date.

With the giant caveat that this galley copy did not have complete footnotes for each chapter, which makes it REALLY difficult to assess the content without being able to see the actual references being used...

Having some personal interest in the overall topic and coming in with quite a lot of highly specialized knowledge about gut microbiology and GI inflammatory diseases, this book seemed right up my alley. And for the most part, I think this is a pretty decent summary of what we know so far from the research and why it’s concerning. It’s definitely not perfect: Some sections do cherry-pick the data — the chapter on pregnancy and the early child microbiome is... rather problematic, shall we say — and in places it can get repetitive. I would have liked to see more thorough discussion about what can be done (realistically!) about these issues, rather than just a depressing litany of grim studies.

A really interesting look at the evolution of "food" as we know it and made for a useful advanced beginner nutrition reader. I knew some of the material she explained as someone who has followed health trends in the last decade, but a lot was new to me.

.What I think made this book most accessible is that while it relied on (solid) research, the author also made good use of interviews that were understandable to the lay reader. I appreciated that she took an honest look that there's no easy answer to the food marketing challenges, it's truly not as simple as "eat better", although that is a worthy goal. As a result, this came through as a useful "how to" rather than scolding readers.

I needed to read this. I can't begin to say how much I needed to read this. It dives into all the junk that we eat and how it's been processed so much its not even food anymore.
Great book and great way of writing.

Thoroughly researched and documented, eye-opening study of the influence of the industrial food system on the health of us all. This book covers the history of the use of toxic chemicals in processed food in the US, how it adversely affects people more or less based on age, race, gender and poverty/wealth levels.

Formerly Known As FoodIt delivers great knowledge to improve the way we eat. It's interesting and easy-to-understand. I enjoyed reading it.

THE PRICE OF DOMESTICATION
We were dogsitting this past week, and, whenever it came time to feed the critters, I would find myself philosophizing about the price of domestication: in exchange for a steady food supply, wolves/dogs gave up their freedoms. On the plus side, they wouldn't starve. On the minus side, every day they must eat the same bowl of kibbles. The kibbles have been pumped up with pleasing synthetic flavors and a smidge of actual meat by-product, but it's still a little bowl of kibbles, twice a day, day in and day out, getting more and more stale the longer the bag sits out.

20180330_175151.jpg
It's a dog's life.

But I was also reading Kristin Lawless' Formerly Known as Food: How the Industrial Food System is Changing Our Minds, Bodies, and Culture and discovering some uncomfortable parallels.

34964836.jpg
Like dogs being domesticated, we've made a deal of questionable benefits. In exchange for convenient, always-available food, we've handed over our ability to choose what we eat. Yes, some of us can afford to be choosier in our groceries, but it's gotten harder and harder to avoid that darned bowl of kibbles. The corn, soy, canola, synthetic flavors, emulsifiers, sweeteners, preservatives, pesticide residues, packaging plastics, oxidized fats, antibiotics, and so on, are everywhere. Buy organic all you like. You cannot escape.

Some days it's all too much, and you just want to stay in bed.
Some days it's all too much, and you just want to stay in bed.

The book makes for some grim reading. There are the usual alarming facts about rising obesity, metabolic syndrome, and allergies, which we've almost become inured to, but what was newer to me was the discussion of cumulative effects of pesticide and chemical build-ups in fields, foods, and oceans, as well as permanent changes to our microbiota caused by diet-induced extinction. Did you know that DDT, banned way back in 1979, is still found in the umbilical cord blood of newborn infants? Discouraging, to say the least. Or that TBT, an organic pollutant used in paints and coatings for boats back in the 1960s (and since banned), has nevertheless so leached into our waters and been biomagnified up the food chain, that we're eating it today. So what, you say? Well, TBT is an "obesogen," causing animals in studies to "have more and bigger fat cells...They're eating normal food, and they're getting fatter." As an added bonus, TBT-induced weight gain can be passed down generationally.

Fine, fine, you concede. There's nothing to be done about the DDT, but I just won't eat seafood. Oh, but TBT is just one kind of "organotin" we are exposed to. There are others,

used in the linings and sealings of food cans, in polyvinylchloride (PVC) plastics, as fungicides and pesticides on crops, as slimicides in industrial water systems, and as wood preservatives. Like many other classes of chemicals, organotins were wrongly deemed environmentally safe for many years -- and they appear to be everywhere in our environment.
And remember the BPA fuss? Because it messed with our hormones, public uproar got it removed from baby bottles and water bottles and such. Sad to say, the plastic compounds used as replacements still have endocrine-disrupting characteristics. Plastic in food and drink packaging is unavoidable nowadays. Buy organic all you like, and 90% of the time, it's still being delivered to you in plastic.

Lawless makes a very compelling argument for breastfeeding but recognizes that women who have to work outside the home and who don't have the most understanding schedules or workplaces for pumping breast milk face impossible situations. In fact, Lawless points out relentlessly how economic and social class constrain food choice, from gestation onward. Some of us can't simply "choose" to breastfeed and buy organic and home-cook our meals:

When food movement leaders say the solutions are to eat whole foods and buy organic, they leave out the crucial fact that we need to collectively reject the production of poor-quality processed foods and stop the production of dangerous pesticides and other environmental chemicals that contaminate many foods. Critics do not often articulate this omission, but it is largely why the movement is perceived as elitist, and rightly so. If the food movement's solutions are market based and predicated on spending more for safer and healthier food, they ignore how impossible these solutions are for most Americans...The food movement has allowed these [crappy, processed] products and additives to exist alongside a cleaner and safer food supply for the privileged few.
Food movement leaders also emphasize the importance of home cooking and cooking whole foods from scratch. Yet many fail to mention that the majority of Americans do not have the time, money, or resources to cook meals from whole foods at home. And when these leaders do acknowledge that lack of time to cook is a problem, they usually address it through providing better ways to cook healthy foods quickly.
I plead guilty to all of these charges.

What solutions does Lawless suggest, if you haven't already succumbed to despair? I admit, I was paralyzed by her solutions. She called for some fairly reasonable measures, like longer paid leave for new moms and household-skills classes for all, but then ventured into suggestions that made my eyes widen: universal basic income, paying people to cook at home, shorter work weeks, and so on. I just didn't see where all the money would come from. Yes, I agree our health as a society would improve, but it's hard to fund programs based on "we'll save money later, years down the road."

I liked better her mentions of urban farming programs on unused land, which has been done successfully in places like Milwaukee and Detroit, although the thought of sending inexperienced college kids out to run them made me think of Chairman Mao sending out all the academics to do the national farming and finding that--whoa!--they didn't actually know how, and now everyone's gonna starve! I guess if this FoodCorps hired the kids who'd done 4-H and had a little experience, but that's a dwindling pool nowadays.

In any case, I highly recommend the book as an eye-opener. And, if you've got the time and money, invite someone over for a home-cooked meal of whole foods, cooked and served on glass and metal.

Thank you to NetGAlley and St. Martin's Press for permission to read this book early.

This book is an in-depth look at where we are in the world with our food production and ingestion. It is a bit frightening to read all that our food goes through from start to the time we put it into our mouths and disheartening to know that the agencies we rely on to label our food, or test our food, are not set up to work in our best interests.
Eat whole foods, breast feed our children, change labeling, (plus other suggestions) are repeated throughout and culminate in the author's 'manifesto' to incite change. . I liked that the author addressed the issues of poverty and urban access to quality, whole food products. I like the well referenced and cited statements.

On the whole this is an informative book but a very technical and challenging read. It is FULL of information that is worth reading if you can hang in there and take it in small bites.

Formerly Known as Food is an eye-opener written by a nutritional expert and consultant. The author’s message is clear and concise and is one that, in my opinion, should be heard by everyone. Even when we think we are making healthy choices we may not be and the ramifications of unhealthy food choices go deeper than many believe. I found this book tremendously informative. It was educational and comprehensive but it could get a bit heavy at times for people with only a casual interest in how our eating patterns are shaping our overall health. I found it best to read in chunks so as not to get overwhelmed with all of the information. I voluntarily read an advanced reader copy provided to me by the publisher through NetGalley. This did not affect my rating. I have provided an unbiased and honest review.

While it seemed the research was phenomenal, this book was a bit of a bummer. So many facts on every page, it was just one thing after another. Didn't make for a book you wanted to read.
I'd say author needs to write for the whole, not for a select few.
Thanks to publisher, and NetGalley for the chance to read this book. While I got the book for free, it had no bearing on the rating I gave it.

The author does a good job of taking all of the past food 'news,' as well as the modern issues and news we see today, and putting them together in a way that is easy to read. For folks who are already into following this information, it's a good brush-up on your knowledge, and you'll find some new things that you didn't know about. For folks who are new to this way of thinking, it's not overwhelming, but does provide a good foundation for why we need to change the way that we think about food and feeding our families.