Cover Image: Bridge of Clay

Bridge of Clay

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

I hadn't realised how much I'd missed Markus Zuzak's writing style, since The Book Thief. I've read few people who write children so beautifully or truthfully. The intensity and enormity of their thoughts, feelings and relationships, the depths of sadness and heights of joy. It was a real pleasure to be introduced to the Dunbar boys and this book has stayed with me long after reading.

Was this review helpful?

Too many characters, would have preferred to follow a few of them rather than having each of their stories covered in less detail. Liked the main character's story - just wanted more of it.

Was this review helpful?

This story centres on five brothers, left by their parents to fend for themselves at home very young. Through the eldest brother’s narration, skipping back and forth in time, we learn how this comes about and the effect the father’s sudden reappearance has on them all. Of the five brothers, though, for most of the book we focus on Clay and all the way through I couldn’t really see why he should be more interesting than the others - the running and horse racing sections he features in were the dullest parts of the story. By the end, though, I’d warmed to him.

Even though it ends on a positive note, I found this book depressing. I wanted to enjoy it so much more than I did. That’s not to say I didn’t find some scenes very moving, even beautiful, and the writing exhilarating. It’s a tale of grief, camaraderie, love, forgiveness, more grief and, though I think the author intended there to be some, I didn’t find many light moments - even relatively happy times and robust sibling banter are shadowed by sadness.

It is difficult to get to grips with the author’s style at first, often delivering short, punchy impressions rather than description. This gives it a cinematic feel that is perhaps intentional. It is certainly strong on atmosphere and dialogue. I’d probably give this book 3 stars if it weren’t for the quality of the writing.

Was this review helpful?

Its been twelve years since Markus Zusaks modern classic “The Book Thief” was released. Since then Markus Zusak has built up a worldwide audience of fans all keeping an eye out for his next novel. This latest novel has had rumoured release dates for the last five years and the book will finally hit shelves this October.

The book takes a distinctively different tone from his previous work and follows five boys, living in a house without any adults or rules. In time we learn about what led them to this but the opening sections let the boys run loose in their bohemian existence. The novel is narrated by the eldest of the five brothers.

The author knows how to pull an emotional punch, there are several sections in the book that are masterful. However the book swings around so many different characters and times, it can sometimes prove confusing who we are with, and how it all relates. Each and every member of the family gets their chance to tell their story and each one has merit. The book gives a deep insight into how they came to be the people they are, but exposes that when bringing the family together, adding an extra weight to the text. The nature of how it chopped and changed did take some of this away, making it frustrating when you were completely drawn into one narrative to quickly be lost somewhere else which had the result of making me lose interest.

The book creates great meaning in objects and a sense of place. A race track, typewriter, piano and of course a bridge, all become key mechanisms within the book to strand from and each and every one works. It’s a constant theme throughout the novel that draws out more and more of the family and never feels forced. This is one of the finest aspects of the novel.

Bridge Of Clay will undoubtedly have a nation weeping again. For me, when it worked it was a genius, but at 600 pages perhaps there were just too many empty and confusing moments and it was that which detached me a little and never quite had me as involved as I had desperately wanted to be.

Was this review helpful?

Markus Zusak is an incredibly gifted writer and reading Bridge of Clay is like watching an absolute master at the top of their game. In Bridge of Clay, Zusak uses words in a way that leaves you breathless, creating a rich, detailed picture of a family and their complex relationships. The back-and-forward storytelling style works to add layer upon layer to this picture of the Dunbar family until they feel so, so real. I've never felt so deeply for fictional characters and I'm so very grateful for the opportunity to read this book. Without any doubt, the best book of the year.

Was this review helpful?

Warning: CONTAINS SPOILERS!
(from my YA-aged daughter)

This is not my first time reading Mark Zusak. The Book Thief, which I have also read, was exceptional. I honestly thought books couldn't get better, and I have to say, Zusak is my favourite author by far.
When I started Bridge of Clay, I was very confused, but pulled through and kept on reading. Here's some advice: it may seem random, but keep reading. You'll love it in the end.

Before I read this, I heard that Bridge of Clay took over a decade to write. I was surprised, and amused. Over ten years for one book? But it turns out that I totally underestimated Bridge of Clay, even after The Book Thief.
This book features five boys, a man, a women and a girl wrapped up in a mad tale of love, hope and tragedy. There are losses in this book too, as well as twists. It is filled with emotion, and surprises.

I never saw it coming. And by it, I mean Carey.

I love everything about this book, the way it flows, how it goes back, forth, back, forth in time. It rewrites itself.
If this book was a picture, it would be beautiful. The clever, backwards plot. The meaningless, yet vital phrases. I love how it all really evolves around Clay. I love how it's all told by Matthew. The Dunbar boys certainly have a story to tell.

But one thing that really stood out was the heartfelt words. Every single one of them.

It took me a long time to read, but Bridge of Clay is one of the best books ever, one where I will reread my favourite moments for a long time. Say what you like, but Bridge of Clay will always shine as original, bright, thrilling and a book you can't put down.

A kind thanks to netgalley for supplying this book.

Was this review helpful?

Bridge of Clay is about masculinity. Five rough-housing blue collar brothers live in a mess of a house with a menagerie of animals. They settle their quarrels with their fists. Their dad has long since abandoned them, following the death of their mother. They are the Dunbar boys.
Women are given short shrift in this book, and are doomed to suffer the most. Men are expected to solve their problems with violence. One day, a broken husk of a man walks into their house on Archer Street. He is their long lost father, and wants their help to build a bridge and bring meaning to his life.
Only one of the brothers, the mysterious Clay, agrees to make the journey to the countryside. Clay is especially tormented and long suffering. Bridge of Clay explores why this is, jumping back and forth between timelines.
For me this was more a book to admire than like. Some of the brothers aren't as well drawn as others. Rory and Tommy are a bit two-dimensional, and I didn't understand why Clay had to have quite so many beatings. The writing style took a lot of getting used to. Nevertheless it was well worth reading, and will appeal to readers of The Book Thief.

Was this review helpful?

Bridge of Clay is the story of five brothers and five animals, told non-chronologically as one of them, Clay, must build a bridge. The Dunbar brothers live, fight, and grieve together, living without parents but with a selection of animals including a mule called Achilles. When their estranged father who disappeared walks back into their house and asks who will help him build a bridge, only Clay accepts. Tied up in Clay's mind is love and sadness, and a burning sense of what happened to his mother. Matthew Dunbar, the responsible one, narrates the story of the brothers and their parents from past to present.

The novel is written in Zusak's memorable style, weaving in ideas of storytelling and repeated motifs and wordplay as well as a lot of Homer references. It is long and perhaps a little confusing at first, but once you've got used to the timeline and characters, it becomes a lot more rewarding. Many of the characters are intriguing and unusual, particularly the boys' mother Penelope and Clay himself, though some of the brothers feel less sketched out than others. The relationships in the book are equally compelling, with a lot left to inference rather than stated. It is a novel to think about, both whilst reading and afterwards (which is unsurprising to anyone who has read Zusak's earlier The Book Thief).

Bridge of Clay is an unusual novel that plays with storytelling and unreliability, but at its heart is about a dysfunctional family and the impact of how they all cope with tragedy. It frequently makes the reader think and keeps ambiguity even through its detail; it's less of a light read and more something to get stuck into.

Was this review helpful?

This book is everything.
There is so much crowded into it, and yet there isn’t a single thing out of place.
Bridge of Clay sings with art, music and blasphemy. It's full of the things we'd anticipate from Markus Zusak - fight and struggle, brothers and heart. Zusak plays with words like no one else, and it is a joy to read.

It will leave you feeling like you've been run over by a truck, but in the best possible way.
Even though this is very different than The Book Thief, fans will feel like they've come home.

Was this review helpful?