Amid poor reviews I was a little dismayed that a familiar tale from history, "1066 and all that..." would be tainted by a substandard historical account and these tumultuous events would fade from my interest.
I need not have worried and previous reviewers must have read the piece incorrectly or failed to accept the premise under which it was written.
They say that 'history is always written and recorded by the victors'. Perhaps no more so than the Bayeux Tapestry; which isn't really a tapestry but is a 'faithful account' (perhaps) of the Norman Conquest.
This graphic novel pays homage to the fact that this account of the invasion by William the Conqueror is recorded by either his wife Matilda or commissioned by his half-brother Odo. The conclusions give some measure of the search for its authenticity.
That it plays on the fact that the original was an early example of telling a story through words and pictures, a comic strip. This re-telling of 1066 is said to be a faithful comic strip based on that original work we know as the Bayeux Tapestry.
I found the story both interesting, fascinating in terms of succession and sibling rivalries, and familiar in the early battle at Stamford Bridge.
The story suits a graphic novel wonderfully and I'm grateful for the opportunity to read it for myself and remember some of my earliest history lessons.

A great graphic novel with a historical fiction bend. Knights, loyalty, and love. Great artwork throughout as well.

This book has it that the Bayeux Tapestry is ultimately impenetrable, with bits that are not understandable. So the creators here have replaced it with this – a book that is, er, ultimately impenetrable and not understandable. So you get waffle, flim-flam and no way in to the narrative, plus jump cuts to Halley's comet and the original, as if this mirrors the actual not-a-tapestry. I'll never know if it does or not, for this was awful. If like me you have an average knowledge of the history of the times, you'll know less after these pages.