Cover Image: XX

XX

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

What an amazing-and timely!-book 'Xx' is. In it, a pioneering technique allows women to have babies with each other and explores what the consequences of 'ovum to ovum' technology could mean through the eyes of a lesbian couple-Rosie and Jules. Running against this scientific advance is a local MP whose election campaign is based on a return to the family values where women are seen and not heard. It is not too far fetched to imagine a world where this technique is science fact not fiction, and given the current political and social climate between the sexes, a world where men are obsolete-Xx chromosomes can only produce female children-however, Angela Chadwick does not beat a moralistic drum throughout her novel.
She tackles gender inequality, sexism and IVF through her characters leaving scope for the reader to think long and hard about where they stand. What I really enjoyed was the political, scientific and social discussion of 'just because we can, should we?'
It is an absorbing read , a thoughtful read and something I would 100% recommend to anyone.
Many thanks to Netgalley and the publishers for letting me read this in return for an honest review.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to NetGalley for allowing me to read an advance copy of Angela Chadwick’s XX. The rating and review are my own thoughts and opinions, and have not been influenced by receiving this book to read.

I loved this book and could honestly talk all day about the reasons why! The story is set around a scientific breakthrough which enables two women to have a child together (ovum-to-ovum fertilisation) which would necessarily be female due to a lack of any Y chromosome. Jules (our protagonist) and Rosie (her long term girlfriend) are involved in the first trial.

I don’t wish to include any spoilers in my review but the book deals with so many issues, misogyny, homophobia, class, medical advancement, social media and control through the media. That being said, the novel avoids preaching and whilst including ‘scientific articles’ and ‘media reports’ still manages to focus on the couple and their relationship and that is the glue holding everything together.

I could relate to Jules throughout the book and I think this is one of the author’s key strengths, letting you into her thoughts as well as her thoughts about her thoughts really fleshed the character out. She could easily have been written in a way that made her unlikable due to her doubts but the author avoids this and instead makes her seem honest, unsure and flawed which seems much more human to me.

I would recommend this book highly and have already. I hope that this author gets the coverage and critical acclaim deserved and I will certainly be keeping my eye out for more!

Was this review helpful?

Angela Chadwick's debut novel XX completely drew me in from the tagline on the cover, "How far would you go for a child of your own."

Juliet and girlfriend Rosie were looking into sperm donor options when the government approves clinic trials for ovum to ovum conception, as a journalist, Juliet knows all too well that they need to keep their involvement and identities confidential for as long as possible however the news is leaked early on making their lives a lot more difficult; now as well as coming to terms with having a baby, their suddenly faced with a barrage of reporter, photographers and protestors. This adds an element of 'whodunit' to the story as it can only be one of their close friends or family who've told the media.

The concept behind this is fascinating, it's not an entirely unplausible possibility and while (I don't think) its specified in the book this is written as if it could be set in the present day so its massively thought-provoking as well. The characters and their relationships are pretty relatable and believable; as the book is written in the first person you hear everything from Jules' perspective as she's dubbed the world's first 'lesbian father'.

I gave this four stars just because I thought the ending was a little cliche, but would definitely recommend!

Was this review helpful?

A brilliant, highly probable storyline and extremely controversial storyline. This is the future in science, two women being able to have a baby without the need of a man!
Jules and Rosie a couple in a loving lesbian relationship decide to volunteer for this groundbreaking experimental procedure, making them both biologically related to their baby, the story really touches on not only the ethics behind this type of experimental science but also the dynamics of their relationship when faced with the backlash and negativity from their decision.

Excellently written, I was totally sucked into this future that in reality isn’t all that far away.

A very clever and enjoyable read.

Was this review helpful?

A fantastic book that takes a clever idea and runs with it , using it cleverly to examine the complex dynamics of several relationships. In a version of our world that is not so very different scientists have discovered a way to fuse two ova to create a female embryo, meaning that two women can now choose to have a baby together, where they are both genetic parents. The story follows Rosie and Jules, a couple who become part of the clinical trial . At first everything is perfect, they are happily planning a future for their family, buying a larger home etc, but when their details are leaked and they are forced into the public eye they become the focus of vitriol, bullying and even a political campaign to have the procedure banned. As the stress builds, putting an inevitable strain on their relationship, Jules begins to have second thoughts about the whole idea.
Aside from the clever conceit on which the plot of the book is based, the real strength of this story is the characters at the heart of it, particularly Jules, and her struggle and journey as the book unfolds. It is impossible not to feel a degree of empathy for her, and it is this emotional connection that kept me completely engaged as a reader, The author looks at a number of family relationships, particularly parental ones, and the story of Jules fractured relationship with her father adds yet another layer of emotional depth to an already compelling book.
Thought provoking and memorable, this is one that kept me thinking long after I turned the last page.
I read and reviewed an ARC courtesy of NetGalley and the publisher, all opinions are my own,

Was this review helpful?

A really interesting book that makes you question what and why and whether you would want to have a baby without any male involvement. But doing so opens up a whole set of questions... and would be a brilliant bookclub read.

The writing is a little slow and sadly I found that I struggled to engage with the characters. An interesting read but unfortunately this book is not as engaging as the debate and dilemmas that ensue.

Was this review helpful?

A taut, focused story of two women joining a medical trial of a new fertilisation treatment to create a baby (necessarily female - hence the title, XX) without the need for a sperm donor. They are a lesbian couple but in theory the procedure could be rolled out to any two women choosing to create a family together, rather than involving a man. The very idea of this causes consternation and is taken up by the press and politicians, both of which have their own agendas. What starts as an intriguing discussion of the ethics of experimental programmes like this also soon gives us an emotionally engaging portrayal of the effect its controversy has on one couple. Jules and Rosie are hounded at home and at work, their relationships with family, friends and neighbours become increasingly strained and inevitably this extends to their relationship with each other. In their different ways, they are both complicated and sympathetic characters, though we follow their story through just Jules’ narration. Emotions run high, indignation alternates with doubt. All this is very well paced, my interest didn’t flag at all and the result is a satisfyingly thought-provoking book that I’d recommend highly.

Was this review helpful?

I was intrigued by the blurb of this book and it didn’t disappoint, an emotional read. Highly recommend.

Was this review helpful?

An amazing novel about the advances in fertility treatment, specifically ovum to ovum feritilisation. Rosie and Jules are the first couple to conceive this way. However, it means any children born this way will only ever be female- which is a threat to the existence of males. This was such an original but completely plausible narrative with brilliant arguments for and against contained within.

Was this review helpful?

This read us very different from anything that I have read before and really interesting. It pit's a moral dilemma in the backdrop of a story, and looks at different views of the dilemma from different charcaters points of view. It is a dynamic story,:well written and the characters are very likeable. I thoroughly enjoyed the book and would read another from this author. It made me think what would my view be, what would my fears be. .. very interesting. .

Was this review helpful?

This is a controversial and thought provoking topic. This story is beautifully written and has been really well thought out. Rosie and Jules are in love and want a baby of their own. That love is evident throughout this book. The hate campaign against Jules and Rosie was well written. This is a topic that would have people vehemently against it.

Thank you to Netgalley for my copy.

Was this review helpful?

👍

Well written, convincing setting (once I'd gotten past the discrepancies between Fictional Portsmouth and Actual Portsmouth)

Shies away from the bigger picture at almost every opportunity, but that's actually okay, I think. It works as a close up portrait of this couple, and I'm wary of expecting every LGBT novel to have to teach us something or extrapolate to its full extent. It's a look at the effect this kind of fertility treatment has on this particular family, and it's a good one, and that's fine.

👎
The writing was good, but a bit dry, because Jules is a bit dry; would've liked to have maybe had Rosie's POV to break that up/provide a bit of excitement. Jules is very anxious, and basically responds exactly how I would, but she isn't the most sympathetic character.

All in all though, an interesting work of speculative fiction, and very timely; worth a look.

Was this review helpful?

I remember years ago reading about the potential for a baby to be produced using two women's eggs, bypassing the need for sperm. So when I saw that this book followed what could happen if/when this becomes a genuine option for women I knew I had to read. The most interesting part for me was around the media attention and speculation. As much as I would like to think in today's world it would not be so nasty and scathing, I know that is just wishful thinking. The political point-scoring and the impact on couples' personal relationships is also covered in detail.

The downside for me is the book felt a lot longer than it actually was. The writing was very dry and as interesting as it was following the journey, nothing much really seemed to happen. I found I didn't particularly care for the characters because I didn't feel I really got to know them. I understand it's a sensitive subject, and not one that needs or deserves any cheap twists, but I did find myself struggling to keep going at times.

Regardless this book deserves to get a lot of attention and I look forward to reading more from this author.

Was this review helpful?

My thanks to Dialogue Books/Little Brown for an ARC via NetGalley. I found it hard to put down this innovative work of speculative fiction and I am recommending it without reservation.

Written in the first person the narrative has a strong sense of immediacy and intimacy as Juliet (Jules) shares her thoughts and experiences. The premise of ovum-to-ovum fertilisation seems credible as do the negative responses to it by the media and various conservative voices.

While common sense indicates that such pregnancies would hardly threaten the conventional way of reproduction or create a world where males become the minority, there are scaremongering voices in the press and social media inciting harassment and threats of violence that feel all too plausible. Spot on that The Guardian, one of the non-fictional newspapers included in the novel, struggle in vain to be a voice of reason.

Chadwick does not allow the issues to swamp her story and Jules and Rosie remain at its heart. It is a stunning debut. A novel bound to stimulate discussion and be an excellent choice for reading groups given its accessibility and the issues raised.

Was this review helpful?

Wow!!!

A very interesting debut novel by Angela Chadwick. Not something that I would normally pick up to read but after reading the description on NetGalley I knew I had to request it.  

The book covers an interesting topic of lesbian couples who could become pregnant and have a biological baby which would always be a girl with the help of scientists who can use eggs from the two women without the need of  sperm donors, an interesting concept that could be all too real in the future.

The book takes us on a journey with a couple who take part in this new trial. It focuses on the couple and what’s it like for them along with what they are feeling and experiencing and how they are coping with the events that unfold while taking part with the trial.

I found the story very intriguing. I did struggle with it a little at the very beginning but the story picks up and from then on I was so gripped. I thought it was well written and the characters felt so real and believable. I felt I could empathise with some of the characters in this book.  

An overall enjoyable book that is thought provoking, while at the same a little challenging. I can just imagine the topic covered in this book becoming possible in the future. I look forward to reading more books by this author in the near future I hope. I highly recommend this book.

I would like to thank NetGalley and Little, Brown Book Group UK/Dialogue Books for my eARC in return for an honest and unbiased review.

Was this review helpful?

A Scottish journalist volunteers to become the first woman to be impregnated with an ovum to ovum baby with her female partner as the other biological parent. This is politically and ethically engaging, as well as a very personal read. It shows a world that is only a few years away, and it left me with a lot of thoughts about gender and science. Excellent.

Was this review helpful?

I couldn’t put this book down. I found it to be utterly heart-wrenching.
The characters were written so realistically - the reader feels like they know them, are part of their circle. I really felt for Jules and Rosie, and although they both annoyed me at times, at the same time their actions were completely understandable.

The plot was an interesting insight into what the world could be like if female same-sex couples could procreate, and it was well thought out and researched. I could completely believe all the processes that they went through, and all the politics they faced.

Now I just want the experiment to be realised (sans angry homophobic backlash) and implemented. I want real-life Emmelines.

This is an incredibly important and timely book, and a fantastic study of society. Thanks to Little Brown and Netgalley for the ARC ☺️

Was this review helpful?

The whole plot was set out so effectively that it made me feel like this was something that could be being developed somewhere in the world right now or it's in the near distant future! Social media, journalist and press were mentioned which made it quite relatable and of modern day. For example there were mentions of quickly checking Twitter whilst doing something else and honestly?! How many of us DON’T do this?? The UK Government system with the House of Lords and all still seems to be pretty much the same. Again making it seem like this could happen ANY day. I quite like the way it takes us through the journey by skipping unnecessary bits and only including stuff relevant to the Ovum-to-Ovum process. All the different reactions are also quite realistic and similar to how many people would react in real life!

However, I didn't really like Rosie as she's displayed as naive and sweet and child loving but also easily angered when anyone says anything against O-to-O? When I was quite a bit into the book I found myself honestly just so annoyed with Rosie like ugh? She’s done some really stupid stuff and when Juliet seems to have indirectly done something she’s all I think we need some time apart and goes to her mothers house like what? And refuses to talk to Juliet? Like where's all your niceness now? Juliet was super amazing and hard working and dedicated, though and I love how hard she tries!

The ending was really sweet and I loved how it all seemed to work out! The fact that the media started complimenting the baby and all seemed pretty unrealistic and was a bit dodge.
The epilogue was AMAZING! I loved how there more o-o babies and how Juliet was writing Emmeline the letter and not trying to hide the bad parts and mistakes of herself!
I thought it was a super great ending!

Read my review on my blog here: https://theeverlastinglibrary.wordpress.com/2018/09/19/xx-a-review/

Was this review helpful?

I'd heard a lot about this book and so was very excited to be accepted to read via netgalley!

This book, Chadwick's debut, is a highly original and thought-provoking concept. Jules and Rosie are a couple who get accepted on to a clinical trial at a university for 'ovum to ovum fertilisation' - IVF without the need for a donor and a way for lesbian couples to conceive a child made up of their DNA.

When the press gets hold of their story, there's a media frenzy. The couple are stalked by photographers, they aren't sure who they can trust and become the subject of a politician's bid to power. A bit of a slow burner at first but by the end I was gripped, as things just seemed to go from bad to worse. (Did not see the great plot twist coming either!)

A stark reminder that women's bodies and choices will always come under scrutiny in the public eye. Though it's possible this book can be described as speculative fiction, it's a concept that could be a possibility in the near distant future. Will definitely be recommending!

Was this review helpful?

This book was a complete change from my usual genre of crime fiction. I think it is bang on topic about same-sex couples having children,it's a topic that is definitely a conversation changer. I found the book a really interesting read,and thought the xploration of all the relationship's where very well written and researched. I certainly didn't expect to see the twist in the story,and it really made me catch my breath . It really does make you think about the possibility of this actually happening . A brilliant book.

Was this review helpful?