Cover Image: Title Deleted

Title Deleted

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

Unable to read and review this book. It was understandably pulled by the publisher after it was found out that this book was about genocide and not okay. I support the publishers' decision and hope in the future other publishers will do the same when a book goes against what they and their readers stand for.

Was this review helpful?

I will not be giving feedback on this book as I couldn’t really get into it but I think others may enjoy it.

Was this review helpful?

Unable to give feedback as title was pulled and is no longer being published, If an alternative version of the book is published I will provide a review at that time.

Was this review helpful?

Unfortunately, I don't know what book I'm meant to be reviewing here, as it has been deleted. I can't really review a book without knowing what book it is!

Was this review helpful?

This ain't it, fam.

If you're gonna write about a genocide, how about you don't make the people who a being murdered the bad guys?

Was this review helpful?

I’m not sure what this was so I can’t say if I read it; I didn’t realise titles vanished! But for the sake of my feedback score I need to ‘review’ it!

Was this review helpful?

This title was deleted and I have no idea what the book even was before I could review it! Sorry for the inconvenience.

Was this review helpful?

Since this book has book has been withdrawn, I won't leave a detailed review. I did read the book and it was a quick read.

Was this review helpful?

Title removed by publisher! Fiction is called fiction for a reason, it is a story. Please trust your readers, true readers to have the mentality to discern fiction from a memoir or actual historical account. We are smarter than the outcry, please allow us to use our brain to make a decision to read it or leave it. Do not feed into this “not safe” or “internet culture” that is undermining our freedom! Shame on you for assuming I am not intelligent enough to grasp the fact that this a story, fiction! Did you ever considered that reading this story would inspire a reader to read and understand what happened in Kosovo? You are standing on the cusp of a very, very slippery slope when you allow a group of people to control our choices, our freedom to think for ourselves.

Was this review helpful?

I very much wanted to leave a review for Kosoko Jackson's A Place for Wolves. I was sold early on thanks to the cover art and concept and was truly excited to partake on this bookish journey.

However, it soon came to my attention -- and many others -- that this story, its characters, and its plot was sparking some serious emotional outrage due to problematic content. This was honestly eye opening to me because I didn't know enough about the history surrounding the REAL LIFE events that are featured in this novel. As I still need time to educate myself on the actual historical events, I decided to delay reading this advanced copy. Unfortunately, before I got the time to do so I heard that this book was being pulled from publication, which might be the right call given early readers' responses.

I do still intend to read this book, but since it's been pulled from Netgalley and every bookseller's site I cannot provide more than this here.

Was this review helpful?

I was unable to read or review this book before it was pulled by publishers. I understand the controversy surrounding the plot of this book and am grateful that I was given an opportunity to read it. Would look forward to reading other books by this author.

Was this review helpful?

Not sure how to review since title was pulled from publication due to social media uproar. I will still read the book, but feel my review is irrelevant at this point.

Was this review helpful?

Social media uproar removed this book. Bad rep. But I know the author will grow. Even though it was deleted, I am sure you'll find many people talking about it, which honestly is more atrention to the book.

Was this review helpful?

I'm sorry to see this book get pulled. I will still read it and keep an eye out. I think the current atmosphere is very unfriendly to anything but a specific set of POVs.

Was this review helpful?

I would give this book a second chance, but I hope more consideration is taken into account for those that lived through the war and still experiences it's consequences.

Was this review helpful?

Not sure what this title is as it shows as "title deleted". I don't know what to offer in terms of a review here.

Was this review helpful?

Cannot review as title was pulled from publication. I also do not feel comfortable reading and reviewing this novel due to the concerns about the content that caused the publication to be cancelled.

Was this review helpful?

This book got pulled (and you obviously know since the title is deleted). But I'm always here for second chances and I can't wait to see what the author does next and to support a clean slate! <3

Was this review helpful?

A Place For Wolves receives one star since I DNFed this book as a result of it being pulled from publication a few days ago.

Was this review helpful?

Well, you may have heard about this book – a gay YA romance/thriller was supposed to be published either in late March or early April, got a lot of backlash because of supposed insensitivities to Muslims given its setting, and was withdrawn from publication by the author.

I, like many others, was granted an eARC by the publisher, Sourcebooks Fire, shortly before the author withdrew the book from publication. I just finished the book last night, since my copy was still valid, and this is my honest review. It may not necessarily be unbiased, but it is honest.

First, I will simply assess the book itself. Then I will talk about the controversy surrounding the book. This book was a little over 300 pages. It is told from the perspective of James Mills, a black boy who is also gay and adopted. His parents are highly educated aid workers – his mother is a doctor, and his father is an engineer. They travel around the world offering their expertise, and they’ve brought their kids, Anna and James, along, so James has been around the world already. In the novel, however, Anna has already gone to college at Georgetown. He and his boyfriend wake up one day to find that James’s parents have gone missing, their home ransacked, and the town completely empty. A letter left behind reveals that his parents have been abducted, and that James and his boyfriend need to get to the embassy. This story is their attempted journey to safety.

The book alternates between James’s present-tense narrative and the letters he writes to Anna. It is in the letters we learn about James’s life before the Kosovo War and how his relationship with Tomas Sousa, his Brazilian boyfriend, started.

James’s voice is good and he is witty at times. The action in the present-day narrative is a stark contrast to the letters he sends to his sister, since life seemed very normal – going to school, exploring the town and surrounding area, hanging out with his classmates and slowly falling love with Tomas. His narrative is quite dark, as the story, at its core, is one of survival. James ends up killing at least two people on their journey to the embassy.

There is also violence, and it is graphically described. I thought it was kind of slow at the beginning, but picked up about halfway through the book.

The villain is suitably powerful and infuriating…and also brutal. Not much is said about the actual conflict that the boys get caught up in – the main antagonists are members of the Kosovo Liberation Army, an organization that existed in real life, and we see foreshadowing of the villain himself and their slow takeover of the town in James’s letters to Anna.

There isn’t a whole lot of what I would call SJW preaching, except for one incident with a stereotypically blond-haired, blue-eyed, sharp-jawed German boy named Georg, who basically calls Tomas a faggot in German, or something. James punches his lights out, and is disciplined by his parents for it. Also, James uses the phrase “toxic masculinity” in one of his letters, and I am pretty sure I didn’t hear that phrase until recently. Based on where James is at the time of the Kosovo War, which was in the late 90s, he and I would be roughly the same age, give or take a couple of years. I also read a lot of teen and women’s magazines…and no mention of “toxic masculinity.”

Since this was an eARC, there were some punctuation errors and other problems, most notably some incorrect word usage that I found a bit confusing. I had to guess at what the author actually meant.

As I said, it picks up about halfway through, and is quickly-paced, but that pacing seems to be interrupted by the letters to Anna. Near the end, you’ll just want to know what happens next, not the weird shit James wanted to share with his sister (such as the first time he and Tomas have sex…I don’t know about anyone else, but I have two sisters and we didn’t talk about our sex lives with each other…that would have been weird).

So the end…the climax is good and satisfying, but the actual resolution left me wanting. The Epilogue is told in the third-person, from Anna’s perspective, and then it ends.

I also read through the Author’s Note, and I pretty much agreed with what the author was trying to say – that, often times in conflicts such as the Kosovo War, nobody is totally innocent or totally evil. Not all Serbians were evil, and not all KLA members were good. I was, however, surprised that the author’s research was done with only three or four resources, all of which were listed at the end of the author’s note.

Not only that, I still don’t know why the author thought this particular incident warranted a YA thriller, beyond wanting more people to know about it. Did he have any sort of connection to the Kosovo War?

I would normally give this book three stars on the GoodReads scale…maybe three and a half, but I gave it four stars for having a nuanced message on the nature of war and such.

So now that’s the review of the book. Now I want to discuss the issues surrounding the book.

It is said that this book is insensitive to the Albanian Muslims that were supposedly genocided by the Serbians. The book doesn’t go heavily into the conflict, which makes sense, since James and Tomas are there as its happening. Furthermore, they’re both foreigners to the land. They probably wouldn’t have the deeper understanding of a native who’s been living there for a long time or their whole lives. I wondered why the author chose to make an American kid his main character, other than the whole “staying in one’s lane” nonsense. I thought it was even more baffling that he chose another foreigner as the love interest. It might have been more interesting if James’s love interest had been a local boy. That would have also required a lot more research, and might have made it far too political for a YA novel, so I dunno.

None of that warrants cancelling the publication of this book, however. The conflict itself is handled well and not in an offensive way. The only time we really get a whole lot of romance is in James’s letters to Anna. Whenever they are romantic to each other in the present-tense narrative, it’s in the context of, “we might die here, so we should die together” or “I am not leaving you behind.” Since they’re both trying to get to the embassy (and later on, to rescue James’s mother), there isn’t much time for making out or having sex. They’re trying not to get their shoes stolen, or shot by KLA goons, etc. They’re trying to survive in a foreign country during a violent conflict in the dead of winter. That’s how gritty it is. Oh, and both boys wisely stay as far away from potential spots of conflict, and for good reason, so we don’t really see much of the conflict – just their attempts to survive.

I don’t think it is insensitive to the people that suffered through it, unless you count a couple of foreigners being present during the conflict insensitive. I think the people that complained about this book were making a big deal out of nothing.

Now, about the villain. We first meet the villain in James’s letters. He describes his new teacher, Professor Beqiri, as an Oxford-educated snob who, nonetheless, is a good teacher and expects a lot of his students. His teacher is also very anti-Serbian and expects his political beliefs to be reflected in the work he assigns to his students. Yeah, we Conservatives won’t be surprised at that. After all, a great deal of our public school teachers basically parrot their political beliefs to their students and expect those students to regurgitate those beliefs in their schoolwork.

So, it turns out that his well-dressed, well-groomed teacher abducted his parents and some of the other foreigners, including Clara, a German girl with an ambassador for a father, to help in the KLA’s efforts. He became a professor to these foreigners so that he could get closer to them.

Beqiri is an extremist and a zealot, but for the KLA’s cause, which is independence. At no point in the novel is it ever indicated that Beqiri is religious, much less Muslim. His one and only goal is that of the KLA’s goal – independence for Kosovo. He’s not a Muslim terrorist, and in fact, I don’t think Beqiri is religious at all, especially given that he’s Oxford-educated. Now, I am sure that a great deal of the KLA might have been Muslim, but that does not mean all of them were religious.

Then again, the left seems to think that Islam is an ethnicity or race. It is not. A white, red-haired dude can be Muslim, you know. Anybody can be Muslim. It is a religion, not a race or ethnicity.

So, in conclusion, the critics are utterly full of shit. This wasn’t insulting to Muslims. It took a nuanced view of the Kosovo War, and since, in the eyes of these people, Muslims can do no wrong, because they’re rather high on the Progressive Stack of Victimhood. This is also one reason why they find 9/11 memorials so offensive. Who gives a shit about the people murdered by Muslim fanatics – Muslims everywhere might feel discriminated against, and that’s clearly more important than the memory of our countrymen!

Make no mistake – the attack on the book was politically motivated. The author did not show the proper deference to one of the left’s pet victim groups. The author, though he can claim Black and Gay Victimhood Points, did not check his Privilege. Therefore, he had to be punished.

I want to thank NetGalley and the publisher for granting me a copy of this book.

Was this review helpful?