Cover Image: Against Nature

Against Nature

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

By some accounts, this is the book that Oscar Wilde had in mind as the book that helped corrupt Dorian Gray. In it, Duc Jean des Esseintes retreats from Parisian society to a secluded villa and spends his time contemplating all that is artificial, artistic, and intellectual. It's basically a more depressing, more decadent version of Ecclesiastes featuring a debauched aesthete instead of the Preacher (Vanity of vanities, says the Aesthete, vanity of vanities! All is vanity.)

Des Esseintes ponders colors, perfumes, prostitutes, affairs, drinks, art, literature, religion, etc. ad nauseum (and there actually quite a bit of literal nausea as his health is in a delicate state). This eventually peters out to a miserable conclusion that led one early critic to opine that, "After such a book, it only remains for the author to choose between the muzzle of a pistol or the foot of the cross."

Interestingly, this edition of the book starts starts with a preface by the author written about twenty years after original publication. While standing by some of his aesthetic and religious judgments, he indicates that he has returned to the church he so despised. Apparently, like the Preacher he discovered:

The end of the matter; all has been heard. Fear God and keep his commandments, for this is the whole duty of man. For God will bring every deed into judgment, with every secret thing, whether good or evil. - Ecclesiastes 12:13-14 (the last two verses of the book)

Overall, I found the book tedious and pretentious (and morally pretty gross), but its connection to The Picture of Dorian Gray and similarity to Ecclesiastes provided a degree of interest. The author inadvertently playing out the last two verses of Ecclesiastes with his own life further shows the wisdom of the Preacher:

What has been is what will be,
    and what has been done is what will be done,
    and there is nothing new under the sun. - Ecclesiastes 1:9

Was this review helpful?

Very decent edition of Huysmans’ classic. Not so much a novel as a critical look at art and literature. Worth a look for the highly memorable and downright despicable protagonist.

This was an ARC in exchange for an honest review. With thanks to Netgalley and Dover.

Was this review helpful?