This is book is looking at some of the culture breakdowns in society and seeing how it can be changed for the common good.

This book is very much written from an American view and issues there. I am not saying that as a negative just a point to know about the book.

The first Part of the book is The Breakdown Community of the Passing of the American church. Looking from the outside I can see many of the issues that he is raising. It grieves my heart to see how the church has bought into so much of the world's values and views. "The tragedy is that when the church fails to preach the gospel faithfully and submit its life to the lordship of Christ, the effects are not limited to the church."

Part Two - The Problems for Community - What is the purpose of community? We have loss of meaning. I life in a large city but in the community where we life we are a small community that cares for one another.

Part Three - The Practices of Community - there is some hope given in this section.

Part Four - The Promise of Community -

Overall I felt that this point had numerous good points and things that Christians need to be addressing. At times is seemed to be disjointed bits of information trying to join to together but not always succeeding.

I came to the end of the book and could not really summarise what I had read. There were parts that I underlined, things that caused me to think, and information to help me understand what is happening in America.

Thanks to NetGalley for the opportunity to review this book.

I was provided an e-arc from netgalley to read and review
Interesting read,
anyone could learn from it, Christian or not

This book touched on many important topics - so many important topics. It skimmed over our view of work in the world, our lack of connection with our neighbors, our modern use of technology, and on and on. Many of these topics are things I have already been considering for a long time. It truly is a valuable book that has earned all the awards it has been given.

That said, since I was already thinking about the big topics raised by the book, I wanted more. I wanted to sit down with the author and a group of friends and have a long, rambling discussion of these issues that would go beyond what a 200-something page limit could allow. There's so much here to think about. This book is probably best viewed as a jumping-off point for in-person conversation with other people who care about these issues.

This book was very dense and deep - as it tackled what it means to look for the "common good" in society. I enjoyed many of the concepts and theological topics tackled here - but at times it was a little intense and hard to follow.

Review by Diane Roth,
for The Englewood Review of Books

Back in my days working in church-based community organizing, I remember a question one of the leaders asked me: “I wonder if anyone believes in ‘the common good’ any more?” He was speaking of the difficulty emerging in those days of getting Democratic and Republican representatives to work together with us on local issues that we had crafted purposely to try to bridge partisan divides.

I read In Search of the Common Good hoping to find the answer to this question. I’m not sure that Jake Meador answers that question, although on the way to his particular vision of Christian community, I found some surprising common ground. I say surprising because there were many things about his book that alienated me. He speaks from an evangelical perspective, and begins by naming nine things that all evangelicals should believe and bemoans the fact that most people who say that they are evangelical don’t believe all of them. He speaks of “the Left” broadly as the enemy of committed Christianity, as if there could be no Christians, like me, who are committed to the truth of Scripture but who are also committed to (for example) the full inclusion of gay and lesbian people in the body of Christ.

Yet, in some of his critiques of current culture, I find common ground with Jake Meador. He writes eloquently about the extreme individualism that has infected our culture, finding its roots not in the last thirty years of so, but in existential and liberal ideologies. Existential philosophers like Camus and Sartre encourage people to make their own meaning in a meaningless world. Liberal ideology believes in personal freedom above all else – community might be valuable but only inasmuch as it serves our own interests. This is certainly a critique of “liberalism” – but this word “liberal” does not carry the meaning that most modern-day conservatives think it does. This is the “liberalism” at the heart of the word “libertarian”. As well, it is the word at the heart of the whole American Experiment in liberal democracy.

This is no surprise, as I suspect that both Jake Meador and I would agree that the United States is not simply a “Christian nation.” Toward the end of his book, as he recounts the vision of the eternal city, he imagines Christians from all over the world, with their own particular cultures, streaming toward this city, singing and praising in their own ways. So he knows that the word “Christian” is not reserved for its American adherents. In that way I welcome a breadth of vision that I don’t often find in conservative circles.

I also resonated with his critique of farm policy in the United States. He names Department of Agriculture Secretary Earl Butz’s famous line, “get big or get out” – a line meant to tell farmers that the greatest values in farming were efficiency and creating wealth. As a young pastor in the rural Midwestern United States, I saw the results of this policy as small communities declined or were destroyed. But, to my mind, it was liberal political theory that was destroying them. It was policies advanced by conservative Republican politicians, and which they embraced, or at least tried to embrace, and failed, as farmers went bankrupt and left the land.

Predictably, Meador lays most of the blame for our current situation on the Left, and on liberalism. He critiques the Left for reducing the meaning of the word “community” to what government can do. He shares an ominous example from one of Barack Obama’s campaign ads, about a woman named “Julia”, as critiqued by Ross Douthat:

She seems to have no meaningful relationships apart from her bond with the Obama White House: no friends or siblings or extended family, no husband (“Julia decides to have a child”, is all the slide show says), a son who disappears once school starts and parents who only matter because Obamacare grants her the privilege of staying on their health care plan until she’s 26. This lends the whole production a curiously patriarchal quality, with Obama as a beneficent Daddy Warbucks and Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan co-starring as the wicked uncles threatening to steal Julia’s inheritance.

To Meador’s credit, he also believes that the conservative vision of community has also been diminished (although he doesn’t name the phenomenon in conservative circles of revering “job creators” over all others in community as worthy of support and emulation).

So where is the common good? Meador both diagnoses its absence in the loss of meaningful work, the loss of Sabbath, and the loss of wonder, and he finds hints of common good in their presence. It is when he speaks of wonder – and of taking joy and noticing small things in life – that I most resonate with his vision. I hear in this aspect of his vision a concern that I share: that the politics of both the Right and the Left will drown out and overshadow other aspects of community life. In terms of our polarization, they already have.

I see this in churches that nowadays are more comfortable defining themselves by their political commitments than by their theology (if, indeed, they know what their theology is); I see this in families fractured by political differences; I see this in communities that are becoming politically homogenized (whether on the Right or on the Left), so that voices of difference are shamed into silence.

The common good – as Jake Meador rightly notes – is not a pizza, where everyone gets a slice – until it’s gone. But what it is? It is at its heart more a web, where the strands cannot be separated.

Meador’s last chapter – the Eternal City – is both his best, and also profoundly sad. This is the chapter where he visits a great cathedral in St. Paul, Minnesota, and where he proposes to his wife, after a performance of the Messiah. The great vision – and the small joys of life – this is the intersection where “the common good” begins. In some ways it is a wide vision, as he includes not just Christian America, but Christians from the entire world – in this vision. But from the beginning of his book, his vision of Christianity is so exclusive – that I’m not sure that it includes me. That is what makes it profoundly sad.

An exploration of the challenges of early 21st century Western culture.

The author does well at even-handedly investigating what has gone wrong with our culture: the loss of community, the rise of rampant individualism, the loss of value in work and effort, the commodification of everything, etc. This is not a partisan work; he finds as much at fault in modern conservatism as he does modern liberalism.

The author no doubt finds in faithful Christian living some kind of antidote to these difficulties, and a presumed path to the common good, but I found the work much lighter in terms of figuring out the way forward than it was in ascertaining how things have broken down. The author is a fan of Dreher's "Benedict Option," and much good could be done with more effective Christian catchesis. But that doesn't seem like something that's going to bring everyone in our pluralist society around to the common good, although it might well be that the author is convinced there can be no common good without communal confession of Christianity. If that's the case, then the common good was rarely, if ever, activated, and has little prayer in the future as a going concern, and is chasing after a myth...or the definition of what it might look like to find common ground in a secular society to improve the lot of everyone would need to be considered to be possible. Is it an impossibility or just beyond the imaginative purview of the author and his associates?

Nevertheless, a good read to consider the situation in which we find ourselves.

I have a love/hate relationship with Meador's writing typically, but this is a volume that is worth engaging if only for the fact that it certainly interacts well with the current....milieu, perhaps?

wow, her relevant! I confess there were times in which it was difficult to read. The author has clearly thought and researched thoroughly to write this. But he doesn't leave us in despair, in the hopeless image of our days. He shows the light that overcomes every darkness and hurt and renews our hope!

The author is well informed and performs some deep analysis of culture. As with any person that was influenced by the Schaeffer's, in reading him you'll find practical and useful things.

One big lesson in the book is to offer others gifts that require your time to make, such as a well prepared meal.

There are a lot of reasons to lose hope in this fallen world. Relationships are failing, there is a break down in community, and rising depression. But there is something--Someone greater than all the brokenness in the world around us.

This book attempts to find middle ground in our deeply divided world, especially in matters of financial status and politics. It's not hard to look at the world and be depressed and hopeless.

But there is a bigger story at play, one that is build upon a stronger foundation--in which we can take part.

While a good read, this book didn't quite give me that thought provoking feeling that I felt that it kept grasping at. There were some issues that I thought that the author had an interesting view on, it seemed to be written for people who might not have read as much on this topic before, yet on the other hand I felt that it lacked conciseness in some areas, and I didn't always feel like the arguments were presented evenly. It was interesting to read about the author's convictions on the New Earth and Heaven, though I personally always take such teaching with a grain of salt as I surely can only speculate from what I know from Scripture.

In the end I felt that this book was underwhelming and perhaps that is a result of the previous books that I read. It is a good reminder that while there is so much to be disheartened about, there is also a greater hope in Jesus Christ.

I received this book from the publisher in exchange for an honest review.