Although I’m always interested in finding out about contemporary Russian writing, this worthy but ultimately unsatisfying anthology left me feeling bemused rather than engaged. It’s a collection of short plays, mostly experimental ones, from young Russian writers and primarily for performance in small, fringe venues. The 10 pieces presented here cover a range of subjects and themes, but I found it difficult to imagine the staging, and it’s certainly not a book for the general reader. The introduction is invaluable and for those with more knowledge than me about contemporary drama there’s probably much to discover and enjoy here, but I personally found the pieces hard to relate to.

Well, I have two degrees in Russian literature, so perhaps I am the ideal audience for this book. Even so, it was sometimes hard to stay engaged with the plays. The corruption and cynicism that permeates Putin's Russia has infected all levels of society, and these postmodern plays reflect that. This book is important for documenting the current state of Russian drama, but it probably won't challenge Chekhov's place of honor on anyone's bookshelf.

Thank you to the publishers and NetGalley for the digital ARC.

I really struggled with this one. I found it interesting as I have never read plays by Russian authors before. It was a very different style of writing and sometimes it felt like the structure of the story didn’t translate well into English. A lot of them came across as juvenile because of unnecessary vulgar language. I have nothing against vulgar language it just felt over used in some plays, and unnecessary. I did enjoy several of the plays and overall felt it was a decent collection.

Postmodern, Sarah Kane-esque, nihilistic and bleak; the plays in this anthology sway between mediocrity and excellence.

I come to this, as I have consistently tried with this certain highly academic (and very good) publisher, as a regular browser, the man-on-the-bus non-specialist, who – you never know – may perchance stumble on one of their books and try and broaden their horizons. Plus, my degree (partly in English and drama) does mean I'm au fait with reading play scripts, which more people should do. What could they possibly be like, under Putin's watch?

Well, bleakness is in order for the first play, which starts with a child dying and goes on from there, as two wannabe sexed-up teenagers see the darkness of their lot, and meet it with their own belligerence head-on. Questions abound about how to stage the flipping thing, with two bird species, a cat (non-smiling), a bus, molten lead and more all mentioned in the stage directions.

The second play certainly tries to be funnier, but fails. The academic side of the book would have its particular brand of ennui pointed out, as it's about a young chap who helps police film reconstructions and record suspects' testimony in situ, only for a death to happen during one such event, which causes another. The farcical elements of filming a filming could have made a reasonable TV skit, but it doesn't work, even when two creatives come along and brainstorm the writing of all we've just been subject to. Tres postmodern. Tres unfunny – the whole smacks of a sketch dragged out far too long.

Then it goes further downhill. Verbatim theatre isn't my thing, and something about Chechnyan terrorism even less so. The fourth piece is too Chekhovian in style and subject, the fifth almost Brechtian in how we don't get a glimpse of character when seeing some machine plant workers. Better is a tale of some boring-sounding youths and their fake, pretense relationship, although the huge interlude concerning other, more boring people in an office is a waste of time. We wait a long time for something much better, with a look at a journalist whose wife has died. Wayward sons, failing relationships with betrayals of trust and fidelity… we're still on dark ground, but this is so much more narratively satisfying than a lot that went before. AND we have characters. Elsewhere at the end, one play takes far too long to discuss the flaws in democracy that might be a woman's domestic lot, and we close with a piece that really doesn't travel without its specific ethnic concerns.

So if the average bus reader were to pick this up, it would like as not end up through the window in a matter of stops. Seriously for the theatre academic alone, I'm sure they find glories ahoy. The average browser, like me, will probably find this hard work, with only one or two memorable exceptions.

I wish I could like this book more! Richard Schechner writes in his Foreword that when he was growing up in the theatre, it was all Russia, and it was like that for me, too. Although I didn't grow up <i>in</i> the threatre, I very much grew up <i>with</i> the theatre, and it was all Russia! My aesthetic sensibility was totally shaped by the Chekvovs and the Gogols and the Turgenevs I saw as a little (and then teenage) girl, totally immersing myself into the depressive, stifling world those characters inhabited. Unfortunately, I can't say I found quite the same qualities in the present volume, though perhaps that would be asking too much from a society that has gone through severe shock and trauma.

As Schechner explains, those in the West conversant with Sarah Kane or Annie Sprinkle will not find anything new in this volume; what they will find, however, is a depiction of contemporary Russia in all its 'postapocalyptic' violence. Hopeless and nihilistic, the characters in these plays are largely unlikeable, unapproachable, difficult to relate to. Alienation and mindless violence mark their life experiences; there seems to be no explanation for this violence, just a stupid, irrational wish to get another human being down. The language reflects this mindlessness: short, snappy sentences puncutate a discourse full of brutality and misogyny where women are sluts or bitches and ordinary human emotions are absent. I have to admit I was quite unable to finish the book -- although I fully appreciate that the theatre is not just about the writing, it's also the staging, the actors, the atmosphere, the lighting... What reads like a mediocre play could be transformed by a competent group into something much more potent. In addition, these plays give a very compelling image of Russian society. I'll end with Schechner's words again:<i> "Taken as a unit, these playwrights have for the most part surrendered to Putin's grotesque, post-Soviet dry rot. They don't advocate, or hope. These plays are short on Brechtian irony, Ibsenian outrage, or Milleresque sentimentality. I think I get it: for these writers, life in Moscow, or life in Chechnya, or Belarus -- all over urban Russia, and its sphere of influence and hostility, both metropolis and hinterland-- is, to quote Thomas Hobbes, 'No arts; no letters; no society; and which is worst of all, continual fear, and danger of violent death: and the life of man, solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short' (The Leviathan, ch. 12)". </i>