Cover Image: The Awful Truth About the Sushing Prize

The Awful Truth About the Sushing Prize

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

This is a hilariously funny humorous book that has so much more packed into it.
Fabulously engaging characters and an intriguing plot. Highly recommended."

Was this review helpful?

This has to go down as my most highlighted ebook to date! Nearly every page brought another tongue-in-cheek spoof of writing, reading, fiction in general, or crime fiction in particular.

I just haven’t read another book quite like it!

The story follows Marco Ocram, bad writer and something of an idiot all round, as he writes his own crime adventure while it occurs. Every word of the story pops from Marco’s addled brain and into reality, via the filter of the words we read on the page. It’s unbelievably meta and incredibly good fun.

Starting with a new television and a squished body, Marco drags his reluctant hero (who he believes to be a sidekick) Como along for a romp through the tropes and clichés of crime fiction, framed utterly anew by the unique style of delivery.

There are innumerable media and cultural references: Marco Ocram is basically standing in front of the Fourth Wall nodding, winking and mouthing ‘Ha ha, look!’ periodically at the reader. I think I could reread the book multiple times and still find new gems.

Whilst seemingly unlikable with few redeeming features, Marco actually quickly endeared himself to me as he bumbled from one ridiculous situation to the next, solemnly pointing out every plot hole and linguistic flaw but pushing determinedly onward in the blind belief that somehow it will all turn out okay if he just keeps on writing.

In my opinion, regardless of the outcome of the case, it did!

I would recommend this to fans of Castle, Robert Rankin’s Lazlo Woodbine and pretty much any self-aware humorous fiction. I can’t wait for the next book…! (5th August 2019).





I hadn’t forgotten. In my last book, I’d wanted to play the bad cop in the ‘good cop, bad cop’ routine when we interviewed one of the baddies, but Como pointed out that I was a writer, not a cop, so we ended up doing the ‘good cop, bad writer’ routine, with me as the bad writer, which had caused no end of cheap jokes at my expense. You don’t forget a thing like that easily.

– Marco Ocram, The Awful Truth About the Sushing Prize


Review by Steph Warren of Bookshine and Readbows blog

Was this review helpful?

Funny, creative, and weird mystery. This won't be for everyone (that wants a funny read), but the author is very talented. If you're seeking something different, you'll probably like this. Recommended.

Thank you to Tiny Fox Press and NetGalley for the ARC!!

Was this review helpful?

this book kept me in tear's of deep laughter and i swear that i have never read a book of this kind! And also an excellent adventure to keep you interested all the way through!

Was this review helpful?

Hmmm... I'm not sure whether I liked this book or not. I guess it is a humorous mystery with a very original concept but I found it a little annoying at times. A quick read and a little bit different but not as funny as it thinks it is.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to Tiny Fox Press and NetGalley for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.

Not a mystery so much as a stream of consciousness narrated by a complete idiot. There is no 4th wall in this story, we are privy to every single fact that flits through the narrator's head and that in turn becomes the story. There is also no superpower, it's just that the story takes many twists and turns (see above), until ending in an extremely unlikely way.

Overall, this would have been genius as a short story, or maybe a longread. As a complete book, not so much.

Was this review helpful?

Weird, creative, unfair, humorous, and clever are all adjectives that can be used to describe this truly novel novel. Whatever rules you learned in your writing classes can be thrown away, and probably should be, if you’re going to enjoy this story in which our protagonist/author writes his own story—sometimes successfully, other times: not so much. But, philosophically speaking, isn’t that what each person tries (or fails) to do each day?

Was this review helpful?