Cover Image: The Deaths and Afterlife of Aleister Crowley

The Deaths and Afterlife of Aleister Crowley

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

A densely written, smug libertine narrator couldn't see me get more than a fifth of the way through this novel, and I didn't have time to slog it through to the end.

Was this review helpful?

I ended up not finishing this one, it just wasn't for me, thanks anyway for taking the time to accept my request.

Was this review helpful?

The Deaths and Afterlife of Aleister Crowley is a very interesting paranormal story where the story is about his life as a cult leader and Satanist. This has been debauched for years. The rumors also are interesting.

The story was very interesting.

Was this review helpful?

With such a stunning premise and cover, I really expected to fall in love with this one.

Sadly, it wasn't a great reading experience. I was bored for most of the book, and my eyes began skimming the text. I didn't get any personality from our main character, he just felt really bland and the narrative was dry. I actually think this may be religious fiction, because it was peppered with quotes from the Bible, and I thought it was historical fantasy!

Anyway, false advertising with bad writing, not great!

Was this review helpful?

I think that the students in our school library need to hear lots of diverse voices and read stories and lives of many different kinds of people and experiences. When I inherited the library it was an incredibly sanitised space with only 'school readers' and project books on 'the railways' etc. Buying in books that will appeal to the whole range of our readers with diverse voices, eclectic and fascinating subject matter, and topics that will intrigue and fascinate them was incredibly important to me.
This is a book that I think our senior readers will enjoy very much indeed - not just because it's well written with an arresting voice that will really keep them reading and about a fascinating topic - but it's also a book that doesn't feel worthy or improving, it doesn't scream 'school library and treats them like young reading adults who have the right to explore a range of modern diverse reads that will grip and intrigue them and ensure that reading isn't something that they are just forced to do for their English project - this was a solid ten out of ten for me and I'm hoping that our students are as gripped and caught up in it as I was. It was one that I stayed up far too late reading and one that I'll be recommending to the staff as well as our senior students - thank you so much for the chance to read and review; I really loved it and can't wait to discuss it with some of our seniors once they've read it too!

Was this review helpful?

Sometimes fantasy and reality blend beautifully in a novel.

Just not in this case.

I’ve long been fascinated by Crowley and loved the premise for this book. I suppose I was expecting some sort of fantastical magic spy novel, maybe something akin to Kingsmen (which I adore) with a little more traditional fantasy abra cadabra type of hijinks.

Instead, the book seemed as though it were unable to make up its mind whether it was historical fiction or high fantasy and couldn’t successfully blend the two. The tone goes from banal and droning when semi-autobiographical to schlocky whiz bang when leaning toward fantasy.

Throw in too much religion, too many drugs, and a whole lot of other eye-roll inducing content, and what could have been a really fun, unique story ended up being disappointingly disjunctive and dull.

Was this review helpful?

This wasn't a match for me. The voice of the main character was unpleasantly arrogant and the writing a bit too pretentious. That said, it's a book I want to reread at some point, and I'm definitely keeping an eye on this author's future work.

Was this review helpful?

The cover is beautiful and the description of the book sounded really promising. A lot of lengthy descriptions and main character it was hard to root for made this a hard one for me to stay interested in. I felt bored and would find my mind wandering, perhaps just not the book for me.

Was this review helpful?

An interesting fictional biography of the life of one of the 20th century's most enigmatic and misunderstood men; Aleister Crowley. I don't think this book will necessarily put right any misconceptions or win him any new fans but it's certainly a weird and entertaining take on an odd man of history.

Was this review helpful?

This book was not what I expected. I was entranced by the cover and the blurb spoke to me but unfortunately it was just not the book I was looking for.

Do not mistake my meaning. This book has wonderful literary prose and flipping the Aleister Crowley story on its head was an inspired concept.

I expected something a little more satanic,

If however you are a lover of literary prose and don't mind the odd bible quote then I would recommend it. My personal taste is not this advanced and so I didn't manage to finish the book. Which is a pity as I like the idea that (spoiler)

Crowley's life was misjudged by others and he was not evil at all. I think this was just a case of wrong reader wrong book rather than a "good" or "bad" book.

Was this review helpful?

DNF 20%

If you're in the market for a Forrest Gump / Aleister Crowley mashup, then look further ... much much further than this book. It had the potential to be a bloody brilliant madcap tale, and instead it was just soooooo boring.

Thank you to Netgalley and the publishers for the ARC.

Was this review helpful?

I really enjoyed a great many things about this book. Characters were fleshed out and the plot was well spaced. Some of the secondary storylines could've used a bit more page space but all in all an enjoyable read!

Was this review helpful?

I requested this book for review because I was intrigued by the premise: that the historical Aleister Crowley was actually a British spy and played a part in various world events. Alas, the narrative focused heavily on Crowley's sexual exploits, drug usage, and involvement with various cults, to the near-exclusion of anything that really interested me. The spy stuff seemed tacked on as an occasional afterthought. As a result, the book lacked any semblance of a dramatic arc or suspense, and the characters were uniformly distasteful to me. (As a note, the narrative conflates actual historical fact with items now proven to be propaganda forgeries, so the whole thing should be taken as unreliable -- it is, after all, fiction.)

All in all, consistent historical tone but otherwise disappointing.

Was this review helpful?

This book was absolutely fascinating! I’ve read some about Crowley, but have been interested to learn more. This is fiction, however there is some fact in there and it was difficult to distinguish the fact from the fiction. This book was a hell of a ride, and I’m glad that I went along for it!

Was this review helpful?

I didn't find the story interesting and the main character did not have any redeeming traits. I tried several times to read the book and could not finish it.

Was this review helpful?

I requested the book without hesitation through Netgalley based on the promise of an interesting alternative take on this historical figure, based on the cover, based on the fact that I would find it personally unacceptable if I didn’t read it. But before I started reading this title, the reviews and the average rating on Goodreads filled me with fear of god. It wasn’t looking too damn good, at all.
In conclusion upon finishing the book, I found that as there was a lot of eventful life as well as other historical events to cover off, it was maybe slightly too much by the end. At least for me. Thing is- the further the story got along, and whilst I still found each instance of a note-worthy milestone interesting, I was getting worn out by colourful picture the author was painting.

Having said that, the aforementioned was my only criticism during the whole of this reading experience. I found the writing to be lovely and rich, as fitting for our main character, as well as the settings and scenes wonderfully engaging. The air of occult hangs in the air because in the back of your head you know Crowley is somewhat of a shadowy figure. It is all the more amplified by the fact that profanity has not been redacted and some of these poems in the story could make a more sensitive reader’s toes curl in distaste.

But all in all, what mysterious, wonderful, eclectic journey. Again, I am no Crowley-expert so I am unfortunately unable to draw any lines about what has been recorded about him in reality and what was portrayed in the book to give you a proper comparison. The little I do know is that, in non-fictional terms he should creep the bejeebus out of you for being a creepy magic-practising Satanist with a healthy appetite in experimental drug use, sexual pleasures with both men and women and for not practising his spirituality quietly in the corner somewhere and instead using his ‘world view’ for social criticism. In fictional terms, when it comes to this book, he’s just … a larger than life character, a type of hero who accepts the downfall of his character for the greater good. And yes, he still loves to shag both ways and get zonked on jungle juice but in this story, his ‘sins’ are balanced out with his mission to do good in the world.

For anyone who enjoys an alternative take on history, this book could be truly interesting. World Wars are covered, Hitler is in the picture as well as Churchill, Rasputin and the Christian fundamentalist group Plymouth Brethren. Hells’ bells, there’s even Shangri La in this book. The historical alternatives are peppered with scenes of earthy, pagan/occultist undertones adding atmosphere and further entertainment.

The Deaths and Afterlife of Aleister Crowley is at times a drug-fuelled, sex-driven fantasy romp on the timeline of past, as much as an alternative case study of Aleister’s character and life that covers the entirety of his life, including his relationships with his parents, his lovers, his friends. His life dissected by chapters as we count down to his ‘return to life’. Yep, it might not be everyone’s cup of tea, but if you recognize a pull in yourself towards the less mainstream, then this would be the book for you.

Was this review helpful?

I was so excited about this book because the cover drew me in but ultimately, I was disappointed by it.

I didn't find myself engrossed in the story and it kind of dragged for me.

Unfortunately I would not recommend this book.

Was this review helpful?

Going in to this novel, I was super excited because its an alternative retelling of the adventures of Aleister Crowley aka The Devil. The cover had sucked me in with it gorgeous script and beautiful border. It was however not exactly not what i thought it would be.

So this wasnt inherently bad, nor was it fantastically good, it just kind of sits in that middle ground of average existence. In the first chapters, Crowley is well, an intolerable jerk for wont of a better phrase. He's just not good people. I understand he is the embodiment of Lucifer but at least he could have had a personality above 'holier than thou to everyone he meets'

Once I got past Part One, he seemed to be a better person and I quite enjoyed parts of his tale. I appreciate how much research had to have gone into the composition of this novel because as far as i can tell, a vast majority of his tales are rather historically accurate.

My main peeve with the entire thing was the apparent lack of an ability to write in sensible length paragraphs. Some were extremely while the majority were longwinded and unnecessary.

The narrative, as i have previously said, was mainly based in fact and a enjoyed it for the most part. It just felt like there was something a little bit off in my opinion.

Definitely worth a read for those who love alternate retellings and have an interest in the occult

Was this review helpful?

I really enjoyed this alternate history book, the premise was semi believable and the story and characters were engaging and held my interest until the end. can't wait to read more.

Was this review helpful?

“My name is Aleister Crowley, The Great Beast. 666. And I am here to tell you the truth.”

My thanks to Unbound for an eARC via NetGalley of Ian Thornton’s fictional autobiography, ‘The Deaths and Afterlife of Aleister Crowley’, in exchange for an honest review.

I have been familiar with the works of Aleister Crowley for many years and therefore didn’t need any convincing that he wasn’t the Satanic cultist of the tabloid press. It was quite interesting to see how Thornton blended fact, fiction, and fantasy.

This novel has Crowley faking his death in 1947 and entering the mythical realm of Shangri-La; where he has resided, apart from the occasional foray back into the world, for seven decades.

As narrator the Old Crow takes the reader through various events in his life embellished with the early revelation that much of the reports of his wickedness were part of his cover: “You see, the truth is that I was the greatest spy of the twentieth century. The lies were all necessary, as they had been for that other great Englishman, The Scarlet Pimpernel.” Indeed, he often refers to himself as a Pimpernel.

Thornton has focused on the idea that Crowley was a spy. It’s been a popular idea with some of his biographers. He also introduces a number of fictional mentors, lovers and children while jettisoning others.

Given my background it proved not an easy book for me to review. I was especially perplexed by the aforesaid protectors/mentors assigned to Crowley when a boy - Dr Dandylyon and Prudence Venus Coshe. They came from a strange lineage dating back to the time of Boadicea’s rebellion and a powerful spell cast that “would last thousands of years. ...... there would always be a Dandylyon and a Prudence, in unison, close to power in England.”

It turned out that the narrative was dominated by politics and espionage as well as Crowley’s relationships, real and fictional. Certainly plenty of sex, drugs, and erotic poetry but very little Magick. His relationships to the gods, who were so central to his magical practices, were hardly mentioned. His seminal work ‘Magick in Theory and Practice’? Nowhere.

Therefore, it proved quite an uneven read for me. I applaud the intention to dispel the label of ‘wickedest man in the world’ and amused to think of Crowley lurking behind the scenes of various events, especially during the 60s. Yet I stumbled over some parts.

I would also have expected some end notes from the author about his inspiration to write this, some sources and perhaps indicating to readers not familiar with Crowley’s life about his areas of creative license.

Edit: Thinking about it overnight and knowing Crowley as I do, I wouldn’t be surprised if he hadn’t been lurking on the astral whispering encouragement into Thornton’s ear. He would have loved the Pimpernel aspect as well as Shangri-la, which isn’t a bad metaphor for the Inner Planes. Still feel that it lacks magic but I think Crowley would appreciate it and perhaps it will encourage new readers to explore his life and work.

3.5 rounded up to 4.

Was this review helpful?