Cover Image: A Duke, the Lady, and a Baby

A Duke, the Lady, and a Baby

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

I loved this book even though there was no explicit sex in it (which is what I expect from my romance!) I'm giving it four stars because of it, but the story itself is so good. Patience Jordan is a woman from present day Guyana who married a British man and returned with him to England during the Regency period. He hid her away because he didn't want to deal with the prejudice that came from having a brown wife in oh-so-white England. Her husband supposedly committed suicide a few weeks after the birth of their son, leaving her vulnerable and a widow in the middle of nowhere. Her uncle-in-law had her committed to Bedlam. Luckily, with the help of the Widow's Grace, she is able to make her way back into Hamlin, her home, to rescue her infant. This is where she mets her husband's cousin, the Duke of Reppington. Busick also has a secret-- an amputated leg-- which he conceals from others so he doesn't appear weak. But his real weakness is the baby, Lionel, and Patience. Vanessa Riley does a great job building the slow slow slow burn... which is never realized with a love scene. Sure, there are kisses, but that's about it. Recognizing it for what it is, the book itself is fantastic. The mystery surrounding Patience's husband's death, the Widow's Grace, and the romance is where it's at. Reminds me so much of Jane Eyre as well as the movie Belle. Go read this book! Thanks to NetGalley for the ARC in exchange for this review!

Was this review helpful?

Even if the blurb sounded interesting the story didn't keep my attention and it fell flat.ù
Not my cup of tea.
Many thanks to the publisher and Netgalley for this ARC, all opinions are mine.

Was this review helpful?

I was intrigued by the synopsis of the description of a West Indian heiress as a heroine in a regency romance. Patience Jordan is of mixed blood, as is her son, and despite her light skin, that difference has made living in England difficult. Her husband had kept her in the country, trying to protect her from the unkindness she’d receive in “society”, which actually put her and their son in harms way when he died. Left in the hands of his disreputable uncle, Patience was sent away to Bedlam so he could retain control of her son’s fortune. When this story starts with Repington now in charge at her former home, it allows Patience to disguise herself and infiltrate her old household in order to care for her son.

Busick Strathmore, Duke of Repington was a strategist in the war and knows that there’s more to Patience’s story and bides his time in figuring her out. They engage in their own skirmishes and of course, find themselves attracted to each other. However, this isn’t a bodice ripper of a romance. The Duke, the Lady, and the Baby is written in a rather old fashioned style which was kind of refreshing, but also felt a little stodgy. I love slow burn romances where the characters get to know each other, but the old fashioned dialog made these characters feel stilted rather than warm.

I had really high hopes for this novel and the future of this series. There is a league of women who help other women in bad circumstances and future novels will surely tell those stories, but I wanted this novel to deal more with the difficulties of being of mixed blood during this time in history and felt like other than a few comments about her accent and being secreted in the country, it was glossed over. Repington didn’t seem too concerned with his future Duchess’s acceptance into society, but as an analytical man who just wanted to get back to war, I guess there were bigger issues on his mind.

The other thing that was a little out of whack for me was that Repington was portrayed as a “Rake”. Meaning, he’s had no issues with the lady’s in the past, and he certainly seems to think he’s pretty charming despite his injuries that have incapacitated him. That devil may care charm played false to me and I had trouble buying him as a cad, at least at that time in his life. I think if he had been a bit more self deprecating? It just felt kind of sad I guess, and not true to the character.

So, you can see my difficulties with this one. I didn’t hate the story. I don’t read too many romances that involve babies, so the motherly aspect was new and interesting to me. I liked Patience a lot, actually. She was smart, dedicated, sassy, and interesting. So, I guess my problem was with the hero, although I didn’t dislike him, I just didn’t like them together. I did finish the novel despite my misgivings, so I’m giving this one a 3.0 rating for a solid good, but not great. ❤️❤️❤️

I received an ARC of this book through NetGalley for an honest review and it was honest!

Was this review helpful?

I requested an ARC of this book, and all opinions are mine.

This is a new to me author, so I did not know what to expect from this book. It started off a bit clunky - the chapters alternate between first person & third person - but it quickly found it's groove and became very enjoyable.

The plot was both familiar - widow is forced to disguise herself as the nanny in order to be close to her infant son - and unique - said widow is from the West Indies, and is fully portrayed as a person of color. I love that this story took on the prejudices faced by Patience LaCroy Jordan. It was a fresh point of view, and one that I'd like to see more of in the future.

This is the first in a new series, and I am looking forward to reading more from this author.

Was this review helpful?

i was given this book by netgalley and publisher for honest review and opinion
i had a really hard time getting into this book and enjoying even the writing. im not sure if it was how it was wrote, the characters, or that it needed edited again but i did not enjoy it at all.

Was this review helpful?

So many things I disliked about this book, but mostly, the stilted dialogue. I’m curious want the author was hoping to portray with the old-fashioned dialogue. It’s clearly not a thing in historical romance.

Was this review helpful?

I received an earc of A Duke, the Lady and a Baby by Vanessa Riley from Kensington Books via Netgalley in exchange for an honest review. This has in no way influenced my thoughts and feelings of the book. 

As soon as I read the synopsis for this one I knew that I needed it. And while I wasn't disappointed per se, it didn't live up to what I was hoping it would. It wasn't bad at all, but I felt that it was missing a few things that would have made it pop. 

A Duke, the Lady and a Baby follows our protagonist Patience as she tries to get back with her baby boy. After the death of her husband, Patience is throw out of her home and her baby is taken away. And Patience will do anything to get his baby back. Even act as the baby's nanny when Busick takes over the house. Meanwhile, Busick is determined to fix his dead cousin's financial dealings for baby Lionel. Wounded from the war Busick just wants to make thing right. However, he keeps on getting distracted by the new nanny. After a common enemy arises between the two, Patience and Busick must trust each other for both their sakes and Lionel's. 

Patience was an interesting protagonist. Most of the time I enjoyed her. I liked her determination and will. From the start, the reader can see how much she cares for her baby. But that also gets in her way. She just wants her baby back and she doesn't care too much about anything else. And this leads to her being in some dangerous situations. I loved the moments between Patience and Lionel. I loved seeing her care so much about him. It was really sweet. 

I also really enjoyed seeing Busick throughout A Duke, the Lady and a Baby. He was easier to get along with than Patience and I liked knowing his story. The banter he had with his men and even Patience was a nice touch. I do wish we got to know more about him, but that wasn't a massive deal for me. I feel that his character arc was more rounded out though. 

The romance was quite sweet in A Duke, the Lady and a Baby. I do wish that we were able to see Patience and Busick connect more, but I could see where the author was going with it. I liked their banter and the interactions a lot. It was different from most historical romance. Simply because the female protagonist has already been married and has a child and I enjoyed that a lot.  

One of my major issues with the book was the changes in point of views. It was a mix of first-person with Patience and then in third person, limited with Busick.  It was confusing at first and as the novel went on it only got more annoying. I wish that the author picked one and then stuck with it. By using both it felt unfinished and took away from the reading experience. 

Another thing that I missed from this book was the feeling that I get when I normally read a historical romance. There were parts where I did get that feeling, but overall it wasn't there enough. I can't explain the feeling I get when I do read historical romance. I think others that do read it will know what I mean. But it just wasn't there for me. 

One of the things that I did like about A Duke, the Lady and a Baby was the inclusion of diversity. Patience is a West Indian living in England, while Busick injury from the war has left him permanently disabled. I loved the inclusion of both. I can't talk about how the representation was but I thought that it was nicely included in the book. It didn't feel out of place or forced and I enjoyed that. 

Overall, I enjoyed reading A Duke, the Lady and a Baby by Vanessa Riley. It was a good historical romance that has its faults but I still enjoyed reading it. I love that it includes diversity and sadly it isn't something seen a lot in historical romance. Patience and Busick had chemistry and it was nice seeing them fall for one another.  I will be continuing this series for sure. I enjoyed the secondary characters and would love to know how their lives turn out. If you are looking for a historical romance that is a little different, then this one is for you.

Was this review helpful?

Once again, Vanessa Riley knocks it out of the park! A Duke, the Lady, and a Baby is a beautiful family love story. Patience is separated from her son by nefarious means and she will do anything and everything to be reunited with him. Including becoming her son's nanny when his guardian, Busick, arrives to rescue him. In addition to serious, military minded Busick, determined Patience, and adorable baby Lionel, there is a cast of supporting characters who you will start to fall in love with. This is a beautiful story and I quickly found myself rooting for Patience and then for her to fall for Busick!

Was this review helpful?

I really liked the premise for this book, the multi-cultural cast of characters, the struggle with disabilities. But the writing was so disjointed. It didn’t flow. The dual points of view was easy enough to follow but it felt like it needed another pass with the editor.

I received a copy of this book from the publisher through NetGalley. All opinions are my own.

Was this review helpful?

A widow who was falsely imprisoned for questioning her husband's suicide, risks her life to be near her child and gets hired as her son's nanny. Buswick Strathmore, Duke of Repington is a man of honor and her son's guardian, passion ignites before long and they join forces to fight a common enemy.

A lively historical romance with a strong heroine and a handsome hero!

Was this review helpful?

I can't put my finger on it, but I really didn't like the hero. This would be a good historical romance for those that don't like love scenes in their books.

Was this review helpful?

This was a disappointment. The author's writing style was very odd to me. There were some questionable choices made in the way that her sentences were constructed or the words used. I didn't buy the relationship between Patience and Busick. He seems to only have the "hots" for her when she is wearing man's clothes. Also, I didn't mind when he referred to a baby as a "soldier", but when he started referring the same way to Patience and she actually started to salute him once in a while, that's just got way to weird for me. There was absolutely no passion between them, no feelings.

Was this review helpful?

** I received an ARC in exchange for an honest review.**
This book sounded so good. Unfortunately, the book did not deliver on the blurb. This book was hard to read and there were holes in the plot. I had a hard time getting through this book.

Was this review helpful?

I enjoyed this book. There’s mystery and dramatics. The relationship between Patience and the duke was different, sometimes sweet and snarky at other times.

Patience is a West Indian heiress that married an Englishman and moved to London. He leaves her in the country and she’s sent to Bedlam and loses her son when he commits suicide.

She is rescued and heads back to her son to investigate her husbands uncle, acts as a nanny to her son.

There are still some major questions surrounding the estate and secondary characters that has me excited to read future books by this author.

Was this review helpful?

3.5 stars

2020 has been the year in which I have discovered a love of historical romance novels and ever since I got myself hooked on them I've been on the look out for new authors to try and I'm very glad that I gave Vanessa Riley a shot.

A Duke, the Lady and a Baby is the first book in the Rogues and Remarkable Women series by Riley, and follows Patience, a West Indian heiress, who's husband has recently died, leaving her widowed with a newborn son. To make matters worse, she's committed to an asylum and separated from her son, only to be rescued by The Widow's Grace, a group of women out to assist widows in reclaiming what they've lost. For Patience, that's her son, and she's out to rescue him when his new guardian, the Duke of Repington comes into the picture and hires Patience as the new wet nurse. Repington is a military man, through and through, and lives his life by rules and expectations - which Patience has every intention of shattering. They begin to form a mutual trust, each recognising the other holds secrets, against a common enemy.

This was a fun story to read. Admittedly, it took a few chapters to get a good sense of what was happening - Riley throws us into the middle of Patience's story, after she has been rescued from the asylum, and we uncover the backstory from there - but once I had pieced it all together I was hooked.

Patience is a strong, female character with one goal in mind: to be reunited with her son. She's willing to do anything to achieve her goal and that's admirable. And while she has an initial dislike of Repington, she begins to realise that there's more to this man who has inherited her late husband's estate than meets the eye and that underneath his rigid, military exterior, there's a lot more going on. 

Repington realises right away that something doesn't sit right with Patience's story, and is concerned that she's there to steal the child (not realising that it's her son), and tries to figure her out. She, meanwhile, shatters all of his rules and forces him to confront some truths about himself.

I did feel there were some pacing issues, but nothing so bad that it made the story unreadable. Being the first book in a new series, I figured that we were setting up time and place and a collection of side characters that we would eventually revisit in later books.

Overall, it was an enjoyable read and I would definitely consider picking up future books (or backlist titles) by Riley.

Was this review helpful?

Patience Jordan, a West Indian heiress, dared to question her English husband, Colin’s apparent suicide, and consequently finds herself thrown into an asylum. When she is released, she does all that she can to regain custody of her young son Lionel but must do so under the guise of her son’s nanny. Busick Strathmore, the Duke of Repington, is acting as Lionel’s guardian, being cousin to Colin. Having been seriously injured during the war, Busick’s life as a rake, has altered dramatically. Yet the more time that he spends with Patience, the more he hopes for a different life.
This is an interesting story, bringing to light the prejudice of colour, in a time where societal rules were paramount. The romance between Patience and Busick, is understandably gradual, with Lionel, central to their story. The book endeavours to highlight the plight of women, the issue of race, and the injuries suffered during war. However, the main detractor from this story was the use of different perspectives with Patience’s story, told in the first person, whilst Busick’s POV is in the third person. Whilst an interesting storyline, the writing style was at times, confusing.
I received an ARC from NetGalley in exchange for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?

New mother and recently widowed Patience Jordan is well aware that the world isn't on her side especially since she's a widow, a woman, an immigrant in the very xenophobic England of the Regency, and mixed race. Her son's been taken from her, housed with a relative who's more interested in chasing skirts than changing nappies. She's been committed to Bedlam and only through luck and the determination of her cellmate was she released. Now she has to sneak into her old home to feed her son. She need a miracle, and fast!

Enter Busick, the Duke of Repington. Grievously wounded in the Napoleonic Wars in Spain/Portugal, he has returned to England to assume control of his ward, Patience's son Lionel. A strict and meticulous man, he soon finds his orderly world turned upside down but the infant and the woman thrust upon him to be his ward's nanny. Worse, he can't help but be attracted to her.

But as the weeks go by, the danger around them mounts. They must uncover the mystery surrounding Patience's husband's death before it is too late.

---

Okay first off some trigger warnings, because they are sorely needed. -- TW: Suicide, TW: Period appropriate racism, TW: period appropriate misogyny, TW: child abuse/neglect, TW: Sexual Harassment, TW: Consent Issues, TW: Period appropriate sexism, TW: Body Trauma

There may be others I'm forgetting.

On to my thoughts!

I'd been looking forward to reading this book for a while. It has some of my favorite things: disabled characters, characters of color, cute plot kidlets, a mystery, a sort of enemies-to-lovers scenario, women supporting women. But upon reading the book, I can't help but feel... I don't know... disappointed.

Let's break it down.

Things I loved:
-- Patience. I really really loved Patience. I loved the way she thought. I loved the way she was so determined to put the needs of her child first. I loved how she refused to back down even in the face of overwhelming odds. I thought her character voice was excellent, and I wish the whole book had been told in her head. (More on that later)
-- I loved the diversity in the characters of color. Pro-tip to authors, England was a lot more culturally diverse than you see in most historical shows/movies. It always has been. Take it from the scholar of History. I liked that the racism and inequality that they faced wasn't swept under the rug. I also liked that all characters, whether of color or not, were described in the same way. It wasn't othering. It was lovely to see.
-- I loved the disabled representation and acknowledgement of disability aids. Wheelchairs, crutches, prosthetics, and various other period-appropriate mobility aids were in play. I loved that even minor characters had injuries. Wars of the time were messy... the medicine even messier. The understanding of Anatomy was still in its early phases. So any kind of injury could lead to disability. I'm glad to see that acknowledged.
-- Did I mention I loved the disability rep? I did. Because even better, the characters who are disabled aren't seen as lesser than. They often have angst about their situation -- very common when a traumatic injury or illness takes away or hampers a portion of someone's life -- but none of the characters spend their days navel gazing. I really loved the representation.
-- I loved the women supporting women plotline. This book gets a Bechdel Test pass and a Mako Mori test pass. Do you know how rare that is in romance? So rare. So so rare. I am here for that.
-- The descriptions, particularly in Patience's POV, are quite lyrical and lovely. Part of the reason why I want the story to be fully in her head.

So what didn't I like?
-- The POV switches. Patience's POV is told wholly in first person, past tense. It's a very intimate choice, and one I agree with. However, Busick's POV is told in the third person, past tense. And the story switches back and forth, often within the same chapter, were jarring. It wasn't handled well, and it kept throwing me out of the story. It was a fourth wall break, and it decreased my enjoyment of the story.
-- The Hero. I didn't like him at all. I found him sexist, overbearing, didactic, and unyielding. He often did similar things to the villain yet his actions were seen as "good" while the villain's were "Bad." Here's an example: He orders around the heroine and threatens her with taking her son away from her... the same thing the villain did. This is even after the reveal that she is not just a nanny but Lionel's mother. I couldn't forgive that.
-- There's a huge, giant, gargantuan consent issue. As in the Hero keeps pushing for physical attentions while the heroine is out and out saying no. This is an automatic star drop.
-- On the hero again, he's jealous of any man who gets near her or who has her affections. This includes but is not limited to: her lawyer, a doctor, her dead husband, and her infant son. Jealousy is not an endearing trait. It's a possessive one.
-- Continuing with the hero, he always has to win and be right... and there's even a scene where he jeopardizes an infant to make a point to Patience. At this point in the story, I stopped rooting for him to get together with Patience and started rooting for her to leave. Or end up with her lawyer. Or her best friend... I'm down for some LBGT rep.
-- The romance. Like many other critical reviewers before me, I didn't buy the romance. Busick basically went from mistrustful to obsessed in the blink of an eye. He kept insisting that because he cared for the heroine that she had to love him too. This was repeated over and over. As for Patience, she seemed mostly tepid toward him. Yes, she thought him attractive... but for the first portion of the book she was beholden to him to stay near her son, and for much of the rest she was focused on resolving the mystery surrounding her husband's death.
-- A dropped thread regarding part of the mystery. It's hand-waved away at the end, but that mars the HEA

So ultimately I'm torn about how to rate the book. Part of me wants to one-star it (for the consent issues, unbelievable romance, the designated hero trope, and jarring POV switches). While another part of me wants to celebrate the diversity in this book. The great representation of characters of color and disabilities. There were things I loved; there were things I hated. If this book had been wholly in Patience's POV I likely would have liked it more.

But since it wasn't and for the reasons listed above, I can only give this:

Three Stars

Thank you to Kensington and Net Galley for providing me with an ARC of this book.

Was this review helpful?

I love regency romance, so I was excited to get a copy of A Duke, the Lady, and a Baby from Netgalley. However, this one fell flat for me. When Patience's husband dies, she is forced to pretend to be a nanny for the estate's new Duke in order to remain close to her infant son. Although she and the Duke are originally suspicious of one another, they soon begin to develop feelings.

What I Liked:
- Patience was a well-developed heroine with an interesting backstory.
- Regency Romance is typically filled with exclusively white characters, so it was great to see a heroine from the West Indies.
- The relationship between Busick and Lionel, Patience's son was adorable.

What I Didn't Like:
- The author wastes no time diving into the action, but I was pretty confused for the first 3 or 4 chapters of what was going on.
- The wealthy male falls for the nanny trope, which I'm not personally a fan of.
- The relationship between Patience and Busick, which I felt fell a little flat.

Was this review helpful?

West Indian heiress and now widow Patience Jordan has lost everything due to questioning her husband's suicide, including her 3 month old son Lionel. Falsely imprisoned in Bedlam, she is rescued by The Widow's Grace, who also assist her with getting hired as her son's nanny. With the arrival of her son's new guardian, Busick Strathmore, Duke of Repington, will she be able to get to the bottom of what happened in order to be with her son without hiding? And will she fall for her attraction to Busick?

This was a cute read. Drama, mystery, suspense, plus romance. Anyone looking for a clean, historical romance will enjoy this book.

This book was given to me an an ARC from the publisher through NetGalley in an exchange for an honest review. I was not compensated in any way.

Was this review helpful?

2.5 stars rounded up to 3.
So....I really wanted to love this book. It had an unique and intriguing premise. It introduced all kinds of hot topics for a Regency era romance (interracial couples, disabilities, women's rights), but the execution fell flat.

Patience Jordan is a widow who had lost custody of her newborn infant after the death of her husband. She is a foreigner and widow in a time when both are looked down upon, and neither have many rights. She has been taken in by the Widow's Grace, a secret society who helps widows in trouble, to help her regain custody of her son, Lionel, from her husband's evil scheming uncle. Patience is tired of the rules of the strict society she finds herself in and is not afraid to take matters into her own hands. I did love her fiery spirit and mother's heart.

Busick Repington is a disabled war veteran. He is the true guardian of Lionel, who is his cousin's son. He has been trying to claim his guardianship of Lionel and uncover the truth of his cousin's last days and death. Busick is a strict military man who likes order and people following his commands quickly. I did like the contrast between the two characters. Patience who is a rule breaker and Busick who needs rules to maintain order in his life. Busick was a great man and the perfect compliment to Patience.

For some reason this story is told from the first person narrative (Patience POV) and the third person narrative (Busick's POV). I found this to be confusing and jarring in the transitions between the two. I didn't understand the reasoning for it to be written this way when a third person narrative would have made it a smoother read.

We never get a clear description of the characters. Just little glimpses of their physical traits. I found without a clear picture of the characters it was hard to connect with them. I like to envision my characters in my mind while reading (as I'm sure most readers do) and I just couldn't with this book. We never get a good introduction to the characters either. I felt confused and disoriented for the first several chapters as I tried to figure out who was who and what they were talking about. It felt like the author had literally dropped us into the middle of a story, not the beginning.

Overall, the writing felt flat to me. Lack of descriptions/explanations left me feeling disconnected from the story. The dialogue was awkward and didn't flow. I never felt the chemistry or attraction between Patience and Busick. This book had a great premise, but lacked emotion and development. I did enjoy some parts of the story, mostly towards the end where the writing felt a little more fleshed out and developed. The majority of it left me uninvolved and uninterested

Was this review helpful?