Cover Image: Humankind


Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

A wonderful inspiring read.A book that gives us hope something we all desperately need and want.Will be recommending this book and author.#netgalley#littlebrown
Was this review helpful?
Thank you to #NetGallely, Rutger Bregman and Little, Brown and Company for providing me with a digital copy of this book prior to publication in exchange for my review.  Humankind: A Hopeful History by Rutger Bregman is one of the best books I have read in 2020.    Bregman put an incredible amount of research into this book and presents it to the reader in an understandable, easy to read format.  He builds a case that people are inherently good and that if we approach life with that assumption, then we can change the way we all live together on this planet.  Bregman claims that rather than people cracking under pressure, known as the "Veneer theory", people are actually at their best in a crisis.    And research has shown that even when disaster strikes, such as the New Orleans flood, and there is rampant looting in the aftermath, the looting is insignificant when compared to the huge outpouring of "giving and sharing of goods and services" that comes afterwards.   And while not everyone will agree with him, Bregman uses evidence from a wide variety of sources, including all those landmark studies like the Milgram electric shock study or the Stanford Prison study,  to back up his theories.   He is very precise and logical in presenting his arguments and they are both informative and entertaining.  He goes into great detail letting us know the problems but then he also provides solutions, finishing up the book his own ten rules to live by.  This is a hopeful, timely, and thought provoking book and I highly recommend it.
Was this review helpful?
Favorite Non-Fiction
I am not actually finished with this book, but I enjoyed it much more than any other non-fiction book I read in May.

Humankind: A Hopeful History is a provocative and compelling new book. I am so glad that I am reading it.

Humankind‘s author is Rutger Bregman, a young and prolific Dutch writer. I first learned about the book last month from this book expert published in The Guardian– Real-Life Lord of the Flies.

Parts of the book, like the Lord of the Flies section, are page-turners, but there is also a lot of social commentary mixed in. As I read, I find myself have one of three reactions: nodding in agreement with some conclusions; taking issue at others (like his oversimplification of the Christian view of the problem of evil, for instance); and feeling intrigued (as in “that’s a unique way to look at (a particular issue)”).

Bregman’s premise is that people are inherently good and seek the good.

This is captured well in Bregman’s account of the real-life “Lord of the Flies,” which was the polar opposite of William Golding’s classic novel. In the latter, fictional account, boys descended into anarchy, murder, and mayhem. In the real world, when six boys were actually shipwrecked on a remote island in the 1960s, they got along well, developed a structure, took care of those who were injured, and were fit and healthy when they were found after 15 months. Why is a fictionalized account so much bleaker than the reality? Humankind explores this.

We have had good discussions in our house about this, as I have shared parts of the book as I read. Of common interest is St. Thomas Aquinas’ view of people most “seeking the good,” but missing the mark or seeking what is not actually good.

Humankind is a compelling and more than thought-provoking read in these heartbreaking times.
Was this review helpful?
With the subtitle “A Hopeful History”, Humankind is exactly the kind of optimistic read I think I needed right now. With so much negative going on, I keep hearing, “What do you expect? People are the worst, a plague on the Earth!” And not only does that not solve anything, but it's so fatalistic as to suggest that nothing short of total human extinction could solve anything. With this new review of human history, Rutger Bregman not only busts a bunch of myths (and especially those based on social science experiments) about how rotten we humans are at the core, but by adding in stories of human decency and exploring some better ways of setting up entrenched institutions, Bregman shines a light on a more hopeful way forward. If the “nocebo effect” (If we believe most people can't be trusted, that's how we'll treat each other, to everyone's detriment) is as powerful as Bregman suggests, then a book like this that proves that humans are not fundamentally evil is the first step towards building a society that works better for everyone. Just what I needed; maybe what we all need.
Was this review helpful?
Wowww...what a book to read especially now when the world is chaotic what with covid19 and the racial protests! A great insight and a different point of view. I'm still having a hard time believing the goodness in humankind even after reading this.

I still believe we live on Planet B. I agree with our addiction to the news and how it feeds us with a lot of negativity. Therefore I had a hard time reading this given what's happening now. Yes, humans are inherently good, I get that. But with so much going on, police brutality, ignorant people going out despite the pandemic and ignoring other people's wellbeing, etc., this book didnt quite make the point for me. How do people react with kindness to people who show evil? 

I get the point he is trying to make, but overall, something still lacked in the book. Like, what do we do with all these negativity?

Thank you Netgalley and Little Brown and Company for the chance go read and review this book. All opinions are my own.
Was this review helpful?
This book is great! It made me optimistic for the future and was a welcome respite from the despair of the world. Rutger Bregman's first book was wonderful and so is this!
Was this review helpful?
This book was a great reminder that kindness really can change the world. Would recommend for those who need some hope and beauty to get them through the craziness going on in the world.
Was this review helpful?
Rutger Bregman set himself a really high-barrier task in his book Humankind. He wants to prove that Man is actually not violent, or bellicose, but peaceful, helpful and kind. To do it, he went back to all those famous, landmark social science studies we’ve all grown up believing. They show unequivocally that Man is selfish, self-centered, violent and wallowing in it. Bregman shows them to be faulty, false, staged or just plain bogus. It makes for an eye-opening journey readers will not soon forget. And he does it with style.

Readers will recognize the studies, like the Stanley Milgram electric shock study and the Stanford Prison study. He even goes after the Kitty Genovese murder case and Lord of the Flies. Bregman goes back to research not just the study or the book, but the author and the author’s own notes.
The setup and the pitch

He uses an absolutely delightful structure. He describes the study, book or story, giving it all the credit it has always claimed, seemingly case closed, no argument possible. Then he starts researching, going back to original documents, and where possible, original participants. The story starts to crumble, and he ends up shaming the originators of the bogus findings. It makes a for a lively read of a very serious problem with Man: not violence, but fraud.
MSM at fault again

Man bites dog doesn’t sell as well as dog bites man. So newspapers focus on the sensational negatives, and don’t bother correcting stories when they prove false. Hollywood is all over sensationalism, mostly in the form of violence and gore. Everyone is always at war, always in a personal fight. Doesn’t matter if it’s Genghis Khan, Vikings or pilgrims. So viewers come to believe that they are accurate, that it is reality. That’s the way it always has been. That’s the way Man is.
Easter Island Cannibals?

For example, Bregman cites the Easter Island story. For centuries, it has been “known” that Easter Islanders raped the island and went to war with each other, finally eating each other as cannibals when the island could no longer support them all. It’s a classic that is in constant use to demonstrate Man’s selfish inhumanity to Man and total disregard for nature, not to mention the tragedy of the commons (which Bregman dismantles separately).

Only it never happened. Going back to the original ship captain’s logs, he shows that Easter Islanders were not just peaceful, they were thriving: joyously open and healthy. Not only did they not fight, they didn’t even know what weapons were. (The Dutch sailors showed them, mowing them down, then later enslaved them and left them with Plague.)
Shocking Stanley Milgram

In the famous Stanley Milgram experiment, volunteers electrocuted people, almost to death. It was supposedly the answer to why Nazis could exterminate people so readily. But Milgram hid the fact that more than half the subjects believed his shock machine was fake, so it didn’t matter how high a shock they administered. And it only came out much later that Milgram’s assistant continually harassed the subjects into shocking the victim. The results were therefore not definitive in any way. Or even valid. But the study lives on as a foundational document and seminal moment in social science.
Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison

Similarly, the Stanford Prison Study proved that jailers plus prisoners will always lead to violence, causing the entire justice system to apply stricter rules that caused (and continue to cause) totally unnecessary violence in prisons. The truth is the researcher forced the violence by making it a we/them setup (with him leading the we as the warden), forcing the guards to be aggressively obnoxious, and imposing odious arbitrary and humiliating rules on the prisoners to get them to rebel. Literally millions of Americans have suffered as a result of this landmark study.

Meanwhile, in modern prisons in Norway, prisoners and guards live, work and play together, help each other in tasks, and prisoners leave ready to rejoin society at a higher level. It costs the state less, and recidivism is a fraction of the American rate. The author of the Stanford study lived off it his entire life, rising to the highest levels in psychology, never admitting what his notes showed was bogus science.
Uncaring witnesses in NYC

In the infamous Kitty Genovese murder, a New York woman screamed for help as she was being stabbed to death, while 38 witnesses did nothing. She died in the hallway of her apartment building in Queens, alone. This story went global, and demonstrated how inhuman humans had become in big cities, reverting to savage animals who couldn’t bother even to lift a phone to help.

Bregman went back and found that two people had called the police immediately, before the second attack took place, but the police never sent anyone. They decided Genovese must be drunk (it was 3:30 am). And she didn’t die alone. A woman in her building immediately rushed to her and cradled her in her arms until she died. Lastly, two men stopped a robber carrying a tv out of a house in broad daylight shortly thereafter, disabling his truck so he couldn’t get away. These two good neighbors turned out to have caught the Genovese murderer, but that was never reported either. No, it was preferable to leave the sensational story of uncaring New Yorkers and an unsolved murder fill the media forever after. Cities breed uncaring, leering animals remains the takeaway, despite the facts.
William Golding loved hating

Even Lord of the Flies, which has long proven how beastly human children will be when left on their own, turns out to be bogus. This novel, read by every schoolchild in the country for 60 years, was written by William Golding, a man who professed Nazi sympathies, and had a worldview of violence and hatred. He made no pretense of it being scientific, but it has become key to the canon of innate violence in Man regardless. It fits our worldview, so it has become truth.

Bregman found a real case of Lord of the Flies, in which half a dozen kids on Tonga stole a boat and ended up shipwrecked on an island called ‘Ata in the 1960s. It took hard digging, but he tracked down the captain (now 90) of the boat that rescued them and got the whole story. After year, the boys were in excellent shape, finely toned, well organized, and now lifelong friends. Any time there was a disagreement on the island, the antagonists had to go to different ends to cool off, and had to shake hands and apologize when they came back. Wouldn’t make nearly as good a film as Lord of the Flies. And no one has ever heard of it outside Australia, where it has been forgotten. Meanwhile, Lord of the Flies is mandatory reading.
What really goes on — unreported

It’s not the common man, it’s his leaders that embody this evil nature. “Dictators and despots, governors and generals — they all too often resort to brute force to prevent scenarios that exist only in their own heads, on the assumption that the average joe is ruled by self-interest, just like them.” Bregman finds the farther one is from the front line, the easier it is to espouse violence.

There are lovely stories of how men find ways not to fight. Ninety percent of the muskets collected after the Battle of Gettysburg were loaded, often with two or more balls, as men used any excuse not to fire their weapons, pretending to be reloading rather than rushing into battle. At Christmas in 1914, Germans and Brits celebrated together, singing carols to each other from their trenches and then meeting to exchange gifts, play football, and carouse. To the point where the generals had to reinforce orders not to fraternize with the enemy. What enemy? “From Troy to Waterloo and from Korea to Vietnam, few armies have fought without the aid of intoxicants, and scholars now even think Paris might not have fallen in 1940 had the German army not been stoked on thirty-five million methamphetamine pills (a.k.a. crystal meth, a drug that can cause extreme aggression),” Bregman says.

As for guerilla organizations. he cites Erica Chenoweth who found that more than 50 percent of nonviolent campaigns were successful, as opposed to 26 percent of the militant ones. The primary reason, Chenoweth established, is that more people join nonviolent campaigns. On average over eleven times more. Turns out violence is way less appealing to ordinary people, even under duress.
Man the domesticated animal

Man is a domesticated animal, the finding of Richard Wrangham, from his excellent, groundbreaking book called the Goodness Paradox which I reviewed here: As with other such beasts, from dogs to cattle, Man is smaller than his wild version the Neanderthal, and has much gentler features. Mostly, he is more peaceable and friendly than the wild species, just like with all domesticated animals. For us to have built this false collection of violent attributes, Bregman says, must simply be wrong.

Before modern times, tribes raised children together, partied with other tribes, shared food, and owned nothing. It was the rise of agriculture, the ownership of land and tools that started the route to wealth, inequality, protection of assets, selfishness and constant warring, Bregman says.
Et tu, Capitalism?

He extends the argument to capitalism, which he says was imposed from above. He says the Adam Smith version is wrong: “Now it turns out that this view is completely upside down. Our natural inclination is for solidarity, whereas the market is imposed from on high. Take the billions of dollars pumped in recent decades into frenzied efforts to turn healthcare into an artificial marketplace. Why? Because we have to be taught to be selfish.”
Aesop explained it right

Bregman’s quest here was recognized three thousand years ago by Aesop. One of his fables was about the sun and the wind. They spotted a man in a cloak, walking along. The wind bet the sun he could get the cloak off the man. He blew and blew as hard as he could, and with every gust, the man clutched his cloak to him even tighter. Then the sun took his turn. With the wind dying down, the sun came out, the birds went back to singing, and the air became welcoming and pleasant. The man took his cloak off himself.

Not much has changed in 3000 years. Co-operation works better than force, no matter what binge-tv series present. And that’s how people actually operate.

We owe Rutger Bregman a debt of thanks for unearthing the truth behind these long-held frauds, and for starting to clear the air about human nature. It’s a lovely, lively, uplifting and even scientifically important book.

David Wineberg
Was this review helpful?