Cover Image: Moonflower Murders

Moonflower Murders

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

Moonflower Murders by Anthony Horowitz.
This is the first Anthony Horowitz book I have read. I wasn't aware this was the follow up to a previous book but, as such, I found it straight forward to read and this was not a problem. The book reminded me of Russian dolls, with the story within a story within a story. My mind did struggle with suddenly going from one story to another and while I happily solved the inner book, I had forgotten the connections to the outer story and struggled with trying to remember it and who was who. I can see that some folk will love this and all the subtle clues. Even though I read it on my tiny iPhone, I was unable to put it down and had to continue reading it until well into the night.

Was this review helpful?

I loved this story. Every twisty turn, every clever bit of plotting, absolutely everything about this book was excellent.

Even though I knew when I started reading this book I would need to have my wits about me to try and spot all the clever little references and anagrams and playful little hints that would solve the mystery I still didn’t work it all out for myself.

I am very tempted to read it again straight away just to spot all those references.

Was this review helpful?

It is pleasing when a  Publishing House contacts you to review a book. In this case Random House UK, Cornerstone to review Anthony Horowitz's latest novel. You do feel some pressure to review positively!  Unfortunately, I was extremely disappointed.

James Bond it is not! It is a gentle mystery that plods along without really grabbing attention. It starts off quite encouragingly with an ex Publisher now resident in Crete running a hotel / guest house. It is struggling so when the chance to earn £10,000 presents itself the opportunity is grabbed by Susan.

Penguin promotes the novel with this introduction "So when an English couple come to visit with tales of a murder that took place in a hotel the same day their daughter Cecily was married there, Susan can’t help but find herself fascinated.

And when they tell her that Cecily has gone missing a few short hours after reading Atticus Pund Takes The Case, a crime novel Susan edited some years previously, Susan knows she must return to London to find out what has happened.

The clues to the murder and to Cecily’s disappearance must lie within the pages of this novel."

Lucy Foley then goes onto describe it as 'A beautiful puzzle: fiendishly clever and hugely entertaining. A masterpiece.' 

Oh dear! Masterpiece is rather over the top! As soon as the plot transfers to the East Anglian countryside, the pace is pedestrian. Step by step Susan endlessly interviews family, hotel staff and other bit players often repeating the same story. As you would expect she starts to unravel the puzzle but so slow.

Typically if a book does not grab my attention quickly I will move onto another book. But as Anthony Horowitz has a reputation I plodded on. I finally gave up after reading 20%. Sorry but this was a disappointing novel.

Was this review helpful?

I love the premise of this book which, like its predecessor Magpie Murders, nestles a modern Agatha Christie pastiche within its pages based on the supposition that the book-within-the-book contains a clue to the murder mystery in the present narrative.

But my criticism is the same as of Magpie Murders: the nested tale is just so laboured, over-long and wooden that it's a struggle to get through it. I don't know why Horowitz fails here since his present day narrative from Susan Ryeland is great: she's peppy and bright and I happily buy-in to her life with Andreas and the problems of her sister.

The solution, when it comes, is left-field and unconvincing but I can live with that - it's the dreary inset story which drags this down. So I'd happily follow more of Susan's investigations, I just wish Horowitz would be more Christie-like in the way she's so deft and light-handed in her books. Still - a fun read.

Was this review helpful?

I just love these books. They are like Russian nesting dolls, a mystery in a mystery and clues within clues, all the traditional ingredients of a classic whodunit. The first one in the series I enjoyed and this one also delivered. It is just really good entertainment, well crafted, well written and so I really hope there will be more coming. Anthony Horowitz is a master at what he does. Extremely enjoyable escapism!

Was this review helpful?

This is a perfect ‘WhoDunnit’ which finds you desperately trying to find out for yourself, before the big reveal at the end.
Thoroughly enjoyable and as I’m new to Anthony Horowitz, I’ll be reading the rest of his catalogue now.

Was this review helpful?

It's a second creation in the series of 'Bird Murders' as I call them and overall it was just what I have expected. A great whodunit with a book within a book. I did really like the fact that after author was dead in the first novel you'd almost think it's a stand alone, but then we get more of it with surely even more to come.
I really like this whole anagram business that is such big part of the stories and wasn't I too busy rushing through chapters to find out what's next, I would've sit down and maybe even worked out who the killer was, but that's just not what I do.
Overall I think it's brilliantly written and keeps you guessing.

My one big problem with this all was Mr Simon Cox (Simanis Chaks). According to the story he comes from Latvia and name is even spelled correctly, that's quite impressive. However it is also said that he's of Slavic origins and that is not right as Latvians do not belong to Slavic group, but nevermind, that's just a little slip.. Makes it much worse later when story claims that Latvia and Romania are neighbouring countries in Eastern Europe. Latvia is part of Baltics, that is actually in Northern Europe, but that is not the biggest issue with it.. Countries are in no way neighbours. It's a little technicality and doesn't make the whole novel worse in a way. But it wouldn't take long to have a simple research or least have a quick look at the map of Europe.

So it's a good novel in my opinion, I have always admired for the amount of details Anthony Horowitz manages to sneak in. His descriptions of places in London are so spot on, even when he mentions a coffee shop that I used to go to all the time. But this time I was very disappointed with what looks like he couldn't be bothered to check up some simple facts.

Was this review helpful?

Who could want more? A Two-For-One murder mystery!

And any novel by Anthony Horowitz is likely to be in a safe pair of hands: Alex Rider, Sherlock Holmes, James Bond, Foyle, Midsomer Murders... this is an accomplished rolecall of detectives! And Horowitz himself in his The Word is Murder series!

What would we expect? Engaging characters, twisty serpentine plotting, a playfulness with the genre... and we get all that here in the sequel to the earlier Magpie Murders (which I also thoroughly enjoyed).

Susan Ryeland appeared to have succombed to Andreas' charms and the appeal of running an hotel in Crete at the end of the first book. and the second opens with her feeling a little jaded by it all when, as if on cue, a mystery from her previous literary life as a publisher literally knocks on the door. A woman has gone missing, apparently days after discovering the true identity of the culprit in a murder that took place eight years previously, recognising clue in the book "Atticus Pund Takes The Case" which Susan had published. Her parents instruct her to find out what happened to Cecily, the daughter, and if necessary solve the eight year old murder at the same time.

As with Magpie Murders, we follow Susan for half the book before diving into the crucial Atticus Pund novel in its (fictitional) entirety before returning to Susan to conclude the hunt for Cecily.

It is a great, escapist, fun yarn and the playfulness of the interplay between the two narratives - and Susan's search for that interplay - is great fun and, just like The Word is Murder, Horowitz loves slipping between the real and fictional worlds. And Susan, who hates the over theatrical gathering of the suspects scene in Atticus Pund is forced to have her own "I have gathered you here..." scene herself!

For me, the characters were a little two dimensional - and there were quite a lot of them! - but the plotting was intricate and byzantine and complex and it kept me guessing. through to the end. A great read for the early summer sunshine and hopefully more to come.

Was this review helpful?

a fun read and the usual clever layering of a whodunnit book within a whodunnit book, with the inner book revealing the clue to the outer book mystery. BUT... in this case it was all a bit too silly, and characature like. not up to HW usual standards, but still an easy way to pass the time

Was this review helpful?

Ex editor Susan is asked by wealthy hotel owners to research the disapperance of their daughter and a murder which happened years ago. It’s all mixed up with a detective novel by one of Susan’s former authors, Alan Conway, now deceased. And Alan’s book, Atticus Pünd Takes the Case, appears here in its entirety.

Classic "whodunnit" crime novel, very well written and joy to read.
if you are a murder mystery reader, this should be high on your required reading list.

Was this review helpful?

ANTHONY HOROWITZ – MOONFLOWER MURDERS

I read this novel in advance of publication through NetGalley in return for an honest review.

Although he is a household name through Foyle’s War on television this is the first novel by Anthony Horowitz I have read. Partly because, though I used to read detective and murder mysteries avidly, I became bored with them and found myself preferring other genres.

This intriguing story concerns a raft of murders: some set in a hotel in Norfolk and, others in the fictional version of itself in Devon, which is a complete book within the book.

The ‘real’ story concerns an ex-editor of fiction who edited the ‘fictional story’ years before, the author of whom is dead. He had based his setting and the characters on the ‘real’ ones in the hotel in Norfolk, where he stayed, where a murder had taken place. Within the book he writes are clues that spell out the answer to who hammered to death a not very pleasant guest at the hotel. Initially this intrigue sparked off by a ‘real’ young woman who lives there going missing. She had discovered the truth of the identity of the ‘real’ murderer through reading the fictional account set in Devon.

Both in the ‘real’ and ‘fictional’ stories, lots of characters have motives for each of the murders that take place, and it is the job of this ex-editor to sort out the clues, as well as discover what happened to the missing woman.

Put simply, if you are a murder mystery reader, this should be high on your required reading list. It is clever, perplexing, and in both ‘real’ and ‘fictional’ worlds there are surprises enough to satisfy anyone.

My only complaint is that I found it extremely difficult to put down, as reading to the end of each chapter made me want to start the next. Ideal in lockdown, of course.

Anthony Horowitz is a deceptively skilled writer, who gleefully plays with the characters and his readers: this is a book I can’t recommend highly enough. Even if, like me, you’re not really a murder mystery man.

Was this review helpful?

I haven't read Magpie Murders - the book before this one - as my partner inadvertently gave away the 'whodunnit'. As a consequence the main conceit of Moonflower Murders - a novel within a novel - was new to me. It works brilliantly. The character Susan Ryeland returns from Magpie Murders and, in this novel, investigates the disappearance of a Suffolk-based hotelier who has vanished after telling her family that, after reading Atticus Pund Takes the Case, she had identified the murderer of a guest at the hotel some eight years ago. And so Horowitz gives us two stories in one: how Ryeland solves Cecily's disappearance; and how Atticus Pund is successful in detecting the answer to his crime in Devon in the 1950s. The story within the story works really well - the writing is tight, pacing is excellent, and the characters well drawn.

Was this review helpful?

Thoroughly enjoyed the prequel “Magpie Murders” so couldn’t wait to read the follow on:
“Moonflower Murders”. Really enjoyed the book within a book concept and the juxtaposition of the old school classic whodunnit with the modern day crime. Susan Ryeland is full of doubt as an unconventional detective but sharp and reflective. I was cheering for her all the way. Mindful of Chekov’s smoking gun, I let myself be misled by red herrings whilst I missed the signs under my nose! In the words of Atticus Pund: “Everything in life has a pattern and coincidence is simply the moment when that pattern becomes briefly visible”

Was this review helpful?

Really enjoyed this book. So well written, clever and complex and a perfect blend of the two murder mysteries that Anthony Horowitz does so well. Highly recommended to anyone who enjoys a good who done it with lots of puzzles, clues and red herrings, a very readable book.

Was this review helpful?

I haven’t read Magpie Murders, the first in this series, which now seems like a shocking oversight and one I intend to remedy as soon as possible, because Moonflower Murders was tremendous fun.

Susan Ryeland, formerly working in publishing, currently running a hotel in Crete with her partner Andreas, is approached by the owners of the Branlow Hotel to investigate a murder which happened there some years earlier, where the wrong man may have been convicted... and which appears to have a bearing on the very current disappearance of their daughter, Cecily. It’s all mixed up with a detective novel by one of Susan’s former authors, Alan Conway, now deceased. And Alan’s book, Atticus Pünd Takes the Case, appears here in its entirety.

His detective, Atticus Pünd, very much resembles a German Poirot without the moustaches, complete with mansion flat and formidable secretary, though Madeline Cain plays a bigger role than Miss Lemon ever did. (Christie - or rather, her alter ego Mary Westmacott - gets a name check within Alan Conway’s text.)

The novel-within-a-novel was tremendously engaging - the only issue for me was that by the time I’d read the entire “Alan Conway “ novel (Atticus Pünd Takes the Case) I’d almost completely forgotten what was going on with Susan’s narrative.

There’s one particular revelation at the end which I can’t believe I didn’t notice sooner... but I didn’t. I wonder if any readers did? We can’t say Horowitz didn’t play fair!

Fantastic read and I’m now off to read Magpie Murders.

Was this review helpful?

I was so pleased to see there would be a new Atticus Pund novel out. I loved magpie murders and so couldn’t wait to read this one. Susan Ryeland, is yet again Surrounded by not just her story thrillers but a real life one.
I really enjoyed reading this very clever novel. Susan is running a Small hotel. she’s retired and wanting a new pace of life, when everything changes.
She gets wrapped up in what I can only describe as a web of a thrilling tale. The clues to the murder and to a ladies disappearance are all in the pages of this novel.
Another great book.

Was this review helpful?

I thoroughly enjoyed Magpie Murders, the first in this duet of books so was excited to be granted an early reading copy of Moonflower Murders.. For me it didn’t quite deliver the punch that Magpie Murders did. I was slightly less engaged with the new cast of characters and found the plot less gripping or convincing in motive. That said, I still loved the Russian doll format of a book within a book, and I was still engrossed from start to finish. It’s an easy and engaging read, which had I not read Magpie murders first wouldn’t have even vaguely disappointed. On a side note these books are the only ones I’ve ever read that mention my childhood home town, Bradford- on - Avon. That makes me like them all the more 😂
Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for the ARC in exchange for my thoughts. I can wholeheartedly recommend Moonflower Murders for a bit of escapist crime novel reading.

Was this review helpful?

This is quite simply the best crime novel I have ever read. It is like a Russian doll. The main story contains the full text of an Atticus Pund novel, which in turn contains the references necessary to solve the current crime. It. Is so cleverly plotted and well written that I cannot recommend this book highly enough.

Was this review helpful?

Absolutely cracking read. The Magpie Murders was one of my top reads last year as I love a good ol’ whodunnit, so it was fantastic to see a return of both Susan Ryeland and Atticus Pund. It conjures up real Agatha Christie vibes of more traditional murder mysteries with a quaint little town struck by horrible events, but with a modern day twist that left me guessing.

Great characters, incredibly well written and intricate plot with more twists than even I could keep up with. Bravo!

Full review can be found on my blog: http://thatbookishgem.com

Was this review helpful?

‘Moonflower Murders' is the latest cryptic murder mystery from the genius Anthony Horowitz. And is a sequel, to the hugely popular ‘Magpie Murders'.
‘Moonflower Murders’ is set two years after the final events of the previous novel. It is not necessary to have read the previous book in order to read the current story and indeed, Horowitz provides sufficient background without spoiling the novel – perhaps, providing just enough information to tantalise the read into reading ‘Magpie' aswell.
The protagonist, Susan Ryeland is now living and working in Crete. She is no longer involved with the publishing industry. Rather suddenly, she is contacted by a couple with a rather strange story – eight years ago, a murder was committed at their hotel and an employee was found guilty. Now, their daughter Cecily has read the book “Atticus Pund Takes the Case" (by Alan Conway), previously edited by Susan and loosely based on the real murder. Cecily insists that she now knows that truth about the murder at their hotel but disappears before she can reveal the truth. The family appeal to Susan for help. And so, begins a tale of murder and intrigue.

There are two murder mysteries within one in this book as the Atticus Pund novel is included with the novel and then of course, we have Susan’s investigation. As with all of Horowitz’s novels, there are plenty of clues and hints with references to Agatha Christie, Shakespeare and Mozart. Half of the fun is in trying to identify and unravel these clues but don’t expect the mystery to be easy to solve.
This is an excellent read and I absolutely recommend.

Was this review helpful?