Tried reading this one and it just was not meant for me. This does not mean that it is not a good book, I just was not in the right place to be reading it and have decided to not try picking it up anytime in the near future.

This book is so relevant and fascinating. The insights into our climate change environment was very knowledgeable and thought provoking. I highly recommend this book.

Published review forthcoming. I will link when I can.

This book includes excellent essays but it is not entirely clear to me what its purpose is. Why publish old essays about climate change when the issue is constantly shifting? This begs the question, what is the purpose of climate writing? Forthcoming review addresses such questions.

You can read my full review at Public Books.

Essential collection of writing on climate change. These essays were published over a number of years in the New Yorker, but it's nice to have them all in one place. It starts with Bill McKibben's 1989 piece, "Reflections: The End of Nature," when carbon emissions and acid rain were not yet standard news fare. It concludes with articles from 2019 on meat alternatives and forest fires. In between there are interesting facts, human interest stories, wry humor, and heavy hearts.

Thanks to the publishers and NetGalley for the opportunity to review a digital ARC in exchange for an unbiased review.

The New Yorker publishes some of the best journalists writing today, and those featured in this anthology are no exception. Spanning from Bill McKibben's The End of Nature, first published in 1989, to essays published in late 2019, this anthology of collected works previously published in the magazine are thought-provoking, well researched, and observant (all traits I've come to expect from The New Yorker). My favorites of the collection include Kathryn Schulz's "Writers in the Storm," Tom Kizzia's "The New Harpoon," "The Emergency" by Ben Taub (probably the most thought-provoking for me), David Owen's "Green Manhattan" (I've read Owen's work before and really enjoyed it and while what he had to say about this topic was most directly tied with my interests, it also felt the most dated of any of the essays--rip Blockbuster), "Adaptation" by Eric Klinenberg (again, I've read his work before, and would say if this essay interests you, you should definitely read the expanded work Palaces for the People: How Social Infrastructure Can Help Fight Inequality, Polarization, and the Decline of Civic Life), and Bill McKibben's "Power Brokers."

I will point out, however, that I am not quite sure this is worth actually spending money on (definitely worth reading!), especially because all of these articles (and more on the subject) are available to you through a subscription to The New Yorker. I do think this could have been made more special had the preface by David Remnick and the afterword by Elizabeth Kolbert been more critical or thought-provoking, but in all honestly, they were not really. The afterword, in particular, I was not impressed by as I feel, given the purpose of the final section of this collection in exploring climate change adaptation and mitigation, Kolbert's final remarks would have been better served to highlight some of the work being done by young activists and policymakers, as opposed to basically saying "we're f*cked."

Finally, given that the vast majority of subjects covered here are ones I am already familiar with (and, since initially learning about these topics, I have taken classes complicating colonial/Western narratives of science), upon rereading about much of these issues I was particularly struck by the connections between colonialism, sustainable development, and climate change mitigation. In large part, I found many of the proposed "solutions" proposed in the final section to fall under the category of what Bill McKibben calls "carbon colonialism," which personally I did not love. More thoughts on that aspect to come though...

Thank you to Ecco (Harper Collins) for providing me with a free early e-copy of this work through Netgalley in exchange for an honest review. The Fragile Earth: Writings from The New Yorker on Climate Change is out now.

You will get exactly what you expect with this book: A collection of excellent pieces from the New Yorker on all things environment and climate change. I was positively surprised to see some of these pieces dating back as far as 1989. I also loved the organization of the articles into different subcategories. As the foreword says: “In this anthology, you will find different approaches to climate change, across a range of geographies. [...] ‘The Fragile Earth’ seeks to illuminate the emergency from a multitude of perspectives.” It certainly managed that.

Just like the New Yorker itself, however, this isn’t exactly a book I was able to read cover to cover. Just one article once in a while was plenty for me.

This is a collection of New Yorker essays spanning across several years that focus on the beginning of climate change consciousness/reporting, how the scientists are currently studying it/crafting climate models, and ideas for "fixing" the problem. Because this is a topic I'm very interested in there was a lot of information covered that I was already familiar with but for someone just starting to explore this topic this is just the place to start.

Luckily, there were essays that covered topics I hadn't read about in depth before like water and electrification grid shortages occurring in places like Africa with little to no vegetation. The point that developing countries suffer the most from climate change yet contribute the least to the creation of the fossil fuels hastening its progress is explored but there are some hopeful suggestions made to rectify the situation (if global political cooperation can be negotiated).

In short, this is a comprehensive look at a topic that is not new but which still has a lot of question marks and contention surrounding it. And the high caliber of the New Yorker makes this highly readable and not at all dry and smothered in analytics.