Due to a sudden, unexpected passing in the family a few years ago and another more recently and my subsequent (mental) health issues stemming from that, I was unable to download this book in time to review it before it was archived as I did not visit this site for several years after the bereavements. This meant I didn't read or venture onto netgalley for years as not only did it remind me of that person as they shared my passion for reading, but I also struggled to maintain interest in anything due to overwhelming depression. I was therefore unable to download this title in time and so I couldn't give a review as it wasn't successfully acquired before it was archived. The second issue that has happened with some of my other books is that I had them downloaded to one particular device and said device is now defunct, so I have no access to those books anymore, sadly.

This means I can't leave an accurate reflection of my feelings towards the book as I am unable to read it now and so I am leaving a message of explanation instead. I am now back to reading and reviewing full time as once considerable time had passed I have found that books have been helping me significantly in terms of my mindset and mental health - this was after having no interest in anything for quite a number of years after the passings. Anything requested and approved will be read and a review written and posted to Amazon (where I am a Hall of Famer & Top Reviewer), Goodreads (where I have several thousand friends and the same amount who follow my reviews) and Waterstones (or Barnes & Noble if the publisher is American based). Thank you for the opportunity and apologies for the inconvenience.

Little Lindy is Kidnapped is an excellently researched novel about the kidnapping of Charles and Anne Lindbergh's young son and how the media covered "the crime of the century". I definitely got "media circus" vibes from the way Thomas Doherty explained how the media acted when this happened. It was like he was writing about this happening in modern day instead of in the 1930s.

"Little Lindy is Kidnapped" is the title of Thomas Doherty's media history of the tragic saga of the Lindbergh baby.

What's good: The book separates out different strands of media--newsreels, TV, radio, print--to discuss how they engaged with the Lindbergh saga over time. The book dips into what Lindbergh himself represented to the American public both before and after the murder of his child; it doesn't flinch from discussing Lindbergh's later Nazi history. Doherty sets the crime and the repercussions of its covering in the context of American media history, including other famous moments of news media interaction with major court cases and the development of popular film.

What's iffier: It's unfair to blame a book for what it isn't meant to be. That said, for those reading the book due to interest in the crime, you're not going to get an in-depth discussion of the investigation, evidence, or theories here. This isn't a true crime book--it is a cultural study of media history.

Note: I reviewed this book based on an ARC given me by NetGalley.

The term 'media circus' was the first thing that came to mind when I started reading this excellent book. The kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby on March 1, 1932 planted the seed that gave us the O.J. Simpson investigation and trial. I have read a few books about the kidnapping over the years but I found this book to read more like a novel. The writing flows very well and I found myself saying 'just one more page' way too many times. The author's approach to the crime and trial via the media angle was fascinating and it did have me making connections to the OJ crime and trial.
News had been newspaper only until Lucky Lindy flew solo to France. Radio was new and not many people owned one in the Depression. Film was taking its share of the media market and it all came together to make Lindy a larger than life hero. America couldn't get enough of him. When tragedy struck his family, American went crazy. The authors description of the small New Jersey town the Lindbergh's called home as it had to handle the massive number of reporters who descended upon the very small town. As one reporter put it, "The little town of Hopewell, 12 miles from Trenton, is the only community in the country that has gotten over the Depression". The police, then the FBI and the Treasury Department all joined the investigation but Lindbergh was the one calling the shots. The investigation became a fiasco. Americans wanted to know every little detail, start to finish.
A couple of things stuck with me - the fact that the crime scene was trampled and evidence wasn't gathered, not even on a very basic level. Later, during the trial, the judge allowed it to be filmed under strict rules. When the cameramen secretly filmed and then got caught the result was that they were sent packing and missed out on filming the verdict. Today we have a steady diet of the likes of Court TV and various CSI series so reading about the early days of media coverage was an eye opener. I enjoyed it start to finish.
My thanks to the publisher, Columbia University Press and NetGalley for giving me an advance copy in exchange for my honest review.

In the mid-1990’s, I latched on to the Lindbergh kidnapping for some reason. Maybe the seed was planted while I was in high school, when a documentary came out and my World History teacher made a comment that implied maybe the wrong man was sentenced to death based on new evidence. While scouring bookstores with my then-boyfriend (now husband), I found quite a few books written about Lindbergh and the kidnapping. Each book came to a different conclusion than the last one on the Lindbergh kidnapping, and I never came to my own conclusion myself.

So when I saw Little Lindy is Kidnapped was available as an Advanced Readers Copy (ARC) on NetGalley, I requested it. I was curious to read, in this age of media manipulation, how the press of 1932-1935 handled the “Crime of the Century.” All opinions in this review are my own.

Some background: Charles Lindbergh was the first person to fly from New York to Paris in a 33-hour flight, in 1927, when planes were still in their infancy stage. He was proclaimed a hero, a massive ticker tape parade was held for him in New York upon his return (some say it was the largest New York had ever seen), and no matter what he said (very little) or did (a lot of experimental aviation), people wanted to know about it.

However, Lindbergh was a very private man. He chose an equally private and intelligent wife, Anne Morrow. The hounding of the press was unheard of in it’s day; even the top Hollywood stars did not have to deal with so much press. So the Lindbergh’s decided to build a house in the remote town of Hopewell, New Jersey, near Anne’s parent’s estate.

The house was still under construction in 1932 when the kidnapping took place. Twenty-month old Charles Lindbergh, Jr. was taken from his second-story bedroom on a night when the Lindbergh’s were not normally at the estate; they had only stayed there and not travelled to their other home because Little Lindy had a cold. A ransom note was left by the windowsill with an unusual marking.

The result was pandemonium. Colonel Norman Schwarzkopf of the New Jersey State Patrol (and father to the General Norman Schwarzkopf of the 1991 Gulf War fame) and the law enforcement officials in both New Jersey and New York didn’t so much take control, as let Charles Lindbergh make important decisions in how to investigate the crime.

The Lindbergh kidnapping was a boon to newspapers, radio stations and newsreel makers. Little Lindy is Kidnapped explores the who, what, where and why of the news coverage. During the investigation, radio won the day, as their updates were near instantaneous. In an age when more and more homes were buying radio, despite there being a Great Depression on, just shows the pull that radio had on the nation. Newspapers published several editions of their papers each day, updated with the latest information. Newsreels filmed the press conferences and the other reporters on scene, as the Lindbergh’s rarely gave statements themselves.

Surprisingly, Hollywood movies did not take the bait and start churning out kidnapping movies. There were a few minor movies in the pipeline, but they were heavily censored, and then in 1934, the Hays Code was implemented, and for the next 30 years, kidnapping was not allowed on the big screen.

For ten weeks, the press camped out near Hopewell, New Jersey for the latest updates, reporting even the slightest thing. The only times Charles Lindbergh addressed the press was to request for privacy during the trying time. Walter Lippmann of the New York Herald-Tribune even turned on his fellow journalists and told the newspapers to “call off their reporters and detectives and let Colonel Lindbergh alone.” Nothing worked. The press would not let up on the hottest story of the decade.

The FBI was finally called in, and the U.S. Treasury Department came up with the idea of paying the ransom with “gold certificate” bills. Franklin Roosevelt, as president, was moving the U.S. currency off the gold standard and all gold certificate bills had to be turned in to the banks in exchange for new bills by a certain date. The Treasury Department kept a list of all the bills in the ransom package.

The ransom was paid to a man nicknamed “Cemetery John” based on where the handoff took place, and Lindbergh and the intermediary said the man spoke with a German accent. And then nothing happened. The intermediary heard nothing back from the abductor about the safe return of Little Lindy. Then, ten weeks after the kidnapping, a laborer walked into the Sourland woods on Mount Rose Hill in New Jersey to relieve himself and stumbled upon a skull and a baby’s foot sticking up out of the underbrush.

So the kidnapping investigation became a murder investigation. For two years, there was little information released. The list of marked gold certificate bills was released to banks and businesses and were told to look out for those passing the bills. Over those two years, the press would report on where the bills were passed. The FBI and Treasury Department had narrowed down the suspect’s location to the Bronx in New York.

Finally, an astute gas station attendant received a gold certificate bill, now pretty much out of circulation, and struck up a conversation with the man who gave it to him. The man said he still had a lot of them back at home. The gas station attendant was smart enough to write the license plate number down. And that was how Bruno Richard Hauptman was captured.

The trial was a media circus. There was an attempt to keep the radio and newsreel press out, but after much jockeying, it was agreed that the newsreel people could have a camera in the courtroom if they only shot when court was not in session; they surreptitiously filmed during the trial anyway. And somehow a microphone was repeatedly hidden in the courtroom.

When the trial was in session, crowds of up to 100,000 packed the streets. Vendors started selling souvenirs like Lindbergh ladders (key evidence in the case), local restaurants had Lindbergh-themed meals, and in general, just to gawk at the key players in the case. All the while the press was reporting every scrap of information possible as well as a fair amount of conjecture.

Quickly, it became clear that Hauptman was the ultimate bad guy. An immigrant from Germany, a country the U.S. had just fought in a war not so long ago, who spoke highly of the new German leader, Adolf Hitler. Some in the press played this up to the hilt.

Hauptman was naturally found guilty and sentenced to death by electric chair. This was another media maelstrom. The press was not invited to witness, but that didn’t stop the radio reporters from counting down to the minute Hauptman was executed. When the execution was delayed by about half an hour, radio personalities had to ad-lib.

The press, sadly, never left the Lindbergh’s alone. Anne had given birth to another boy before Hauptman was caught, and eventually the Lindbergh’s fled to England to live in peace. They returned in 1939, with a decidedly different Lindbergh: an appeaser who thought highly of Adolf Hitler and prominent spokesman of America First Committee, the nation’s largest isolationist group. Suddenly less and less people were interested in what Lindbergh had to say.

Little Lindy is Kidnapped is a very interesting take on how the press played a big part in the story of the Lindbergh kidnapping. Sometimes they became the story. In today’s world, endless coverage of an event is commonplace with so many media outlets. Back in the 1930’s, with very few media outlets, the reporters and photographers found a way to create endless coverage. The closest thing I can recall of wall-to-wall coverage of an event was the O.J. Simpson murder trial of the 1990’s. After that, channels like Court TV became commonplace. The reporters and photographers of the 1930’s were decades ahead of their time.

Little Lindy is Kidnapped is being released to the general public on November 3, 2020.

Doherty writes an interesting account of the kidnapping of Charles Lindbergh's toddler son with an emphasis on how it changed news reporting. It sounds like it might be a bit dry, but I found it very compelling.

An exhaustive look at the media coverage of the Lindbergh baby kidnapping. But more than that, it’s an examination of how media evolved during that critical period when radio was developing and news reels were emerging. It’s almost comforting to know that the importance of actual journalists was undercut nearly 100 years ago. That radio “swiped” the information from newspaper journalists and rushed it on air, beating the print edition, is a precursor to our age of the internet. The coverage of the original “Trial of the Century” was alarmingly similar to the most recent trial by the same name. There are so many layers to this extremely well-written book that I can’t cover them all. However, that the author could cause me to tear up in his descriptions of Mrs Lindbergh’s stoic testimony at the trial of her baby’s accused murderer is evidence of exceptional talent.

Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for the opportunity to read this book.

Thank you to Net Galley and Columbia University Press for the chance to read and review this book. I highly recommend this book if you like to read about historical events. This centers on the kidnapping of the Lindbergh baby, but it is mostly told through the eyes of the media. There is also a lot of history about the development of different types of media and how they reported the kidnapping. Very well written with lots of interesting historical facts!

In this monograph, Thomas Doherty, professor of American Studies at Brandeis University, offers a well-researched, highly engaging history of the media's coverage of the so-called crime of the century--the kidnapping of Charles Lindbergh's son--that reads like a novel. As the author notes the 1932 kidnapping coincided with the "tipping-point moment of penetration for radio and sound newsreels." The newspapers found themselves in intense competition for the next scoop with the above two emerging media branches. While newspapers could provide its readers with column inch after column inch of detailed coverage, radio had the advantage of immediacy and speed, and newsreels could draw in viewers with visual images projected on the big screen. In telling the story of the intense competition between the three media branches, the author also succeeds in evoking the emotions that Americans felt as they followed the news of the tragedy as well as capturing the colorful media personalities that reported it.

Particularly interesting is the author's discussion of the trial coverage. The governor of the state of New Jersey, the state in which Bruno Richard Hauptmann was tried, issued an edict barring radio equipment from the courtroom's interior. Although newspapers initially celebrated this decision, thinking it eliminated the upstart new media outlet from providing substantial coverage, this celebration proved premature. Radio outlets used their best commentators to provide their listeners not only with news of trial events but also to provide explanation, interpretation, and opinion about the forensic evidence, the prosecutorial and defense strategy, and witness testimony. But their coverage did not stop there, radio stations interrupted their regular programming with breaking news bulletins, thus creating a sense of urgency that newspapers could not duplicate and even went so far as to provide dramatic reenactments of key moments in the trial. And when they had no new information, they reported on the reporting of the trial.

But radio was not the only competitor with which newspapers had to contend. The judge shocked many when he announced that he would allow newsreel cameras in the courtroom. Newsreel editors has promised Justice Trenchard that they would show the utmost respect for the sanctity of the courtroom and be as unobtrusive as possible. In fact, they devised a special "quiet" 35mm motion picture camera for this purpose; metal gears in the machine were replaced with fiber and other moving metal parts were encased in graphite to reduce noise. The agreement with the judge stipulated that the five newsreel outlets would "cooperate in a relay system of pool coverage" and would not film during actual trial proceedings. Of course, the newsreel companies could not resist secretly filming the trial. But their distrust of each other led them to reveal their secret film coverage before the trial ended. As a result, the judge banned them from the courtroom and they missed filming the trial verdict.

Coverage of the verdict was also marred by scandal, as AP released a false news flash announcing that the jury had found Hauptmann guilty, but recommended life rather than death. Newspaper rushed to release special editions of the verdict only to have to pull them later when the actual verdict became known.

This well-written, well-researched, and exciting recounting of this transformative moment in media history and in Americans' perception of the media, will make any person who thinks history boring do an about-face. Highly recommend!

Just when you think you have heard everything about the Lindburg kidnapping, out comes another book that traces yet another angle of the story. Fortunately, this is one book you should not miss.