Skip to main content

Member Reviews

As a convert to the Catholic Church, this book has become a new, favorite resource for me. Growing up Protestant, I was schooled in the reformation, Luther, Wesley, Calvin and so forth. However, when I came home to the Catholic Church, I found myself a bit lost when it came to my knowledge of the popes, many of the saints, appearances of Mary and many aspects of Church history. (Also, to my absolute joy, this book is one in a series! So now I can learn even more! Cue the confetti.)

This book is packed full of information and covers some of my very, very favorite saints; Saint Faustina, Saint Josephine Bakhita and Saint John Henry Newman, to name a few. The time period ranges from the election of Blessed Pius IX to the death of Saint John Paul II, a period of Church history that I was greatly lacking in knowledge of. But the greatest thing about this book is that it is written to be understandable. It isn't so lofty that I need a commentary or cliff notes, nor is it so elementary that I feel that I am learning nothing. It was written beautifully and comfortably, but at a level that required me to slow down and study a bit. Literally my favorite type of writing on the planet. A definite recommend!

Was this review helpful?

This book looks at the history of the Catholic Church from the reign of Pius IX to the death of John Paul II. As should be expected, the book does not go into great depths on any subject but covers the events and issues of the turbulent times in an even-handed way. Although I disagree with Wagner on several issues, he manages to walk down the orthodox middle on topics such as Vatican II.

Where the book falls short is in dealing with the reign of John Paul II. Here the distance needed for a fair analysis is missing. By calling him "John Paul the Great" the author is making a judgement that he does not back up with facts, nor is he giving us the clear judgement of the Church on this pontificate.

In addition in his long section on the clerical abuse scandals on the early 2000's his analysis, while accurate is too lengthy for the other "you be the judge" sections in the book, but does not really provide sufficient analysis.

This volume is useful but not nearly as good as the other volumes in the series.

Was this review helpful?