Cover Image: Rise of Knight and Sword

Rise of Knight and Sword

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

Rise of Knight and Sword is a retelling of the classic legend of Excalibur set in a modern world with very slight inspiration taken from steampunk aesthetics. There are dinosaurs, somewhat futuristic technology and 19th century inspired fashion that all play a very small functional role in the novel while yet somehow taking up a great deal of descriptive detail. These are elements that do make it a rather unique version of a well-known tale but neither the dinosaurs or semi-futuristic technology was used in an interesting way despite being a potential strength.

The novel drowns in very minute background detail while leaving character development and interesting dialogue in the dust. Dialogue between characters was very stiff, flat and honestly just really odd and awkward. Every single character was devoid of any real personality or depth while engaging in rather irrational behavior that just did not flow. I believe a really good novel can be measured in how relatable the main characters are or how much a reader can (or wants to) envision themselves as the main character, but sadly none of these characters did that. Because of this the novel felt both too long and too short at the same time, like it was missing huge chunks of plot that were replaced by boringly detailed descriptions of the way a person was sitting or how a certain setting looked.

There was real potential for this to be a unique take, but just ended up being bland and overly long to the point where I struggled to finish reading it.

**Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for an ARC in exchange for an honest review.

Was this review helpful?

This book is … not good. I know it’s a debut novel, which I would love to support, but I cannot do it in this case. It’s very telling when my motivation to read a book is simply to finish it so I can move on to something better.

This book has far too much going on with it: it’s a retelling of Arthurian legend, with modern technology in a fantasy world, and dinosaurs. Yes, dinosaurs. I was excited about the dinosaurs at first (Dinotopia was one of my favourite shows when I was little) but the dinosaurs in this book were irrelevant. They were simply there so the book has an interesting marketing phrase: King Arthur but with DINOSAURS. They are simply background decoration. It doesn’t work. I would’ve loved to see just Arthurian legend and dinosaurs, without the modern technology. How cool would it be to read about dinosaurs in a medieval setting? It could’ve been done so well.

The characters are very bland and cliche. Guinevere is your typical ‘fierce’ heroine who makes silly mistakes and is meant to be intelligent but isn’t. She’s also incredibly beautiful, which everybody points out, especially Arthur, who’s smitten with her immediately. Speaking of Arthur, he’s … weird. All the characters are weird. They don’t speak like humans as the dialogue is very stilted and cliche, so I never cared about any of them.

The book needs to be edited to be much tighter and more tense. There’s a lot of description that could be cut — when Guinevere stows away on Arthur and Mordred’s ship, we spend too many pages following Arthur sleeping, being woken up, then sleeping again, then waking up again for no reason, then sleeping AGAIN, and then eating, and then FINALLY discovering Guinevere.

Also, I have never been able to spot a debut novel faster: this book literally starts with Guinevere waking up to her alarm and going about her day as normal. Why not start when she’s already at the library when an important delivery arrives?

This book can be fixed, but it needs someone with a lot of red pen to do so. If it was still early in the editing process I wouldn’t mind, but this book comes out in November this year, so I don’t have much hope.

Was this review helpful?

Aside from some of the character and place names, there isn't much here to remind you of the Legend of King Arthur. It's set in a modern-ish world...with airships and dinosaurs. My major issue was that I couldn't connect with the characters - I just didn't care what happened to these people.

Was this review helpful?

I requested a copy of this book before I saw the rating, and as soon as I saw it, I was super skeptical. My skepticism proved to be wrong though, because I still really enjoyed this book. While it was far from the best I've read, the plot kept me intrigued.

This book follows Guinevere on her journey to find Excalibur, highlighting a character usually ignored in the legend. Along the way she meets familiar characters, like Merlin, Arthur, Mordred, and Lancelot. All of these characters have been rewritten to fit into a steampunk world with dinosaurs roaming the wild, so the story felt completely different from other Arthurian legends.

The characters in this were really the star of the book. Guinevere became a historically savvy heroine with a world to protect. Mordred became a gruff bounty hunter with a hidden soft spot. Merlin became a mysterious fortune telling female knight. And, saving the best for last, Arthur became a pirate-esque smuggler, with something to prove. As soon as he waltzed in with his double pistols, I was in love. He was by far my favorite character, I loved his sarcasm and the constant banter between him and Mordred.

Speaking of Mordred, I kind of despised him at times. He was a total jerk, and swung between being kind to Guinevere, and demeaning her. I did my best to ignore his faults, but I do have to say that I was somewhat happy when he fell out of the narrative.

The romance in this book was one of the weakest points. As soon as Arthur laid eyes on Guinevere, he was in love, and because I hate insta-love, I was immediately a bit irritated. Thankfully, Guinevere played hard to get, so our romance turned slightly slow-burn. Arthur and Gawain's flirtations with Guinevere were always a light spot in the book, and kept me smiling.

Now, a lot of the complaints in the other reviews I've seen were about the writing style. Don't get me wrong, it definitely had its problems, but I found myself adapting to it, and by the end of the book, it didn't bother me. We had several large info dumps that I ended up skimming, and the author also had a tendency to write in the "she did this. she did that" formula, which felt super choppy. This may have been because this was a debut novel, but it did make reading a bit hard at times.

Despite the lower ratings on this book, I did enjoy it. I am a fan of most Arthurian retellings though, so that might have been part of it. I loved Wade's reimaginings of the classic characters, and the plot had enough action to keep me interested. I would say that this book is pretty hit-or-miss with readers, and I do understand some of the lower ratings.

Thanks to Miriam Wade and Netgalley for providing a free copy in exchange for an honest review

Was this review helpful?

Imagine Arthurian legend mixed with a dystopian world story,that's mostly what this book has to offer.
Has a very different style of writing, though I could not connect with the main characters 100% ,it can be a one time read.
Many thanks to GenZ Publishing for providing me with an e-ARC of this book.
3.7/5 stars.

Was this review helpful?

Thanks to the publisher for providing an eARC of Rise of Knight and Sword in exchange for an honest opinion.

This is a debut book. That is a fact I knew before reading the author bio on the back of the book. I don't agree on being more lenient with debuts so I'll still discuss it as I would anything else but since a lot of my issues with this are thing you normally find in debuts, I'd like to ask you to keep this in mind.

Rise of Knight and Sword either doesn't know what it wants to be, or doesn't know how to communicate it with the reader. The description puts an emphasis on Guinevere pre-adventure but we get very little of that in the actual story. When are we? Where are we? Who are our characters? Everything felt vague even though it was also ultra descriptive. This book has too many adjectives and adverbs, especially when it comes to dialogue tags. You'll rarely find a 'said' without a qualifier following it. I like books that trust you to understand how the character feel based off of context clues but we never get that hear. Mind you, I read an advanced version so phrases like "yawned tiredly" may change, but its such a prevalent problem that I doubt it'll be rectified before publication. The narrative really, really hurts this story here.

So what of the story? It was... it was, I suppose. Some parts were good, some parts were boring or confusing, but perhaps I only found those parts boring or confusing because of my inability to connect to the narrative. This may sound weird because I doubt quite know how to describe it, but I'm not entirely sure if Arthurian lore is Wade's passion. Don't get me wrong, I'm not saying she doesn't like it and isn't knowledgeable of it, but loving someone's story so much that you adapt it for a new world and plot requires this level of admiration that normally leaks through the pages. Rise of Knight and Sword felt a lot more like an 'in-name-only' adaptation with characters names and alliances copied over but everything else changed, almost like when you do an AU for a fanfic and put your angsty warlords in a coffee shop. It's still a quest for escaliber so I'm not sure why I felt that way, but its the only way I can make sense of why I had trouble with this plot so I'll leave you there.

Was this review helpful?

Imagine a mixture of this:
- Han Solo + Leia romance
- Dinotopia
- Arthurian Legend
... And you get pretty close to understanding what Rise of Knight and Sword is about. If you watched/read Cursed and thought it needed more steampunk and pterodactyls, then you'll probably love this debut by Miriam Wade.

In this first in the One Sword series (trilogy?), we get political power-grabs, a fancy library, teenage infatuation, Excaliber, and Zeppelin stowaways. There's space for the characters to grow and develop (protag. and antagonists alike), but, at the very least, it adds new elements to a familiar story. I don't recommend reading if you're not a fan of anachronistic reimaginings of Arthurian lore (and definitely not if you're not a fan of Arthurian legends period).

Was this review helpful?

I really wanted to like this book. The variation on the hunt to find Excalibur was a fun idea but the execution made it difficult to become attached to the story. I wanted more character development and left not really knowing the characters beyond their sexual tensions. The book has a few typos and is both overly descriptive and lacking in the details needed to create depth.

Was this review helpful?

Wow.

“Rise of Knight and Sword” is an interesting take on the lore of Camelot as Guinevere finds a map hidden away in a box of artifacts and sets off to find Excalibur with the help of an unlikely duo.

I don’t know where to begin.

Let me start by saying that I appreciate the attempt here at giving the story we all know a sci fi twist however the execution was not as successful as the idea itself.

There’s not a lot of time given to organically build the story, characters or their relationships and a lot of what happens plot wise happens so fast that you almost get whiplash trying to keep up. From the very beginning I was lost trying to understand a world where the descriptions of her home, self and morning routine sound very modern day contrasted quickly with the sudden introduction of pterodactyls before she is handed a map that shatters her world, again no real build up as to why other than the city is big on tourism and not helping its actual citizens, and then we have spaceships?

For me I like to see growth and some exposition before we dive head first into the overall arc which never managed to happen here, there is very little structuring outside of point a and point b and I spent more time side eyeing the narrative especially when it came to the trio as they kept flip flopping on so many things with the biggest being a sexual and physical assault where she gets yelled at by Mordred for showing anger towards Arthur for suggesting she wanted it prior to seeing the bruises and then a handful of chapters later she brings it up again and they both act like this is new information? And Arthur was just the absolute worst which isn’t a new thing for me with the recent reimagining of this tale but my god did this guy need a solid punch to the face for his mood swings and the way he treated Guinevere to the point that in one scene he had to be pulled away because she along with everyone else expected him to become physically violent with her literally three pages after being happy and affectionate which is not okay nor romantic at all and she is the one who has to apologize and take all the blame? Absolutely not.

The relationships themselves are one dimensional and cartoonish at times with insta love an obsession with her beauty and nothing else along conversations that should be happening after a longer period of time than what we get on the page. This isn’t a new dynamic where we have our heroine stumble into a position far outside her comfort zone and try to make the best out of a bad situation and rise to the occasion over the course of the novel as the journey is what keeps us readers coming back to explore and grow with them but with this take there is none of that and I was pretty disappointed.

There’s a lot of moments here that I wish I could show to fully explain my confusion with the story as a whole but I think this book needed a few more drafts to fully flesh out every aspect. I can’t tell you a single defining characteristic for this version of the infamous Camelot characters and while the plot again had some potential with the genre bending it was never going to be successful for me as there was no real way for me to connect with them and the task at hand which was a shame.

I hope I am in the minority as I hate to dislike a book and see it do poorly but overall this was a giant misstep for me.

Was this review helpful?

This book was really good and I read it in a day. I am not sure if it is one I would read again though. The plotline was decent but I could never fully connect with the main characters.

Was this review helpful?

An interesting novel, which grows on the reader very quickly. Guinevere is an archivist who discovers a map leading to the legendary sword, Excalibur. She has to run with it, gets away, and then finds that she has a bounty on her head. What happens next I leave to the reader to find out, as I don't wish to spoil the ending.

Was this review helpful?