Cover Image: Masters of Rome

Masters of Rome

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

I appreciate the publisher allowing me to read this book. I found this book incredibly interesting the author really kept me hooked until the end. very well written I highly recommend.

Was this review helpful?

Constantine and Maxentius are no longer friends and quickly on the road to becoming enemies and thus their inevitable conflict at the Battle of the Milvian Bridge.

Close 1st person POV limits the view of each author/character but an able rendition of wars of the Tetrarchy. ★★★

Was this review helpful?

Mystery, action, betrayal, intrigue...

When I saw this book I knew I had to read it. The Roman world has always fascinated me and when I came into one that illustrated it in all it flair, it was one to read.

Captivating plot and vibrant characters to keep one at the edge throughout the book.

I received a copy of this book from Netgalley and this is my honest opinion.
Reasons I enjoyed this book

Was this review helpful?

Masters of Rome is the send book in Simon Turney and Gordon Doherty’s joint trilogy set late in the Roman Empire/. I’m a huge fan of both authors, however felt the first book in the series fell a bit flat. So I was worried that book 2, which in general tends to be the weakest book in a trilogy, would be a struggle.

I’m glad to say I was proven very wrong. In this book, I really feel that both main characters finally found their own voices. Both have developed into very strong protagonists, with distinct characteristics and personalities, something I felt was lacking in book 1.

Added to this, the book is packed full of exciting action, with a story that really does grab hold and drag you along.

Its full of brilliant dialogue between fascinating characters, which is a trademark of both authors.

The authors have really set things up nicely for book 3, and knowing its only a few months away has me very excited!

Was this review helpful?

Part two of the Rise of Emperors series is the necessary bridge between the fascinating beginning and the climax between Constantine and his friend-turned-enemy Maxentius. Like book one, each chapter is told in succession by first one, then the other. Maxentius, who started out weak and was forced to take control of Rome despite himself, has grown into his position—even to the point that he is able to oust his treacherous father who attempts to wrest the empire back from him. Constantine, who is pretty much the rogue of the west, is forced to fight on the fringes, slowly gaining the loyalty of barbarian tribes. Both Maxentius and Constantine are at odds with the eastern empire, but they cannot join forces because they know that their positions are mutually exclusive. One or the other must capitulate. Both face serious—and different—problems, leaving them weakened and miserable. I find myself liking both of them and would have a hard time knowing who to “root” for, except we all know who will win in the end. It’s just a matter of finding out how. It seems that Constantine has the advantage that his followers practically worship him and see him as divinely inspired. Even after his lowest point, emotionally, he emerges from a shrine to a heavenly welcome:

“But then, just as I made to step out from the portico and into the sunlight to cross the glade towards them, I was almost blinded when a shaft of white light—like that cast by a blade in a noonday desert battle—flashed across my face. Blinking, I realized it was the sun’s rays, reflected from the thin film of wine I had poured into the font.
I took one more step forward, but when I caught sight of my soldiers not just looking at me but staring, I halted. Their mouths had fallen agape, and they were owl-eyed as they beheld me in some sort of awe, pointing. It was as if I had sprouted wings!
Those who had not yet noticed me emerging from the shrine were soon alerted by their comrades and within a trice, each of them too regarded me as a man might look upon a strongbox of jewels. Batius’ lips moved as he mouthed some instinctive prayer and stared at me. Krocus dropped the rag of bread he had been eating.”

Maxentius could only have wished to be seen in the same light! Although he was the stronger of the two, his reputation diminished in direct proportion to his funds—mostly frittered away by his own mismanagement. Regardless, it’s becoming obvious that his big confrontation with Constantine is looming. Things got off to a slow start in this volume, but the action picked up halfway through and hurtled to the end. There was a lot of background to absorb, but my patience was well rewarded. It’s inevitable that our two protagonists are on a collision course and the stage is set for book three and a rousing conclusion.

Was this review helpful?

This is a monumental triumph detailing the stories of men who brought the downfall of Rome. This book perfectly illustrates how Rome's magnificence fell into ruinous decline. I hardly claim to be an expert on the Crisis of the Third Century, which saw the death of Emperor Septimius Severus result in the Empire's succession thrive into chaos. Without a proper line of an Imperial family, successive generals took charge, and thus civil war, inflation, taxation, and constant warring from Germanic tribes and the Sassanid Empire weakened Rome's borders. The Empire itself was a facade. Sure, you had the Empire. But you also had the Senate and the People of Rome. This stretches back to the day of Augustus. What you will see in this book is the complete unraveling of Roman Politics and the herculean task of rebuilding an empire. Diocletian's reforms brought down the Empire more than it was intended to revive it.

The politics of this period is rife with conspiracy, betrayal and love, loss, and disaster. The religious turmoil of the growing new religion of Christianity in the heart of Rome and Africa, to Gaul and the East of the Roman Provinces, is clearly illustrated. Tensions boil between Roman Paganism and Roman Christianity. Emperor Maxentius has a difficult problem of dealing with the new cult, as it would have looked to him at the time and how Roman Christians themselves weren't united on a single purpose, having constant and conflicting ideas. Maxentius should be credited as a greater man for Christianity because he indirectly helped and built the foundations of a strong Christian state to take over when Constantine historically assumes the role of Imperator. That's as much clue you'll get. In this novel, you'll explore so many areas of the cities of Rome, Augusta Treverorum, a Roman City in Germania that resembled the capital. You'll be seeing so much new history it's like a virtual history tour of a video game for a second. You'll see Praetorians killing and butchering Romans within the City of Rome. You'll see generals and emperors at each other's throats. Confrontations, insults, all the lot you can expect that is associated with Roman Politics. Let it be clear, this is your classic Roman novel. Loyal men fighting to preserve an already collapsing empire. Constantine couldn't prevent the Empire from falling even when he had a solidified grasp on Rome's influence. And another thing: When the legions of Rome aren't paid, they will revolt. That has been a consistent theme within Roman military history for that matter. There are so many emotional scenes written in this book describing the private/personal lives of the two characters, you will tear up.

Old characters make a return and they fit well. Galerius, the man who had set out to become the master of the world becomes a shadow of his former shelf. Maximian, father to Maxentius by his daughter's marriage, Valeria. These two men who had once participated with Diocletian in the events of the first novel to bring back peace to Rome are shown to have utterly failed. The novel doesn't need to make that up for you, if you read on the politics of this time, it seems every Emperor and every General was declaring himself Emperor and trying to reclaim Rome all the time. Valeria is one character I never liked, and I still don't like her. It was a mistake, both in the novel and in real life, for Maxentius to even get married to her. A political marriage is never a trust-worthy alliance of two souls, and in the rare cases that it is, it is a miracle. There is a vibrant and colorful cast of characters, and I also discovered how the Franks, part of the Germanic tribes that were launching wars on Rome all the time, became integrated into Constantine's army as he defended the Empire from their raids. So by the time, the Empire did officially convert to Christianity, and the Empire split into two, the Western Roman Empire and the Eastern Roman Empire. You already get to see how the Franks soon converted to Christianity and that then formed the Frankish Kingdom, i.e the medieval foundation of France as we know it. But I've diverged a bit and gone a bit too ahead for myself. So that's a fun and cool fact. For all I know I could be wrong.

There's nail-biting action in this novel, and there's no shortage of excellent battle scenes. One thing that I did not get was that were the Roman troops still using lorica segmenta and using the equipment of Gallic-style shields, or did they revert to the oval ones that became more popular around the time of this crisis? I did not, and might never like Constantine. I think Maxentius, for all his faults, would have made a better Emperor for Rome. Maxentius was no naive fool. But inside, I felt sadness that with the passing of Emperor Galerius (this being the man who was declining, was the only thing standing between Constantine and Maxentius from declaring war on each other) that these two great men, will soon become enemies. The childhood friendship is over. Now Rome's destiny will be forged at the battle of the Milvain Bridge, and the fate of Western Civilization is about to be born, anew. I say, without a shadow of a doubt, that Simon Turney and Gordon Doherty, two of my favorite authors, have delivered an outstanding sequel. I feel sad that Maxentius did not become Emperor of Rome however.

10/10 from me.

I have submitted my review to Amazon and Waterstones, awaiting their approval!

Was this review helpful?

Book 2 in this series of the epic battle between Constantine and Maxentius for supremacy in Rome continues where ""Sons of Rome"" left off - 308AD and continues up to 312AD. Each man's story is again narrated by a single author, with an alternating overall narrative so that we get a sense of what is happening to both concurrently.

No spoilers here as events are well known - however the journey taken to get there is as thrilling and fresh as if it happened yesterday. It is not an easy journey for either man - both face the constant struggle to maintain their positions, both within and without the Roman Empire as territories are won and lost; there is personal tragedy and a deterioration of their fragile friendship; and religious dissent is on the rise as the supporters of Christ demand more freedom of worship; and add into the mix, the rise of rival contenders.

Though the more I read - and for me Constantine was ever present in my mind - the more I felt an empathy towards Maxentius. I was more drawn to his plight than his nemesis, for many of his deeds and achievements have latterly gone unrecognised. Maybe it has something to do with the way we like to support the underdog against an obviously stronger, experienced opponent. Maybe, it is just my knowing the outcome that has drawn me closer to getting to know this man more.

The final showdown take's place in book 3 for ".... it is in battle that this will end for one ..."

Was this review helpful?

BLURB
Their rivalry will change the world forever.
As competition for the imperial throne intensifies, Constantine and Maxentius realise their childhood friendship cannot last. Each man struggles to control their respective quadrant of empire, battered by currents of politics, religion and personal tragedy, threatened by barbarian forces and enemies within.
With their positions becoming at once stronger and more troubled, the strained threads of their friendship begin to unravel. Unfortunate words and misunderstandings finally sever their ties, leaving them as bitter opponents in the greatest game of all, with the throne of Rome the prize.
It is a matter that can only be settled by outright war
REVIEW
It's a struggle between two titans, my fellow readers, an extraordinary battle of epic proportions with only one winner. From chapter to chapter the battle intensifies, as each reacts in a manner similar to "I see what you did there, and I'm going to up the intensity. And of course there's also the thing between Constantine and Maxentius. (editor's note - I notice an attempt at humor there - or, maybe there is a growing irreconcilable chasm of envy, and the craving for creative superiority amongst our dynamic writing duo. You can imagine the verbal exchange at one of their ale filled get togethers - Gordon to Simon "Wow, that last bit you wrote really stunk. Did you write that with a used sponge on a stick?" Simon to Gordon "Better than that haggis induced flatulence you just created, you blue painted heathen." ) Regardless of the veracity of this mano a mano writer's tiff, the outcome of the collaboration, which is the most important part to us, is simply magnificent. The buildup of the enmity between Constantine and Maxentius, the shattering of their personal lives, the supplanting of the old gods, the constant threats from the East...man oh man there's a lot going on in a three year period. Emotions so raw, so compelling that they leap off the page, pulling the reader into the ongoing internal and external struggles faced by the competitors for mastery of Rome. I love the way the authors have had the protagonists misconstrue the actions and motives of each other, and even given the chance to see past the misunderstandings....well, you'll have to see for yourself how that works out. 😊 As will we all, though now we wait for our dueling authors to produce the last piece of the puzzle; the inevitable outcome, the winner. 5 ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

Was this review helpful?

When last we were with Constantine and Maxentius their friendship was fractured, their childhood connection and long standing respect hanging by a thread as they both struggle to gain power within the empire.

War is coming.. but neither side want to admit it or is ready to make the first move.

Doherty and Turney cowrite perfectly, each depicting the role of an emperor and the struggles they faced… money, religion, love, betrayal, murder.. its all there!

I’ve been a big fan of both authors since I caught the reading bug and Masters of Rome didn’t disappoint, it’s a real talent to make history come alive, to add passion..and the knowledge and talent of both authors shines through.

For the action fans there’s some brilliantly depicted military actions on Constantine’s part that I just loved..things could have turned out very differently.

The story really helped me as a reader see the fragility of those in power.. sometimes there is no right decision.. someone will always be unhappy.. but as Maxentius learns the hard way you can only run away from your troubles for so long, sooner or later it will come back to bite you in the arse and towards the end of the book you see the wolves biting at his heals leading to one of the worst decisions he could ever make.

The most interesting bit for me was the advisors both Constantine and Maxentius took guidance from.. They were so heavily relied upon and actually had more power/control than the emperors themselves really.. the trust they had in these individuals must have put a major strain on the relationship.

Both emperors suffer from grief, leading to some rash actions but you could really feel how the events could have played out this way. Mental health is a massive topic these days.. I can’t imagine the mental health of these rulers was all that good to be honest, you really feel for them. I don’t think either really wanted war.. but they are left with little option in order to take the power they truly believe is theirs.

For someone like me who loves the period but doesn’t know a lot of the history it’s great to have it come to life so majestically and what I always appreciate even more is the author notes which clarify where they may have deviated from facts, or made assumptions as there are things we just will never know for sure.. I think that’s why I love the genre.. there’s scope to weave a wonderful tale into history as we know it.

Wonderfully written, powerful, raw emotion. Simply WOW!

Looking forward to the next instalment in the series.

Was this review helpful?

Masters of Rome is the second book in the Rise of Emperors series continuing the epic story of the tense rivalry between former boyhood friends Maxentius and Constantine.

The end of the first enthralling book, Sons of Rome, left me in no doubt that there were some interesting events about to unfold in this new instalment, as the strained relationship between the two friends began to fracture in the face of the power struggle among the leaders of Diocletian's tetrarchy.

While Diocletian devotes himself to his cabbages in his rural retirement, the peaceful, productive empire he imagined would spring from the seeds of this new order is suffering from severe blight! The leaders of the four corners of the empire are waging an undercover war against each other in moves and counter moves designed to undermine each other at every turn, in order to take the imperial throne.

Maxentius finds himself tied up in troubles in Rome, complicated by the rapid growth in the Christian church. His domestic and family concerns lead him to take his eye off the ball and lose his grip on the African part of his empire, causing him severe financial problems. It's hard to be a popular leader when your subjects are discontented - especially when you have to increase their tax burden to plug the holes in your leaky coffers - and many of his decisions do not bear close scrutiny.

Constantine meanwhile, still maintaining his right to rule the Western Empire, has his hands full quelling the Franks, dealing with shortages of food, his own dissatisfied citizens, and more than a little double dealing from his political enemies - including his own father-in-law. It is going to take a mix of lateral thinking and taking the bull by the horns to get through this, but his strength of character starts to shine through - even if he is a little on the impulsive side at times.

Maxentius and Constantine are rather older and more experienced in this book, dealing primarily with their own domestic affairs rather than epic sweeping dramas, which does give it rather a different feel to the first book. But simmering rivalries will out, and their longstanding problems do have a habit of intruding, which keeps you aware of the wider issues at stake - especially towards the end of the book. War is inevitable, and the climax of the story comes at a crucial point in the proceedings that promises lots of excitement in the final book in the trilogy

Second books in a trilogy can be very tricky beasts, but Graham Doherty and Simon Turney have hit the mark once again in this book. It builds the picture of both Constantine and Maxentius as men and rulers, and I found it much easier to work out where my own loyalties lie now we are building up the concluding book. I must admit that I would prefer to have a few more female characters to root for, as they tend to be confined to one-dimensional maiden, mother and crone roles, but nonetheless there is plenty to entertain in these books and written history does have a habit of being more than a little biased towards the deeds of men.

If you like you history on the epic and immersive side then this a series I can highly recommend - especially if you are missing some Game of Thrones style family relationships and backstabbing!

Was this review helpful?

This is the second book I read and review in this excellent historical series, review of the first one here, and I found it even more exciting and fascinating than the first one.
The authors did an excellent works in describing this very complex historical time and turning it into a gripping, informative and entertaining novel.
I think that this part of the Roman history can be sometimes confusing as there are plenty of intrigues, political alliances and historical facts to take into account: the Empire is collapsing, barbarians are at the door and gaining ground. The number of Christians is growing and it’s becoming a wide spread religion even if it will still take centuries before becoming the main European religion.
This is the background of the novel and Constantine and Maxentius are at the centre of the stage. I’m happy I got to know more about Maxentius and appreciate this complex and fascinating man whose name is part of the the history but whose story is never told.
Constantine is the man of the history, the man that can manage to change the history and give new life to the Empire.
Both are well thought and vivid. I love both of them for different reasons and I was enthralled by this novel turning pages as fast as I could. Even if I knew what will happen I turned pages as fast as I could savouring the battled, the descriptions of the intrigues, and the turns and twists of this story.
I can’t wait to read the next book in this story and I would love to read novels about the Constantinian dynasty written by this authors as this another part of history that is quite fascinating.
It’s strongly recommended.
Many thanks to Aria & Aries and Netgalley for this ARC, all opinions are mine

Was this review helpful?

"𝘼𝙪𝙜𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙨. 𝘼𝙮𝙚, 𝘼𝙪𝙜𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙨. 𝙁𝙤𝙧 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙢𝙮 𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙡𝙚, 𝙢𝙮 𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙤𝙣, 𝙢𝙮 𝙗𝙧𝙞𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙞𝙜𝙝𝙩. 𝙉𝙤 𝙢𝙤𝙧𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙡𝙛-𝙙𝙤𝙪𝙗𝙩; 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙨𝙝𝙚𝙙 𝙞𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙤𝙙𝙙 𝙨𝙝𝙧𝙞𝙣𝙚 𝙤𝙣 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙧𝙤𝙖𝙙 𝙛𝙧𝙤𝙢 𝙈𝙖𝙨𝙨𝙞𝙡𝙞𝙖. 𝘼𝙪𝙜𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙨 𝙄 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙘𝙡𝙖𝙞𝙢𝙚𝙙 𝙗𝙮 𝙢𝙮 𝙛𝙖𝙩𝙝𝙚𝙧'𝙨 𝙩𝙧𝙤𝙥𝙨 𝙬𝙝𝙚𝙣 𝙝𝙚 𝙙𝙞𝙚𝙙. 𝘼𝙪𝙜𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙨, 𝙖 𝙩𝙞𝙩𝙡𝙚 𝙂𝙖𝙡𝙚𝙧𝙞𝙪𝙨 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙩𝙧𝙞𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙚𝙣𝙮 𝙢𝙚. 𝘼𝙪𝙜𝙪𝙨𝙩𝙪𝙨, 𝙄 𝙬𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙧𝙚𝙢𝙖𝙞𝙣." -- 𝘾𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙚

"𝙄𝙩 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙗𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙨𝙤 𝙡𝙤𝙣𝙜, 𝙖𝙣𝙙 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙬𝙤𝙧𝙡𝙙 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙙𝙤𝙣𝙚 𝙞𝙩𝙨 𝙗𝙚𝙨𝙩 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙧𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙖 𝙬𝙚𝙙𝙜𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙩𝙬𝙚𝙚𝙣 𝙪𝙨. 𝙄 𝙘𝙤𝙣𝙨𝙩𝙖𝙣𝙩𝙡𝙮 𝙝𝙤𝙥𝙚𝙙 𝙙𝙚𝙚𝙥 𝙞𝙣 𝙢𝙮 𝙝𝙚𝙖𝙧𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙬𝙚 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙧𝙞𝙙𝙜𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙜𝙖𝙥 𝙩𝙝𝙖𝙩 𝙬𝙚𝙙𝙜𝙚 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙢𝙖𝙙𝙚, 𝙗𝙪𝙩 𝙄 𝙬𝙖𝙨 𝙪𝙣𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙩𝙤 𝙙𝙤 𝙨𝙤, 𝙤𝙧 𝙚𝙫𝙚𝙣 𝙞𝙛 𝙞𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙗𝙚 𝙙𝙤𝙣𝙚. 𝘿𝙞𝙙 𝙝𝙚 𝙨𝙚𝙚 𝙢𝙚 𝙖𝙨 𝙖𝙣 𝙚𝙣𝙚𝙢𝙮 𝙣𝙤𝙬? 𝘿𝙞𝙙 𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙚𝙡𝙞𝙚𝙫𝙚 𝙢𝙚 𝙬𝙝𝙤 𝙝𝙖𝙙 𝙨𝙚𝙣𝙩 𝙩𝙝𝙚 𝙗𝙡𝙖𝙙𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙝𝙞𝙨 𝙩𝙝𝙧𝙤𝙖𝙩? 𝙄𝙛 𝙨𝙤, 𝙝𝙤𝙬 𝙘𝙤𝙪𝙡𝙙 𝙄 𝙝𝙤𝙥𝙚 𝙩𝙤 𝙧𝙚𝙖𝙨𝙤𝙣 𝙬𝙞𝙩𝙝 𝙝𝙞𝙢?" -- 𝙈𝙖𝙭𝙚𝙣𝙩𝙞𝙪𝙨

⚔️308 AD. Roman Empire. After the failed reconciliation attempt to solve to succession problem in the West, Constantine has been declared a False Augustus while Maxentius has been proclaimed an enemy of Rome. Once childhood friends - Constantine in Treverorum struggles with sparring barbarian tribes, a scheming father-in-law, and a dwindling supply of sustenance while Maxentius in Rome deals with troublesome Christians, an African rebellion, and a personal tragedy to keep their respective quadrant of the empire secure without intruding on each other quadrant - realize their friendship cannot last. But with the passing of the senior Augustus of the Tetrarchy, the competition for the imperial throne intensifies and the strained threads of their friendship begin to unravel. A failed assassination attempt, the slandering rumors, and finally, a sudden confrontation at Felix Romuliana, creates misunderstanding between them and closed all hope of reconciliation, leaving them as bitter opponents in the greatest game of all, with the throne of Rome the prize.

⚔️The book - 2nd in the Rise of Emperors trilogy - explores the life of emperor Constantine and his friend turn rival emperor Maxentius. Narrated from their interchangeable 1st Person POVs it follows their internal and external struggles as they face political conspiracies, Christian resurgence, personal tragedies, the barbarian forces, scheming internal enemies, and the constant threats from the East and how their friendship turns sour, pitching them against each other.

⚔️Both the author - Simon and Gordon - are masters in the art of storytelling. The hypnotic narratives, the gradual raising of tension, the cinematic battle scenes, and the wonderful pacing hooked me so much that I forgot time while reading, so engrossing was their writing. And the way they incorporate historical facts in their writing is absolutely outstanding. Instead of giving it a textbook feeling it enhances my reading experience as if I’ve been teleported to that ancient Roman time and watching the story unfolded in front of me.

⚔️Both the characters - Constantine and Maxentius - are so well written. Where Constantine is a hot-headed, politically shrewd, and man of war, Maxentius is indecisive, emotional, and easily influenced. In spite of all the misunderstandings, deep down in their heart they are still friends and try to reconcile their friendship but failed. This overall transformation from being a friend to rivals to being a bitter opponent is commendably written. I also like reading the complex love-hate relationship that Constantine and Maxentius shared with their wife - Fausta and Valeria.

⚔️The ending was satisfactory; as Constantine chooses to be a conqueror and Maxentius realizes what he had ultimately become, my excitement level reaches new peaks and leaves me wanting to know how both the author gonna wrap up the final showdown between these two great emperors in the next book.

Overall, Masters of Rome is a masterpiece, a book that can’t be old/ boring even after many re-readings. If you like historical fiction and like to read character-driven novels, then do read it. HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.

𝙈𝙮 𝙍𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙣𝙜: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐(5/5)

Was this review helpful?

Sadly I’ve yet to find time to read the first book in the series, Sons Of Rome,. However, thanks to the brief references to previous events scattered throughout the opening chapters of the book, I didn’t feel at any disadvantage. In addition, the comprehensive historical notes at the end of the book provide a useful factual summary of the political situation at the time.

The authors throw the reader right into the action with an account of a ferocious battle between the forces of Constantine and a barbarian tribe in a Frankish forest. It’s one of the first in a series of great set pieces in the book including a chariot race in the Circus Maximus that could have straight out of the film Ben Hur, and a battle on a frozen river.

Told in alternating chapters from the point of view of Constantine in Gaul and Maxentius in Rome, it soon becomes apparent that although they may be rivals for control of the Roman Empire, they share a similar range of problems – religious conflict, personal tragedy as well as political, military and financial concerns. In fact, their position is neatly summed up by the chief of the Bructeri tribe when he remarks to Constantine, “I know of the the dark pall of trouble that gathers over your empire. Factions forming. Armies swelling. A storm of war is coming”.

More than anything, Constantine and Maxentius regret the demise of their former friendship. At one point, the death of a mutual foe seems to offer a glimpse of a different future. ‘It was one of those moments where the world hangs in the balance. Where destiny spins on a knifepoint.’ As students of this period of history will know that moment of opportunity passes making a clash between the two men inevitable.

Masters of Rome is the story of a struggle for power waged between, and often within, families. As you would expect from two such well-regarded authors of historical fiction, there is a wealth of detail about everything from weaponry to social customs, religious practices and Roman curses. The book ends at a tantalizing point in the two former friends’ rivalry setting things up nicely for what will be the final instalment in the trilogy.

Was this review helpful?

Masters of Rome is the stunning sequel to Sons of Rome, and the juicy jam? in this trilogy about Maxentius and Constantine, and the state of the Roman Empire in the early 300's.
It is a book of vast scope, and yet perfectly held in check by the twin authors, Turney and Doherty, both taking the part of one of the main characters.
Taking the reader from Rome to Africa, from Gaul to Rome, the scope of the novel is massive, and yet it never feels it. Never.
I am in awe of the skill of both authors to bring something as complex as this time period to life with such apparent ease (I know it won't have been easy, but it feels it). Each chapter flows into the next, the desire to give both characters an equal voice, never falters, and quite frankly, I have no idea how the trilogy is ultimately going to end, but I am desperate to know:)
I highly recommend Masters of Rome, especially and particularly for those, who have no knowledge of the history of the period (like me) because it is absolutely fascinating and told with panache and skill, with an eye to detail. And those who do know the period, you're still in for a treat as we follow the lives of Constantine and Maxentius and the inevitable march to war.
Thank you to Netgalley and the publisher for my review copy.

Was this review helpful?

Review

Book 2 in a series that sees two excellent authors combine their talents and tell the spellbinding story or warring emperors, the back and forth style where each takes one emperor and writes from that perspective was breathtaking in book one, and the pace continues in book 2 with every chapter crafted with immersive skill.

In book 2 we see the continuation of the enmity of Maxentius and Constantine, both still hoping for lost friendship but seeing it swept away by politics and circumstance. Both men hemmed in on all sides by enemies, they must attempt to consolidate their positions and build their armies, they must resolve the internal strife’s of their regions political, religious and personal, to give themselves scope to then try to conquer all and be Emperor of an whole Empire.

This book is the middle book in a trilogy and it does feel like that, all trilogies are a journey and the middle book is the journeyman, the one that takes you from the shocking start to the dramatic conclusion…. that said, both Doherty and Turney manage to add action, thrills, emotion, political and personal turmoil and so much more into this journey, meaning that you the reader are left both satisfied and wanting more by the end.

This like book one is a total triumph of collaboration with both writers bringing their A game to every page.

Highly recommend this book and series (and for book 3 we only have to wait until September)

pre-order Book 3 Gods of Rome in Hardback

Pre-order the Kindle version (Sept)

(Parm)

Was this review helpful?

Last year I read a wonderful book by two of my favourite authors, Simon Turney and Gordon Doherty. Sons of Rome was a fabulous adventure looking at the early years of two future rival for the Roman imperial title, Maxentius and Constantine. Told from two viewpoints, each author had his own character: Turney was Maxentius and Doherty was Constantine. In Masters of Rome, they have continued the story, getting to the heart of the struggles and threats the two leading protagonists face.

Masters of Rome is a fascinating tale of the Roman Empire and the struggle between its various rulers and the factions they engendered. The politics are high drama, the manipulations of friends and advisers demonstrate the dangers of great power and politics; you cannot trust anyone! Friendships are stretched to the limits, though Maxentius and Constantine are reluctant to break that tenuous link, the inevitability of it, as both try to realise their ambitions, is a driving force in the book.

And then there are Maxentius and Constantine themselves. As a reader, you feel that you must pick a side. I thought I would be on Team Constantine, but then Maxentius did something notable and I wavered. The truth is, both emperors did things they should be proud of, and both made mistakes. At the heart of this books is the truth about all men; they have their strengths and weaknesses. Each has noble traits, and each has his flaws. Ultimately, they are both likable characters, which is what makes their story so fascinating.

Masters of Rome is a tense, thrilling story charting the lives of two unique individuals, Maxentius and Constantine, both seeking to become the Roman Empire’s sole emperor. The triumph of this book – and indeed the series – is that each lead character has a unique voice, due to the fact each has his own writer. Simon Turney and Gordon Doherty work well together to give each emperor their own voice, viewpoint and story. It is a fascinating concept that could have gone very wrong, if not for the individuals strength of the two authors. With Turney and Doherty, it works beautifully.

The research is impeccable and the depth of that research helps to recreate not only the buildings of Rome, but also the personalities of all those who touched the lives of Constantine and Maxentius, as well as the two protagonists themselves. Both Doherty’s and Turney’s unrivaled understanding of the Roman war machine help to make Masters of Rome a riveting read.

If you have never read a novel about Rome, this series would be a good place to start. It draws you in, envelops you and involves you so deeply in the drama that you find yourself shouting at the book! Masters of Rome is a fabulous, absorbing read that you never want to end – but at the same time can’t read quick enough! The drama, the politics and the personalities all serve to make Masters of Rome a masterpiece of fiction.

It is, quite simply, a must-read.

Was this review helpful?

This one was definitely amazing, I liked it better than the first one. It's so enriching of the Rome history and how it develops in a story.

Was this review helpful?

I received a free copy of this book from Netgalley in exchange for an honest review. And I'm so grateful for that! After reading the first book in the series, Sons of Rome, I knew I had to get the next one. Surprisingly I enjoyed this one even more!

The story continues were it stopped in the first book. Constantine rules in Treverorum and has to overcome one problem after another. Aggressive "barbarians" who cross his borders, his scheming father-in-law and of course the constant threat of his competing enemies, Galerius and Licinius. Not to mention his former friend, Maxentius, in Rome.
Maxentius meanwhile has problems oh his very own: personal tragedies, rebellious Africans and troublesome Christians.

The two characters of Constantine and Maxentius are so well-written and fleshed out. It's a joy to spend some time in their heads (one each chapter) and read about heir thoughts. They are both very different characters, not always easy to like, but certainly relatable. I couldn't say who of the two I prefer. Both have to overcome problems and each of them does it in his very own way.
I kept hoping that they could somehow reach out to each other again and rekindle their friendship. But well, if you know a bit about Roman history, you know what has to happen...

Once again the authors managed to set the scene for their conflicts perfectly. They really brought Ancient Rome back to life and it's clear that they know what they're talking about.
Throughout the book, the tension kept growing and I found myself glued to the pages. For me, it was a typical case of: Just one more chapter .... oh, 2 hours later already .... ;-)

If I could I would give them an extra star just for the historical note at the end. I love that in a historical fiction book, especially if it's based on real historical events.

Like the first book in the series, I can definitely recommend Masters of Rome. It's so well-written and enjoyable and exactly what I want in a historical fiction book. I can't wait for book three, I think it'll come to in 2021 as well. Highly deserved five stars!

Was this review helpful?

This book is the 2nd in a trilogy about Constantine’s rise to Emperor and it focuses on The conflict between Constantine in Gaul and Maxentius in Africa and Rome. The two men were once friends but not so much anymore! Like other books Ive read by these authors, this is a brilliant fast paced through a less well known period of a Roman history. I Loved it.

Was this review helpful?

Another fantastic book from two masters of the genre!

I was THRILLED to see this sequel to Sons of Rome available after previously being able to read the first book in the series (Rise of Emperors), I was just so excited to jump back in with Constantine and Maxentius that I absolutely tore through this book much like the first. It's an incredibly engrossing look into the two main characters, how they manage their parts of the empire, how they deal with internal and external threats and stressed, all while wondering if they can keep their long standing friendship intact.

The book isn't all politics and relationships though there are incredibly vivid and interesting battles described through out as well. Even with all the players and action happening through this book you never feel overwhelmed or lost in a sea of names dates and places.

A great book for anyone interested in ancient Rome (and really who isn't?!?!), I can't wait for the next title!

Was this review helpful?