Cover Image: Faithful Presence

Faithful Presence

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

Bill Haslam sees a country deeply divided by political issues. We face government gridlock in any attempt to address important issues along partisan lines. But the country itself is divided. Cities versus rural areas. Sometimes even within families. Bill Haslam also believes there has never been a time when it is vital for thoughtful, committed Christians to engage in politics. To bring hope amid despair. To build bridges across divides.

Haslam, a former mayor and then governor of Tennessee, invokes James Davidson Hunter’s idea of “faithful presence” to frame his vision for what Christians ought to strive for in politics. It won’t be easy because of the complexity of the problems, the divides that exist, and the media that feeds on such division. (He tells a story of building merit-based promotion and pay into civil service, and having a very short media interview, because he had worked with unions and opposition early, developing proposals meeting concerns of various stakeholders. There was no ongoing conflict!) Through story and biblical principle, he elaborates both what “faithful” and “presence” in political office might look like.

Faithfulness means attempting to “think biblically about our politics rather than thinking politically about our faith.” For example, he advocated for (and lost) the expansion of Medicaid–an unpopular act for a Republican that was rebuffed by his legislature–because he was convinced it would serve “the least of these.” It means caring for the public good even when it others play dirty. He contends for the unpopular quality of meekness, of allowing that others might have good ideas, and sometimes we might be wrong. He cites Jim Collins From Good to Great that the most effective leaders often combined humility with professional will. He contends that belief in the image of God even in those who oppose one or who are different is crucial to serve the public good–otherwise, one comes to objectify people.

“Presence” is the other part of this calling. The idea of separation of church and state does not preclude Christians from politics. One may advance legislation that reflects Christian commitments when it neither establishes religion nor impairs anyone’s right of free exercise. By the same token, some issues that reflect one’s values may be contrary to constitutional protections. Haslam shares examples of each during his tenure.

He also talks about the joy of his work. He writes, “But there was never a day as mayor or governor when I did not feel honored to get to do my job. Every day, as I walked up the steps of the state capitol, I thought to myself, I can’t believe I get to do this.” Nowhere was this more apparent than when he had the opportunity to pardon Cyntoia Brown, convicted of murder as a juvenile and not eligible for parole until she was 68. She was being trafficked. He felt that he had the chance to use his role as governor to bring gospel justice and mercy together. He concludes the book by sharing other examples both of what faithful presence looks like and the difference it can make. And in the end, it is not only the difference we can make, but how public service can be used of God to form us in Christ-likeness.

While I appreciate Haslam’s account, I found myself wondering whether what he is proposing can go very far in the hyper-partisan atmosphere of party-base politics and gerrymandered electorates. The only thing that occurs to me is that this also might be part of faithfulness–to not swerve from biblical integrity, humility, and a commitment to see all as made in the imago dei no matter how vicious it gets. Perhaps in a personal memoir it is not appropriate to speak too much about Christian courage, but this also seems to be an aspect of faithfulness.

Haslam’s book also serves as a benchmark for candidates professing Christian belief, no matter the party. His challenge of thinking biblically about politics rather than conforming our beliefs to our politics could transform politics tomorrow. The fact that it doesn’t tells us how deeply the “Christianity” of many of our politicians go, and the contempt they show for the electorate. Haslam speaks of political office as a “noble calling,” no less so than the ministry that Haslam had at one time considered. In a time when neither profession garner the respect they once did, this book is both a breath of fresh air and a prophetic word for a country and often a church consumed with our political divisions. There is a better way.

________________________________

Disclosure of Material Connection: I received a complimentary review copy of this book from the publisher via Netgalley. The opinions I have expressed are my own.

Was this review helpful?

I was thrilled to receive this book from NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.

As soon as I saw my former governor Bill Haslam was releasing a book, I knew I had to jump on it. Governor Haslam is quite different from many in the political sphere nowadays. He's a man who gets it. He understands his stint as governor as a part of a greater call on his life, and calls us all to be better under the Lordship of Christ.

Thank you Governor Haslam for your service, your example, and your leadership. May we take the reigns of conservatism from here and create a better nation for all.

Was this review helpful?

Attn. Republicans,
This is the type of Conservative we Progressive folk want to deal with. Indeed, it’s the kind of person everyone wishes to work with regardless of political affiliation. Bill Haslam is a credit to his faith and political party. Being a liberal and an atheist, this is not the kind of review I had anticipated writing.

The centrefold addresses an age-old issue. Did the founding fathers of the United States intend for the privatization of one’s personal religious convictions while participating civically? Is this what Thomas Jefferson envisaged when drafting those immortal words, “Erecting the wall of separation between church and state is absolutely essential in a free society.”? Constitutionality aside, is this desirable? Is it even executable? Expecting people to table their beliefs - which motivate their politics - is like asking a blade to cut itself; like demanding a tongue to taste itself; or searching for the beard of a eunuch. Fortunately, that’s not what American - or any secular - society is about.

I was enjoying myself so much that, only a few pages in, I began feeling nervous there would be nothing to disagree over. But it’s okay, he redeemed himself! There’s still plenty of yin and yang. Throughout this humane and thoughtful book, I found myself repeatedly at odds with Haslam’s political positions and Christian worldview, yet wholly embracing of him as a person. I wish the Senate in both our countries (I’m Canadian) were filled with people like him. It would surely be a better world!

Herein, Bill Haslam is pleading with Christians - actually, all of us indirectly - calling us back to nuance, depth, and compassion. If you’re looking for a conservative you can pigeonhole as a zealot, a racist, an anti-intellectual or a homophobe, then steer clear of this one. Maybe hold out for Ted Cruz’s book. It will restore your faith in humanity, and perhaps a tiny bit in God. Pssst, you didn’t hear that last sentence from me though.

4 stars! Thank you for the advanced copy.

Was this review helpful?

TN former Governor, Bill Haslam , writes a compelling treatise on how to return to a more civil form of political discourse using the principle of the Christian being a peacemaker.

I appreciate the heart behind this book. Haslam truly wants the political climate to return to the era of compromise and respect. But, perhaps its a bit utopic in scope. That this book was written is a promising start. I hope evangelicals will take his message to heart and turn from their devisive and unloving approach to political issues. But I won’t hold my breath.

Was this review helpful?

Sadly did not finish. I thought it would be more political but alas it wasn't. I didn't enjoy the subject matter and it's not something I have interest in. I persevered for a while because it wasn't a badly written book, I read a few chapters and did find it well written. Just not one for me.

Was this review helpful?