Cover Image: The Woman in the Library

The Woman in the Library

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

I really enjoyed this story. I really liked the storyline and the characters. I was excited to turn the pages. What’s not to love about a book about books!

Was this review helpful?

Although this is not the first book to use a twisty plot or unreliable characters, it is the first I've encountered that has a twisty character attempting to influence an unreliable plot.

Gentill uses the frame of the book's narrator/writer corresponding with a possible character who advocates more violence, explicit references to the characters' races, and acknowledgement of the pandemic. That frame allows her to do all the things her character advocates while pretending not to do so. It also allows her to play with fact/fiction, illusion/reality, and do so under the reasonable guise of ending each chapter with a letter from her off-stage writing adviser.

I found the book entertaining and captivating with good characterizations and enough to plot “reveals” to keep me reading well after time to turn off the light.

I hadn’t expected to enjoy it nearly as much as I did — highly recommend.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to Netgalley and Sulari Gentill for this ARC of The Woman in the Library. On to the review.

This book had me hooked from the beginning! I was expecting a great, but run of the mill, who done it mystery/thriller novel but was pleasantly surprised! I won’t lie, the story within a story aspect of the book threw me for a loop for a little bit, but once I got that sorted I was not disappointed!

The story within a story certainly added extra layers to the plot in a way that wasn’t distracting, and once you got to the “twist”? Instantly added more dread and anxiety than there was present before.

I would absolutely recommend this book to friends who I know like mystery and thriller novels!

Was this review helpful?

I am absolutely in love with the style of writing for this novel!!! The story itself had me guessing and second guessing who the murderer was and what was going on. Will definitely be highly recommending this book to everyone I know!

I'm so grateful for getting the chance to read this ARC through NetGalley!

Was this review helpful?

I would like to precede by saying that while I rate this book a 3 out of 5, I’m sure many people would give it 4 out of 5.

While I didn’t love the book, I would still say it was worth me reading it, especially once it got to about halfway - I did actually find it exciting and got hooked in.

The mix of characters was definitely a strength of the book, being current and relatable. The biggest plus though was the plot, it genuinely isn’t easy to figure out and keeps you guessing with subtle twists and turns. I was unsure whether I enjoyed the additional element of author correspondences, maybe at first it was a little too meta and confusing, however the concept felt unique and gave an interesting insight into being a writer.

For the weaknesses, the first part of the book (~15%) was spent setting the scene which possibly took a bit too long and lost me a little bit. The character interactions at points felt a little tired and shallow and I personally didn’t feel drawn in by any of the characters. Overall, I would just say the book missed a certain sparked to really excite me and make it an “unputdownable” read.

Was this review helpful?

What a ride! I thoroughly enjoyed this adventure in all its intensity and sometimes cheesiness! There was commentary about the pandemic and race intermixed which made it a very relevant book but those parts weren’t even a part of the actual story. I felt like this was a super unique read and really enjoyed the author.

Don’t trust white men:)

Thank you so much to NetGalley, Poisoned Pen Press, and of course the author Sulari Gentill for this advanced digital copy!

Was this review helpful?

A mystery that starts in a library. Sold! I was hooked from the very start. It pulled me in and never let go. I absolutely loved this unique, twisty, highly entertaining, and layered story. If you like unique formats, mysteries, and books about books, check this out!
Thanks to netgalley and the publisher for allowing me to read an e-arc in exchange for an honest review.

Was this review helpful?

I thought this was a really clever approach to a murder mystery! The frame of using emails between a fictional author and the author's writing is a new one to me. The email subplot is just as intriguing as the main plot of the novel, despite how few pages it takes up. I found it funny when the emails would point out inconsistencies or errors and the author would correct them - it reveals a lot about the revision and feedback cycle that readers are usually not privy to, and I was thrilled to be in the know. As a teacher, I think this look into the meta parts of writing will be interesting for some of my students to read, and I'll be sure to recommend this book to them!

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to Netgalley for this ARC.

This book was so confusing. I'm still not 100 percent sure what happened. It's a story within a story and I honestly don't know which part was what. However, I still gave it 4 stars because it had me guessing up until the last page, and even beyond. I was hoping the end would clarify things, but it didn't, at least not for me. It was intriguing and suspenseful though, which is, I think, what made me still give it a high rating. Plus, the characters were very likeable, which helps.

Was this review helpful?

A fiction story in a fiction story with an additional side story with correspondence between chapters was a bit much. I loved the idea of a murder in a library and one of four people meeting for the first time being guilty of the murder; however the this fell short of my expectations. The characters were flat as they were being created by a fictional author and the correspondence with Leo interrupted the flow of the book for me.

Thank you to NetGalley and Poisoned Pen Press for the opportunity to read this early copy for an honest review.

Was this review helpful?

2 ⭐

I found the 40% of this super addictive but for some reason the story fell flat for me and I don't think I'll remember this one in a few weeks. I liked the writing and I do think this was a soild read but I just wish there was a bit more added.

Thankyou to Netgalley for allowing me to read this one early.

Was this review helpful?

The woman in the library by Sulari Gentill.
Hannah Tigone, bestselling Australian crime author, is crafting a new novel that begins in the Boston Public Library: four strangers; Winifred, Cain, Marigold and Whit are sitting at the same table when a bloodcurdling scream breaks the silence. A woman has been murdered. They are all suspects, and, as it turns out, each character has their own secrets and motivations – and one of them is a murderer.While crafting this new thriller, Hannah shares each chapter with her biggest fan and aspirational novelist, Leo. But Leo seems to know a lot about violence, motive, and how exactly to kill someone. Perhaps he is not all that he seems…
I really enjoyed this book. Great story. I had my theory and I was partly right. I did like Freddie and Marigold and Cain
Wasn't sure about Witt or Leo. 4*.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to Netgalley and the publisher for allowing me to read an ARC of this book.

What a wonderful surprise this book is! I tend to read books that have library in the title because I'm quite partial to libraries. I had never heard of this author before but intend to follow her from now on. I gather this is Ms Gentill second stand-alone book and that she has a series also.

This story starts out with four young people, unknown to each other, sitting near one another in the Boston Public Library. A terrifying scream is heard and they start chatting and end up at a coffee shop guessing at what possibly could have happened. A second story runs alongside which tells us that an Australian woman is writing the first story but since she is in Australia she is using an acquaintance to give her specific facts about Boston, Cambridge, etc. Each chapter of the mystery is preceded by an e-mail from the acquaintance, both solicited and unsolicited, in response to the preceding chapter. It is an ingenious approach and in no way throws of either story.

The four friends, two men and two women, have attractions, get close and more information evolves about each one of them as people die, and strange events happen. You could say there are red herrings but not really. There are explanations and the reader bounces around like a ball in a game box trying to make sense of each new piece of information and whether it is pertinent to the mystery of the 'scream in the library.'

I read this book in two days but it would be a disservice to label it a beach-read. I think Ms. Gentill is an evolving writer with a lot of tricks up her sleeve. I'm looking forward to getting my hands on her detective series. and more of these wonderful stand alones.

Was this review helpful?

e-arc provided by netgalley in exchange for an honest review.

"so now i'm alone with a murderer. but then it's not the first time."

there's always a risk with stories-within-stories that one -or both- of them will be made worse for it, so i'm very glad to report that that is not the case here. while it seemed totally random at first, i loved seeing how the email correspondence between the author and a diehard fan impacted the story she was writing -the one advertised on the blurb, so double inception- and enhanced my engagement in reading this. in all regards, the subplot (parallel plot?) surprised me, and ended up my favourite part of 'the woman in the library'. i just love very subtle signs that something is terribly wrong.

as for the main plotline about four strangers meeting in a library, unaware that one of them is a murderer, i've got to say i didn't connect with it as much. maybe since this was my first foray into mystery novels and it's just not the genre for me, or i read it at a weird time which impacted my enjoyment. definitely not much of a criticism of the story, i guess i just like the moment where everything slots into place more than the guesses and red twine phase.

in any case, i found myself looking forward to leo's emails at the end of every chapter more than the start of the next one. there was just a bit too much 'x wouldn't do this because i know he wouldn't' or 'oh didn't you hear? y is connected to z because of q' for me to get really invested. the main character felt sort of like a passenger on a bus, watching the plot unravel through the window instead of interacting with it.

wow i sound just like leo huh

Was this review helpful?

this was a very interesting idea, since the fictional story was… actually fictional, which I’ve never seen before in a book. the author of the main story got emails back with feedback which was also so innovative and original, especially since I actually learned some new stuff. so, yeah. definitely enjoyed that aspect of the story and I loved leo (the real one.)

the problem I had with this is the fictional story in the story. none of the characters were as captivating as leo made them out to be in his emails. I literally didn’t like any of the characters and that is a huge deal to me. definitely a dealbreaker, since I’m a character driven reader. if I can still call myself that since I’ve been losing more and more interest in reading recently, unfortunately, which might have also largely impacted my review of this book, for which I apologize.

I didn’t hate this book. did I think it was very forgettable and not that special? sure! but I also know there are going to be people who enjoy it for what it is and I know even now there are people who loved it after reading the arc.

I don’t know. no strong feelings. read it if it sounds like your jam and see for yourself. :) good luck author.

Was this review helpful?

The story within story of the author getting letters from a mysterious extra character was just as exciting to read as the main book. I truly wondered which way the story was going to go with who the murderer was, and loved that about this book. I will definitely be recommending this book to my friends!

Was this review helpful?

This book makes abundantly clear how writing a novel is hard work, which is why it pains me to give it a low rating. The plot should have been catnip for me, since it’s a whodunit in a library. The main character is a mystery author, who analyzes the tropes of the genre while living them in her real life. Unfortunately, the story was implausible, the twists felt forced and the characters didn’t seem organic. A subplot where a fan writes to the “author” of the novel within the novel didn’t make much sense and that particular revelation didn’t work for me. I didn’t connect with any of the characters, which makes it harder to get invested in the story. That said, I may not be the target audience, so younger readers may enjoy it more.
I chose to read this book and all opinions in this review are my own and completely unbiased. Thank you, #NetGalley/#Poisoned Pen Press!

Was this review helpful?

Dear Hannah…

This “story within a story” opens up with a letter from Leo Johnson, a beta reader, to Australian author, Hannah Tigone, a mystery writer, who cannot travel to Boston to research her latest novel, because of Covid restrictions. Although many things can be “googled” there is nothing better than a local who can help with getting the “lingo” right, as well as provide social commentary on current events.

We then move on to Chapter One, (of Hannah’s book) where we will meet Australian author, Winifred “Freddie” Kincaid, living in Boston as the recipient of the Marriott Scholarship, which comes with accommodations in a Victorian brownstone called Carrington Square.

Freddie has decided to spend the day writing at the Boston Public Library (BPL) but she finds herself distracted by the artistic detail of the ceiling and by the three other people who are sharing her table-People she has made notes on, so she could base characters on them later on-giving them the monikers Handsome Man, Heroic Chin, and Freud Girl. (Cain, Whit and Marigold)

But then the quiet of the library is shattered by a terrified SCREAM….one that will bond these four strangers and turn them into fast friends, when they discover that the scream that they heard, was of a woman being murdered, and that they are now each other’s alibis.

But not everything is as clear cut as it might appear.

Each chapter of Hannah’s book, is followed by the latest correspondence from Leo, and as her story progresses, so do the TWO mysteries-one for each narrative, and BOTH were equally as engaging!

This has gotten mixed reviews but I ABSOLUTELY LOVED IT! ❤️

I couldn’t wait to pick it up every chance that I could, and it will be a favorite of mine this year! It was SMART, CLEVER, and it didn’t have to rely on twists coming out of left field to deliver a satisfying ending!

I gave the author’s last novel, “After She Wrote Him” 4 ⭐️ and I enjoyed this one even more! Five ⭐️ shiny stars from me!

Check it out on June 7, 2022!

Thank You to Poisoned Pen Press for the gifted copy of this ARC, provided through NetGalley! It was my pleasure to offer a candid review!

Was this review helpful?

This was a very intriguing read. I’m still a bit on the fence about how I feel about it but in regards to the way it was written, I applaud. A book within a book is what you’re getting. Try and stay with me on this one: Hannah is a writer in Australia working on a novel about four strangers who meet in the Boston Public Library. You never actually get Hannah’s point of view other than the actual novel she is writing which is a good murder mystery. She is corresponding with a man named Leo and it goes back and forth between the book Hannah is writing and Leo’s letters to Hannah as a fan and a sort of soundboard for her new book.

Did I lose you? It’s a much smoother read than explanation.

I liked the story within the story. I liked how it made you see struggles of writing and diversity of characters and how/what needs to be added to make a story full. I didn’t like the end. I knew the killer and it all felt very obvious while trying to make things not obvious. In the end as much as I appreciate the fluidity of the story as well as the creativity, the end left me a bit lackluster.

Thank you to Poisoned Pen Press and netgalley for the arc in exchange for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?

This book took me a little time to get used to but then I loved it! It's told from a couple of perspectives: Hannah is writing a thriller and her "characters" come alive for us as they dominate the pages. There is a murder at the beginning where the four main characters meet and attempt to solve it as they met at the Boston Library where the murder took place. Once I got the hang of it, I raced through as I needed to discover who was behind it all. It's really a genius concept because as the reader you are constantly surprised at the twists and turns and have to remind yourself that they are just characters...or are they? Kept me on the edge of my seat until the end!
Thanks to NetGalley for this ARC!

Was this review helpful?