Cover Image: The Woman in the Library

The Woman in the Library

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

This book hooked me from the beginning and didn’t let go. What a wild ride! I was impressed by the story within a story. I generally have a hard time suspending belief when it comes to mysteries but this one felt believable. I loved the characters and the setting. I know Boston well and I think the author did a great job of describing the city. And the ending!!! This book will be perfect for book clubs.

Was this review helpful?

I enjoyed the main story of the book. I found the Leo emails a bit distracting. I found myself just skimming over them

Was this review helpful?

This is a story within a story. That can be quite interesting. For me, that was not true here. I felt as though I had gotten bogged down in some sort of trap. It just seemed to go so very slowly for me.
I am a reader who loves character driven stories. To be honest, I did not identify with anyone in the story. No matter which story I was reading (yes that is the way I felt) I did not feel invested in anyone in either story.
For me it was simply not appealing.
I stopped reading after about 1/3 of the book.
I received this book from the publisher through NetGalley in the hope that I would write an honest review. All opinions are completely my own.

Was this review helpful?

Full Disclosure: I received an advanced copy of The Woman in the Library by Sulari Gentill from Poisoned Pen Press via NetGalley.

I'll admit I wanted to read this book based on the title alone. Could have been in any genre and would have read it. That it is a locked room mystery of sorts was a real bonus. I thought this book was insanely clever. It is essentially two stories in one. It alternates between one story told in correspondence and the other story in the chapters of a new mystery novel as it is written by one of the correspondents. You get caught up in wanting to know what will happen in both. It's the kind of book that is hard to put down. If you like mysteries, thrillers, rabbit holes, and/or epistolary novels, you'll want to read this.

Was this review helpful?

"Wow! That's a bit random!" -From The Woman in the Library, but also my thoughts constantly while reading

1.5 stars

I had to read this book because of the cover, and the fact it takes places in the PBL, one of my favorite places. Listen, I know that's not a perfect reason for reading a book--but it doesn't usually result in such a crash and burn offense. This is a book inside a book, that reads quite dryly with little payoff for both things, because they don't come together in any way that you're expecting or wanting. The e-mails just really summarize what has happened in the last chapter, with additional nit-picky commentary. There is enough wrong in each chapter, I didn't need Leo explaining she should have had a hat on. Some of the problems will hopefully be edited (RIGHT? RIGHT? How do you get what T stop the PBL is at wrong though??) The fact that these people become "friends" anyways, from just being at the same table at a library (which are huge btw), so much so they are having a random SLEEPOVER together at 12% for no reason at all, makes zero sense. Adult friendships just don't work that way, especially in a huge city like Boston. The romance was odd and didn't work, it ended up making you care about the mystery even less somehow; something I didn't feel was possible. The end was so lack luster, and not worth slogging through the odd nonsensical conversations and e-mails.

Thank you to the author, publisher, and NetGalley for an advanced copy in exchange for an honest onion.

Was this review helpful?

The Woman in the Library by Sulari Gentill has a lot of pluses - thriller, the mystery of who did it, romance, and it's set in a library.

Was this review helpful?

I'm a sucker for books about books or books about libraries and the magic within them. I loved the interwoven story and the setting. A little too deep and interwoven for me to keep up with but still an enjoyable read!

Was this review helpful?

This is a fun, creepy story in a story almost in another story. I didn't know to be confused until it was no longer necessary to be confused.

Most of the characters were constructed in such a way that you couldn't help but root for or against them.

Well done! Big thanks to the author & Net Galley!

Was this review helpful?

A classic whodunnit murder mystery set in a library?? Of course I wanted to read!! This had everything you could want from a classic style murder mystery and I really enjoyed it! It was easy to read and well written!

I will be looking out for more from this author!

Was this review helpful?

The setting: Four strangers in the reading room at the Boston Public Library hear a scream. They bond. A mystery ensues. Who killed Caroline Palfrey?

Hannah Tigone, an Aussie, is writing a novel set in Boston. Because of the pandemic, she cannot travel to the US. As her novel progresses, she sends each chapter to Leo, a fan of hers in Boston. Every chapter ends with a letter from Leo where he sends her suggestions on how to make it more American and incorporate bits of Boston. As the novel progresses, Leo becomes more aggressive in his suggestions and assertions.

The cast of characters: Winifred "Freddie" Kincaid [the protagonist], an Aussie, is in the US on a Marriot Scholarship and is writing a novel [hence, a story within a story]. Freddie nicknames the others Handsome Man, Heroic Chin and Freud Girl. The four of them become bound in the mystery--who killed Caroline? Marigold [a quirky young woman], Whit Metters, a Harvard law student who'd like to flunk out, and Cain McLeod, a man with a past [murder and incarceration]. who has written a DARK bestseller about his life/experience. And Cain's ties to Boo, a street person [much more on this subplot.] Along the way we meet other characters--police officers, Whit's mother, Freddie's neighbor [also Leo], her doorman, and more.

Just didn't feel the love that many did. I kept wondering why it didn't grab me. The writing was ok, but...

Did I care? Not much. Never really engaged perhaps in part because I didn't care for any of the characters.

But I plodded on. Not a page turner, but I did want to see how it turned out. Often I see the "whodunit" but here I did not. Maybe because I just wanted to finish it and did not do a deep dive.

2.5 but rounding up because there will be fans and it wasn't awful. Just not for me.

Was this review helpful?

What an unconventional way to write a mystery thriller…I was intrigued by the plot’s premise, but did find the narrative a bit confusing, especially at first.

While done with unique and unconventional prose, I struggled to get into this one and found myself skimming at times.

Thank you to NetGalley and Poisoned Press for the advanced copy.

Was this review helpful?

What did I just read? It was like an author writing a book about an author writing a book about an author writing a book! SO fascinating! I was captivated by the letters from Leo, the beta reader sending feedback on each chapter. I may have had a unique experience with this one. The book he's critiquing is being written by an Australian but is set in his hometown of Boston and he likes to point out the difference between the two cultures. However, I'm from Massachusetts and went to grad school in Boston but have lived in AU for the past 12 years. I didn't notice anything amiss until he'd point it out. I'm curious what Americans or Australians think of those differences, as I am a "bilingual" reader, in a sense. This kept me guessing until the end and I didn't know if I could even trust the narrator. Highly recommend this book!

Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for the opportunity to read this book.

Was this review helpful?

3,5/5 stars. Thanks to Netgalley, the publisher and the author for sending me a copy of this novel in exchange for my honest thoughts.

The only thing I disliked about this book was the first very slow 30%, and some of the red herrings that seemed very excessive. So this will be an appreciative, kind review with only few objections.

The structure amazed me! There re so many different layers, so this novel is by an author who is writing a book about n author who is writing a book about an author who’s writing a book about an author/herself. There are emails from an author friend of the author in the end of each chapter, commenting on the chapters and giving insights on the novel’s progress. Leo’s emails are chilling, they add an amazing and interesting layer to the story, and your interest is on a chokehold all of a sudden. I’m impressed, as again, it keeps you interested, as well as takes the novel to a new and distinct level of mystery.

The characters were okay. Like, I didn’t want to murder them, but I didn’t care much about them either. However, I think they function properly with the plot and the flow of the story. So no problem here.

Coming to the red herrings, misleads, whatever: they were all too obvious to me. At a point my reaction just was “okay yeah no this absolutely didn’t happen”.

The only other complaint is how slow the first 30% of the novel was. This is especially disappointing as the plot is very, very rich on itself. I think we could have more action here instead.

Overall a refreshing, cozy mystery. Very appreciated.

Was this review helpful?

I received this from Netgalley.com.

A book about a book, what could go wrong? The epistolary format didn't work for me and left a disjointed, jerky feel to the story. I never felt attached to the characters.

2☆

Was this review helpful?

This is the first book that I have read by this author and I am now looking forward to more.
It did take me a little while to get into the story and what was going on. The story seems to run in parallel with a manuscript being written by an Australian author Hannah Tigone who is located in Sydney, but writing a story set in Boston, unable to travel there due to the pandemic. A 'fan', Leo, who is located in Boston, is sharing an email exchange with Hannah to assist her with local information. Yet this correspondence starts to become dark in nature and takes quite a strange twist.
Then there is the manuscript, which is about four strangers brought together, when working independently in a Boston library they hear a blood curdling scream. The four, Freddie (aka Winfred), Marigold, Whit and Cain bond and are later shocked to find out a murdered woman is found in another room of the library. They find themselves drawn in and starting to do their own work to try and solve the mystery.
This is a very unique and contemporary take on a murder mystery that I am sure will become very popular.

Was this review helpful?

3.5 stars

An interesting premise of a thriller within a thriller; although it's not until the halfway mark the reader is clued in to the dynamics between all the characters. I like how the author acknowledges certain tropes and the notion of coincidences needed to bring a novel together. All the characters were well done and it's an enjoyable reverse locked room mystery.

Was this review helpful?

Less than impressed with this one. Which is such a shame because a murder in a library sounds exactly like my kind of thing.

And that plot-line is actually okay. Not amazing, but decent enough to keep me reading. What really ruined the book is the additional plot of someone emailing the author of the story (this is a story within a story within a story). It adds absolutely nothing to the book. If anything, it disrupts the flow of the mystery in the main plot, taking the reader out of moments that could have been tense if not for the disruption. I started skipping these interludes by the 50% mark because I realised they have absolutely no impact or connection to the storyline that I was actually somewhat interested in.

So just a very disappointing narrative choice, which unfortunately made me not interested in the book as a whole. The only reason I finished it was because I needed to know “whodunnit.”

Was this review helpful?

I enjoyed this mystery. I particularly liked the way the letters provided another story to follow and extra information, The characters were well developed and the story line kept me guessing. I will be looking for other books by this author.

Was this review helpful?

4.5 stars
This book was such a fun and interesting concept. The story within a story made it intriguing and kept my interest. I couldn't put this one down. The characters were well developed and I enjoyed trying to solve the mystery with them. My only complaint is that the ending felt a bit rushed.

Thank you to Netgalley and Poisoned Pen Press for the eARC in exchange for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?

The Woman in the Library gets a little preposterous, but it sure is entertaining. It is written as a mystery within a mystery - an Australian author named Hannah is receiving e-mails from a zealous fan in the United States named Leo. Hannah is writing a novel about 4 people that hear a woman scream in the Boston Public Library, and later find out a woman has been murdered. The four friends, Freddie (also an Australian writer), Cain (another writer, Marigold (a pysch graduate student) and Whit, a prominent Bostonian enrolled begrudgingly in Harvard Law School bond very quickly and become friends. We are led to believe that one of the four is a murderer -but who? Meanwhile, the story of the murder in the library is framed in e-mails from Leo, the aspiring writer and fan, to Hannah. They begin with her sending chapters to him, and him answering with suggestions, and ways to "Americanize" her story and details on Boston geography. By the middle of the book, the emails are taking a more serious and alarming turn. Also by the middle of the book, secrets are revealed about one of the four friends - Cain may have a few secrets, and a previous conviction to hide.Very enjoyable and I will look for more books by this author!

Was this review helpful?