Sarah Weinman’s Scoundrel: How a Convicted Murderer Persuaded the Women Who Loved Him, the Constative Establishment, and the Courts to Set Him Free (Knopf 2022) tells the wild tale of Edgar Smith, a man who was convicted of the 1957 murder of fifteen-year-old Victoria Zielinski and was sentenced to death.

Smith, however, was never put to death by California’s state penitentiary system, due in part to the endless appeals that his legal team sought, but also because of the influence of William F. Buckley, founder of National Review and a posterchild for the neoconservative movement. It is because of Buckley, who began to correspond with Smith while he was on death row, that Smith received the best legal counsel—through their correspondence, Buckley became convinced that Smith was innocent. It was also due to Buckley’s encouragement and connections that Smith was able to write and publish his 1968 book Brief Against Death while still in prison.The bookclaimed that the case against him was riddled with errors, and that he had been wrongfully convicted. Buckley connected Smith with Alfred A. Knopf editor Sophie Wilkins for Brief Against Death’s editing and publication, and although their correspondence began in a purely professional manner, it quickly devolved into a romantic relationship. What followed was pure chaos: eventually, Smith was released from prison after a long legal battle, but it wouldn’t be long before he found himself jailed once again.

One of the most fascinating aspects of this book is the deep dive that Weinman took into the correspondence between Wilkins and Smith. Although Brief Against Death became a huge success upon publication, the road to publication was a rough one. Weinman tracks the relationship between Wilkins and Smith through their letters in such a way that it is easy to see how Wilkins, a smart and accomplished woman, could be drawn in by Smith, an intelligent but psychopathic man. There are many points in the text where Weinman relays the content of a letter that Wilkins sent to either Buckley or Smith and then comments afterward that Wilkins could see through Smith’s manipulation but was falling for it just the same. As a reader, I really appreciated Weinman’s voice coming through in these moments. Her contextualization not only helped to shape the larger narrative of these letters but helped me to feel a kind of kinship with Wilkins, who was taken in by this relationship almost against her own will. Weinman also does a lot of important work shaping Wilkins as a person for her reader. This work means that Wilkins cannot be viewed as a victim or just the collateral of Smith’s chaos.

Another extremely interesting and well-done aspect of Weinman’s text was her detailed relaying of the correspondence between Buckley and Smith. Weinman does a careful job of contextualizing who Buckley was within the conservative movement and how he too was taken in by this “wrongfully convicted” prisoner on death row. Both Wilkins and Buckley thought they saw a powerful writer and thinker in Smith and wanted to nourish that. However, while they thought they were working on him, he was working on them, and Scoundrel very clearly depicts this slow decent.

Weinman is also quick to call out Smith’s egregious treatment and hatred of women, his manipulation of the justice system for his own gain, and his total inability to self-reflect. There is a journalistic distance in Weinman’s writing, but her own voice and personality comes through in important moments when things like Smith’s treatment of women needs to be reflected upon. As a reader, I felt like there was a perfect balance in the narrative: there was enough contextualization and reflection offered by Weinman that I felt I was being guided through this chaotic story, but there were also moments where Weinman put her foot on the breaks and allowed me to come to my own conclusions. This balance is difficult to strike in any genre, but it is most difficult in true crime. Weinman pulls it off flawlessly.

For its tireless investigation, its detailed analysis, and its careful consideration of a case that seems ready-made for the movies, Scoundrel is a must-read and an important addition to the true crime genre.

Please add Scoundrel to your Goodreads shelf, visit Sarah Weinman’s website, and follow her on Twitter.

Don’t forget to follow True Crime Index on Twitter and please visit our Goodreads for updates on what we’re reading!

About the Writer:

Jesyka Traynor is an academic living in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. When she’s not writing or researching her dissertation, she’s consuming all the true crime and non-fiction she can find time for. Jesyka holds two degrees in English literature and is currently pursuing a doctorate in contemporary Californian literature. Her work on women in twenty-first century true crime is forthcoming from Crime Fiction Studies.

As a young married father, Edgar Smith was sentenced to die in June, 1957 for the hideous death of young Vickie Zielinski. He took full advantage of her naivete and audaciously blamed her for his rage and death. Yet he died of natural causes in 2017 in prison aptly (or inaptly) called Death House at the age of 83. How did this happen? He used everything in his power to manipulate, cajole and fool everyone. He confessed but then changed his mind, he confused and abused. Sadly, his legal team members (especially William Buckley) were taken in and defended him to the nth degree, eventually enabling him to walk free. After release, Smith viciously attacked a second young woman, Lisa Ozbun, severely injuring her and was arrested and imprisoned once again. It was not until then that his legal team admitted they had made a terrible mistake.

Vickie Zielinski was a teenager and had everything to live for. But as the author explains when victims are killed, their lives are over. The killer has the power. Vickie's and Lisa's families paid dearly. Book Editor Sophie Wilkins was taken in, too, and entered an emotional affair with Smith and exchanged hundreds of (at times very inappropriate) letters to each other while he was in prison (and later deeply regretted it). Yes, Smith wrote books from Death House. Not only that but he married three times in his lifetime. After he was freed he even launched lawsuits and wrote book reviews. The author also writes about what happens to each person involved. Smith outlived nearly all of them.

This tragic true crime story is a difficult read in a way as it is graphic, contains abuse and other triggers. I had not heard of this case before and therefore learned a lot, not only about the case but was reminded of the capacity of human beings from foolishness to predation to manipulating to killing. Learning about Mary Higgins Clark's connection was interesting. The photographs are crushing. Though fascinating and informative, this book is not for everyone due to the content. The author researched meticulously and what she wrote is absolutely riveting. That ending...wow!

My sincere thank you to Penguin Random House Canada and NetGalley for the privilege of reading this insightful book about a despicable killer, infuriating injustice, trickery and heartbreaking repercussions for the families affected for many years, into subsequent generations.

Thank you to Penguin Random House Canada and NetGalley for sending me an advanced review copy. All opinions expressed in this review are my own.

I have been a fan of the true crime genre for many years, so when I had heard of Scoundrel, it had piqued my interest. I had heard about William F. Buckley, but I had not heard about the Edgar Smith case.

This book had captured my attention immediately as I felt as if I was right there in the middle of the case. I must mention that there are huge triggers for abuse , misogyny, narcissism, murder, divorce, graphic violence.

I was extremely frustrated at how the judicial system treats minorities, yet this white dude can get bailed out of jail and then can reoffend. I found myself repulsed at the actions of Smith and while this book spanned from the 1950s to 2017, I kept shaking my head at the errors of justice. I also found it frustrating at how each of the people involved unwittingly believed Smith for only to be taken advantage of in the end.

I was finally glad to see Smith receive justice.

I do recommend this to true crime readers.