Cover Image: The Justice of Kings

The Justice of Kings

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

Me, before starting this book: Ugh, this is gonna be one of those super long epic fantasies that takes me a month to read.

Spoiler alert, it did not. I read this in 5 days and it only took that long because work was extremely busy. ANYWAY, this was overall much more interesting than I expected.

We are following around Emperor's Justice Konrad Vonvalt. He's like a circuit judge, riding around the far-flung parts of the Empire and administering justice with a combination of magic powers, investigative skills, and Javert-like zeal for law and order. The story is told by Helena, Vonvalt's young clerk, who is now an old woman and narrates with the mostly-ominous wisdom of hindsight.

It was the police procedural aspect of this that hooked me. I'm a big fan of the combination of detective work, political maneuver, and Solomon-style "cut the baby in half" shrewdness involved in the work Vonvalt and Helena do.

The epic fantasy part comes later, and in the form of a huge battle scene. There are a lot of good seeds sown here:

• The omnipresence of the Empire's past. The worldbuilding is explained when necessary, but it doesn't need to be described in explicit, painful detail to be clear how the Empire's recent wars of bloody conquest have left everyone with trauma.

• It is very much hinted that we are about to see the downfall of the empire, and the ominous nature of the story, it being told by Helena as something already over, comes through strongly.

• Vonvalt is a very intriguing character. His complexity and compellingness are presented very well, and the contradictions in his relationship with Helena too. His fall from faith and what happens later because of it promise to be painful.

• Helena is present, but in many ways Vonvalt inhabits the story more than she does. This seems to be the beginning of Helena grappling with her own story, and who she wants to become outside of just being Vonvalt's clerk and shadow.

• The priest and religious shenanigans are not my favorite, but I am VERY intrigued by what is actually going on in the afterlife. I hope that is a worldbuilding mystery we will get to explore more in later series installments.

Overall, definitely an enjoyable, intricate ride and I'm fascinated to imagine where we will go from here.

Was this review helpful?

This was a great book about concepts like justice, honor, and legal ethics. It was fun to follow the scribe of a judge/executioner, and getting an understanding of the legal system in this fantasy world, which is a unique angle to explore the worldbuilding through. The plot was well-paced and unpredictable.

Was this review helpful?

DNF at 40%

I just can't...I HATE the narrator. She's annoying and very very unlikable.
At first, it's pretty okay but after reading 25% into this book, I started to get annoyed with the narrator, Helena. The narrator is not the 'main character', Sir Konrad Vonvalt, the Justice, who narrated our story but Helena Sedanka, his talented protégé. Helena is a 19 years old girl. She's pretty okay at first but she's got even more annoying from time to time.

I'm a big fan of 'romance' but I don't care whether the fantasy book that I read did contain it or not. At least please do the 'romance' part in the right way! There is this one particular serious scene where Vonvalt somehow can't use his ability and shits went down. It's pretty crucial and I also feel afraid of what will happen next after I read that particular scene. At that time, Helena thinks about this guardsman she's currently seeing named Matas....they kissed once and fell in love instantly. She's also a bit of a bitch to Vonvalt and said something cruel to him (I feel second-hand embarrassment here). That makes me even hate her more.

Was this review helpful?

Possible Triggers:
Death | Gore | Rape

Characters:
The story follows three characters traveling together, with a focus on one (Sir Konrad Vonvalt), told from the perspective of his protégé (Helena Sedanka).

Sir Konrad Vonvalt: is a pretty interesting character. I love the fact that he is SO VERY LAWFUL. He strikes me as an, ‘I signed a contract/made a pact (what have you) and will do my duty to uphold the very letter of the law, but not necessarily the spirit of it’, kind of guy.

Positives:
+ Justices in the world seem to have a special magic all their own. Vonvalt had a few magical abilities that he had trained in when he became a Justice and a few others were mentioned as the story progressed. I am interested to see if there are even more that haven’t been talked about yet and what those might be. There didn’t appear to be any other obvious uses of magic in the story; making it a pretty low magic fantasy - which for me is fairly rare. I enjoyed getting the snippets of the Justices’ group history sprinkled throughout.
+ Vonvalts’ character progression was very interesting. By the end of the book it was fascinating to see the changes that had come over him because of the consequences of his own actions. Really looking forward to seeing how he changes more in the subsequent book(s?). Closely linked with that, it's also going to be really neat to see how Helena changes (specifically in her views on Vonvalt) as she matures.
+ 500 badassery points to Dubine Bressinger. I think I have a new candidate for “most badass character in a book”.

Negatives:
- Saddest of pandas, the next book appears to be slated for 2023. We will have to patiently wait to find out what happens to our new book friends. This isn’t a negative really, more of a bemoaning my lack of patience.

Final Thoughts:
This book was fantastic. Absolutely recommend it for anyone who enjoys mystery along with their fantasy! It was really neat to slowly uncover the true scale of what all is going on in the characters' country while their work was being unveiled piece by piece. There wasn’t a ton of fighting in the book, but what combative action there was, was well written and brutal, with real and lasting consequences. The magic was also quite interesting. This is not a high magic world. There are no mythological beasties and magic appears to be feared and abhorred as unnatural. I absolutely did not guess what was going on in the mystery aspect of the story and was delighted with the reveal. Can’t wait to finally have this bad boy up on my shelf as part of my collection.

Was this review helpful?

I'm sitting here finding that I may be in the minority here. This book wasn't bad, it was just missing **something**.

Firstly, lets talk about the elephant - the synopsis and how it is definitely not telling you what you need to know. Is this book about Sir Konrad Volvalt as he traipses through the map, meting out Justice and gets more than he bargains for when he reaches this town and the world seems to upend itself??? SURE, yeah that definitely happens, but we don't get his point of view at any point. It's told by Helena Sedanka an older lady who is telling you the story from when she was in his employ at 19 years of age. And I think this is where a lot of my issues lie with the book.

Helena, in her remembrance of her youth felt like a hollowed out version of who the character could have been. I'd like to give the author the benefit of the doubt that he can write women, but this wasn't a great showing. Helena, For a kid who grew up on the streets, her outbursts at times when there was even the smallest amount of friction between her and Konrad, seemed unnecessary and didn't fit with how she was set up to be. Interactions with other female characters also fell flat, and what should have been an easy interaction was painful to read because WOMEN KNOW when they ask "Hey that dude seems creepy, yeah?" There isn't much room for conjecture there. The author did kind of shit on housewifes a few times, and that wasn't super nice. Also besides the last big scene, it was Helena and August that were doing all of the heavy lifting in moving this plot on through.

Konrad, oh Konrad, you deluded dimwit. I understand that you get this image of him through the eyes of a beloved employee, but many of his actions were a hindrance to solve the things he was there to solve. His concept as a character is super cool, and it's not a common occurence in fantasy that we follow the lawmaker since they're usually the side characters of all side characters. But in practise he just seems to be like the last guy changing his mind on a thing, even when all the evidence is presented to him. And when you boil down motives and actions that happened this book, it's basically him not listening to the key information from the people surrounding him (unless they're male, or it's a really good idea), and the direct consequences for him being his stubborn self.

And to speak on the stubborn self parts of Vonvalt, is that there is a plot that is happening off page. It's about politics, but since we haven't specifically met any of these people, it's REALLY hard to care about what is happening there. Like sure, you have to get the politics in there, but at times it felt info dumpy because it all happened off page.

The other thing that kept niggling at the back of my brain the entirety of reading this is that it is IMPERIAL Justice and there was a lot of trunkating religions in the recent past. When they meet a representation of a group still worshipping the older gods, Volvalt is sympathetic (to a great extent), but it's still giving big colonizer vibes, and it was sometimes hard to be reading it from the Imperial end and root for it.

Lastly, I was super excited at one point where it looked like the author was going to reward me with my favorite trope of all time, but then it fell super short of what I needed it to be, and also disappointed me further from where I was.

I think that there are going to be a lot of people who are going to LOVE THIS, and I am happy for them.

Was this review helpful?

An elderly woman, Helena Sedanka, is retelling her life as a young law clerk in this fantasy tale set in an empire of many peoples held together by a common law code. Helena is an orphan surviving on the streets when she tries to steal the purse from Sir Konrad Vonvalt, Imperial Magistrate. Instead of arresting her he offers to mentor her as his clerk. Together with his taskman, Bressinger, they travel around the outer empire. Accompanied for part of the way by a rather fanatical Neman priest, Claver, Vovalt makes a decision that later impacts them all. When they arrive in Galen's Vale to investigate the murder of Lady Bauer they discover much has been happening in the empire between the emperor, the senate, religious factions and various nobles. It reminded me a bit of the old Holy Roman Empire or the Ottoman Empire. Helena is a fun character to root for and Vonvalt is complicated and interesting. I look forward to the next book. Thanks to the publisher and NetGalley for an advance copy in exchange for an honest review.

Was this review helpful?

Thanks so much to Richard Swan, and Netgalley for providing a free Arc for my Honest review.....

Well here is my honest review....

I just could not finish the the book...I thought the description sounded great and I have thoroughly enjoyed Mystery/ Fantasy mashups in the past, as this Genre bending combines two of my favorite types of book...

I really wanted to like this book and I really wanted it to get better, but for my personal take :the idea of Vonvalt being the main character, as seen through the eyes of Helena, although unique, didnt work for me. I didnt get Vonvalts internal dialogue, thoughts or feelings. I enjoy this sort of thing and come to expect it when vonvalt is purportedly " the greatest this, that, and so on..." Annnd the main character...Helena doesnt seem very deep

My other problem is that this book isnt totally original in its use of terms from a semi-modern world which really takes away from the authentic feel of a story and takes away from creativity that I enjoy from authors....

The prose itself is good and the story pacing is not bad, but I found myself struggling to really care about what happens next. The magic may not be meant to be a primary focus but I felt it was bland and unexciting in especially when the the books description lead me in to a different belief....it was actually more exciting than the story itself...

Was this review helpful?

I thoroughly enjoyed The Justice of Kings, hooked from the beginning by the gritty, Slavic-feeling medieval world and a truly compelling focal protagonist. My early impression was that this book feels like The Witcher 3 with low magic, focused on law and philosophy instead of monster hunting. Humans can be monstrous enough, as this narrative shows.

Sir Konrad Vonvalt is a fantastic, layered protagonist who I bonded to immediately. The narrative is told not from his interior but from the point of view of his young clerk, Helena, a choice that frames Vonvalt in a way that feels both intimate and mythic. He is at once very human, with all the faults thereof, and also legendary, revered, unapproachable. I would have enjoyed more time with Vonvalt versus the story taking us elsewhere periodically with Helena, but overall I felt the point of view choice was a solid one.

The relationship between Vonvalt and Helena has many angles, all of which get stressed during the story and keep the characters dynamic around the mystery plot, which itself gets slowly expanded and convoluted from small village scale to country-wide politics and revolution. While confronting this broadening, deepening scope, both characters have to face up to naïveté and the cost of their ideals, while also exploring the meaning of service. The novel starts quite slow but builds on itself to an intense climactic scene and a peak of character growth that sets up strongly for the next book in the series.

Lastly, the magical abilities in the novel are sparse and used sparingly, but feel more impactful because of that. One of Vonvalt’s skills is an interesting form of necromancy that gives readers a peek into a complex afterlife…which promises to be explored more in the sequels.

Was this review helpful?

As if Aragorn left the hobbits and because a lawyer. Or, Judge Dread, maybe.

A magical solider responsible for upholding the law, a Justice travels the country, making sure the Emperor's law is enforced. This includes taking testimony, courtroom depositions, etc., which was surprisingly well done.

The actual court case is interesting and serves the plot well, but the characters is where this book shines. Characters are flawed and real, We see a person lose their faith in what they believe and keep moving forward anyway. We see everyone looking after themselves, especially those with the most to gain by cooperating. Everyone feels real, even if stiff at times. I'm looking forward to seeing these characters more and having the time to let them develop through the story.

Was this review helpful?

I received a free advance reading copy (ARC) of this book from Orbit books in exchange for my honest review.

I did like the book, but the characters felt a bit flat to me and I didn't connect to them as much as I would have liked. The blurb for the book says it "introduces an unforgettable protagonist destined to become a fantasy icon: Sir Konrad Vonvalt." Sir Konrad is an epic character, but the story is told from the point of view of his clerk, Helena, who isn't very likeable at all. So, as great a character as he is (and I do think he's awesome), the narrative of the novel doesn't really allow us to get to know him very well and that's a pity.

This isn't the first time I've read a book (or series) where the main POV character isn't the center of the story, but this attempt wasn't as effective. I think that's because, while we did learn more about Sir Konrad & his history, I still felt like I didn't get to know him very well by the end of the book. Some of the choices he made throughout the book puzzled me. Had I gotten to know him better, some of those choices might have been easier to understand.

On the plus side, the politics & political intrigue in this book were very well written. I'm usually not very interested in stories that feature religion & religious conflict as a major plot point, but in this case, I found it intriguing, and it helped move the plot along very nicely.

The heart of this story is the investigation into various crimes, including murder, political corruption and disappearances. It is a gripping story and it pulled me in, I just wish I had gotten to know Konrad better.

I liked the book, but I wasn't in love with it. I give this book 3.8 out of 5 stars (rounding up to 4).

Was this review helpful?

I dnfed this at ~85%
Just like many reviewers, I was originally surprised to find out this novel had a female protagonist, I assumed this book would be about Konrad Vonvalt. And I thought it was a rather interesting story narration idea aka "Present but not heard". Besides, you don't often have a fantasy book centered about Law, Unfortunately, I was disappointed with the execution and overall I was bored.

I disliked the main female character because there was absolutely nothing that made her a woman. If there was no "Ugh, sharing a room with a man", "ugh, sexism" and "I want to marry that guy", I'd never have guessed she was a woman. This is a first person POV yet there was absolutely nothing feminine about her thoughts, no sense of kinship when talking to other women (like when she was in the kloster it was time to experiment with it, but there was nothing), no female intuition, no female logic, no love for clean orderly environment, no giggling, no being embarrassed in certain situations - nothing.
I got way more female presence from Brienne of Tarth than I ever got from Helena.

I thought that the writing style (the sentences) were bad at times, and some words were used inconsistently.
The exposition was clunky.
Another big problem for me was anachronisms.
This book had:
- Crusades (11-13 century called)
- "groat" (a coin speficially used between 1351 and 1662)
- "Breakfast" with "porridge and bacon" - both of which are very modern concepts
- "Bigots" and "homosexuals" (21 century called)
(+ a few other words similarly spread across an entire Millenia of history)
You can have all these concepts in a book, but you need to use time appropriate language and explain why does your novel have these concepts if the historical period did not (like breakfast). This book could've had disel fuel and driving cars and I wouldn't bet an eye, IF there was an explanation to HOW society reached that stage.
I don't think in this case "It's just fantasy" is an appropriate cover-up bc it does seem to try and draw a picture of a certain time period in reader's mind and it actually uses real-life words and cultures

Besides, I have had a linguistic education, and history and historical linguistics have always been a passion of mine, and I did not approve of the mumble-jumble of Germanic and Slavic words mixed with some Roman, Greek and others.
Again, I think there needs to be an in-world explanation to why the characters and places are named so differently and why they use so many words from so many languages. IRL these languages used to be one Indo-Proto-European language, but are now vastly different because of the history and geography and if one language borrows a word, there's an explanation behind it. And here there was no geographical or historical explanation to why there was this mumble-jumble of so many words from so many different fields/classes.

Was this review helpful?

Absolutely incredible story from a master craftsman. This book sucked you in from the beginning and refused to let go, culminating in the extraordinary and unexpected ending.

Was this review helpful?

I enjoyed this book, it's interesting and intelligent. Richard Swan did an excellent job with character development. I recommend it.

Was this review helpful?

This was a great start to a new fantasy series. I enjoyed this though I was skeptical. The book cover suggest grim dark. Think of it as a clash between Church and Roman empire. Very interesting. This had mystery and political machinations. There is even a bit of romance, though this portion was a little clunky.

Was this review helpful?

I enjoyed this book. It is told from the perspective of Helena, a young law clerk, traveling around what feels like a Soviet Union/Northern Europe type empire expansion in a medieval time period, solving crimes, holding court cases, and carrying out executions. Sir Konrad is an Emperor's Justice, with a few magical abilities including speaking to the recently dead and compelling people to tell the truth. Other Justices have other magical abilities. The magical abilities are only moderately helpful, though most people are frightened of them. Most of the characters in the book are described to be in a bad mood most of the time, I suppose unsurprisingly given how grueling and dangerous their life is. It is pretty much always cold and wet, and bad smells abound. Helena and a young watchman fall deeply in love after talking twice, with Helena in a bad mood as usual and rude. She expects Sir Konrad will want a sexual relationship with her when he hires her, which to her relief doesn't happen, but she is jealous when Konrad displays affection for another woman. Anyway, the romance wasn't terribly convincing, but the other relationships were interesting. The story is told as a memoir, by Helena as an old woman, with a lot of hints about what were good or bad decisions in hindsight, which I don't love. There's a set up for additional books about this trio though, and certainly a lot more to explore.

Was this review helpful?

4.5 stars. A solid debut. I was really drawn in to the story and it kept me engaged from page one. The description is a little misleading... Yes, the story is about Sir Konrad, but it's told from the first-person perspective of Helena, his clerk, and she's telling the story looking back years later as an old woman. I actually really really liked this. It added a sense of anticipation: We knew what the end result was, but we didn't know how it was going to play out. There were a few twists and turns and heartbreaking moments, and overall I really enjoyed it and anxiously look forward to the next book in the series.

Was this review helpful?

There is so much I could say about this book, but I will only hit the highlights for brevity’s sake. The story is told from the POV of a sidekick to the protagonist. This struck me as a little unusual, but it worked really well. We don’t know the thoughts of any character except the narrator.
The World building isn’t exactly original, yet it is an excellent backdrop for the tale being told. I felt as though I were in the story and it seemed real. There was magic and it was believable.
Five stars for #TheJusticeOfKings. You will enjoy this one! My thanks to #Orbit via #NetGalley.

Was this review helpful?

I feel the names were unneedingly complicated and made the writing bland in comparison to the character names. I felt it could've reached a higher level but fell short.

Was this review helpful?

I really fell in love twitch this world. I don’t usually end political fantasy, but I tend to really like it when I do. And I really liked this book. It took me a while to finish, but I am really glad that I got around to it. I hope to eventually check out more work by this author in the future as well.

Was this review helpful?

The Justice of Kings is absolutely brilliant. Richard Swan’s talent for writing and creating a new high fantasy world, with multiple religions, complex main characters, a unique magic system, and tons of political intrigue, was obvious from the first page!

It was refreshing and impactful to read from Helena Sedanka’s (albeit sometimes naive) female perspective, in such a male dominated story. Helena is a young imperial clerk or assistant to our main character, Imperial Justice Konrad Vonvalt, and companion to Dubine Bressinger their man at arms, and she documents their trials. Throughout the story they examine heresy, murder, disappearances, corruption, treason, and the eternal battle of good vs evil. By reading from Helena’s POV we notice certain details, that although intelligent and honorable, Justice Vonvalt doesn’t consider important.

Some of my favorite elements were the great dynamic between Helena, Vonvalt, and Bressinger. Also the sense of humor lightened some of the darker points of the story. I love it when a book makes the reader contemplate their morals and what is right & wrong, especially through such a great trio. But mostly I was impressed with how respectful and open minded Vonvalt’s character is, considering he has so much authority & power.

Initially I felt this was similar to The Witcher and A Song of Ice and Fire (Game of Thrones) but it’s definitely it’s own unique story. If you appreciate dark fantasy, high fantasy, epic fantasy, righteous main characters, political intrigue, religious conflict, and some great swordsmanship, I HIGHLY recommend this. I look forward to the next installment of this trilogy!

Thank you to Richard Swan, Orbit Books and NetGalley for the opportunity to read this ARC in exchange for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?