Member Reviews
Thank you to NetGalley, Sourcebooks, and the author for an advanced copy in exchange for my honest feedback!
I was so excited to read "Helltown: The Untold Story of Serial Murder on Cape Cod" by Casey Sherman because I am a total crime buff, and I was shocked that I had never heard of Tony Costa before! Helltown tells the story of an unhinged and mentally ill serial killer (before that term was even a thing in the crime world!) in Cape Cod, Massachusetts.
The content is obviously very heavy and gruesome detailing Costa's victims and perversions, but the book was well-written and you could tell that a ton of research was put into getting the story right.
The only thing that threw me off (and took my 4-star rating down to 3) were the chapters about Vonnegut and Mailer. I understand why the author included them to set the tone of what was going on at that time in history, but I'm not sure if they were completely necessary. The chapters dedicated to the two writers threw off the fast pace of the main story and were really difficult to get through. I would still recommend this book to any true-crime lover because Casey Sherman did deliver a thought-provoking story about substance abuse, early childhood trauma, violence against women, and mental illness.
All in all, the story of Tony Costa is one that I will not be forgetting anytime soon, and I enjoyed reading this book and learning something new. Thank you again to NetGalley, Sourcebooks, and the author for sharing this one with me!
I read this books in spurts, over a long period of time (uncommon for me) because the writing was just not very accessible. It took me so long to read I had to buy the book after I lost access to the eARC (Thank you as always NetGalley and you Sourcebooks for the eARC). The writing, which I must say first and foremost is the tool that conveys your ideas and opinions. If it is lacking, it is hard to even think about what the story is trying to tell you. This is that case in which I know for a fact that their are facts and information intertwined with opinion and assumption to make a think piece of a true crime story. Did I enjoy it? No.
But I feel as if there is an audiences, some hardcore true crime lovers that can wade through this and not a reader who likes to read but isn’t particularly into true crime; in that instance you will be sorely disappointed.
This book was not exactly what I expected, so I did not finish the book. I think some true crime lovers would enjoy this book, but it’s definitely not for everyone. The writing style and the various story lines/points of view ended up being not my cup of tea. It also seemed to blur the lines between fiction and non-fiction, which didn’t sit right with me either. Thank you to Net Galley for giving me an advanced copy of this book in return for an honest review.
Thank you Sourcebooks for the gifted digital copy.
I love true crime, but I just couldn't get into this one. The writing style was hard to follow in my opinion. There is a combination of facts with some assumptions that I did not love. Overall, I just would not recommend this book.
Wasn’t quite the exciting read I was expecting. Sadly it didn’t live up to the description. It was poor to read. Was to slow for me.
Wow. I don’t know where to begin with this one.
I was able to read it in two days. Probably could have done it in one but I have kids lol
It was enrapturing, spellbinding, and it let you fall into the story entirely.
I loved the authors writing. Some true crime novels can be a bit bland but I found the author really was able to tell the story in a way that made it sound like you weren’t reading true crime.
Thank you NetGalley, Sourcebooks, and Casey Sherman for a copy of this book in exchange for an honest review! Unfortunately, I didn’t really enjoy this one, and thought it was a bit boring and too graphic. I was excited to read this one because I had previously never heard of Tony Costa, but this book includes a lot of unnecessary information. The writing was good, but this one just wasn’t for me.
While the story itself was more or less interesting and I learned a lot about Tony Costa, a brutal serial killer active on Cape Cod in the 1960s, I do not think that this book/its author was doing a responsible job in the name of true crime. There were too many details about the victims, what they were doing, how they were talking, what they thought, etc that the author could not have known. To add them into a book and call it fact and true crime is, in my deep opinion, irresponsible. I guess they were, in a sense, recreations, but they bothered me greatly and nearly made me not want to finish this book. Additionally, the author got caught up many times in talking about two active authors during that time, Vonnegut and Mailer. I thought all the attention to these two dragged the story a bit.
Uh yeah. WOW.
I have read quite a few true crime books in my 50+ years of reading. I have read books about murder, death and dying, autopsies and body farms. NONE [and this is saying something] of them have made me as queasy and uncomfortable as this book did. I spent most of the book being completely grossed out, which was something I was really unprepared for. The descriptions of the crimes [while the killer was performing them and then again during the trial] is brutal and graphic and unflinching and well, you need to have balls of steel to deal with it without being grossed out.
The story itself is crazy - the twists and turns that the case takes and the roller-coaster ride the cops have to try and find both the bodies and the truth is gripping. The fact that at least three bodies were never talked about during the trial is infuriating. WHERE is the justice for those dead girls and their families? I guess it is in where the killer ends up at the finish of the book, but I think that is a poor substitute for their families.
There are parts of this book that absolutely DO NOT WORK. WHY the author felt the need to include Normal Mailer and Kurt Vonnegut into this story is beyond me, nor was the story of Edward Kennedy and Chappaquiddick beneficial [this story was used to show how stupid the DA was, but it just muddled the waters even more - it is mentioned and then *POOF* nothing more and it was an unneeded distraction from the story that completely interrupts the flow]. The addition of the two men completely interrupts the flow of the story and I found myself wondering over and over just what they contributed to it. Even more confusing was the brief introduction and mention of Charles Manson and the Tate Murder. I am STILL trying to figure out why that was in the book.
All of that is why this book is only 3 stars [and really, should only be 2 stars, but the story, minus the gore, is very compelling and it just is not a 2 star read] and to be fair I cannot really recommend this to everyone. You have to have a really strong stomach and an ability to sort through all the nonsense to get to the real crux of the story - if you have that and a serious tenacity to weed out the meh, then this is the read for you. If not, I suggest you stay away, far, far, away.
I was granted an audiobook ARC of this book. Sometimes, authors should not narrate their own books and that is the case here. The author's staccato way of speaking, the way he often rushes sentences and then has longish pauses that randomly crop of, this makes for a choppy listen.
Is is the worse narrator I have ever listened to? No. Not even remotely. Was it an enjoyable listening experience? Also no [and not just because of the subject matter]. I will say I listened to the whole thing so that is something. ;-)
Thank you to NetGalley, Casey Sherman, RB Media/Recorded Books, and SOURCEBOOKS [nonfiction] for providing these ARCS in exchange for an honest review.
I had heard of Tony Costa before and I was anxious to read more about his story. The parts of this book that were about him were intriguing, but there was a whole part of the book about the writers that were onto his story that bored me to tears. The two stories weren’t woven together well in my opinion. I wouldn’t recommend it to my true crime loving friends due to the lag in action and storyline.
Thanks to #netgalley for the opportunity to read this book and offer my honest review.
Thank you Netgalley and the publisher for an advance copy of this book in exchange for an honest review. This was just ok, unfortunately, it didn't capture my attention as much as I wanted, I ended up being a little bored.
So, I loved the title and the cover and when I read the synopsis that this was a true crime book about a man and murders I had never heard of, I was so in! I knew without a doubt I had to submit a request and I am so happy I did. This was a crazy story that I knew nothing about. Jam packed with knowledge, murder, and some cool little hippie vibe. Helltown, needs to be on every true crime lovers radar. I will now never forget Tony Costa. This whole book was just absolutely insane. Please do yourself a favor and request this book and then obsessively go down rabbit holes for all the details .
This book contains two of my favorite subjects: serial killers and Cape Cod. I was intrigued when I first heard about this true crime story because somehow I had never heard of Tony Costa or the gruesome murders he committed. The way in which the sequence of events was told made me feel as if I was right there alongside Tony while he desecrated the bodies of those innocent women. It was insanely disturbing to say the least, and I questioned whether or not to finish the book. But the portions of the story I disliked reading the most were those that discussed local writers, Kurt Vonnegut and Norman Mailer. I found it unnecessary to include them as they often segued into parts of their lives that had nothing to do with Tony Costa.
Overall, I liked the idea of this true crime story and think it is one that not a lot of light has been shed on in recent years, but I didn’t fully enjoy how the book was written and at times it bored me to tears.
*Thank you to NetGalley and Sourcebooks for providing a copy of this book to review.*
Propulsive and well written, this true crime book reads like a novel. A fascinating read - I knew nothing of Tony Costa before reading this and I consider myself something of a true crime junkie. Sherman has done a masterful job of describing Cape Cod in the 60s as well as being a chilling account of a brutal serial killer. Reminiscent of the works of Erik Larson, in that I could not put it down despite nonfiction normally taking me much longer to get through!
✨Book Review✨
Another eARC and ALC courtesy of @netgally and @sourcebooksfire and @recordedbooks and I’m so grateful! Also, the author narrates the audiobook, always a bonus!
Helltown is the story of Tony Costa, serial killer on Cape Cod in the 1960s. Costa’s murders were before Charles Manson even made it onto the scene and, honestly, were much more gruesome. The details involving the murders in this book are hard to read or listen to, but the story of how he was eventually caught is so satisfying. To see that monster make it behind bars is 👏🙌.
The way Casey Sherman writes this book is much like a historical fiction novel being written about a true historical figure. Sherman wanted to write this story in a conversational and novel way, so it’s not written like the typical true crime story. The events that occur in this book are still very real and very 😱🫣😣.
This wasn't quite what I expected...
Definitely didn't hate it, but didn't love it either. It was more gruesome than I was prepared for, more fictional...and I was thrown off by the "recreation" elements of this otherwise true crime novel as well. That said, the writing was smooth...it's evident Mr. Sherman is a talented author.
Thank you to NetGalley and Sourcebooks for the advance copy.
Thank you to NetGalley and Sourcebooks for providing me with an ARC copy.
All thoughts and opinions are my own.
I have mixed feelings about this book...
Helltown is about the 1960's serial killer of Cape Cod.
This is a true crime narrative that takes us back to the 60's, back to Provincetown, Massachusetts, back to a time Tony Costa, drug-soaked hippie culture and gruesome murders.
Gruesome is definitely a key word here.
I enjoy true crime, both reading about them and watching the stories. It's something that has caught my attention and became an interest over the years. (that sounds odd haha) Stories of disappearances, kidnappings, murders, true crimes that just add to my anxiety and worries yet I keep reading them. Maybe it's because of our own local stories but that's beside the point.
I had actually never heard the stories of Cape Cod or this serial killer and while interesting to read and discover more, I just had to step away from the book at times because it's a bit too graphic for me. I know sometimes the shock factor is there to catch the reader's attention but for me, I had to skip over a few parts. I did look up some details, I like to know more about the true crimes and see how well the story stays on track with facts.
I think if you really enjoy true crime, this would be a book for you. It was interesting but slightly more than what I like as far as gruesome details.... however.... the story, the crimes, the murders, they truly were gruesome so the author was simply telling things as they should be told.
I am absolutely sad to say that this one was not for me. I tried multiple times to get into it, and it never hooked me. I love crime fiction, thrillers and true crime, but the Vonnegut story seemed like a distraction to me. I also became concerned about the book being pitched as nonfiction when I began to realize how much was ad-libbed. I am a journalist, and that part bothered me more than I thought it would.
I really loved the cover and had high hopes of sharing a rave review of this one on my Bookstagram, but it ultimately wasn't for me.
1.75
Reading this book was a rollercoaster. I was unsure of how I felt about it in the beginning, as the narrative jumps from Tony Costa, the killer, to authors Norman Mailer and Kurt Vonnegut. But once I started looking at the book more as an exploration of the time period rather than a pure true crime I started to get invested. And then the book kept going.
Ultimately, I think I understand what Sherman was trying to do, but the convoluted storytelling was unsuccessful in my mind and adding in all the extra details about the era and Mailer/Vonnegut just made the book feel too long and uneven.
I also wasn't the biggest fan of this particular style of narrative nonfiction. Towards the beginning of the book, specifically in the Vonnegut portions, it was hard to tell if Sherman's information came from actual sources about Vonnegut's life or if he just took the "autobiographical" parts from Slaughterhouse-Five. And throughout the book Sherman "recreates" full on conversations and internal dialogue that may or may not have actually happened and in one particular instance recreates a scene that in his author's note he says is a theory "as plausible as any" but with no indication in text of it being a theory. For me, the kind of nonfiction that toes the line into fiction doesn't work.
Fascinating! A nonfiction book that reads like fiction, and also involves some of the most famous names in literature in the MOST bizarre ways, this is a must read for anyone who is fascinated with serial killers and their motives. Highly recommend!