Cover Image: Pandora

Pandora

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

Overall, I really enjoyed this novel. It was clear from the beginning that there were mythological parallels. However, Stokes-Chapman does a great job making it all her own. The characters are vibrant and realistic, with lots of robust relationships described amongst the cast. From love interests to eccentric aristocrats, Pandora really has it all. And, throughout the well-thought out plot, the reader gets a clear glimpse into Georgian society. This makes it a must-read for any historical fiction fan.

Was this review helpful?

A fun novel, while not quite the amazing literary experience I had pinned my hopes to. The setting is well realized, but while the characters fit within it well, I never quite latched to any of them fully. I will be checking in on this author in the future, though.
.
Thank you to Netgalley and the publisher for an opportunity with this title.

Was this review helpful?

In London in 1799 there sits a shop full of antiquities. This shop has fallen out of favor in recent years due to a change in ownership. Pandora Blake's uncle now runs the shop that used to belong to her parents. They cared deeply about this shop and selling true antiquities, Dora's uncle doesn't care and would rather sell forgeries to make a quick sale.
When a large delivery arrives Dora starts to question what her uncle is up to in the basement and she untangles the mystery of what happened to her parents 12 years ago.

Myths! History! Curses! Romance! Mystery!

I really enjoyed this read! I liked the characters and was cheering for Pandora and her new friends during the story. There is a quiet love story weaved through the book, well actually two. I had guessed that a character was in love before they even admitted it.
I loved some of the side characters as well. I will definitely be recommending this read to lovers of historical fiction.
Readers of The Lost Apothecary and even Bridgerton will have a great time with this novel!

Was this review helpful?

Pandora
⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Set in 1799 London, Pandora is a story filled with mystery and Greek Mythology.

🏺never in my life would I thought that reading a book about a Greek pithos (basically a large vase) would be so interesting!
🏺this story was compelling, and had my interest from the beginning. I found myself so eager to see how all the puzzle pieces would fit together.
🏺Susan Stokes-Chapman’s writing style is beautiful, atmospheric, and descriptive. I could easily picture the sights and smells of the streets of London. Unfortunately, most times it wasn’t the best of smells being described, but shows her talent as a writer.
🏺this book will keep you on your toes, will have you rooting for the main character, Dora, and will have you wishing you could be there alongside to help Dora.

If you like historical fiction, Greek Mythology, suspense, and mystery, treat your shelves to this one when it releases in just a few days on January 17, 2023


Thank you to Net Galley and Harper Perennial for a copy of this ARC in exchange for my honest review.

Was this review helpful?

I really enjoyed reading Pandora which is both surprising and not. Surprising in a sense that I've gravitated more towards science fiction and not surprising because it was a great story, lovely characters, and I eagerly wanted to find out more about Dora Blake and her jewelry designs. It was a novel that had me googling quite a bit of information and that just made me like it even more.

It had a little bit of everything for me (secrets, action, intelligence, attraction, modern touches, I could go on....) and painted so vividly that I felt transported to London, 1799. I hope there's more to Dora's story and I will be on the lookout for more books by this author.

#Pandora #NetGalley

Was this review helpful?

I feel sort of in-the-middle about this read. I liked the setting well enough, though it felt just like...every other historical novel set in that time period/setting (there are a surprising number of these). It was vividly realized, but overall nothing too crazy. I thought that overall this story was pleasantly average? I never really felt a sense of urgency or forward motion--the story was just sort of dragging for me. I think that while the POV changing added a bit of interesting fodder, it would always switch right when I finally was getting interested, haha. I think if you're a really big fan of Greek myth and historical fiction you'd get a right kick out of this. As it stands, this wasn't horrible but wasn't great (for me personally).

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to Harper Collins for sending me an advanced copy of this my way.

This book seemed interesting at first but i couldn't get passed the writing style and how slow the plot is. the characters just seemed bland and i got really bored. I feel that i probably would like this more if i was a fan of historical fiction but sadly i am not.

I will be posting my review on goodreads as soon as the strike has ended.

Was this review helpful?

Working at her uncle's antiquities shop, Dora becomes suspicious about a Greek vase that he's hidden in the basement. She enlists the help of Edward, an antiquities expert struggling to make a name for himself. Is the vase real or a fake? Was it acquired legally, or is it contraband? How far will her uncle go to hide his secrets?

This romantic suspense is more suspense than romance. Still, I loved Dora and Edward together. The mythology elements added atmosphere without detracting from the story. The book is written in first person, and it took a chapter or so for me to adapt. Ultimately, I enjoyed the book more than I expected to.

Thanks, NetGalley, for the ARC I received. This is my honest and voluntary review.

Was this review helpful?

I thought this threaded the needle between "inspired by" and "retelling" quite well--it is certainly not a pure rewriting of the Pandora myth, but there is plenty of room to question whether the vase at the center of the story is THE container of legend. Dora finds inspiration from the artwork depicting her namesake, which also brings opportunities for romance and advancement. She discovers more about her parents' death along the way. It works on its own as a historical fiction tale of a woman coming into her own, but having that bit of mythology in the center of the story gives it some added oomph and an instant connection point.

Was this review helpful?

My goodness! What an absolute delicious treat to read-- packed with greed, history, and deceit. The setting of Georgian London was vivid and reminiscent of all the historical novels I've read that are set in London. This author beautifully wove a number of elements together that resulted in the most captivating storyline-- a must read.

Was this review helpful?

Pandora is a historical fiction novel set in Georgian (1799) London. The main character, Dora, is the daughter of antiquarians who uncover the original Greek pottery that is "Pandora's box". The novel has a slower pace, and didn't become really interesting to me until over 25% of the way through - if you like historical fiction, you may have a different view on this however. I requested an ARC of this book because I LOVE Greek mythology, unfortunately it's more historical fiction with a sprinkle of Greek mythology (NOT a retelling), so it wasn't quite my cup of tea. I didn't think the stakes of the novel were high enough - associating with someone dealing in black market antiques is really worth the death penalty? Was everyone from 1799 England okay?? But I did really enjoy the implications of opening Pandora's box and the characters grappling with whether the curse was real or not. Ultimately, if you're a big historical fiction fan, I recommend it!
Thank you to NetGalley and Harper Perrenial for the ARC. ARC was provided by the publisher via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review

Was this review helpful?

This was not what I expected, but not for the right reasons.

I have to say the author takes some serious risks here in the novel, which I appreciated. The third-person present tense was jarring at first (as it felt like the novel had been written in first person only for the author to decide to change it at the last minute). It gives a whole feeling of being TOLD to the audience instead of EXPERIENCED. It’s weird, but I ended up skimming over the present tense and just pretending like it was in past tense by the time I reached the middle.

I did like some of the characters, like Hermes (Pandora’s bird) and Mr. Ashmole. Lottie was even endearing by the end of the novel, and I think she is the most interesting of the characters by far. The romance between Edward and Dora is a little contrived, and there’s a wholly unnecessary intimate scene towards the end. I feel like it should have caused much more scandal than it did, considering there was mention of a chaperone earlier in the novel. There was an interesting moment between Ashmole and Dora (SPOILERS) where it’s revealed that Ashmole is in love with Edward. I’ve seen that trope before, but the author handles it in a really interesting way. I thought he was just being elitist and judge mental, but he was actually jealous of Dora the whole time.

The writing itself (aside from the present tense) is well-done, but I did find myself skipping over larger paragraphs to get to the meat of the moments that really mattered. The story itself really only started picking up around Chapter 9 or 10, which is way later than I would have expected. The author has a great mastery of writing dialogue, which came across very well in character interactions. The rest of the descriptions of the era were fine (I’m not particularly knowledgeable about the time period), but I found a few scenes to be too vulgar. This comes around especially with Hezekiah and Lottie. I mean, if Dora is disgusted, it stands to reason that the reader would also be disgusted. I’m not sure those are the feelings you want to associate with the novel, as I felt it could’ve been skipped over or otherwise hinted at instead of shown.

In a final note, I appreciated the cover art (it’s gorgeous) and the Greek mythology aspect. I didn’t expect the main character to be named Pandora (it almost feels Mary Sue?), but I got over it by the time we unraveled the mystery about Pandora’s parents. (SPOILERS) Pandora finding the key to open her parents’ safe at the end was rather contrived, as I don’t recall that key being found earlier.

All in all, I may pick up another book from this author, but I hope it doesn’t make the choice of POV as this one did. Thanks to Netgalley and the publisher for a free copy of the book in exchange for an honest review.

Was this review helpful?

Special thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for a free, electronic ARC of this novel received in exchange for an honest review.
Expected publication date: January 17, 2023
After the tragic death of her parents during an archaeological excavation, Dora Blake is now living with her uncle, Hezekiah, in her parents’ antiquities shop. But Hezekiah does not have the interest in antiquities her parents had and he is slowly destroying her parents’ once loved business. Dora is desperate to escape from her uncles’ care, and is hoping to turn her love of drawing and jewelry making into a career, giving her the independence she craves. When her uncle imports a Grecian vase, one so old that it predates time itself, Dora feels an immediate connection. While anyone else who touches it or means it harm is instantly cursed, Dora continues to be the only one to open it and she uses its Greek inscriptions and drawings as inspiration for her jewellery. But Hezekiah has darker plans for the vase, and even darker plans for Dora, and when Dora realizes the true importance of the urn, her life is put at greater risk.
“Pandora” is a historical fiction gem, the debut novel by author Susan Stokes-Chapman. Set in London in 1799, Chapman’s novel manages to merge Greek mythology and Georgian England in a creative and realistic way. The story is told from three POV’s; Dora, Edward (a historian with a passion for antiquities and Dora’s love interest) and Hezekiah himself. I loved how Chapman brought all three characters alternatively into the limelight, as it served to deepen the plot and character development.
Dora is smart, feisty and absolutely fierce, and she instantly became a character to root for. Her background and history is emotional and heartbreaking, yet she does not ask for pity, and only wants to work hard at what she loves in order to gain independence from her manipulative uncle. Stokes-Chapman took some liberties with the historical facts in this novel, and she admits to these herself in the authors’ notes, but it is a fiction novel, and anything she chose to omit or alter only made the novel more enjoyable.
I loved the creativity of this novel, and it stands out for its uniqueness. The fact that this is a debut novel only further highlights the talent that Stokes-Chapman has. “Pandora” is full of intrigue, and I can’t wait to see what Stokes-Chapman delivers next!

Was this review helpful?

I really thought I would like this book more. It was really appealing - Greek Mythology mixed with real world London in the 1900s. However, the pace and writing fell a bit flat to me at times. I couldn't connect with Dora too. Maybe I just expected more and it didn't live up to it. There were some good plot points and overall, a decent read. A 2.75 rounded up to 3

Was this review helpful?

I really enjoyed this story. I thought that it was a brilliant combination of Greek Mythology and Georgian England. I thought that there was this perfect balance of dark and light that somehow came out to be a morally sort of grey. This is random but in college I took a lot of history classes featuring numismatics, greek mythology and antiques so it is like this book was written straight out of my interests. I love this modern-esque twist on such an old tale and how Dora and Edwards life seemingly intertwined. This book was filled with deceit, mystery, rare antiques and book binding. This is very much so a story where a revaluation of the people you think you know and the world around you is changed. Think taking rose colored glasses off and realizing most of the people around you have a darkness to them. I love the fact that there was a combination of history and fantasy. If I were to say anything I would wish that there were a dash more in the greek mythology side of things but overall I think that does not necessarily take away from the book as a whole .

Was this review helpful?

3.5 stars

Pandora by Susan Stokes-Chapmen is a historical fiction novel set in Georgian London that focuses on the myth of Pandora. The novel isn’t quite a retelling, though there is a mysterious vase at the center of the story. Instead, this story is a mirror of the myth, showing another iteration of what happens to a woman caught up in the schemes of men. The protagonist of this novel, Dora, does manage to somewhat extricate herself from their plotting, but readers are not given a chance to enjoy her success because of the novel’s abrupt end. Dora only gets to tell Edward, her love interest, that she never needed him to save her a few chapters before the novel’s epilogue, which announces their engagement. In the end, this wasn’t quite the novel for me. I was hoping for a little bit more romance, myth, or mystery, and barring that, at least a little bit more feminine rage. Still, I think historical fiction readers will enjoy Pandora.

Was this review helpful?

*I received a free copy of this ebook from the publisher in exchange for an honest review.*

3.5 stars.

I found the idea of this book very interesting, and I enjoyed reading it. Was it my favorite book of the year? No, it was not. Something failed to fully capture me, though I’m not certain what it was. I liked it, but I didn’t love it.

The book is written in third person present tense, which always feels very strange to me. It’s mostly from Dora’s (21) and Edward’s (26) points of view, with some chapters from Hezekiah's. The writing lacks major flaws and flows well. But it also lacks much emotion or intensity; perhaps that's why I never got fully engrossed in the story. Although I would not compare the story to a textbook, I might say that the writing had the same emotional depth as one. Everything was very matter-of-fact. I never got a pit in my stomach when something bad might happen or felt butterflies during tender, romantic moments. So that's what it was--the book was interesting, but I failed to make an emotional connection to it.

I liked Dora the most; she was intelligent and quirky, somehow innocent and scheming at the same time. But I had mixed feelings about Edward. He seemed to be using Dora in a way that put her life in danger, but he didn't even realize it--or perhaps he wouldn't allow himself to realize it. I warmed toward Cornelius (29 or 30, if I remember correctly), especially when things changed between him and Dora. When it came down to it, he was a good friend.

From the author's note (I always love th0se), I learned that more of the people and events in the book were real or based on fact than I had expected. The image after the final chapter was difficult to read on my Kindle, however, and I could only make out the largest words. I tried it in my NetGalley Shelf app, as well, and couldn't find any way to zoom in so that I could read it.

How it ends: (view spoiler)

Note: Some mild language. One implied sex scene (completely off page). LGBT supporting character(s).

Was this review helpful?

The cover of this book immediately caught my attention, and I really enjoyed reading it.
Readers will be completely absorbed in this atmospheric story set in Georgian England. I loved the author's lush descriptions! The plot also combines historical elements with mystery and even mythology, all of which made the book a really quick read.
This is a fun book to read that will appeal to a wide variety of readers!

Was this review helpful?

I really wanted to like this. I really did. It just didn’t hit the spot. I even tried the Audiobook to see if that would change anything and I just couldn’t get into it. I am a sucker for greek mythology and that’s what drew me in in the first place. I had a hard time getting through this book.

Thanks to NetGalley and the Publisher for allowing me to read this book early.

Was this review helpful?

OVERALL:
Yawn. I wanted to like this. A period piece. A supposed re-telling. Greek mythology. It checked all the boxes, but genuinely I was bored often. It didn’t take long to read and it wasn’t hard, but I did feel it was a slog.

20 SECOND “WHAT’S THIS ABOUT”:
Dora plays somewhat of a Cinderella in this story. Parents died when she was young, left in the care of her uncle, who treats her like a servant, banishing her to the attic, when his “housekeeper with benefits ” moves in. All Dora wants is to be independent, designing jewelry, but alas, she’s a woman. Enter Edward, a young man who is given a “tip” to talk to Dora because her parents were famous for their antiquities. The work together to discover a mysterious vase her uncle is keeping under lock and key.

My favorite part:
Cornelius

ARC provided by Netgalley and Harper Perennial.

Was this review helpful?