I loved this 1973 essay about Marx by Venezuelan poet Ludovico Silva. His close reading of Marx brings the 150-year-old books to life. Silva suggests we consider the way Marx wrote, not just the topics and ideas he wrote about. If you are a Marx reader, this is a must-read, and I give it my most dialectical recommendation.

A brief but fascinating analysis of Marx's writing. You do need to filter out a little bit of hyperbole because Silva was a Marxist himself in the 1970s. However, Silva's central contention regarding Marx's use of metaphor and polemic, as well as the organisation of his text, is incredibly intriguing.

A delicious translation of Silva’s quintessential work regarding Marx and his literary style. Featuring an introduction specific to this translation, this book is short in length but chock full of important approaches to Marx and his expanded works. I definitely have a better understanding and expanded perspective on Marx and his works after reading Silva’s arguments; I wish I had had these perspectives earlier in my journey of understanding Marx and his philosophies.

Originally published in 1971 by Ludovico Silva (1937-1988), a Venezuelan poet and Marxist philosopher. Comes out this month by Verso Books, an essay that outlines Marx as a literary figure.

Prerequisites: The reader needn't be familiar with the contents of Capital. But a certain awareness of dialectics, particularly Hegel's dialectics. A quick tour of the Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy might be helpful.

Things I learned: Shakespeare and Homer were Marx's favorite poets. His doctoral thesis was on the natural philosophy of Epicurus and Democritus. And he had enormous love for Latin and Greek works.

At University, he took courses on Homer, Greek and Roman mythology, the history of modern art and Roman law, and Puggé's encyclopedia of law.

This background seemed essential for him to become a social scientist who incorporated metaphors and dialectics in his works. He appreciated the economy of words for his take on economics. I might be paraphrasing but Ludovico has provided another example of how classical studies may be enjoyed once again.

The short chapters that follow show excerpts from Marx's work and the usage of metaphors as a literary tool to chart the arguments. Stylistic features of his works mentioned are the architectonic of science (Kant's art of systems), dialectics about class struggle or struggle of opposites (formulating a phrase, following up with an inverse phrase with the same words, and finally tying up with a third phrase that creates a synthesis), and his superstructure metaphor from plain building architecture.

In writing this essay, Ludovico warns contemporary Marxists to respect Marx's metaphors as metaphors alone for analogy purposes and not be falsely presented as scientific theories.

I am not well-read enough to understand the whole text. But I know enough that believing metaphors as an ideology is dangerous for any society. Ludovico makes a case that Marx didn't intend the stated in his works.

What's more to say about a book called "Marx's Literary Style" that isn't already said in the title? This is a focused look on language and style in Marx's work, and for anyone interested in Marx, Marxist thought, or the greater contemporary literary conversation in general, this is a must-read. For those not interested in Marx's economic or philosophical dimensions, this is a great way to get into one of the most influential thinkers of all time.

Thanks to NetGally and the publisher for the digital review copy in exchange for my honest opinion.