Cover Image: In Praise of Disobedience

In Praise of Disobedience

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

In Praise of Disobedience
Clare of Assisi, A Novel
by Dacia Maraini
Pub Date 13 Jan 2023
Rutgers University Press
Christian| Historical Fiction| Literary Fiction



I am reviewing a copy of In Praise of Disobedience through Rutgers University Press and Netgalley:

⭐️ ⭐️ ⭐️

I really wanted to like this book, but less than a quarter of the way in I had trouble following it. The concept was good, the execution not so much:



In a mysterious e-mail, an author is asked to tell the story of Clare of Assisi, an Italian saint from the thirteenth century.



After being annoyed by the request, the author begins researching Saint Clare and is captivated by her story. In the pages of the book we are also transported into the strange and beautiful world of medieval Italy, where we are witness to the daily rituals of life in a convent.


As the center of that life, Saint Clare stands out for her contradictions: physically disabled woman who travels widely in her imagination, someone who is unforgivingly harsh with herself yet infinitely generous with the women she supervises, someone who abnegates herself, but still knows she is valuable. A visionary who liberated herself from the chains of materialism and patriarchy. As a visionary who broke free from materialism and patriarchy, Saint Clare is an inspiration for a new generation.


The concept was good, but the narrative execution was poor, so I gave In Praise of Disobedience three stars.

Happy Reading!

Was this review helpful?

I really wanted to love this novel because it is about a saint. However, I found the plot to be a bit boring and repetitive. Still, St. Clare was a fascinating figure that deserves more attention. This, this book has a great premise but was not executed well.

Was this review helpful?

Unfortunately this was a DNF for me at about 50%. I truly wanted to like it - I loved the concept! I just didn't find myself reaching for it all and had to force myself to keep plodding through it. The parts about St Clare were interesting, but it an easier and more interesting read as a biography of St Clare without the epistolatory aspect. The interaction between Chiara and the author felt forced and unrealistic to me.

Was this review helpful?

This book is hard to rate or recommend because it doesn't quite know what it wants to be. It calls itself "a novel," but there isn't a narrative other than the emails exchanged between Chiara and the main character; and it is even a stretch to consider that frame to be a narrative. The dialogue is unrealistic and holds no pretense that it is native - the "emails" are inorganic, awkward, and obviously translated. When the main character writes about Clare, it is rambling and unorganized. I honestly wouldn't have finished the book if I didn't personally find St. Clare to be an incredibly interesting personality.

So, if it is not a novel, is it a nonfiction text? No, definitely not. These characters and their conversations are manufactured, and even the description of Clare's life and believes is tainted by the main character's personal insights. There is a list of sources in the end, but no in-text citations.

While I enjoyed some of the bits about St. Clare, it was nothing new to me. I wouldn't even recommend this text to someone who wanted to learn more about St. Clare because of the lack of primary material or citations. I can't imagine who the audience is for this book other than those who want to read Dacia Mariani's entire bibliography, or those who want to read absolutely every text written about St. Clare.

Was this review helpful?

A tremendous amount of research went into this fictional telling. I was disappointed to have the exchange of letters between the young girl and the writer go away for part of the book. It was adding something to the story.

The author uncovered so much material worthy of consideration. Why did these women go to convents? Why the emphasis on poverty? They could have done so much more! This would be a great book club read. I appreciated that it read as fiction.

Was this review helpful?

Dacia Maraini’s In Praise of Disobedience (2013) is a novel concerned with silence, dreams, and meaning-making outside of time. The novel is woven together by three women: Chiara, a young Sicilian hoping to understand herself vis-a-vis the saint from whom she took her name, the unnamed writer she appeals to for narrative assistance in this venture, and their shared subject, Saint Clare of Assisi. Through letters and diary entries, readers are immersed in the writer’s process of enlivening Saint Clare through research and bold stretches of imagination.

In the midst of one query, the writer says this: “Enough of these irreverent thoughts. No one has ever posed these problems with respect to a saint. Yet such issues were real, the stuff of daily life, and they had nothing to do with prayer and meditation.” The narrative unfolds in dialogue with scholarly and classical texts, including Clare’s own letters and poetry. The writer dreams, again and again, about Clare. In attempting to get closer to her subject, there is no suggestion that one type of attention—scholarly or psychic—is more valuable than the other. She fervently wishes for Clare to answer for herself as a woman, above all else. Why did she choose the convent? Why insist on inflicting so much pain upon one’s own body? Behind her nominal desire to experience martyrdom in Morocco, didn’t there linger a more decipherable desire for novelty? She wants Clare, with her calloused feet and sickly body, to bleed beyond the outlines of her canonical portrait. After all, “What virtue is there in being born already perfect and holy?”

There’s this recurring image: nuns’ writings locked away in rotting convent drawers—an entire classical tradition lost. The writer fantasizes about the day when women’s mystical writings will be prized alongside those unquestioned classics written by men. Indeed, Maraini succeeds in prodding us toward a reassessment of “women’s literature” through her unconventional narrative structure and energetic encounter with a wide range of sources (Aristotle, Pinocchio). I sensed deep generosity in Maraini’s recurrent deference to the witnesses to Saint Clare’s canonization, nuns who lived with her at San Damiano. Muddled by time and constrained by the task at hand (the pressing question of Clare’s happiness, for instance, would have hardly been relevant), the women were imperfect narrators and yet, all the same, storytellers engaged in worthwhile literary projects of their own.

Was this review helpful?

Very interesting book in content, flowing from a narrative point of view. The author studies the character of Santa Chiara in a contemporary key drawing information from medieval texts. The attempt to explain to the contemporary reader the concept of "freedom" in the context of the choice of deprivation and mortification in the dark times of the Middle Ages is noteworthy. Compelling

Was this review helpful?

But a very interesting book how they wrote this book how they talked about The C LAR E Oh ASS IS. This one came from a lot of money in the middle ages. The way they wrote this book was very interesting they would talk about present day when the author would talk about it and then And then switch over to her life. She was very very independent and she did not want to marry so she went into the nunnery. This was really interesting about the Catholic churches at that time. I like the history behind that and how it all tied in together. Alice woman would perform miracles to help people. She loved children and she would Hope them out. She also liked to wash people's feet Because they were not allowed to wear shoes in the numery. She also warm a hair shirt which is very painful. She seemed to be very happy because she Do not have to have the strength of being married with children. The numbering let them have some kind of freedom to be who they are. It was very interesting how they were not allowed to talk and t And the Bells would recollect their what they had to do during the day. The title Title says i At all because it was disobedience Cause they do not have to live in The male Dominance in middle ages. They could be who they wanted to be on the free Thinkers.

Was this review helpful?

IN PRAISE OF DISOBEDIENCE is a deep personal meditation on the life of St. Clare of Assisi, disguised as an epistolary novel, a correspondence between the “Author” and a mysterious young woman keeps urging the Author to write about St Clare. This fictional frame for the story allows the author, in the guise of the “Author”—to free St. Clare’s story from its hagiographical baggage, and to meditate on the life and faith of Saint Clare with fresh eyes. It’s quite an extraordinary journey. There are many liturgical and literary references throughout and these thrilled me. the Author/author interweaves apocryphal stories from the lives of the saints, meditations on myths from other traditions, contemporaneous accounts of Clare as a historical figure, and autobiographical anecdotes from her own life…and the effect is really quite extraordinary. Never ponderous, almost playful in its reassessment of women’s lives and choices, and sometimes soaring effortlessly into the metaphysical, this novel is a one of a kind read that made me grateful to be literate.

Was this review helpful?

I gave a 4* review for this novel for the amount of knowledge conveyed woven within the story. I have found fascinating to learn about Clare, her way of living and being. However we don't really know why she has become such an extreme personality.The author's main aim is to speculate about the reasons which pushed Clare to evolve the way she did. Even though I know that going to a convent was one of the only choices a woman was able and allowed to do, I am not sure that this feeling of feminism led to such extremes. For me the author focused too much on the topic of feminism. I felt that more emphasis on psychological aspects could have led to other interpretations, maybe closer to the truth?
The writing style is epistolary at the beginning and conclusion. The more developed part of the novel reads more as a biography than a novel which is definitely not wrong. However, the two characters writing to each other did not appear credible to me and I have found them irrelevant to what I wanted to read about.
I received a complimentary ARC of this novel from NetGalley and I am leaving voluntarily an honest review.

Was this review helpful?