Cover Image: On Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman

On Mary Wollstonecraft's A Vindication of the Rights of Woman

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

Note on formatting: The kindle version of this book was a formatting nightmare. I tried numerous fonts and spacing techniques to fix the problems, but nothing solved the problem.

I appreciated going back into the world of Mary Wollstonecraft. I've read most of her writing, and it had been a while since I was immersed in Wollstonecraft's work, philosophy and turbulent personal life. I was the prime candidate for Susan J. Wolfson's book. I think the problem is that this book is geared for readers who are not that familiar with Mary Wollstonecraft. It's not a book for someone who has read a great deal about Wollstonecraft's life.

That's fine because Susan J. Wolfson's book works as a beginning look at Wollstonecraft's life especially how it relates to the creation of "A Vindication of the Rights of Woman." Wolfson highlights the difficulties non-married women had in eighteenth-century Britain. Wollstonecraft wanted to break free from those legal and societal shackles so she turned to writing about education, philosophy, marriage, sex roles, motherhood, work, etc. Wolfson connects these topics to Wollstonecraft's own background and how her life and writing are inextricably linked. She repeatedly cited passages from Wollstonecraft's letters and published writing to prove this point.

As this text offer material for the first-time reader, Wolfson also provides a glossary of short biographical notes on writers, thinkers, and philosophers she mentions within the text. This is helpful for someone unfamiliar with Wollstonecraft and eighteenth-century Britain. This would be a nice gift for someone starting off on an English or Women's Studies degree or career.

Was this review helpful?

I found this to be a great edition to introduce students/other interested parties to why Wollstonecraft is important, and why we should continue to read her work. There were a few formatting this, but I'm guessing that was due to the not-yet-published nature of the book. Rounding 4.5 stars to 5.

Was this review helpful?