Thank you for the advanced copy of this book! I will be posting my review on social media, to include Instagram, Amazon, Goodreads, and Instagram!

This book was a lot of fun specially the narrator Oberon’s former jester and a hobgoblin who will tell you much he enjoys mortals suffer.
The story itself as he will tell you involves romance and curses and a heroes and villains and be assured a happy ending too.

ARC was provided by Del Ray via Netgalley for an honest review of the book.
4 1/2 stars
I really enjoyed this book. It was narrated by a hobgoblin and I thought his thoughts were very funny. It’s a historic romance with a sapphic love story. It has curses, and mystery and romance and magic and mayhem. This book had me laughing on every other page but also made my heart flutter.

This book had SO much potential and fell flat and then continued to fall down several flights of stairs. The concept of the curse and the living and widely accepted gods is such a delightful idea, I just wish the execution wasn't so bad.

Positives:
Setting/world building

The idea of the different gods and goddesses being very much Real and Tangible is so fun and wonderful. My absolute favorite parts of the book were the descriptions of how the magic system works in this universe and how the temperaments of supernatural beings changed how they dealt with mortals was genuinely a great time. I especially liked the descriptions of the curses and how the various attacks against Maelys got progressively worse.

Negatives:
Character voice

The characters in this book are each very distinct from each other, but in ways that felt cheap and silly. The main character, Maelys, felt very flat throughout the story. Her cousin, John, exists only to say "no" to silly ideas and further one (1) plot point.
Spoiler
Miss Bickle is exceedingly silly, and feels overall akin to the straight girl in highschool who eagerly joined GSA in order to get permission to say homophobic slurs. Lastly, Lady Georgiana, the main love interest, has the personality of wet cardboard. Someone who is suspected to be a wicked, murderous, lesbian witch seems like they might be a fun and interesting character to interact with, but she mostly likes to leave scenes without saying much.

Homophobia/transphobia

My God. Where do I begin. In historical romance, especially queer historical romance, I expect to read about homophobia and transphobia. It comes with the territory and is a regular point of friction both in stories and reality. The brand of homophobia in Mortal Follies is a very, very particular one. "Let my gays marry" "I support gay couples as much as normal couples" type shit. The objectification of queer characters for straight amusement is prevalent throughout. About 50% of Mae's interactions with Miss Bickle show this kind of ~scandal~ and it is exhausting. The constant pressing to make Mae confess her feelings, to show or discuss physical affection, and to "test" her attractions leaves a horrible taste in my mouth. There was also a scene towards the beginning of the book that felt completely out of left field and ended up being hideously transphobic. CW: transmisogyny in spoiler
Spoiler
Why, in a world where magic exists, where beings are able to change form at will, and where curses and blessings bear real strength; WHY would this be said? And why in the current political climate would it be necessary to include this scene other than to share your blatant disrespect for trans women? Do better.

Narration

I became tired of the cheeky fae narrator 10 pages in. I would sooner lay down in the middle of the road than continue to endure a fae creature complaining about first world problems.

The Ick

Any time a character talks about sex outside of the sex scenes I want to break my feet with a hammer. I have no desire to read 19 year olds sexual fantasies. Also, making up silly ye olde terms for shipping your friends is just as cringe as telling your real life friends that you ship them.

The rub:
Pacing

The first half of the story moved on at a decent clip and kept momentum well. The biggest issue was each time a new major conflict arose it was just "AAAH MORTAL PERIL" and the stakes weren't there by the end.

Desperate attempts to not seem problematic

There were SEVERAL moments throughout the book where it felt like the author paused and turned to face the reader to say Worry Not Dear Reader, My Wealthy British Aristocrats Are Not Bigots Or Racists. They all feel just as shoehorned as you might imagine. This adds nothing and just exists to relieve some imagined hand-wringing over whether the characters are acceptable by modern standards.

Overall, this book was fun briefly and in spurts. I wish the characters didn't make me want to rip my hair out. I also wish that it wasn't so fucking weird to gay and trans people. 2/5 stars.

Thank you NetGalley and DelRey for the ARC in exchange for an honest review. I DNF’d this because I got bored pretty quickly. I felt there was not enough action early enough to keep me invested. This would have been better if that wasn’t the case. The characters are bland, which enhances upon the lack of action. There is a bit of tension (primarily of the sexual variety) between Miss Maelys Mitchelmore and Lady Georgianna Landrake (the “Duke of Annadale”). It feels like a slow burn, sapphic romance that didn’t get enough of the burn. I really wanted to enjoy this, as a queer woman.

I read an eARC of Mortal Follies by Alexis Hall. Thank you NetGalley and Random House Publishing House-Ballantine.

This is one of those books that straddles the line between hilarious and deeply annoying to me. Even the voice that was used to tell the story was simultaneously a character I wanted to give the Loki treatment and also had the wittiest and some great little moments within the text. My first impression of them was an explanation of how they were able to write the book in a prologue, which I didn’t care about, and probably explained why they kept complaining about having to live in the human world (the most annoying part of this characters ramblings outside the story), but other times they’re observations, little quirks, or the way they irritated the humans around them for their entertainment.

For the actual story, it’s entertaining enough. The quirky setting of 1814 life where they’re still trying to worship god when there are fairies, old gods, and so many other dangerous things that people need to have skills in and knowledge in. There are many who are looked down on, like witches, though one man has created a safe place where the rich come as a safe place where everyone is supposed to be safe.

The two romance leads are a bit boring on their own. The most interesting thing about them is their curses. The first one is set up like a mystery, but it’s such a weak mystery that it’s solved halfway through the first half of the book, mostly because the person who did it might as well have a giant arrow pointing at them saying “this is who it is” and the fact she doesn’t even consider him until he points a finger at himself is ridiculous. Then it’s the other’s turn, hers is older and made her jaded, so the most interesting part isn’t figuring out how to break it, it’s the spicy scenes as they work up to finally figuring it out.

So, the book it funny, it made me laugh out loud at several points, but the plot is often weak, maddening, and uneven. Still, I had fun for the most part. But I’d probably say get it from your library and read it that way first before committing to adding it to your collection.

Our heroine Maelys enlists the help of an outcasted woman rumored to be a witch when her regency debut is interrupted by a mysterious malevolent curse in this novel filled with whimsy and escapades! Maelys and her outcast fall for each other in a refreshingly queer-normative take on a magical 1700s England. Narrated by a cantankerous and semi-omniscient fae, and written by the obviously talented Alexis Hall, Mortal Follies has a voice unlike much else in the contemporary fantasy genre.

Unfortunately, the story did struggle with some pacing and continuity issues— it felt at times as if the first and second halves were intended to be two separate books as the main struggle was resolved and a new one was created some 50 pages later. As much as I enjoyed the concept, I did struggle some getting through the final quarter of the book.

If you’re someone who loves historical fantasy with queer characters but not queer trauma, where all of the problems arising to a relationship are due to a mysterious and powerful entity and not period homophobia— this is a great book for you! Thank you to Alexis Hall for making this choice towards levity in what is already a whimsical book, which isn’t often present in the LGBT+ historical fantasy genre.

Thank you so much to Netgalley, Del Ray, and Random House Publishing for the opportunity to read and review this book!

Representation: wlw (mc), mlm, trans woman (minor character)

trigger warnings on Readerly!

As soon as I saw this gorgeous cover, I knew I had to read this book (so thank you very much to NetGalley for the ARC). The story very much delivers on the promise of the cover. We get Alexis Hall's signature wit, but this time channeled through the narrator Puck / Robin a la A Midsummer Night's Dream, who relays to us the journey of Miss Mitchelmore, a beautiful young woman who's been cursed by an unknown entity for unknown reasons. It took some time for me to get used to the narrator's frivolous details about his own misadventures, but there were some pretty hilarious details ("Apparently you pay for water in your world. The naiads must be running a scam.") that warmed me to his voice, and I came to look forward to learning more about the world through his eyes. Hall imagines for us a playfully magical setting, with fickle beings and vengeful gods, which Miss Mitchelmore must win over in order to uncurse herself. Helping her are her delightful friends, Mr. Caesar and Miss Bickle (the latter of whom is awesome and needs her own book), as well as the mysterious Duke of Annadale, who is not a duke but a lady, and a very dashing / swoonworthy one at that. It was sweet to see Miss Mitchelmore awaken to her own desires, and to go against the gods in order to free her love. It's a charming, whimsical story, a fantastic romantic-ish comedy.

Good but uneven. This book captured me in many ways - the storytelling, the unique take on the plot. But then it would invariably drag for pages upon pages before picking up again.

I didn't like the way that this book was written or the choice in narration. Maybe lthe story could have been good if it was done differently.

I really loved this fantasy story, especially the representation. I will be recommending to my friends and adding a physical copy to my library. This story felt different from a lot of fantasy, which can sometimes be redundant. I was not disappointed!

Mortal Follies was such a unique read! From the narration to the storyline it truly felt like nothing I have read before. From the romance to the adventure - I was absolutely hooked. Will definitely be checking out all other works by Alexis Hall!

This one just didn’t hit right for me! It was just one of those books that didn’t resonate with me, that I couldn’t get into or relate to - regardless of how well it was written. I love the concept of the narrator - I was beyond excited to see Puck was narrating, as he’s been a favorite character for forever - but the execution made me feel distant from the characters. Having a narrator part of the story yet somewhat still distant somehow moved the reader a few further steps away. I had no attachment to the characters, nor was I invested in their stories. I think this one just wasn’t for me, but definitely could see it resonating with someone else, perhaps someone who enjoys historical fiction a bit more, or who loves a good narrated tale.

Everything Alexis Hall writes is unique and wonderful. Mortal Follies is no exception. In this tale, Maelys is entering high society in London in the early nineteenth century. This is burdensome enough, without the addition of curses, deities, and the like. Searching out her only option, Maelys teams up with an alleged malign enchantress to beat her curse. In this uniquely charming novel Hall branches out into a magical, romantic, and whimsical story that will enchant readers from the first chapter.

Hall continues to showcase a wide range of writing skills in this novel, replicating the rhythm and atmosphere of Shakespearean works. However, I'm not sure that the repeat reader of Hall is going to know what they are walking into and may not find it to be their cup of tea. Libraries may be better off recommending this to patrons who have been into retellings of Shakespeare, rather than the fan of Hall's romantic novels.

✨ ARC REVIEW ✨

3⭐️ 0.5🌶️

I have complicated feelings about this book. There were certainly things I enjoyed. I just don’t think I enjoyed it as much as I hoped I would.

Alexis Hall is obviously a talented writer, but this story in particular felt very disjointed. Based on the synopsis, I was under the impression the two main characters would be working together to eliminate a curse plaguing Maelys Mitchelmore. And, in a way, I guess that’s true? However, the whole time it felt like Maelys and her friends were investigating amongst themselves and Lady Georgina was investigating separately. But the “whodunnit” of the original curse was made obvious very early on and handled at around the 60% mark. Then we have 20% of nearly nothing (maybe the intention at this point was to finally grow the relationship between Maelys & Georgina), then we have another curse. The second curse, however, wasn’t nearly as mysterious or intriguing as the first and felt a bit…silly. I think it’s because I didn’t feel like I was given anything to make me invested in the romance between Maelys and Georgina.

I thought the use of a third party narrator was clever at times, but detrimental at others. Having a sprite tell the story definitely added to the overall whimsy of the novel, but I think it was at the expense of developing a deeper connection with the characters themselves. I found this to be especially true any time there was an intimate moment between Maelys and Georgiana.

I did love how whimsical this novel felt. Some of the commentary from the narrator was actually very funny, and added some much needed lightness to the story. Lizzie Bickle was by far and away my favorite character. She is not bothered by anything and her insistence of finding proof of fairies was quite sweet.

Overall, Mortal Follies is an okay novel. If you think you’d enjoy a sapphic regency romance novels with a touch of whimsy, maybe give this once a go!

Thank you so much to Random House and NetGalley for the ARC!

Thank you to NetGalley for the ARC of Mortal Follies.

I thought this book definitely had potential and with the unique aspect of a fairy narrator was amusing at first. It's an interesting mix of first and third person narration, but he inserts himself and his opinions and goes down these tangents that just take away from the unique narration aspect. The romance can only be commented on so much by a narrator like this and while it is something unique in this way it is seriously limited because how can he comment on what these characters are truly feeling? He can't, he's just an observer and not in a third person narration type of way. The plot somewhat loses focus around the midway point and takes a while to come back to but in the end, it was a pretty decent book.

Thanks to Netgalley and Del Rey for this ARC in exchange for an honest review.

I have enjoyed Alexis Hall’s books in multiple genres this far. This one was interesting with an omniscient narrator and could have used some editing as the story seemed to meander onward way too long, then skip forward in time and not really explain issues.

I enjoyed the world building with a mixture of historical romance and mythology. I enjoyed the characters but felt they could have been more fully developed which is a drawback to having the omniscient narrator.

Overall I enjoyed this book, but felt it could use some further editing to condense down unnecessary parts of the story and flesh out others.

I sadly had to DNF this book at around the 40% mark. It was set in the 1800 and it was just not my reading style and trying to understand the dialog became a little complicated for me personally and the story just did not pull me in.

This was a cute book with likable characters, but something about the writing style just didn’t work for me. Maybe it was just because it was trying to emulate dialogue from the 1800s but it felt forced in some way. Overall, I still enjoyed the book!