Skip to main content

Member Reviews

Set in the 1970s, the novel revolves around the members of an exclusive hunting club in upstate New York. Long-standing members gather to discuss and disagree on the club’s finances, the admission of a new member and much more.

Was this review helpful?

This is one of those books that I keep thinking about over a year after reading. It follows some of the common tropes of a locked room mystery but the character development sets it apart. The main characters are fully developed in a way that makes you think truly anyone could be the murderer.

It is far too common in new mysteries where the culprit is someone you have barely been introduced to who happens to have a convenient backstory revealed only after everything is solved.

Was this review helpful?

Sooo….how to write a constructive review of this “mystery”. It’s hard. I almost DNF’d within the first chapter as the only time I like second perspective is reading choose your own adventure types of books but I stuck with it. I should have stopped or jumped to the epilogue.

I liked the hunting lodge and the detective and the mystery. The interspersed little history of mystery novels and mystery writers were mostly annoying but I understand Mr McDorman wrote an experimental mystery novel. I disliked the last quarter of the novel where the reader has literally become the detective and the story is presented in a play format. What I couldn’t abide and what honestly is insulting to every reader of this book was the non-existent denouement. It’s not often I get angry at a book but this did it. I suffered though 4 hours and 52 minutes of the audiobook for THAT ENDING?!? Insulting.

So glad I did not buy this book, I absolutely do NOT recommend it at all and I highly doubt I’ll read another of his books. Based on the Goodreads reviews for this book I’m not alone in my feelings. I’m leaving a 2 star review only out of respect for the author getting a book published but my initial feelings were 1 star.

**Thanks to the author and Knopf for the e-arc I received via NetGalley in exchange for my honest review. I also got the audiobook and physical book from my library. In the physical edition someone who’d checked the book out ahead of me wrote “cheated” at the bottom of the very last page. Now that I finished it I have to agree.**

Was this review helpful?

An interesting premise but unfortunately it didn’t hit for me. There were too many characters to keep track of and the pacing felt too slow to keep my interest.

Was this review helpful?

I tried this one on audio. I just couldn’t get into the characters or plot. So I had to DNF around 8%.

Thank you to the publisher and NetGalley for the e-book copy.

Was this review helpful?

I wanted a fun, yet classic style murder mystery read and this seemed like the perfect book for that. I do appreciate what the author was trying to do here with making this "whodunit" style of mystery novel a bit more modern for today's reader, but I feel like it feel just a bit short of his goal.

Overall though this was an entertaining, fast read that was enjoyable, but I am not sure if I will remember much of it later on.

Was this review helpful?

This is presented in a highly unique style that made it difficult for me to connect with, not only the characters, but the story as a whole. I usually read a book from beginning to end within a couple of days if not hours but I found myself opening and closing this one in a battle to get it read. It was a bit exhausting for me. I believe there are readers who are going to love this style, but I'm looking for a more traditional read with great twists and not one that I have to work so hard to enjoy.

Was this review helpful?

This book was easy to read. A page turner. A guy finds himself in a bar with strangers. It leads to more and more interesting twists.

Was this review helpful?

I wasn’t particularly a fan of the fourth wall breaking and the book felt sort of derivative and weak. It lacked the charm I think it was trying for and also just fell flat in most other areas. The characters lacked depth as well.

Was this review helpful?

“…for every writer is a murderer, and every reader is a sleuth.”

This is quite unique as it is not any sort of typical murder mystery. Nor is it suspenseful. It’s written more like a thesis that attempts to explain the art of writing this genre of fiction. The tropes, the various methods of murder, the possible motives, and even how a clever whodunit should be constructed. Much discussion of other authors and their canon. It’s described as metafiction. I found it disorienting.

The shifting point of view is crazy — starts out in second person with the narrator, who seems to be the author, speaking directly to the reader with explanations, literary references (primary sources), and hints guiding our reactions to the situation and the characters. Then, to third person limited, to first person singular, and to first person plural.

The plot: there is a detective, hired by someone, who is meant to report back on any suspicious or interesting observations that he makes while attending a 4th of July celebration at this wealthy enclave where the residents have known each other all their lives. Did I mention there are a ton of characters and I found them hard to keep straight. During the weekend there are deaths. Who is the killer?

And believe me, this moves along and I’m very interested in the detective’s process and the clues and red herrings. Totally invested. And then the big reveal at the end…doesn’t come. Now I’m the kind of person who feels cheated when faced with ambiguity.

So, despite all the pretentiousness and thought provoking commentary, I was frustrated and confused by the way the narrator pulls a one up at the end. I come away thinking, what in the heck did I just read. I wanted to like it but the unconventional ending just ruined it. Sure I can guess all day but I wanted the author to do the work for me. Maybe this is brilliant work, but I’m just not clever enough to get it.

I listened to the audio book while following along in the e-book ARC provided by the publisher. I liked the voice of the narrator, Robert Petkoff, and he did an excellent job. I did, however, find the redundancy of the question and answer interviews hard to listen to so had to fast forward thru that. It definitely enhanced my appreciation of the book.

Was this review helpful?

I had a very hard time with the formatting of this book. it was an interesting plot but i ended up not finishing this as i just couldn’t get past it.

Was this review helpful?

I was surprised this was nominated as I felt that the whole thing was a mess. Smarmy I think is the word I used to describe it. Just not for me but maybe others?

Was this review helpful?

I tried getting into West Heart Kill and it has a pretty interesting and unique vibe to it. It’s just one that I can’t really dig into. My brain just can’t nestle on it and get comfortable with the format and story line. Which is a shame because I was getting a little bit of Clue and that’s always a favorite.

Was this review helpful?

This started out really good and I was enjoying it a lot. But the further into the book I got the less enjoyment I was getting. I feel like there were a lot of red herrings and it was longer than it needed to be. I also was not a fan of the ending. I believe this is a debut novel, so that being said, I believe he has the potential to become a better writer down the road. I did like it enough that I would consider reading more by this author in the future.

Was this review helpful?

This is unfortunately a DNF. This book has been on my TBR for so long and I’ve tried reading it multiple times, but I just couldn’t get into it. I don’t know if it was the way it was written, but it did not hold my attention. I tried reading the eARC and I tried listening to the audiobook.

Was this review helpful?

Y’all, this is one of the strangest books I’ve ever read, both in plot and writing style. (And I mean that as a compliment!)

It is a locked room murder mystery and metafiction* combined, which turned the genre on its head. If you need a good old fashioned Agatha Christie story to tuck into, this one may not be for you but if you want a book where the narrator pulls you into (by speaking to you directly and even giving you lines to stay), absolutely pick it up.

*a story where the author, narrator, or even characters are aware of and analyze the elements of the fiction they are in. It’s the same as an actor breaking the fourth wall during a performance.

Was this review helpful?

I really don’t understand why this one has such low reviews on so many websites because I really enjoyed this one. I felt like a detective trying to crack the case at the fancy country club. Great for fans of locked room cozy mysteries. I really liked it from start to finish.

Was this review helpful?

eehhhhhh. i think the metanarrative style was kind of trying at times. i prefer a fair play mystery rather than one like this

Was this review helpful?

Whether you can appreciate West Heart Kill almost entirely depends on your opinion of the omniscent narrator with whom we are trapped in a locked-room mystery at a country hunting club, who at times sounds stuffy, know-it-all and pretentious. The kind of person who would call themself a polymath in a social media bio. I however found this book charming and refreshing for a cozy mystery.

Thursday Murder Club meets The White Lotus in this metafiction tale of the fading glory days of a hunting club and the secrets, lies and love affairs of the old money set. They get together at the club every summer, unhappy people addicted to drugs, alcohol and infidelity, to drink, swim in the lake and reminisce about the good old days. The days that were tainted by associations to Nazi Germany.

A private detective is a visitor to the estate only he frequently lies about his background and client. Until bodies start dropping, secrets unravel and suspicion mounts. Everyone is a suspect with something to hide.

I found it refreshing that the story is told in alternating points of view, literary analysis essays of the mystery canon, play scripts and interview transcripts. This really is a novel for people who love the mystery genre, as it is as much a love letter to the genre as a mystery and a puzzle to be solved.

I did find the POV changes abrupt and hard to follow. This has an unresolved ending that I found unsatisfying but inevitable with the style of the story within a story.

At times this book was too clever for its own good, but this was a fun, enjoyable, unique mystery that took liberties with the literary medium.

Thank you to Netgalley and the publisher for the advance review copy. I am leaving this review voluntarily.

Was this review helpful?

West Heart Kill was a unique book for me. I read a lot every year and "Mystery" books of any kind are my favorite. I've read a lot of plot devices and twists in the genre so I'm rarely surprised by author choices but McDorman played with historical and standard tropes to create a brilliant mystery.

West Heart Kill follows wealthy families at their holiday retreat at West Heart. There are simmering tensions between several members, families that are barely hanging onto their inherited wealth, a threat of new members (with the change of culture), affairs, friendships in flux, and a guest detective. The scene is set quite quickly with almost fatal accidents, accusations of bad behavior, and whispers of money issues. Then the weather shifts, trapping the lot together because of an impassable snowstorm.

McDorman inserts a fun aside for the reader, showcasing what other authors like Christie or Hammett do, as well as quirky POV notes. It was done well and I enjoyed the play with the greats of the genre. By playing with the narration, McDorman can bring the reader into the story in a unique way that subverts most mystery book tropes.

This book stayed with me after reading but there are a lot of moving parts leading me to feel like I might not have noticed all the clues.

Was this review helpful?