Skip to main content

Member Reviews

This book unfortunately was not for me. The trauma and gory details are huge triggers for me. Going into this book, I didn't know this.

Thank you to the publisher for the book.

Was this review helpful?

Sacrificial Animals by Kaylee Peterson, I did not like this book about a man raising his two boys Nick and Josh and he loves Josh and was abusive to Nick but he disowned Josh who marries an Asian American while away at college leaving Nick to suffered the aftermath. The book was told with to POV’s, past and present and at times I was confused as to which one I was in while reading the story. It said the book was inspired by her being adopted in China and raised on a farm and since that is not a storyline you hear every day it is why I requested the book, but sadly that isn’t at all what the story is about. #NetGalley, #KayleePeterson, #SacrificialAnimals,

Was this review helpful?

In Sacrificial Animals, author Kailee Pedersen blends horror and Chinese mythology to create one blood soaked, violent, suspenseful, and completely compelling debut novel. Set in Nebraska on a thousand acre farm owned by cruel and despotic widower, Carlyle Morrow, who rules over his domain and his two sons, Nick and Joshua, with an iron fist, showing more kindness to his dogs than to the boys, especially Nick. The story is told mainly from Nick’s perspective and is divided between then and now, ‘then’ describing Nick's teen years after his mother dies and after Joshua leaves for college and ‘now’ is thirty years later. The horror throughout most of this story is the kind to be found in real life and the monsters are almost all of the human variety.

The story begins when Nick, second and least favoured son, is thirteen and it isn’t long before things devolve into blood and violence, the kind of violence to be found in any rural area, involving a fox, but it is a foreshadowing of what is to come. A few years later, Joshua leaves for school and eventually returns with a wife, a beautiful woman, Emilia, of Chinese heritage. But Carlyle, racist that he is, meets them at the door, refuses them entrance, and disowns Joshua. They won’t return for thirty years when Carlyle calls Nick, telling him he has cancer and wants him and Joshua to return, even extending the invitation to Emilia.

It isn’t long before old rivalries and jealousies arise between the two brothers as Carlyle displays his old favouritism towards Joshua. At the same time, Nick finds himself drawn more and more to Emilia, who despite all the years, looks as young and beautiful as she had when Nick first saw her all those years ago. It is here in this final section of the story that mythical elements begin to rise in the story providing an extremely grisly ending to the tale.

It should be noted that this is not always an easy tale to read despite, or perhaps because, much of the violence described in the story can be found anywhere in real life including cruelty to animals and child abuse. More than once, I had to put the book down and almost marked it as dnf although I’m glad I didn’t. Overall, despite this, it is a well-written book that kept drawing me back despite myself, with plenty of chills and a hell of a shocking end that I have no doubt will keep even the most jaded horror fan glued to the page.

Thanks to Netgalley and St Martin’s Press for the opportunity to read this book in exchange for an honest review

Was this review helpful?

Ummmm well that shit was wild. I just idk. I mean there were a lot of things.

I feel like these kinds of horror books always make me think to not fuck with animals.

It’s also possible I couldn’t explain to somebody what this book was about if I even tried

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to the St. Martins Press Early Reader Program for the gifted copy!

Sacrificial Animals by Kailee Pedersen mixes a dark ancient Chinese Mythology reminiscent of the huli jing with trauma and slow burn drama.

Though this has a speculative horror twist I felt the focus was more settled in the human experience. Brothers who come from an abusive past are summoned back to their childhood home at their father's final request. The story is told between a Then and Now timeline through the eyes of Nick. I personally preferred the present timeline that had more of an atmospheric tension that gets under your skin.

The past experiences are drawn out in a prose rich style with an almost cloying feeling. Even though some of the events felt repetitive in the past it still built a generational story that feeds the present timeline.

The last 15% is where everything comes crashing together in a vicious and vengeful glory. It's the poetic cap to an author whose melded personal and cultural with a arterial spray of folklore.

The audio is read by Yung-I Chang. I liked the mellow reading tone but would've enjoyed a smidgen more emotion for some areas. Overall, I enjoyed jumping between both platforms and found myself reading the present and listening to the past.

Was this review helpful?

DNF @ 18%

Thank you to the author Kailee Pedersen, publishers St. Martin's Press, and NetGalley for an advance digital copy of SACRIFICIAL ANIMALS. All views are mine.

I imagine the publisher was attracted to this manuscript because it comes from such a unique perspective, as the author was born in Nanking and was adopted and raised in Nebraska. Unfortunately, I can't find my way to agree that this is either a well-written book or a story told interestingly.

Reading notes:

Three (or less) things I didn't love:

This section isn't only for criticisms. It's merely for items that I felt something for other than "love" or some interpretation thereof.

1. Some really grisly animal cruelty in this book, which is a horror trope I don't like.

2. A few style issues. Hyperbole can be a great literary tool. But sometimes, it just causes clarity issues. Like here, on page 23:<i> Without the gun he has no power in this house. His father could strike him dead where he stands.</i> It really had not been established that this was a household where murder was a danger. At least not yet. Also, if every event in a book is described as a calamity, every meal as a feast, every feeling as a flood, it gets not only repetitious for the reader, but inauthentic. The syntax is unnecessarily complex: <i>Years from now, when he is man enough to stand taller than his father, the garden will not rise to bloom again; it will lie fallow and barren as their family tree.</i> p24 Also, the lack of quotation marks doesn't appear to have stylistic meaning, but does cause clarity issues. I'm finding this a miserable read. Was that the point of this curmudgeonly style? I just can't finish it.

Was this review helpful?

I think this book needed a TW list at the beginning for violent animal murder. I had no idea that was going to happen and I literally was so turned off from reading this book after that scene in the prologue. I read a lot of horror and dark books, but that just felt unnecessary, personally. Plus, so much of this book is spoiled by the description. I think it needs rewritten so that the coupling (that isn't even until at least 60%) isn't told ahead of time.

Was this review helpful?

Impressive debut from Kailee Pedersen. Her ability to mix the mythological stories of China into America was incredible.

The racism and animal deaths were difficult to read throughout, as well as the uncaring way to which this family approached everything. Yet, it was important to see how vile people can be in order to understand their comeuppance in the end.

Simply put, don't mess with foxes. They can play the long game at revenge. You have no idea if you're encountering the Nine-tailed fox or her family. It's best to treat foxes with the respect they deserve or you will pay.

Perfect for those who loved The Fox Wife by Yangsze Choo.

Was this review helpful?

Thanks to NetGalley and St Martins Press for this copy of "Sacrificial Animals."

First, this was a very impressive, unforgettable debut novel.

Second, the story itself is brutal, cruel, tragic, and hypnotic as it leads to the inevitable ending.

But the ending - I'd really like to discuss it with you after you read it.

It starts with a very interesting writing style - almost stream of consciousness- that takes some adjustment, but I liked it.

I kept thinking (while reading) this is like mixing a Greek tragedy, Asian mythology, and a Eugene O'Neill play all together. Will there be repentance, redemption, reconciliation?

Was this review helpful?

Some family relationships can be a sort of mundane horror, sometimes you can find something more cosmic or part of a mythology.
Sacrificial Animals is a story of violence, abuse, a rascist father, a queer son, a femme fatale who's also someone who cannot be accepted by a violent and racist father.
It's a very dark and disturbing novel. I found some scenes of abuse and animal deaths a bit hard to read (even if I spent a lot of time in the country and seeing animal being butchered was quite common).
Even if it streched well over the limits of my comfort zone I appreciated the story, the characters, and the storytelling.
Recommended.
Many thanks to the publisher for this ARC, all opinions are mine

Was this review helpful?

3.5 stars rounded up to 4

I enjoyed this book but it wasn’t quite what I expected (or hoped) it would be.

This is told in dual timelines, which I liked. I got to see Nick (our main character) as a kid and learn about a situation he took part in that makes a huge impact on his and his family’s lives in the present timeline. I don’t think that everything we learned about Nick in the past timeline was totally necessary. I assume that most of it was there for us to get to know him better, and it did, but I still failed to connect with him (or any other character for that matter). I wished it all had more bearing on his life in the future.

I also think this could have benefited from being a little longer. I would have liked to spend more time in the present with everyone together in the house, with more signs pointing to the fact that something was terribly wrong. There really wasn’t anything to lead me to suspect that something was coming. It was good in the sense that it removed the element of predictability, but I would have liked to be thinking and wondering and questioning more than I was. I wanted to feel a creeping dread that never came.

I liked the writing itself and while there didn’t feel like there was much going on for a lot of the time, I was still interested and engaged with the story. I actually read the entire thing in one sitting!

In the end, I think the overall idea was cool and I did like where it ended up. I just wanted to enjoy the ride a little more than I did.

Was this review helpful?

This was not for me, but I'm sure there will be someone out there that loves it. I feel like it's more family drama then horror....the horror doesn't come till the very end with a tiny bit of fantasy. And even then I like skipped everything to get to the end to see if I could find the horror. I am also not a big fan of not having dialogue quotations. I felt that it ran all together and was hard to read. But I might be biased and find it weird since I've never seen a book like this, so if you've read others and like some family drama then this will be for you.

Was this review helpful?

“Sacrificial Animals” is a tale that sells itself as a horror novel based in Chinese mythology. And, to a certain extent, it is. But those elements enter into the novel so late in the game (about 80% through) that it’s hard for me to say that that; ‘s what this novel is.

The story focuses on the Morrow family: patriarch Carlyle, eldest son Joshua and younger son Nick. They live on an expansive property called Stag’s Crossing. Carlyle is an angry, bitter, racist man who, after losing his wife and unborn child, starts abuse his sons emotionally and physically. Joshua, the favorite son, gets less of this treatment than Nick.

Eventually, Joshua meets and falls in love with a Chinese-American woman named Emilia and is disowned by his father, leaving Nick to withstand his father’s moods alone. Nick also eventually leaves Stag’s Crossing and Carlyle behind for several decades. On his supposed death bed, Carlyle seeks to reconcile with his sons, who reluctantly return.

That’s the basic plot of the novel, at least. It’s more of a family drama about abuse than it is a horror novel. It takes the term “slow burn” to a whole new level. However, if that’s what you’re looking for, then this will be right up your alley.

Adding to the slow burn element is the format. Chapter alternate between “then” and “now”. One chapter will be a “then” chapter and tell events that happened in the past. “Now” chapters will tell what is happening in the present of the story. Sometimes, though, I found myself forgetting if I was “then” or “now”, which led to a slightly confusing reading experience.

The language of this book is beautiful. Pedersen has a talent for rich, vivid, poetic description. Language lovers will relish in every bit of it. And while I do love rich and vivid descriptions and occasional jaunts into poetic prose, I often found the language too flowery. I longed for some modern, up-to-date, concise langue and storytelling rather than something that languished in the words. It probably could have helped speed up the pace of the novel, as well.

Throughout the novel, mostly in the “then” chapters, there are references to foxes and things that Nick and Carlyle have done both to kits and full grown adults (killed them, trapped them, that sort of thing). It all seems very metaphorical for most of the novel and I found myself wondering what it was all about until I hit that final part of the novel. So be prepared that it does go somewhere.

One more structural note I want to touch on is the complete lack of quotation marks in the book. This honestly bothered me a lot. It was incredibly difficult to tell when people began speaking or stopped speaking and I was constantly rereading sentences. I’m not sure why this choice was made, but it makes for a frustrating read.

I wanted to like “Sacrificial Animals”. I’ve been seeking out horror that is written by folks other than straight white guys. I’m interested in horror that reflects cultures other than one I’m most familiar with. I also don’t shy away from family drama. There’s a lot of potential for fantastic character work and development in a story like this. Instead, I found myself deeply bored by the book. At one point, I mentioned to a friend that I was finding almost anything else to do with my time but read it.

That said, like with all things, someone else may have a very different experience. As I mentioned earlier, if you are someone who really loves to sit with beautiful prose and is okay with a very slow burn, then this may be right for you.

Was this review helpful?

This book was a slippery beast, kind of like the fox that plagues the henhouse at Stag’s Crossing, the homestead in Nebraska where this story is set. Patriarch Carlyle is a stunningly violent man who beats his sons Joshua and Nick in order to train them up to become men who will do right by the farm. The story is from Nick’s POV with a dual timeline: childhood and thirty years later, when the boys are called back to Stag’s Crossing to tend to their dying father. Meanwhile, Joshua has married Emelia, an Asian woman, and the racist Carlyle has disowned him.

From the first page, I didn’t love the writing style. The language is stilted, the sentence structure awkward and fragmented. Additionally, she doesn’t use quotation marks for dialogue. I generally don’t mind this, and sometimes it’s a great stylistic choice, but I found it jarring in concert with everything else.

But the story hooked me, and Pedersen writes with a macabre edge that I admired, crystallizing moments of violence: Carlyle’s violence to his sons and to animals, and Joshua’s violence to animals and Nick. Nick’s abhorrence of violence stands in stark contrast. He’s learned the performance of intended violence without acting on it, under his father’s watchful gaze. He guards his first sexual relationship with another boy carefully. There is much symbolism in the fox that hunts the hens.

However, I started to dislike the “Now” timeline: Emelia’s character didn’t fit well and Nick’s fascination with her didn’t seem plausible. There was a super cool plot point that emerged eventually, dragging the narrative into horror territory, but I thought it was a little too late to save the story.

There were so many amazing elements to this novel, but I admired it more than I truly enjoyed it. I felt there was an excellent book here that was wrapped up in stylistic choices that distracted from the story, with some plotting challenges that I had trouble getting past. As a debut this shows a lot of promise, and I suspect if Pedersen keeps writing she’ll produce some exciting work.

Thanks to St. Martin’s Press and NetGalley for a gifted digital copy!

Was this review helpful?

*4.5 Stars On My Instagram Account*

"My mother said it was only a cautionary tale...About falling in love with the wrong woman."

"...the season of forgiveness was long past."

The intensely unsettling atmospheric gothic story, Sacrificial Animals, by horror debut author Kailee Pedersen, is a master crafted work of literary fiction.

Influenced by the writer's life as an adoptee from China, raised on a farm in Nebraska, and based on Chinese mythology, Sacrificial Animals is told in alternating, "Now" and "Then" short chapters.

Nick, 43, receives a call from his father Carlyle, asking him to come home to the farm after 20 years away. He's dying and needs to see him and his brother Joshua. Carlyle disowned Joshua for marrying that "Asian" woman. But it seems all is forgiven. He wants Emilia to come too.

Carlyle is a racist who abused his sons. Trying to teach Nick to be a man, he performs an act of unconscionable animal cruelty involving several fox pups. Carlyle thinks nothing of sacrificing animals or humans; but it haunts Nick his whole life.

As Joshua and Carlyle reconnect, Nick and Emilia begin bonding, Nick infatuated with Emilia's beauty. In fact, she looks the same after 20 years...exactly the same. Inevitably, they make a decision that has unfathomable consequences.

Listening to voice actor Yung-I Chang anguished heartache as Nick, suffering from generational trauma, sexual identity, and overbearing guilt is an emotionally visceral experience. Reading the book made me realize that every word mattered because each word was a stepping stone to a deadly conclusion that some might say was justice, others vengeance, many more evil. Just remember, "Tricky things, foxes."

I received a free copy of this book/audiobook from the publishers via #NetGalley for a fair and honest review. All opinions are my own.

Was this review helpful?

great book about family and issues within the family. Loved the different point of views and seeing the animal

Was this review helpful?

This did not work for me at all. The flashbacks seemed unnecessary. I'm not sure how Nick's queer experiences related to the full story at all, and I only needed so many examples of Carlyle being abusive to get the hint. If there were going to be flashbacks, it would have been more relevant to show Joshua meeting Emilia, and their wedding, and Carlyle's reaction, than it was to introduce the character of Henry at all. I also felt like the affair was somewhat poorly introduced, and the actual supernatural horror elements didn't kick in until roughly 80% of the way into the novel. The interesting parts were essentially the last ten percent of the book. It would have been nice to learn a lot more about this ancient horror than a quick chapter of exposition towards the end (ironically, the most interesting chapter!). The Emilia character remained a cipher the whole time.

I am unclear on what the author is trying to convey with this book. Don't kill animals? Don't be abusive? Either way, it did not work for me.

Was this review helpful?

When I started reading Sacrificial Animals, I did not think I was going to end up liking it very much. It is the story of two brothers, Nick and Joshua Morrow, growing up with their angry father Carlyle in isolation on a one thousand acre farm called Stag’s Crossing. Nobody is allowed on the farm except the three men, and Nick and Joshua cannot wait to leave. The novel is two stories, the past and the present (which “the present” actually takes place in the 90s). The past is about Carlyle being tough and angry with his two sons while the present is about Carlyle calling the boys to return to Stag’s Crossing because he is dying. Joshua had not talked to his father in twenty plus years due to Carlyle not accepting his marriage to Emilia, a stranger, a foreigner, an “unacceptable woman from an unacceptable family.” We think Carlyle is a hard, bitter, racist person, someone who lost his wife and son in childbirth and will never forgive the world for letting this happen. 

I did not instantly love this novel because the beginning starts slow and subject is very dark, with a young Nick trying to get the approval of a father that preferred the company of Joshua, and the summoning of their return to the farm in hopes that things had finally changed. Kailee Pedersen works hard on her prose, using verbose sentences and repetition to make sure the reader understands that Carlyle is a vile human being. As the novel moves forward, the coldness of the father mixed with the loneliness of Nick on the farm and living alone as a forty-three year old makes you feel the impending doom, like something bad is going to happen between the two that will be irreversible. You just do not know what exactly. In the last sixty pages of the novel, the entire thing comes together (or falls apart depending on your perspective), and there is a strange sense that Carlyle was right all along, that he spent most of his life isolating his family from the outside world for a good reason. 

I enjoyed Sacrificial Animals, and maybe it is because I understand a father/son relationship that is rocky at best. The approval that Nick seeks from his father, and the hopes that their relationships will be mended by the end makes complete sense, as does watching nothing turn out the way that it is supposed to turn out. I also like how the construction of this story, from the opening scene to the very last sentence, feels very important. Even though the sentences and word choices can be a little on the busy side, the story itself seems taut, thoughtful, and well-executed. This could be one of my favorite novels of the year. 

I received this as an ARC from NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.

Was this review helpful?

Sacrificial Animals
by Kailee Pedersen
Pub Date: Aug 20 2024

Sacrificial Animals shifts between past and present timelines. The story is also a slow-burn horror that blends Chinese mythology with midwestern white America and cycles of abuse. Great writing style building tension and unease at times. A book I strongly recommend.

Synopsis: Sacrificial Animals was Inspired by Kailee Pedersen's own journey being adopted from Nanning, China in 1996 and growing up on a farm in Nebraska, this rich and atmospheric supernatural horror debut explores an ancient Chinese mythology. Sacrificial Animals explores the violent legacy of inherited trauma and the total collapse of a family in its wake.

Many thanks to St. Martin's Press, #NetGalley and #SacrificialAnimals for providing me with an E-ARC of this novel.

Was this review helpful?

This is a literary horror novel that touches on sensitive subjects like sexuality and racism. It also jumps back in forth from past to present and centers around our main character Nick Morrow who is the youngest son of a racist, paranoid and violent man.

Was this review helpful?