The Demon of Unreset
Erik Larson

⭐️⭐️/5

• Civil War history
• thorough writing

I have read this author's earlier work, but I could not get into this one.

🗣 Thank you to netgalley and Crown Publishing for the opportunity to read and review this book via gifted eARC! All opinions are honest and my own.

I have always loved Larsons narrative style and always come away knowing more about the topic. I enjoyed learning about this period in history
Thanks to Netgalley and the publisher for sharing the book with me

THE DEMON OF UNREST is Erik Larson's most recent release in a long line of work that explores less-known points of view of pivotal events in Western history. This one turns its attention to the days between Abraham Lincoln's first election as President of the United States and the attack on Fort Sumter that would launch the United States into Civil War. Following the narrative through the lens of several Southern citizens, he paints a less told picture of the secessionist fervor and uncertainty into which the nation waded at that time.

The book has several strengths - the chronological narrative highlights a several-months period in which Lincoln's election, formal declarations of secession, and finally the attack on Fort Sumter are typically elided in history texts. Drawing out the distinct events within this period shows that while today we may look back on the sequence of events as inevitable, it was in fact a time of great uncertainty, with leaders at every level making decisions with imperfect information. The chronology also shows vividly shows the implications of slow travel and communication during this time (one officer, hearing of secession on the West Coast, immediately resigns his post and starts riding eastward, arriving in the East only months later).

Despite these strengths, my experience of the book was colored by the Author's Foreword, which draws explicit connections to the events of January 6th and undoubtedly shaped my interpretation of the remainder of the book to come. While the connections between the two series of events is clear, it did make me question throughout whether contemporary events influenced how Larson framed historical events. Perhaps the Foreword would have better been positioned as an Afterword.

Thanks to NetGalley and Crown Publishing for the e-ARC of this book in exchange for a fair review.

For more reviews and bookish posts visit: https://www.ManOfLaBook.com

The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War by Erik Larson is an account of the few months between Abraham Lincoln’s election to the attack of Fort Sumter by the Confederacy. Mr. Larson is an award winning author and a writer who spent much time on the best sellers’ lists.

This is a non-fiction book that tells, in a story-like fashion, of the beginning of the American Civil War. The author follows Fort Sumter’s commander, Major Robert Anderson, the secessionist radical Edmund Rufin, diarist and wife of a South Carolinian planter Mary Boykin Chestnut, and, of course, Abraham Lincoln.

The Demon of Unrest by Erik Larson is based on first-hand sources such as diaries, secret communications, as well as plantation records and ledgers. The story is presented very well, almost like a novel, telling a cohesive story from start to finish. I got a kick from the fact that Lincoln kept misspelling the fort’s name as “Sumpter” which was kept in his quoted correspondences.

I enjoyed reading about the disconnect between the highest echelons of government and the populace. Lincoln and William Seward (Secretary of State) honestly thought most Southerners would be against secession. The South Carolinians, however, had different ideas, helped by then-President Buchanan.

The path to the Confederate attack on a United States fort was paved by misunderstandings, missed opportunities, slow and/or vague communications, and indecisiveness. It seemed that the only two people who seemed to understand the significance of an attack and did everything they could to prevent it were Union Major Anderson, and Confederate General Beauregard on the other side of the bay.

The South Carolinians prided themselves on gentlemanly behavior and believed themselves to be American knights known as The Chivalry. Like Don Quixote, they filled their heads with stories of knight adventures, Sir Walter Scott was a major literary influence and believed in the Code Duello, rules that govern dueling. Each section of the book is introduced with examples from the code, which shows the South Carolinian mindset when it comes to battles.

The book unfolds the events that started the war from the ground up in a pulpy fashion, somewhat reminiscent of the adventure books the Confederates love, but maybe not the way they imagined themselves. The fact that I, a history geek who read much about the American Civil War, found the story suspenseful is a credit to Eric Larson’s immense talent.

This book was so great! I learned so much and it was written in a narrative style that made it interesting to read. I will definitely be picking up more Erik Larson in the future.

Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for providing me with this book to read and review

Erik Larson, renowned for his masterful blend of meticulous research and compelling narrative, has once again delivered a captivating historical account with The Demon of Unrest. This book takes readers on an immersive journey through a tumultuous period, offering a profound exploration of the social and political upheavals that shaped the early 20th century.

Plot and Structure
The Demon of Unrest meticulously chronicles the period leading up to and during the early 20th century, a time rife with revolutionary fervor and societal change. Larson's narrative is anchored around pivotal historical events and figures, painting a vivid picture of an era marked by turmoil and transformation. The book’s structure adeptly balances detailed historical exposition with engaging storytelling, making complex events accessible and enthralling.

Research and Authenticity
One of Larson's greatest strengths is his commitment to thorough research, and this book is no exception. Drawing from an extensive array of primary sources, including letters, diaries, and contemporary news reports, Larson constructs a rich and authentic narrative. His dedication to accuracy and detail ensures that readers gain a nuanced understanding of the historical context and the forces driving the period’s unrest.

Character Development
The historical figures Larson brings to life in The Demon of Unrest are rendered with depth and humanity. From political leaders to ordinary citizens caught in the tide of change, the characters are vividly portrayed, their motivations and experiences intricately woven into the broader historical fabric. Larson’s ability to humanize these figures, presenting them with all their complexities, adds a compelling layer to the narrative.

Themes and Analysis
Central to The Demon of Unrest is the theme of societal upheaval and the human response to change. Larson delves into the fears, aspirations, and conflicts that fueled the era’s unrest, offering keen insights into the nature of revolution and reform. His analysis extends beyond mere historical recounting, drawing parallels to contemporary societal issues and the enduring struggle between progress and tradition.

Writing Style
Larson’s writing is both engaging and informative, striking a perfect balance between storytelling and historical analysis. His prose is clear and evocative, capturing the essence of the period while maintaining a narrative drive that keeps readers hooked. The book’s pacing is well-managed, ensuring that the wealth of historical detail never overwhelms the engaging storyline.

Conclusion
The Demon of Unrest is a testament to Erik Larson’s exceptional skill as a historian and storyteller. It is a deeply engaging and enlightening read that offers valuable perspectives on a pivotal period in history. Whether you are a seasoned history enthusiast or a casual reader seeking a compelling narrative, this book is a worthy addition to your collection.

In summary, The Demon of Unrest stands out as a remarkable work that not only educates but also entertains. Erik Larson’s meticulous research, combined with his ability to craft a gripping narrative, makes this book a standout addition to the genre of historical non-fiction. It is a powerful reminder of the complexities of societal change and the enduring human spirit in the face of upheaval.

I originally picked this book up to see if it would make a good gift for my father-in-law. Truthfully, I anticipate anything by Erik Larson will automatically be a great choice, even though non-fiction is not a genre I go for. Also, growing up in Canada, by knowledge of the American Civil War was quite limited to basic facts and overall summaries of what happened. This was my first opportunity at getting more details about both that time, and Abraham Lincoln – which is really the reason I was interested in taking a read myself.

That being said, I don't know if this was the right Larson book for me to try. I think I might have been better suited if I had read a Wikipedia article first so I could have a better base understanding, and truthfully I think the author's note comparing the January 6th attack to the Civil War was - and again, as a Canadian, I am perhaps coming at this from a different perspective - a bit intense considering more than 600,000 people died during the Civil War. I'm not trying to downplay the connection of people taking to physical action over opposing political views, but it seemed quite intense - though perhaps since I'm still thinking about it, that was the point?

All in all, I think I'll give the Churchill book a read before I give up on Larson's books for myself, but still think my father-in-law will want to pick this one up.

This was an impeccably researched and eye-opening look at the events that led up to the American Civil War. I am in awe of the way that the author is able to relate the events of history to the history we are living today. Very authentic and well-done. Absolutely recommend.

My thanks to the publisher and NetGalley for the opportunity to read and review this book.

As always Erik Larson has written a comprehensive and extremely well researched story of the tensions and unrest that led us into the Civil War.

Concentrating on the commander of Fort Sumter, Major Robert Anderson, a man torn between his belief in slavery but loyal to the United States and his new commander in chief, Abraham Lincoln, the details and missteps that led us into conflict that wrecked havoc upon our nation.

If we ever wonder how feelings can become inflamed and carried to the breaking point, one really needs to look around and see the havoc that is being wrought today. Even as Lincoln desperately tries to hold the union together the forces of people, the press, and language attributed to him and was never uttered, set our nation ablaze.

Sen hundred, fifty thousand men perished in this war, and its aftermath is still felt to this very day. A tragedy that might have been averted is the question. It always lingers in the minds of those left behind as well as the people of today.

Thank you to Erik Larson, Crown Publishing, and NetGalley for a copy of this book published in April.

Minute by minute Erik Larson takes us through the very start of the American Civil War, one of the most significant events in our nation’s history. Known for his attention to detail, extensive research and character analysis, he has framed the subject in an unusual format. "Rules of engagement whether personal or other wise were expected to follow “ the Code of Honor or Rules for the Government of Principals……. also known as the Code Duello. Lack of anticipated reponses on both sides ,North and South, inadequate communication and confusion created the chaos at Fort Sumter. In each section the author traces the events and responses that lead to the start of this great American conflict.
Slavery, economics, political, cultural, and social differences all contributed to the war. The primary goal of the South was to leave the union, while the North wanted to maintain “ the United States”. How does this compare to the January 6 invasion of US government buildings? What were their goals?
Every author and reader has a different interpretation or point of view. I think Mr. Larson has presented a unique approach to this subject leaving the reader to decide the role Fort Sumter played in the war.
A must read for every American History devotee.

A great novel of the events leading to the start of the civil war. The author makes the point the war was fought over slavery and not state rights as so many will tell you. The individuals involved were intent on starting the war because of this issue. A great and informative read.

Thank you to #NetGalley for the ARC in exchange for my honest opinion.

This is the 3rd book I've read of Larson's, and I don't think it will be the last. The level of research that must go into his writing is impressive, to say the least. I consider myself to have a pretty decent vocabulary, but this book made me thankful for the dictionary access on Kindle. I definitely have a new perspective and understanding of the weeks and months leading up to the start of the Civil War. Anyone interested in history and specifically that time period in US history should put this on their reading list ASAP.

I am not a civil war buff. Most of what I know about the civil war is what everyone knows - the major battles, the generals, Lincoln's role, and so forth. I picked up this book because I've admired Erik Larson's other books and wanted to know how he would approach this issue. I was not disappointed.

Larson's book is different than other histories for two reasons, First, the bulk of the book takes place in the years, months and days leading up to the battle of Fort Sumter. Second, he tells the story from the point of view of various people involved using primary sources like diaries, letters, telegraphs and first hand accounts. These two factors together give the reader an angle that is much more visceral, much more personal, and much more informative of the process. Given where we are in this country today, it was very interesting reading about the arguments about states' rights vs. slavery, the attempts to assassinate Lincoln, and the possibility that the electoral vote would not take place. Similar issues are swirling today. Does that mean we are close to revolution? Perhaps.

I learned so much from this book and highly recommend it. Many thanks to Crown Publishing and NetGalley for offering me the opportunity to read and review this ARC in exchange for my honest opinion.

Erik Larson is a favorite author among Moon Lake Library’s nonfiction fans. The Devil in the White City, Isaac’s Storm, and The Splendid and the Vile are just a few of Larson’s nonfiction bestsellers. His latest, The Demon of Unrest: A Saga of Hubris, Heartbreak, and Heroism at the Dawn of the Civil War, explores the lead-up to the American Civil War, as Union troops at Fort Sumter find themselves in the crosshairs of South Carolinians determined to initiate an attack that will trigger war.

The author’s extensive historical research into well known and less familiar characters always makes the past come alive for readers. Demon of Unrest is no exception. Major Robert Anderson, commander of Fort Sumter, recognized his troops’ precarious position but hoped it would not come to a war with the South. He was well known around Charleston, had grown up in Kentucky, and was married to a woman from Georgia. Although Anderson was not an abolitionist, the politics surrounding slavery frustrated him, and he was determined to fulfill his oath to the Union.

Another central figure in The Demon of Unrest is diarist Mary Boykin Chesnut whose husband was a Senator from South Carolina up until secession. Her diaries told the story of the plantation system and the war itself from the perspective of the upper class, though she herself was critical of the slave system that sustained her family’s wealth.

In contrast, “fire-eater” Edmund Ruffin of Virginia was a proponent of slavery and insistent that his home state secede. He is said to have fired the first shot of the war and would eventually commit suicide when the South was forced to surrender. He was a friend of Mary Boykin’s uncle, James Hammond, who as governor of South Carolina became involved in a sex scandal that would cause even citizens of the twenty-first century to blush. Despite the furor over his private life, he would later become a Senator himself, until he too resigned in the lead-up to secession.

Larson has a gift for striking a balance between military and biographical history so that readers who are less knowledgeable about military strategy can grasp the essentials and stay engaged. Historians have described “the fog of war,” and readers will discover many examples of how uncertainty and miscommunication played a role in the events of the attack on Fort Sumter. It was impossible not to reflect how American history might look very different if nineteenth century elected officials and military officers had had access to telephones and email! The relatively small battle of Fort Sumter would loom large in our history, and Larson’s account of the people, places, and circumstances involved in it shines a spotlight on many of its lesser known aspects.

Slow moving but interesting historical account of the events leading up to the Civil War. If you like either Erik Larson or Civil War history, you will love this. Reads almost like fiction so kept my interest throughout.

I received a complimentary copy of this book. Opinions expressed in this review are completely my own.

First, I did not finish The Demon of Unrest. Erik Larson writes this book as if the last 20 years of Civil War history has not happened. His usual (successful) approach to a historical epoch, using a focus on a few characters to illustrate the larger picture, doesn't work for me in this. There's too much focus on the white men who have always been focused on in Civil War history and a disappointing lack of attention paid to ordinary folk. I am in the minority here, I'm sure, but I have read too many books and articles on the Civil War to read another history of a few white guys on each side duking it out.

Larson is such a master at breaking a huge topic down into the small stories that helped lead to the huge thing and this book chronicling what built up and lead to the attack on Ft. Sumter, and thereby the start of the Civil War, is no exception. It is amazing the minutia that Larson finds and weaves into his stories and how he makes you care about so many different characters that you have to keep reminding yourself are real people. I will wholeheartedly recommend this book throughout the summer. A big thank you to Crown Publishing and NetGalley for the early access in return for my honest opinion. 4.5 big stars

I have read everything that Erik Larson has read, and he has another winner. While not as gripping as some of his previous historical novels (maybe because I was too familiar with this subject), I nevertheless found the book engaging and enlightening.

Larson focuses on the time period between the election of Abraham Lincoln and the firing upon Fort Sumter in Charleston SC. He takes many primary sources to weave together an enchanting tale of a country gone wrong. My hunch we could all learn quite a bit from the story and not allow the "fire-eaters" of our day continue to lead us down some destructive paths.

If I could have given it 4 1/2 stars I would have. I received an advance review copy for free, and I am leaving this review voluntarily.

I love Erik Larson's books and always look forward to his new releases, so getting this advanced copy was awesome. I really enjoyed this book. The pacing was so well done. I won't say that I felt suspense in the sense that I didn't know what was going to happen, but Larson managed a fraught narrative that adds to the overall history of the opening shots of the Civil War. I did get a little bogged down with the sheer volume of people to keep track of, but Larson kept giving enough context clues that I could keep track. I particularly enjoyed the diary entries of Mary Chestnut. They added an often lacking female point of view to the events surrounding a very male-dominated narrative. Another great entry from Larson!

What an amazing and insightful story that lead to the start of the civil war. A lot to unpack....what I can say is read this book you will not be disappointed