Cover Image: Dance of the Starlit Sea

Dance of the Starlit Sea

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

This was such a good book! I really love this author so I was so excited to get to read this book. The plot was so good I could not put it down until I finished! The characters were unique and I loved the journey and turmoil they went through. I will be recommending this book to all of my friends and family.

Was this review helpful?

This book reads like a woman obsessed with "aesthetic" to the point where it's their entire personality, without realizing that aesthetic is just that: an aesthetic. If there's nothing beneath, readers aren't going to relate or engage with the material fully. It's vapid, boring, and--above all else--shallow.

Wow.

Was this review helpful?

It feels as if no editor ever came within a hundred yards of this book. The prose is weighed down by heavy handed overblown metaphors and the dialogue feels clunky and juvenile. It seems like everyone is either squealing or scoffing every time they speak. There is also chronic repetition of certain phrases and descriptions; garden of my mind, ocean of a girl, everything smells like jasmine and looks angelic and is reminiscent of seafoam; Lila constantly makes dramatic statements about being dragged to Hell, belonging in Hell, etc. These things should really be dialed back, since they're repeated so many times it becomes frustrating.

It's apparent that the book is intended to be a female empowerment story, and yet... all the girls except Roisin are just cliche, mean, Regina George-esque bullies who pick on Roisin and Lila for no apparent reason. Then all of a sudden, they decide to be nice, also for no apparent reason. Their animosity comes and goes as the plot needs it; the bullying and the resolution felt like something you'd see in a disney channel special.

The book doesn't work on the romance level either, since there is no actual build up to anything. Lila meets Damien and he's already waxing poetic about how she's magic, she's immaculate, doesn't she see how amazing she is. They have few interactions, all of which start with Lila thinking she's falling for him, just for him to be evasive, then she gets mad and storms off. Rinse and repeat.

The ending is anti-climactic and ultimately unsatisfying, both in terms of Lila's "battle" with the Devil and the resolution with her parents. Unfortunately the book is overall very confusing and chaotic, seemingly trying to tackle too many themes and be too many things at once and not succeeding in any of them.

Was this review helpful?

i was super excited to get this early but i think the story could’ve had a lot of potential but the writing style was just not for me.

Was this review helpful?

A perfect blend of fairytale cottagecore and tension-filled romance, Dance of the Starlit Sea is equal parts unputdownable and unique. The reader is transported to lush Luna Island—an absolute paradise it seems, with picture-perfect shorelines steeped in sea foam and soft, fluffy sand—where they meet Lila, a ballerina who gets caught up in the island’s age-old tradition… that just might be dangerously paranormal. Full of forbidden romance, mystery, and angels and steeped in elegant prose and intricate world building, Kiana’s debut is a must-read.

Was this review helpful?

I know this review will make it to the author, and I know all the vitriol it will cause. But having read the whole thing and witnessing the author's behavior over many years, I am putting my name to this and standing by it. As a rule, I don't review books I don't like by debut authors. This is the exception.

So I requested this book out of insatiable curiosity. I worked with this author a few years ago on her query package and subsequently fell out with her over her lack of willingness to take any kind of critique, so I was interested to see what the final product was.

I ADORE Peachtree Teen and everything it has published, so I assumed the author must have finally learned her craft.

Not so much.

I would kill to be a fly on the wall in her editorial process, because I truly don't understand how a book can go through so much, be pushed so often, and still read like this.

I'm not going to go into specific examples, but let the work speak for itself. The author does a huge disservice to her potential readership, minimizing their love of beautiful things down to its most shallow elements with 0 depth or conversation. Girls deserve better, especially girly girls who are often discounted as vapid. Honestly, the misogyny in this execution (not its aesthetic) is very apparent and disappointing.

I beg the author to respect her readership and her editorial team and her reviewers, and check her ego which has lead to an unwillingness to accept critique at any point in her writing journey.

I know this review will be discounted as 'hate', just as other reviews have been discounted. But let the work speak for itself.

The comps pointed to a beautiful story for the pink girls who love beautiful things, but the execution is a hollow insult to those readers and those who will pay $20 for it.

Was this review helpful?

This book was okay. It was not the best written book. But I did still enjoy reading it. I definitely think that the pacing could be better.

Was this review helpful?

~No Spoilers~


To start off, if you don’t like all things pink, glitter, flower arrangements, floral perfumes, ball gowns, pageants, etc., then this book will not be for you. I feel like the descriptions of the book that were advertised are accurate, with a huge emphasis on the coquette aesthetic. 



Lila’s surroundings were described in depth and as otherworldly. It is very immersive and I took in every new sparkly detail as if I was going through a Sailor Moon transformation sequence. Luna Island sounds like such a magical place with angels frolicking in the forrest and making secret appearances in the oceanside town. Yet, we find out that there is a dark side to the island and it pulls at Lila’s inner demons.

She is sent to Luna Island at a very low point in her life. She felt like she had failed her parents, and for other reasons we find out later, felt like she was a walking hazard and a danger to people around her. Speaking from experience, the extremely high expectations and standards that children of immigrant parents put up with can be unbearable at times. Lila’s grandparents had immigrated to Luna Island from China and generational trauma had found its way to her. Her actions and feelings may seem extreme and perhaps unrelatable to some, but I felt like I understood where she was coming from. We also have to keep in mind that she is still a very young girl, *just* turning 18 in the book.

And with being young, comes young love— enter Damien. This beautiful guardian angel of hers holds some very dark secrets. Despite withholding the secrets of the island, “safe space romance” is the perfect way to describe their entirely innocent relationship.

“Trust me, no one is as angelic as you think. We’re all just doing the best we can.”

“You are not unlovable just because someone else makes their love unobtainable.”

Laina, Lila’s aunt, was trying her best to keep Lila comfortable after such a sudden change in scenery and was kind of that introductory person to feeling what open familial love is like. And Roisin… my girl!!! She was such a good side character and was another influential person in Lila’s self-discovery. I am sure we would all want a friend like her!

With the help of Damien, her aunt, and her new friend(s), Lila finds the hidden strength within herself to make things right on the island.

I am not a literary expert by any means and I simply review books based on my personal enjoyment of them. I did really enjoy this book and I am sad to see other reviews hold so much negativity. I hope Dance of the Starlit Sea finds its true audience so we can have a little tea party on a pink sanded beach together.

“You aren’t your worst moments.”



**Thank you NetGalley and the publisher for sending this book for review consideration. All opinions are my own.**

Was this review helpful?

(Thankyou netgalley for sending me A Dance of the Starlit Sea in exchange for an honest review).

I loved the premise of this story and that is what really drew me into to reading this whimsical book.

Was this review helpful?

I really liked the cover and how whimsical it felt, however I don’t think the writing is for me as the plot kind of got lost on me and I was just trudging through to the end of the book.

Was this review helpful?

I fear the author would hate me for saying this but ... Roisin should have been the main character, and this should have been comped not to The Phantom of the Opera, but Midnight Mass.

I am struggling to believe that what I just read was not a second draft still in development. It was ... almost nonsensical. Every ounce of potential was buried beneath heavy purple prose, dialogue lifted from an animated Barbie movie, and a sickening sweet coquette aesthetic that made up half the book. Nothing is short of beautiful and everything is described with five different scents and colours. Pastels, ribbons, pastries, glitter, pearls, seafoam, flowers, lace, tea, perfume -- it was exhausting.

The author tried to tie together several themes to create a feminist, girl power ending, but none of it was touched on previously and no work was to put in to make such an ending pay off. And that was my biggest issue. This book had so much potential for the themes it could lean into or subvert, the concepts that could have so easily fit into the story and grown with these characters, and it never committed. The innocence of girlhood, first loves, the pressure for girls to be perfect and beautiful, the way men aren't held to the same standards. Instead, it felt as though the author did not understand these concepts, or simply didn't know how to articulate them. That damn aesthetic was all that mattered.

Was this review helpful?

Unfortunately, this was a dnf for me. The writing wasn’t my style and the story was really confusing. I think others might enjoy this but it’s not the book for me.

Was this review helpful?

This book is meant to be read with rose-colored glasses, the tintinnabulation of the stars, and the whisper of angels. It’s written with the wonder and whimsy of a Studio Ghibli movie. It’s a melting pot of aesthetics: balletcore, seacore, cottagecore, angel vibes, coquette, the stars. Truly, genuinely enjoyed it.

Very heavy on the lore and vibes. I appreciated the themes of reclaiming yourself, healing, and of a sisterhood.

However, I need to take off the rose-colored glasses. Despite my high rating,I have to admit I was barely following the story and was just there for a vibes. The writing had me using five brain cells when I only have two left. It definitely helped with setting the tone and atmosphere, sure, and immerses you and paints a picture of a dreamy landscape. But I’m afraid the prose came off too purple-y and pretentious in the long run. The plot didn’t feel too substantial as well and I wasn’t convinced of the romance and the portrayal of girlhood. We are stuck in Lila’s head the entire time but I also can’t understand her character as a whole, nor her development.

Anyway, it was giving “give me back my girlhood, it was mine first” and “and you asked me to dance and I said ‘dancing is a dangerous game’” and, along the way, Twelve Dancing Princesses.

Thank you to Netgalley and Peachtree for

Was this review helpful?

This book had such a strong aesthetic from the first page — Spring, pastels, cozy, delicate. The prose really added to that, as well as just the overall setting. I also thought it was really interesting especially when that was offset by the darker happenings beneath the surface with the cultish-ness of Luna Island and Lila’s own dark history.

Was this review helpful?

thank you netgalley. thank you peachtree. thank you for this arc.

now that that's out of the way.

it's possible you're looking at that one star rating and clutching your pearls. i really do not like giving out anything below a 3 star unless a book really bothered me, and anything below a 2 star unless it's offensively bad. this wasn't offensively bad, in the sense that it did not offend my sensibilities in any way, but it's simply bafflingly constructed. like truly, for the life of me, reading through it, i struggle to understand how this was the final product released to the public. i only say that because i know the author worked one-on-one with an editor for quite a while to put this book through extensive rewrites because the editor liked the vision. and after all that, i'm really struggling to see the vision.

first and foremost, this is a YA paranormal book. before it is about dance, its coquette aesthetic, or any of those things, it's a very /very/ classic young adult paranormal. we have self insert allegations, a 1v1 battle with the devil, a love interest with no personality other than the fact that he's special and in love with our mc, the mc's mysterious Incident in the past, her special magic, etc etc. i have mentioned my sordid history with wattpad before, but the truth is, i religiously read 3 genres on there-- sci fi, fantasy, and paranormal. this has all the strokes, the genre conventions, of a traditional angel paranormal story. it comes from a world where fallen was written in an era when soft girl clean makeup was the current trend. and i do think paranormal books can be good, but a lot of what that time period churned out was not the best and this does not elevate the oeuvre in any way. but that is its audience.

the strongest part of the book was its aesthetic eye. on a line by line, prose basis, when entering a new room and explaining the contents to us, it did paint a very strong and specific image. it's impossible to pick up this book and not walk away with the coquette vibe. unfortunately, as soon as the language dips into anything even slightly surreal, most metaphors, or anything dreamlike, it lacks the same clarity and control of language. half of the time i simply do not know what's going on during anything surreal. which, is a huge issue if you have paranormal and otherworld elements in your book. it's also a book that regularly introduces metaphors, and so when they don't work, it's a huge distraction.

the aesthetic also failed to say anything about the world. quite literally, this is a cult in which everyone dresses all cute and coquette and soft, but it doesn't comment on how that aesthetic, how the mere concept of beauty, is a means of control, because the narrative was so enamored by the images it was spinning. a lot of the cute images are juxtaposed with real actual violence and anger and darkness, but the prose refused to mixing the two ideas, to create the grotesque and sickly out of the sweet. this is comp'd to phantom of the opera. i am a phantom girlie thru and thru, and it's truly wild to make that comparison where there is no physical ugliness in this world (the entire point of phantom let me remind you). instead, it was all awkward allusion to that idea, a distracting whiplash between the visually pastel and the emotionally dark, in a jarring way that was not intentional.

the main character, lila, also suffers from this. she's just a mess. i was trying to extend her benefit of the doubt. i remember being a really dumb and overly emotional teenager. anything i did was a mistake, everyone hated me, and i interpreted the entire world through this lens. that being said. even this girl was too much for me lol. her thoughts aren't even filtered through a veil of self loathing, allowing the audience to see past the constraints of first person into what's going on. she's super inconsistent, and mostly for plot reasons. she had to have conflict with the angel, so she'll hate him for this scene, but then it's important she feel remorseful for the narrative, so on the next page he's the best thing that's ever happened to her and she hates herself. there's no real sense of flow or emotional stakes or any commentary to be made.

many are bringing up her Incident (on par for the subgenre), but i'll tell you rn, that gets resolved and we still have like 30% left in the book. she gets something that many, many asian children will never get (their parent being vulnerable and honest about their faults) and the book doesn't end. not only that, but the character isn't allowed the space to properly self reflect and internalize what happened instantly jumps back into "i'm such a failure loser that disappointed my parents". that's because her conflict with her parents, which is presented to us as the central emotional distress to her (repeated OVER AND OVER AND OVER AGAIN verbatim like truly EVERYTHING was told to us as if she was looking into the camera and crying every other page) is not actually the conflict of the book. it has no arc and the book was not concerned with resolving it or dissecting it. what was it concerned with? girlhood, but only if was represented by those tiktoks of influencers at picnics scooping vintage heart shaped cakes into wine glasses and set to "oh how i love being a woman". the climax revolves around the metaphorical value of her own power and value, but there's very little to that when they're not connected to anything beyond vague notions of rage or joy.

oh yeah, girliepop has powers. it's kinda funny because she finds out she has magic and then just accepts it. the questions are kept to a minimum. the self discovery is done in a very cinematic montage kind of way but we don't actually get any insight truly into how she's feeling about it. or maybe we do, it just simply doesn't make sense? she instantly gets defensive and territorial over them because that's the way they slot into the plot, not because that's how a person would react to getting magical ballet powers. but whatever. that's just only a small sliver of lila's larger inconsistency issue.

the love interest, damien, is a non-entity. he doesn't really feel present in the book. he doesn't really feel like a person. i feel like there was a better way to introduce him, to have him as a part of lila's day to day life as an undercover angel or have some routine to their nightly meetups so he has the chance to become a person. i don't really have anything to say. he's just a special beautiful boy who suffers and she's a special beautiful girl who suffers and that's why they end up together. we don't learn much about the angels. they have their own lore divorced from Christianity, and since it's divorced from Christianity, there should be a little bit more explaining done. the lore kept changing and shifting and it was hard to keep track with what little information we were given in the first place.

roisin, the friend lila makes upon coming to the island, is someone who we see care about lila in a much more direct way, with far more direct conversations, and probably the most concrete relationship in the book because it's built on an actual foundation. there's not much done with that, though.

this is (admittedly) a hastily constructed review, and i mentioned a lot of stuff, but in conclusion, the book was a disjointed mess without a through line of conflict or a cohesive emotional arc. the prose lacked the clarity that would make a book with paranormal elements work. the paranormal elements themselves were executed without the razor-precise thematic intent, so they felt out of place and confusing within the story. telling is a huge crime here, with the main character constantly monologuing to herself about how much she sucks instead of showing us her remorse or her guilt through her actions. it was just a jumble. a mess. a mood board of pretty pastel images, but the red string tying it all together was too ugly, so it was left out.

Was this review helpful?

Dnf @ 10 percent. I don’t normally write reviews on books I don’t finish, but this one warrants it. The summary and cover give the book so much potential. But the inside is very mediocre and immature. I don’t know how I found out about this book but the premise really intrigued me. The writing however, did not compel me to continue reading. The story (though only 10 percent in) was so flat. The characters, setting, etc, were all lackluster. We are thrown into a story with not much background of our character or world building. The writing was both over the top purple prose and also very young YA. The obsession with beauty was evident from the beginning with constant mentioning of stiletto nails, lip gloss, highlighter, etc. The writing was too immature and the character far too annoying for me to continue.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to NetGalley for the ARC.

This is one of my most anticipated reads of the book and I, personally, had so much fun reading it. Pastel horror is something I’d like to see explored more because there’s something so interesting about cute things being disturbing. It just feels chilling and creepy.

I loved many elements about this book. I loved how it was a “girl” book, not because it had names that belonged to Barbieland or had a pink cover but because of the feelings of the FMC and her experiences. It has some of the sweetest portrayals of the girlhood I’ve read about, though I’d like to see actual development in the girls relationships.

Our main character, Lila, is having more than one battles at once. She’s trying to both fight off the Devil and solve the mystery of the island while also trying to solve a bigger mystery that is herself and coming into the terms with her own flaws and past and feelings. You could see how genuine the author felt while portraying those.

However, I felt like the “Phantom of The Opera” and “Hades and Persephone” were wrong media to market this book. I also would love to see some more chemistry between Lila and Damien since this is also meant to be a romance story. I couldn’t connect to Damien I did with Lila and I’d love some clearer lines between scenery changes. But overall, it was a book I enjoyed and lived up to what I was expecting. It was a personal book in a way that I could relate to Lila and feel her emotions as my own.

Was this review helpful?

thank you netgalley. thank you peachtree. oh boy.

i’m too online. i know i am. and this book came to my attention From The On Line, specifically a a blog post by the author about her publishing journey. it’s irregular.

TL;DR kiana krystle (KK) accidentally contacted an editor who requested her full. 20 beta readers had read her MS and had almost nothing but praise. after receiving rejections while querying- which were attributed to the MS being too literary, off-trend and not commercial, she sent it to the editor. the editor said the book needed a full rewrite but made an offer anyway, which lead to multiple offers of representation from agents. the editor acquired it and then presumably, revisions began. to reiterate, this book was sold on proposal which is, to my knowledge, uncommon for fiction.

given the novelty of this road to publication, i took an interest in what final product would emerge from the process. i’m aware that the book was rewritten from the bottom up with the guidance of an editor and agent, and gosh! compelling! what could that look like?? i’m a mess, i love to seek out uncommon cases, observe the discourse like i’m a birdwatcher, etc.

saying at the sort-of top, there’s nothing that thematically links this story with hades and persephone OR phantom of the opera. the phantom-y vibes are extremely superficial and hades persephone amounts to a pomegranate and a name-drop.

i did not think this book was good. i didn’t think it was good at all. i think the prose was overwritten in the same way that dough can be overworked, rendering it tough and unable to digest. we’re treated to hundreds of words of description that are meant to enhance the setting and atmosphere but felt to me like wasted space. the luster of the moonstone, the sweetness of the honey, it didn’t add anything to my experience reading.

man... i’m simply not a woman who’s susceptible to the fairycore flower girl coquette hyperfemme visual melange. maybe it’s my pollen allergy. and make no mistake, even though i am a spry 22, i do consider myself a woman, with complex thoughts in my head and ambitions and insecurities and a fully drawn inner world. i am appreciative of my independence and understand that other people have needs and souls and minds, that we all have responsibilities and desires. when i read, i will accept characters with even an iota of the complexity i see in other people. but there’s nothing in this book.

lila’s emotions were all over the place, oscillating wildly- sometimes from paragraph to paragraph without any time or care spent developing them. she goes from trusting and lovestruck to profoundly betrayed in mere sentences. she has a perspective on the nature of love and actions and redemption that i think i just fundamentally disagree with. her monologue is repetitive and long and is far too similar to her spoken dialogue. there is no distinguishing quality between the two, rendering it confusing in many places.

damien. how to describe damien when he is but a gossamer thin facsimile of a person, an automation to insert quarters into in exchange for words of affirmation. there is no depth inside of him. no desires beyond a strained relationship with his parents and their expectations. he falls in love instantly for seemingly no reason, ceaselessly reaffirming his devotion which seems to have sprung from nothing. what do these characters like and admire about each other beyond how the other reflects themself? you've never met anyone else with a complicated family life? it’s such a shallow, indulgent version of love and loving.

lila’s aunt laina exists solely to bolster her niece, to be endlessly patient with her emotions and to encourage her into situations of some danger. despite some implied history with her own siblings leaving their home, she never comes to terms with the twisted sort of life she’s made to live on luna island.

and there Is a Twist regarding the idyllic, pinterest-perfect luna island, one that ought to have ramifications for everyone who lives there. but it doesn’t. or at least we don’t see it.

and ah roisin. you should have been the love interest girlie pop. but then again what is there beyond her tacit desire to know what happened to her ex girlfriend from the previous pageant and her immediate and unfailing loyalty to lila? roisin suffers from not really wanting anything enough to act upon it, beyond managing lila’s ever-changing moods. we’re told everything about her, never shown.

now bear with me for this detour.

aesthetic goals to me are emblematic of a search for identity and sense of self. but instead of identity and selfhood being something internal and personal and sacred, the act of aestheticizing transforms it into an external signal for others to consume. someone builds a visual identity through the acquisition of goods, inhabitance of places, exhibition of attire etc.

as the social media age has forced authors to become the primary marketing force behind their books, they’re also forced on some level to become brands, which are inherently for consumption. and when you’ve already aestheticized your life, it becomes easier to lose any real texture of who you are for the sake of maintaining an image, an idea (or of course, to sell a product).

when looking at KK’s social media promotion of her book, there are types of images that recur. pastel fabrics, rolling tides, soft feathers and flower arrangements, delicate porcelain, strands of pearls. it’s all very sensory. imagine how soft this dress is, how these roses smell. the taste of these meringues, the feeling of gentle water on your feet. it makes me wonder about the performance and effort of it all.

would you post such looks into your life, your work, if you hadn’t already put in the work cultivating a certain look, with soft photo filters, a cohesive color palette and flawless makeup?

if those visual conventions weren’t already upon you, would you post the same way? as much? do you post to signal your aesthetic or do you maintain your aesthetic so you have material to post?

my life doesn’t often fit into acceptable and expected parameters of “what’s posted”, even in mundane ways, so i don’t feel the desire to share it- who would want to look? i just think that so much of modern, online life is tied to capitalism, commodity consumption, consumerism; it erodes my sense of self and i truthfully cannot imagine a world in which such things are able to help me construct my inner life and self.

with that slight (ha) digression, i’m going to talk a little about the portrayal of girlhood in the novel. i think KK sees girlhood as aesthetic rather than experience. girlhood as decoration rather than feeling. when we enshrine and idolize something so that’s so arbitrary yet universal, assign to it specific images and experiences, it becomes almost exclusionary and reductive. girlhood in this book is being amongst other beautiful girls in beautiful gowns, eating delicious food, exchanging little tokens and soft gifts. there’s seemingly no place for anything truly deviant.

i know that the fetishization of youth and femininity has always been around, but it still makes me pretty sad. you are worth more beyond your girlhood. you don’t have to dance for the patriarchy to feel liked. limiting yourself, even if you believe you’re making the choice to, is still limiting.

that is to say nothing about other things that are still rattling in my brain, the strange portrayal of representation politics that drops midway through, the relationship between cottagecore and white supremacy that goes unchallenged, my thoughts on the nature of love, the execution and tone of the entire final 15%. but we move!

there is a version of this book where a young woman arrives on a hyper-stylized island, so pristine and beautiful it becomes uncanny, cultish. she competes with and against a group of girls in a mystical pageant that has something to say on the nature of patriarchy, youth fetishization, beauty culture. she helps deprogram their ways of thinking, and they become close, perhaps even more intimate. at the same time she experiences the seductive nature of the island, the lifestyle, the ease of living, perhaps manifested in the form of a boy, tempting her away from her convictions, her sense of self, her new relationships. the temptation of this uncomplicated adoration and acceptance is so potent, so ingrained into what young women are expected to want. but eventually, perhaps, she and the other girls expose the truth of the island, the culture, the people, and dismantle it. from the difficult rejection of the simple, pastel, feminine grotesque comes the emergence of a more complete, complex and curious society. idk. whatever

Was this review helpful?

Okay... There's potential here, but... it still needs a lot of work, which makes sense with how the author has said that she's rewritten this book from scratch multiple times in just the past couple of years, rather than editing what she already had. So, it doesn't seem like this draft has gotten much in the way of developmental edits. I don't think it's ready for an August publication date, but with some deep edits, I do think this could be wonderful. In its current state though... if it wasn't an ARC, I would have DNF'd in the first chapter. And I wanted to DNF at multiple other points after. I started skimming because I just wanted it over with. They should have pushed the publication date back again so that they could have more time making this work.

The Good

I love the concept of ballet magic. It's very Barbie in the 12 Dancing Princesses.

The idea of a beautiful island with a cultish vibe and dark secret is great.

Some (key word: some) of the descriptions are lovely.

The Bad

Like other reviews have said, the descriptions are way too much in this book. I love a good description, but this had so much purple prose, and repetitive purple prose at that, that I started skimming and got super annoyed. The editor should have really reined this in. With how there are still a few months before publication, there is still time to cut the descriptions down to a reasonable amount. There was such focus on description that the characters, plot, and world as a whole suffered immensely.

This is YA, but it feels kiddish in certain areas, like how one character kept giggling and going like, "it's for the angels, silly!" and how the pageant girls behave. I saw the animated Barbie movies were an influence for the author, which might be why this is, but it's jarring having moments like that in a story where the main character strangled her mom. And not jarring in a good way, like this lovely angel scene where then a girl gets turned into a monster. Jarring in a "this takes me out of the story" way.

Other reviews said this too, but there's a good way to keep a secret from the reader and there's a bad way. There's nothing wrong with wanting to keep what Lila did secret for effect - but how it was done didn't make me intrigued, it pissed me off. It felt like the author was taunting me with: "I know something you don't know!" And I was like, yeah, yeah, the character did a bad thing - either spill or get on with it.

The characters also feel very one-dimensional and like a lot of them have the same personality. I feel like you could swap a lot of Laina and Roisin's dialogue, and you wouldn't know the difference, that's how similar they are. No one had any depth aside from Lila.

Also, this is such a pet peeve, but I did ballet for over a decade. It really irks me when writers drop random ballet terms into their story to try to show that they did their research. I've only seen two books incorporate ballet terminology well, and they were written by people who had extensive experience in the ballet world. I always get so excited when I see ballet in books, but then I'm always let down because I'm like, ah. You don't know what you're talking about. I also think it's very ill-advised to use ballet terms in a story that isn't centered on a ballet school or professional company. The average reader isn't going to have any idea what those words mean, which will take them out of the story.

There's weird disjointedness in the story telling, too. It doesn't flow, or it will be flowing and then there will be a scene that throws it out of sync, like Lila remembering her time in ballet while on sitting outside with Roisin. I get what the author was trying to do, but it didn't work. And her rant to Roisin about ballet... no one talks like that, bodies going into cyclones and all this. It felt so unnatural.

The romance... there wasn't any chemistry. I could buy them as friends, but I didn't ship them at any point. It's meant to be soft and sweet, it's YA after all. But instead, I was bored and didn't see any reason to root for them. The "I love you" was an eyebrow raising moment. You can still make the reader swoon with soft and sweet - Jenny Han does it all the time. But you need chemistry for there to be swooning, and there was no chemistry here.

The plot with the Devil and everything... I don't know, man. Maybe it's that I was raised Catholic, so using the Devil like that always feels offensive to me (which is actually why I stopped reading Laini Taylor's books, which this is comped to. Loved her writing, but hated what she did with angels and demons.) But yeah, this felt overwrought and sure, with fantasy, you need to suspend the disbelief, but what happens still needs to be believable. A lot of what happened in this book was just like... ok... I guess that happened....

Yeah. This book sounded magical, and with a lot more work, it could be. But as it is... I did not have a good time.

Was this review helpful?

SOOOO SOOOO SOOOOO GOOD! Loved the story line, the plot was fantastic, I gave it 4 stars but my heart is giving 5 so......

Was this review helpful?