Cover Image: Elaine

Elaine

Pub Date:   |   Archive Date:

Member Reviews

In some ways this is a companion to WS's earlier novel How the Dead Live - another story of death-in-life as it affects a woman not unlike his late Mother. Only this time, no phantasmagoria is needed - getting through the day is more than enough.

As in his memoir Self, the main character's thoughts and memories, offset in italics, fly across the page like a pinball - handy, given Elaine is a seething mass of neuroses about to go critical at virtually any point.

I don't think Self is given enough credit for writing convincingly about women, especially when seen from within. Not many male authors do, with the exception of the late Brian Moore. Self is another.

I admit that I prefer the relative discipline of this work to the other novels, which all suffer from self-indulgence and an acute failure to take the reader much of anywhere. His short stories, interestingly, seldom suffer from the same problem, where he can play out a conceit to its logical conclusion and then quit while he's still ahead.

Was this review helpful?

What an interesting book. I liked the idea of the story and it kept me engaged from the start. A few points were a bit long and drawn out but overall the writing and character development were spot on. Thanks to NetGalley for the ARC.

Was this review helpful?

The publisher’s blurb describes Will Self’s Elaine as “Perhaps the first work of auto-oedipal fiction” as it is a heavily novelised treatment of the private diaries of Self’s own mother, Elaine. (Brief research shows that Self has a brother and was raised in London, whereas the “Billy” in this novel is an only child, raised in Ithaca, New York, etc.; this is not straight auto-fiction.) I don’t normally love when a male author writes from the female POV — and particularly in a case like this where gender-based power imbalance is the main focus — but with access to his mother’s diaries and a front row seat to her life, Self has more than usual insight into his “character’s” psyche (and the case could be made that perhaps he approaches his mother’s story with an outsider’s objectivity that has allowed him to explore her life with something like clinical detachment unavailable to other women?) Ultimately: this is a compelling story of a 1950s American housewife, thwarted in her own ambitions and suffering mental illness, who isn’t quite emotionally stable enough to endure the swinging parties of her husband’s Ivy League faculty crowd without humiliation and loss. With elevated language, intimate psychological exploration, and unusual literary devices, Self is an obvious master of his craft; and with a mother whose story is at once both unique in its details and broadly typical of its time, this is a novel that feels both revelatory and necessary.

Was this review helpful?