Skip to main content

Member Reviews

A cute regency romance. Outspoken woman writer and the publisher who was an ass. This story and its twists kept my attention and the tension between the two MCs was captivating.

Was this review helpful?

I was expecting the cartoon cover to reflect the contents of the book, but there is very little in the way of humor. In the book is angst, prejudice, family control, child abuse, false assumptions and sexual discrimination. Last but not least, is a romance. A young lady who longs to get her book published, but the man who owns the publishing company refuses to publish her book, because she is a woman. They clash but it isn't long before he is humbled to admit he was wrong. Mild descriptive sex.
I voluntarily read and reviewed a copy of this book from NetGalley.

Was this review helpful?

It has been awhile since I read a good regency romance and I guess I’m still waiting…
This book starts off string but quickly the wheels (plot) fall off. I finished this book and couldn’t sun up the plot because it is all over the place. It doesn’t help that the characters’ motivations were poorly drawn out and there is too much going on for any really character development.

Bridger does not have any redeeming qualities and even when he realizes that Maggie was taken to her aunt’s house, he just writes letters… does nothing but writes letters and hopes that she can break free.

The Ann and Lane drama was weird and the Ruby and Pimm drama was frustrating. Neither of these were advertised and took away time from the actual plot/storyline. Most characters annoyed me and I finished the book feeling bad for Maggie.

2.25 stars

Thank you to Random House Publishing and NetGalley for the ARC.

Was this review helpful?

This was fun, but I didn't love the characters and felt that the pacing was, at times, at odds with the story.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you netgalley for the arc. This was okay. I wished it had been more Much Ado than it was. It's my favorite Shakespeare play and while this had elements there was so much else thrown in I'm surprised the page count is only 272 because it felt so much longer. I don't think this needed to be spicy either, it felt like those scenes were just thrown in for the sake of selling as a spicy read but the narrative didn't really call for it. It didn't hold my attention as much as it should of as I usually love historical romance retellings but I can't even really pinpoint what went wrong for me other than vibes. Maybe Roux is not the author for me, I've read one of her young adult books as well and just wasn't into that either, so it might just be a case of mismatched reader and author.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you NetGalley and Random House Publishing Group/ Dell for the E-ARC in exchange for my honest review.

This was a cute historical romance with an enemies to lovers trope. I enjoyed the bookish references, FMC is a writer, MMC a publisher.

Recommended if you enjoy:
- HIstorical Romance
- Enemies to friends to lovers
- Shakespeare retelling

Was this review helpful?

DNF

Unfortunately, this book was not for me. Writing felt stiff and repetitive. I didn't have confidence that the premise will be handled well and I wasn't finding myself interested in the story.

Was this review helpful?

This book moved very slowly. It finally picked up around the 45-50% mark; I’m not sure if I would have finished it otherwise. It was hard for me to care about the characters. I mostly kept reading to confirm what I thought had happened with the central mystery.

Was this review helpful?

This was a fun take on historical romance, although I feel the plot was a little chaotic and not at all what the summary implied. But if you enjoy regency era novels, witty banter & slow burn romances with a hint of mystery then I’d recommend reading this one.

Was this review helpful?

Many thanks to NetGalley and Dell Publishing for the E-ARC!
I love a historical romance- and I appreciated the FMC with bookish vibes and self reliant aspirations. The FMC and MMC felt well developed-ish, but I had a couple issues that kept it from being a memorable read for me.

The "villian" felt like an old moustache twirling villain, and the resolution/comeuppance for his character felt VERY fast and underdeveloped.

The going from attraction to LOVE felt very quick- just because you have books and some other things in common? I dunno. I could have used more conversations, more banter? Maybe you just caught me on a grumpy day.

Anywho, it was a nice light read. I wouldn't pick it up again but I would read another by this author.

Was this review helpful?

✨ I received this book as an ARC for my honest review✨

Rate: ⭐️⭐️

Much Ado About Margaret is a Regency romance about Margaret, an aspiring writer in a time when women weren’t supposed to be writing at all. She’s living with her family, thanks to her aunt’s kindness, but her aunt has big plans to marry her off.

The story takes off when Margaret’s manuscript is accidentally blown out of a window at her cousin’s wedding, where Bridger, a publisher is instantly captivated by it but is unaware who it belongs to. Given the fact that Bridger humiliated Margaret when she submitted her book for review, she is not a big fan of him.

There’s definite chemistry between Margaret and Bridger, but the book has some issues. The pacing is all over the place—it starts slow, then rushes through the end. Plus, there are so many side characters and plotlines that it felt like I was reading different stories at once. I got lost in all the extra drama and found myself forgetting what the main romance was supposed to be.

I liked the idea of the book, but the execution felt a bit messy. The writing is pretty in parts, but it sometimes shifts between a classic and modern tone. The romance between Margaret and Bridger felt rushed, and I liked Margaret as a character, but Bridger didn’t really stand out as a romantic lead. Honestly, I was more interested in Regina, Bridger's ex, who was way more memorable.

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to NetGalley and Random House for a copy of this book!

As someone who thoroughly devoured the Bridgerton books in a few weeks, I really enjoyed this read. I loved the FMC and found her interesting, and her connection to the MMC was intriguing enough.

I do wish the book went a little slower - it's almost too quick of a read!
Highly recommend!

Was this review helpful?

🧁Review: Much Ado About Margaret

☕Rated: 5 Stars ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐

💗 Characters: Margaret and Bridger are beyond hilarious! I will say Shakespeare would be proud! Margaret is very headstrong and very sweet! She is determined to get her work published! Bridger was a complex character with a gooey center that you had to just bite into! I kept reading until I found out LOL

📖Details: This book had a lot of emotional aspects! You have a young woman with a dream! The man that did not want to help publish her book now finds potential in it! A lot of family truths and drama come to light! I have to say I was not a fan of the aunts LOL!! But sometimes characters with the most disdain come with the most addiction to get to know about! Romantic butterflies fly between our two main characters! The romance was perfect! I absolutely loved it!


🍾Extra Details: A true delightful read! A woman who wants to follow her dreams but family members are trying to convince her to do otherwise! A man who turned down her book who now wants to help! I truly adored Margaret's rebellious ways! Rebellion is not just hard grit it can be from the heart and filled with potential to see a goal through!

Bravo! 🕯️

Was this review helpful?

This period romance by Roux has something for everyone who watched any Austen adaptation, or Bridgerton, or enjoys putting pen to paper--its aspiring author protagonist and her smoldering publisher are an entertaining couple. A ne'er-do-well brother and an initial scandal add interest, and a surprisingly strong ex-fiancee character make this a satisfying read.

Was this review helpful?

All in all an enjoyable regency romance! I enjoyed the premise of the story and I thought it was well written. I struggled to connect with the MFC though. Would still recommend

Was this review helpful?

I thought this book was really cute. I’m very picky about my historical romances and this one did a lot to subvert my expectations and the plot always had a slight twist that I wasn’t expecting. I’ve already recommended it to a couple friends that I think would really enjoy it as well.

Was this review helpful?

Adequate but I found the characters eminently unlikeable. So much so that their pairing made sense.

Was this review helpful?

Margaret Arden wants to be a writer. She's put her all into writing a novel that will get her name in print. But her father's death left her, her mother, and her sisters dependent on their aunts' generosity to survive. And the aunts are tired of Margaret not acting like a lady and making an advantageous marriage. A particularly brutal takedown from a publisher has Margaret deciding that it might just be time to give up her dream, but a family wedding puts her in the same house as the unfairly handsome publisher and on the way to a scandal. Bridger Darrow was a captain in the war with France who wants nothing more than to put that behind him. He works as a publisher now and his only hope of saving his family is to find the next, great novel. After rudely and brutally turning down Margaret, he finds himself in close quarters with her and the novel he didn't even bother to read. It's a clash of personalities and obligations that will force both to decide what they really desire.

Despite starting out looking like it was going to be a very generic story, Roux quickly takes things into a fun and empathetic territory where things are still familiar, but feel new as you experience them with the characters. Both Margaret and Bridger have strong personalities and watching them first clash and then fall in love was a treat. The way the story focuses so much on how awful women have it in society could have gotten preachy, yet it feels like something that needs to be navigated smartly and following your heart. A much better way to get the point across.

Overall, it was a super engaging read with characters that I cared about.

Delighted thanks to NetGalley and Dell for the great romance read!

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to the publisher for a complimentary copy of this book! The opinions in this review are entirely my own and unbiased.

I'm not sure how I feel about this book. I really wanted to love it. There were chapters I liked and some of the interactions and events kept me drawn in. However, there were also parts that made this a "just ok" book for me. I could have done without the sex scenes; they kinda felt out of place somehow, like they didn't feel right in the storyline. But they may just have been me. Who knows!

Was this review helpful?

The only type of historical/Regency era romance I'm interested in is the kind with a heroine who does not accept the misogynistic boundaries placed on women, and Much Ado About Margaret absolutely meets that criteria. I will say, Bridger did seem to take Maggie less seriously as a woman, and then randomly kisses her after no prior relationship development? It did make me struggle to fully buy into him. But I liked Maggie enough to sort of make up for that gap. Overall, pretty good!

Was this review helpful?