Skip to main content

Member Reviews

Franki said it best: "How are white men even real?" Aspiring Black playwright Relebogile "Eddie" Moruakgomo faces repeated rejections in London's theater scene, suspecting her non-white name is the barrier. She partners with Hugo Lawrence Smith, a well-connected white man disillusioned with his legal career. They submit her play under his name to expose the industry's racial biases. As the play gains acclaim, their plan spirals, threatening their reputations and friendship. This debut novel delves into themes of perception, redemption, and the impact of success. I liked this a lot! And for such a good book, it was shocking how I much I disliked almost all of these characters (Blue being an exception). This book was a perfect mix of Yellowface and BlacKkKlansman, so if you're a fan of either of those and their premises, I think that you'll enjoy this book. Without giving too much away, although the ending was abrupt, I feel like everyone kind of got what they deserved.

Thanks, NetGalley for this ARC in exchange for my honest review!

Was this review helpful?

I really enjoyed this book and following the plan through to see where Eddie and Hugo would end up. Although I found the middle of the book slower, it picked back up and kept my interest.!

Was this review helpful?

Thank you to the author, publisher for providing a free ebook version of this title in exchange for my review.

I wanted to like this book, but it fell flat in a few places. Maybe I just read too much so this felt - blah. Felt like the author tried to put too many buzz worthy topics in the same book - it's too much.

Not for me.

2 stars rounded up from 1.5 b/c I feel bad for a 1 star.

Was this review helpful?

Eddie and Hugo are physical opposites but they make a powerful team that gets Eddie's work published and produced and Hugo onto the stage. And then....This is told from both of their perspectives. It's very much about prejudice in the arts world and, unfortunately, it's being published in the immediate wake of By Any Other Name which is focused on misogyny in the world of the stage. Jay has created two very good characters, has a distinctive and incisive writing style, and has made me eager to read more. Thanks to Netgalley for the ARC. A good read.

Was this review helpful?

I wanted to love this book more than I did due to the background with theater and plays. Unfortunately it fell short for me with the references that seemed a little overbearing and the unsatisfactory ending. I wish it had played out a bit differently and I felt there was some stinted flow when it came to the dialogue at certain parts. I did persevere in finishing but I almost wish I had just placed it down before I got too ahead.

Was this review helpful?

I can't believe The Grand Scheme of Things is a debut!! Two coming together to work out issues , especially two strangers male for an interesting discovery of how situations play out .

Was this review helpful?

really fun and well written work with some awesome ideas and vibes on it. would very much recommend. 5 stars. tysm for the arc.

Was this review helpful?

I received a copy of this novel from the publisher via NetGalley.

I tried to read this back in the summer and paused at 11%, thinking I just wasn't in the mood for it at the time. Now I have tried again and given up only a little further along. It just isn't for me. Naledi, the main protagonist is a recent graduate and the narrative reads a bit young adult to me. I am sure her character has important things to say about institutional racism, but I didn't warm to her and got a bit fed up of the general humourlessness of the story and Naledi harping on about how brilliantly she did at university. The conversations with her mother and family in Botswana were littered with words in (I assume) an African language, but since I don't speak that language, they were meaningless to me.

Was this review helpful?

I received an ARC from the publisher in exchange for an honest review.

"The Grand Scheme of Things" by Warona Jay is a first-person, dual-POV British contemporary novel set a few years after Brexit. The story follows Eddie, a Botswana-British playwright, who has completed a dystopian play. She faces challenges due to her birth name and race. To help her play succeed, she asks Hugo, a white British man, to pose as the writer. Their secret complicates their lives even further.

The setting plays a significant role, with references to Brexit and subtle nods to a character resembling JK Rowling, creating a vivid time period for the story. Themes of white privilege, ignorance, and artistic integrity are explored through both Eddie’s and Hugo’s perspectives. Their different experiences with the powerful agent Helen highlight the impact of racism, as she treats them very differently based on race.

Eddie, who has a long-term girlfriend, and Hugo, who is often in relationships, share a complex friendship that feels more like a shared struggle than genuine camaraderie. The book avoids romantic elements, instead focusing on deeper questions through their relationships and the dynamics surrounding them.

Content warning for racism and queerphobia. I recommend this book for readers interested in post-Brexit racism and complex character-driven relationships.

Was this review helpful?

I found this novel difficult to follow - there was too many characters, sub plots and dialogue. It might be for someone else but it wasn’t for me.

Was this review helpful?

**Features:**
- Black woman who is also a lesbian and first generation British citizen as the main character
- Explores racism and sexism in the theater world
- Examines the tension between the main character and her family caused by her sexuality, her choice of career, and being raised in a different culture.
- Shows the corrupting power of success

**Synopsis:**

Relebogile Naledi Mpho Moruakgomo, or Eddie for short, knows she has a masterpiece on her hands. However, when her play is rejected by every agency and competition she sends it to, she begins to suspect that her unusual name is the reason. After submitting it under a shorter male name, she finally gets interest only to be rejected once more when the agent discovers she is a black woman. Looking to expose the theater industry for its biases and desperate to give her play an honest chance, Eddie reaches out to Hugo Lawrence Smith. In addition to having a similar passion for the theater, Hugo is everything that Eddie is not. Together, they hatch a plan to call out the theater industries by using Hugo’s name and face to make Eddie’s play a success. However, neither could anticipate just how successful Eddie’s play would end up being.

**Thoughts:**

This book does everything that the modern storyline in “By Any Other Name” failed to do and I am so happy I picked it up. The narration switches off between Eddie and Hugo and it is clear that they are recounting what has happened from a point in the future. Though not strictly in letter format, the characters tell the story as if they are saying it directly to the other. This makes the story feel intimate from the very beginning and I found it really compelling. Though there are definitely differences, Eddie’s and Hugo’s relationship is similar to the main characters in “Tomorrow, and Tomorrow, and Tomorrow” and I would definitely recommend this read if you really enjoyed that aspect of the book.

Eddie herself is a smart, determined, and talented individual that finds herself stuck between worlds both socially and professionally. Her side of the story is just as much about navigating the complexities of her life that inspired her play as it is about trying to make her play successful. Nothing about her experience felt forced or overdone except for a couple of small moments that I found odd for her character. Her story has an agenda, but it manages to avoid hitting you over the head with it. Though I naturally found Hugo’s position less compelling, I liked his character voice and enjoyed what his perspective brings to the story as a whole. I could easily see Eddie’s perspective losing some of its welcome if Hugo’s wasn’t also included to balance things out. My only complaint is that there are a couple of brief moments where the story started to drag. However, this didn’t ruin my overall experience and I would highly recommend this read!

Was this review helpful?

I made it to 27% in this book and had to put it down. I can't force myself to read anymore, especially not if the book just is not for me. I enjoyed the humor and the plot itself. My brain is quite picky with writing style, especially on an ereader, and I think the formatting and writing style made this difficult for me to get into. I was laughing and intrigued in the beginning and tried to get into it, but this book just is not for me.

I am incredibly grateful for the opportunity to provide honest feedback. Thank you for letting me read this!

Was this review helpful?

Thank you so much to NetGalley and the publisher for a eARC of this novel in exchange for a honest review!

This was so enjoyable and overall a fabulous debut! I thought the dynamic of the two leads was very well done, the dialogue was punchy and the story kept me entertained. The characters felt real, the conversations felt viscerally uncomfortable, as intended. This had elements that reminded me of Yellowface, which I adored. There is something about characters scheming society that is so captivating to me!

I felt like the ending was a bit rushed, and I didn’t love the reveal in the last chapter. But overall this was a well written exploration of systematic racism in the arts and how trying to combat this can lead to messy and sometimes unexpected consequences. Would love to read more from this author!!

Was this review helpful?

This book has some really well crafted scenes that get to saying what the author wanted to say in a smart and natural way that flows well with the characters' thoughts and conversation.
That said, it feels like the rest of the book was written as filler to get to those scenes.

Given the subject matter, a lot of the plot is very predictable from the beginning, and there were some moments when I genuinely considered DNFing as it felt like it was dragging on and what I was reading wasn't bringing any value to the story, the characters or the message. There was a lot of repeating the same thing or the character having the same thoughts many times that as a reader, took me out of the story and made me question why I was reading it.

I am glad I stuck through and got to all of the brilliant scenes (especially the one on the boat, I think that is one of the strongest parts of the whole book), but I wish there wasn't so much filler in between.

This is a debut and I will be looking at what the author writes next.




Thank you NetGalley and Atria Books | Washington Square Press for the opportunity to read this ARC.

Was this review helpful?

A powerful read that will definitely make you think.

(Reminds me of Disorientation in that regard)

A phenomenal new writer to keep an eye on!

"Art is a stressful game, Hugo. I know you know that now."

Was this review helpful?

Overall, this was an entertaining and fast-paced read. It kind of felt like if Maame and Yellowface had a baby, in terms of its explorations of racism within publishing and broader industries, but also alongside a woman of color’s reflection and self-discovery via her connection to a white man. The pacing was great and the conclusion was satisfying. That being said, my holdups with the book:
- Nahid’s behavior and decisions often didn’t make sense, particularly her treatment of Eddie. That was the weakest part of the whole book to me.
- Hugo’s voice felt inauthentic at various points (maybe it’s just because I hated him)
- I’m not clear as to why it had to be written as letters/stories told between the two MCs’ points of view. It added nothing to the story and often just made for a slightly clunkier read.

Was this review helpful?

I received an ARC from the publisher in exchange for an honest review

The Grand Scheme of Things Warona Jay is a first person dual-POV British contemporary set over the course of a few years shortly after Brexit. Botswana-British playwright Eddie has just finished her first play, a dystopia inspired by her experiences, and hits a massive wall due to her birth name and race. In order to give her play a chance, she enlists her new acquaintance, Hugo, a white British man, to pretend to be the writer of her play. But the accolades aren’t the only thing coming their way as their web gets messier and messier the longer they keep their secret.

The time period this is set in almost felt like a character along with the cast of human characters. From the references to Brexit to the allusions to JK Rowling (Rowling is not referenced by name, but an off-page character who is meant to be a stand-in for her is present) and her sphere of influence, to the post-9/11 world we live in that impacted Iranian-British Nahid, the time and place is very richly fleshed out. There is no mistaking when and where the story is meant to take place from page one even if the place names were never given.

Warona Jay tackles white privilege, ignorance, and the integrity of art from both Eddie and Hugo’s POVs, having both POVs refer to the other as ‘you’ in the narration, and their frustrations and regrets with others and each other are front and center. Eddie has shortened their name from Naledi to Eddie due not only people mispronouncing it constantly but also because of how constantly Othered it made her. When we meet the powerful agent Helen from both Eddie and Hugo’s POVs, it’s very clear that their experiences with her are extremely different and there’s very little reason for that to have happened outside of racism. Helen doesn’t even really want to shake Eddie’s hand, but she is enthusiastic when she meets Hugo and eats up the story he and Eddie cooked up regarding why the same play was submitted twice under two different names and two different titles. There’s no question that publishing and theater have an issue with whiteness like many industries do and those issues are truly highlighted here.

Eddie and Hugo are never romantic and their friendship is very complex and sometimes doesn’t even feel like a friendship but more like two people who are trapped together in a room and can’t get out. Eddie is Queer with a long-term girlfriend with no interest in Hugo whereas Hugo is always in a romantic relationship but Eddie is never really an option. I would love to see more interracial romantic relationships in literature, but, here, I’m glad that’s not the direction it went because the themes worked so well with the dynamic as is. A romance could have complicated it in some very interesting ways, but Hugo’s romance with Nahid and Eddie’s increasingly complicated relationship with her girlfriend Blue because of her lies opened the door to other questions that allowed for further exploration of the world we live in.

Content warning for racism, including use of the N word, and Queerphobia

I would recommend this to readers looking for a book exploring post-Brexit racism and fans of works that focus on a variety of complex relationships that are very character-driven

Was this review helpful?

I liked the idea of the book but I don't know if I bought that particular play would have been be better accepted if it was written by a white man. I think an organization that felt that way about a Black woman playwright also wouldn't be interested in producing a play that was written from her viewpoint about topical issues like Brexit, drawing on her personal experiences as a Black second-generation immigrant, even if they thought it was written by some rich white guy. Same plot but a less personal to her experience play would have been more believable. Something about that didn't feel quite right to me and that was the set up of the whole book. Maybe the point was that the producers were too dumb to understand what the play was about?

I did like that Naledi was flawed and kind of annoying despite her lofty goals.

The ending was flat. There was too much build up for that. I did think it raised a lot of valid points about art and racism but the book was a little clunky.

Was this review helpful?

The plot spun a little out of control for me, but a pretty solid exploration of race and privilege in theatre/society.

Was this review helpful?

I like to thank the publisher and NetGalley for allowing me to read this book.

The book appealed to me because it dealt with identity, theatre, and scamming. If you ever seen BlackKlansman then you would be a bit familiar with this tale. Girl writes a play inspired by her life, thoughts and feelings about Brexit, tries to shop it to a couple companies, they turn her down. She tries under a male name? They almost accept her until they find out she is black. But a chance meeting with a guy who thought her play had potential (who is white and wants to make it into theatre, plus his aunt is a famous writer) gives her the idea to use him to be her stand in, shop the play and see if it will not only prove her point that - A.) a black woman has a harder time than a white male and B.) the company that turned her down was racist and judgemental as hell.

I think poc would enjoy this more, and I think there is a lot to take away from this tale. We still live in a world where the white male or female has a lead up over others of a different color. There are stories to tell and many are being overlooked for their non-westernized names and color of their skin.

The only reason I marked it down a star is that I read it was supposed to be funny, I didn't find it funny. I found it rather serious, and by the third of the book's marker I wanted to shake the hell out of the guy and the choices he made regarding his success.

Was this review helpful?