This is advertised as children’s nonfiction, but I’m not sure what age child could read this entire book. I appreciate the author making the book visually appealing, but the information is quite complex and dry. I tried to read this book, but stopped at 20%.

Interesting facts. I am a huge fan of Science Comics series and this did not disappoint. I love how they explain vocabulary instead of dumbing it down. Kids that are interested in Computers will love this.

5 stars

We normally LOVE Science Comics but this one missed the mark for us. I ended up bailing the read together at 25% and finishing the rest myself. I worked as a failure analyst in semiconductor manufacturing for 7 years so have a relatively solid grasp of computers and still found this confusing... as a 30 year old. Maybe a 10+ year old with a strong interest and solid foundation would find this book engaging but my 8yo got bored and overwhelmed with the content very quickly. The victorian dinosaurs were cute though.

Thanks to NetGalley for the ARC and we look forward to reading more Science Comics in the future (because we DO love them, even if we didn't love this one).

Science Comics has become a well-known graphic novel series, producing some of the most interesting methods of making information both comprehensive and entertaining to juvenile readers. Unfortunately, this one seems to have run into the problem where the method of teaching said information is not streamlined in a way that children would find engaging. It's an ominous sign when the introduction is filled with "we'll talk about this thing later" warnings because the author couldn't condense the concept of what a computer is without caveats. For example, the narrator's admission that their computer example won't involve electricity because "I don't have to explain how electricity works, which, trust me, would take an entire book of its own" may be true, but it is already established not all computational machines need electricity in the book already. Another comment is in illustrating the binary-designed BRAWNIAC, saying, "we don't have enough room to design the whole thing" which is, again, taking more space out of the book to describe how the narrator can't explain something rather than devoting that page space to simplifying it.

Also worrisome is when many of the characters talk about how tedious or boring the process is, like the poor velociraptor Edna who is forced to simulate a computer's retrieval process using old fashioned card catalogues and an embroidery hoop. Penelope Spector's art is lovely and the concept of Victorian era dinosaurs is a charming illustration theme to follow, but the writing never takes advantage of the limitless potential for images that the artist could achieve so most illustrations are just dinosaurs doing computational math on a chalkboard. Likewise, the images introduce a lot of things before explaining it, such as gate symbols being shown in a diagram and then only later being described what they mean. The small historical pages that involve Boolean or Babbage are nice, but not long enough to really get into their major contributions without resorting to footnotes. And some of the in-character dialogue, like a child t-rex mentioning a Van de Graaff generator, are not explained at all.

The information in this book is accurate and the illustrations are very nice, but this is a rare flop for the Science Comics standards.

While I love this series, this one was a bit of a miss for me. The author has attempted to make a very complicated topic more palatable for children (I definitely appreciated our dinosaur characters!), but I don't think we've quite hit that mark. The text read as dry and confusing for me personally. As someone who has no background in computer science, I just couldn't follow.

Thanks to NetGalley and the publisher for the ARC!