Many nonfiction books are better off as articles.
Marc Berman's book may be one of those, as everyone will likely agree with his thesis: nature is good for the human soul.

It has a high "duh" factor.

This is why I was hesitant to read Berman's book.
Still, I hoped to glean some remarkable facts.

"The worse off we are, maybe the more dramatically nature can set us right."

Humans love biophilic architecture, which mimics natural elements by incorporating curves and organic qualities.

We don't know if walking in Yosemite is better than walking in your urban park.

29% of US adults have been diagnosed with depression at some point.

Naturalize your space: bring a real or fake plant to work, create an arch over a doorway, or make your alarm clock play birdsong.

Supernatural images are preferred over natural ones.

Future cities should incorporate plants abundantly.
Buildings will look like giant trees or mountains.

Bermann is not anti-city. Stockholm is an ideal city. Singapore, Seoul, and Amsterdam are also notable for their innovation.

KEY TAKEAWAY: We are who we are because of our environment. Science proves that green spaces improve minds.

If you desire a deep dive into this subject, this is a perfect book.
I skimmed several sections because I felt the book was overkill for the subject matter.

The subject of this book really caught my attention. During COVID I coped with the isolation in part by falling in love with the outdoors, and in particular grew a deep fascination with trees. Couple that with the stress that we’re all feeling at the moment and this book seemed to be right up my alley.

The author certainly dives into the topic of attention restoration through nature, which was incredibly fascinating to read. However by the midpoint of the book I have confess that I began suffering from study overload! While assertions about the positive impact of nature are central to the book’s theme, there are just too many studies cited. Because there were so many, they also felt repetitive, as many studies only revealed subtle differences in outcome.

The book would have been that much more enjoyable if some anecdotes into the benefits of nature were included, or perhaps more attention was given to more landscapes that captured the essential elements of nature’s restorative powers.

The book was certainly an enjoyable read, but I believe the author left some opportunities on the table that would have made it all the more captivating.